IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Dog Days, Captain Obvious points to new SR Fiction
Lindt
post Apr 18 2006, 04:42 AM
Post #51


Man In The Machine
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,264
Joined: 26-February 02
From: I-495 S
Member No.: 1,105



Hey, it could have been worse. He could have harvested the dead animal for its ware. THAT would have been disturbing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FanGirl
post Apr 18 2006, 05:05 AM
Post #52


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 8-April 06
From: My dorm room
Member No.: 8,438



QUOTE (Wounded Ronin)
QUOTE (FanGirl @ Apr 17 2006, 09:14 PM)

And while you're taking further advantage of an animal that has spent its whole life being exploited, why not just walk up to a little old lady and punch her in the face?  Just for kicks.  One sock to the jaw and she'll go down like a sack of potatoes, and that's when you start kicking her in the ribs.  Don't be afraid to body-slam her a couple of times, too: old people bones make a very satisfying crunching sound when they break.

BWAH HWAH HWAH HWAH HWAH!

Did you *intentionally* word that in the way designed to be the most funny-sounding way possible?

I think if you wanted to make that sound like a bad thing you could have at least made it sound Stephen King icky when describing it. But the way you describe it here it reads like a cartoon of a Mexican luchadore assaulting some Republican old lady who hates immigrants or something.

You're exactly right: I was going for what is known as "black humor," and I'm especially proud of the "old people bones" line. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emo samurai
post Apr 18 2006, 05:28 AM
Post #53


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,589
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 8,019



The ending just seemed very "OMG SR HAS TO BE STREET LEVEL DURRRR!!!"
I mean, yes, you got that across with the cancerous dog that had blood in its pee and the shelter employees who shot them in the head instead of euthanizing them. Chester surviving would have been the perfect ending to the story, with the main character having a rational reason to be able to rise above the horror that surrounds him. But he had to Rebar the dog in the eye, just because it would be shocking and sad.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Apr 18 2006, 05:50 AM
Post #54


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



oh come on

seriously people
The GM would have laid a serious smackdown on the runner had he tried to keep the dog, as that would be powergaming.

The end wasn't crap writing, it was metagaming.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Apr 18 2006, 06:00 AM
Post #55


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Kremlin wins the thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Apr 18 2006, 06:15 AM
Post #56


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



*dances the cabbage patch*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 18 2006, 06:33 AM
Post #57


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



It isn't powergaming to reach for resources the GM puts in your grasp. If it isn't something they should have, the runners should never get near it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Apr 18 2006, 07:26 AM
Post #58


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



but if ya know the GM will punnish you for taking it...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Apr 18 2006, 07:43 AM
Post #59


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Then you get a new GM, because this one is clearly broken.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Apr 18 2006, 07:46 AM
Post #60


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Nah, not broken. Nor defective.

Broken implies that it did at one time work, and no longer does.
Defective implies that it would in theory work, but this one was @*%^@ed at the factory.

No, I'd call this one faulty, as in "design flaws".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Apr 18 2006, 03:12 PM
Post #61


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



hehehehe

sadly though, far too many GMs end up using anything the PCs take or any 'loot' as an excuse for a plot device that screws the players over
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 18 2006, 03:49 PM
Post #62


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



Most games need plot devices or things don't happen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Apr 18 2006, 03:56 PM
Post #63


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



yes but what percentage of plot devices should include "Player characher X gets fragged on and loses everything"

not sure what you consider the right number

But I feel the most wrong number is 100%
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 18 2006, 05:07 PM
Post #64


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



100% is almost assuredly the wrong number (unless the player likes it). 0% is also probably the wrong number.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Apr 18 2006, 05:17 PM
Post #65


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



true
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emo samurai
post Apr 18 2006, 06:07 PM
Post #66


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,589
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 8,019



They have to have a reason for their ability to track him down, though. They can't just be "LOL OMG YOU JUST STOLE A GUN YOU'RE MARKED FOR LIFE HURRR!" RFID tags should be easy to block. Spirits need to be relatively close for search to work; remember that each kilometer adds 1 to the threshold.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Campbell
post Apr 18 2006, 06:38 PM
Post #67


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,028
Joined: 9-November 02
From: The Republic of Vermont
Member No.: 3,581



QUOTE (FanGirl)
You hit the nail on the head! ^_^

I thought it was the old woman I hit on the head.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wireknight
post Apr 18 2006, 08:05 PM
Post #68


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 527
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,118



Maybe he had another reason for killing the dog.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emo samurai
post Apr 18 2006, 08:09 PM
Post #69


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,589
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 8,019



Stick is Timothy Roberts? Well, they do share a lack of computer skills...

And holy shit. :nuyen: 2 for public toilets?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Apr 19 2006, 02:22 AM
Post #70


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



QUOTE (SL James)
QUOTE (Ancient History)
QUOTE (SL James)
But at least I'm not harping on the writing like someone I showed this to, who read this line
QUOTE
Mr. Johnson dexterously pulls a hologram out from the inner pocket of his jacket.

and was asking exactly how one "dexterously" pulls something out of one's pocket.

With their right hand. ;)

You should have specified that in the story.

QUOTE (hyzmarca)
The brutal deaths of the KE officers in the end provide this kind of cathartic release even though thye occur offscreen as it were. The KE officers are one deminsional "bad guys" and we can be happy to see them die.

HAHAHA

So much for the webfiction submission guidelines

QUOTE (Web Fiction Submission Guidelines)
DON'T ...


  • Make antagonists into brainless, soulless cannon-fodder. They are people with lives, families, needs and fears. They may also have training, experience and budgets that equip them with the latest gear. In other words, they are not always a monolithic force, but they may not always be easily manipulated or mowed down, either.


Heh, Fan-Pro-owned!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emo samurai
post Apr 19 2006, 02:29 AM
Post #71


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,589
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 8,019



QUOTE
Heh, Fan-Pro-owned!

Huh?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Apr 19 2006, 02:55 AM
Post #72


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,008
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



It flows better if you just say Fanpr0wned!

Alternately, Fanpwned could work, though I think that one should be saved for the times when the fans have a better grasp of rules interactions than the writers.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Apr 19 2006, 02:56 AM
Post #73


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Nice short story if a bit light on logic. Some clever discriptions and good contact examples.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Club
post Apr 23 2006, 07:15 AM
Post #74


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 190
Joined: 24-October 04
Member No.: 6,787



just before the KE show up, Sticks has for some reason decided to keep the dog. In his mind, it is HIS dog now. After Chester tears apart two people, it's not his dog, it's his monster.

All right, it's a bit of a stretch, but it does seem to hold together
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Piecemeal
post Apr 23 2006, 11:04 PM
Post #75


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 18-April 06
From: midwest
Member No.: 8,478



is a cyberpets brain completely rewired? (yeah never been something i've really read up on...)

i would just like to be satisfied knowing why Hutchison's death -in full view of Chester the Maul-ester- didnt garner our story's hero the new monicker of "Kindling"?...

as for the abrupt end..
"woof. hi, i'm your new best fr" *SPLORT*

rrawww rhat rucks.

killing Chester in cold blood... meh, its obviously not out of the scope of the character, having just previously slain Hutchison w/o significant provocation. having stated early on the need for a monatary influx, making his way back to Soon's suggests -to me- he's about to bodylaunder the uberpooch by one means or another.

i dunno.. as readers we are less left hanging and more subjected to a .50cal "Fin" to the head.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th February 2025 - 05:10 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.