Online Campaign Rules, To make it flow... |
Online Campaign Rules, To make it flow... |
Apr 18 2006, 12:19 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 21-March 05 From: Freeport NY Member No.: 7,205 |
I'm going to be starting an online campaign with some friends of mine, and I was looking for some opinions to think on.
Time-frame: 2-3 hour weekly sessions, plus individual character development time as necessary. Rules adjustments: - 100 build points (to curtail munchkins) - Only one six allowed in each category: Attribute, Skill, Spell-Force. (this obviously does not apply to derived/base skills, such as Magic or Essence) - Canon initiative. (I'm considering capping initiative passes at 2, and converting the third into an "interrupt" or some-such. Or perhaps a combat-skill bonus.) - Unlimited successes (keep throwing 6's and keep racking up successes.) - Three starting contacts: 2 randoms, 1 shared between the group to get it started. - Additional item; special V.R. electrodes/Matrix apparatus. Not as good as Decking but useful to allow non-Deckers a chance. Thoughts on these rules? Think it'll work? |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 12:26 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
At only 100 build points there won't be much need for the other caps, as nobody will be able to afford sixes or really high initiative without seriously hampering the character in a lot of other aspects. But as long as the opposition is equally low key and the players don't mind starting so weak it could work.
Of course, just lowering points doesn't really curtail munchkinism, it just means that the munchkin character is weaker. He can still be more powerful than the rest of the group if their minmax skills aren't up to the challenge. |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 12:32 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
The good parts:
The shared contact. Nothing inherently good about this, it's just a valid way of making sure everyone's in on the same basic stuff. The… um, canon initiative? If you don't make the change, that is. Other than that, can you give us some kind of idea what these changes are intended to address? All we've got is "to curtail munchkins", and this is pretty much the worst way to go about it. What is this special matrix apparatus? How do successes accumulate? So on and so forth. ~J |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 12:40 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,640 Joined: 6-June 04 Member No.: 6,383 |
I don't know the SR4 rules but I don't understand what trying to curtail munchkins has to do with making the campaign "flow" better.
I GMed online for years using SR3 and in my experience online campaigns are slow because everyone has to do t3h typing. I'd suggest having one session a week for 5 or 6 hours to give everyone time to accomplish crap instead of two shorter sessions. |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 12:43 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Wait, what? Is this SR4? I thought SR4 already had the cap for 6s.
Yeah, it has to be SR3, he mentions spells having Force. ~J |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 12:49 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
I missed that. Ignore the 100BP comment from me, as I don't know what that'll buy you so I have no idea if it's too high or too low.
|
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 12:51 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Too low. Not the crazy-insane-low total it would be in SR4, but certainly way too low to worry about anyone bothering to play a mage (full mages costing 30 of those 100 points, aspected or adepts costing 25) and thus being eligible to take Spells that might have Force 6.
~J |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 01:00 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Midnight Toker Group: Members Posts: 7,686 Joined: 4-July 04 From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop Member No.: 6,456 |
Also, with a 100 BP limit in SR4 very few character will have any stats higher than 2 and fewer still will have any skill higher than 1.
Limiting BP just ensures more specialized characters. To reduce munchkinism becks is the way to go. It is the least exploitable of all build systems. |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 01:01 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,070 Joined: 7-February 04 From: NYC Member No.: 6,058 |
Having only 100BP (as opposed to the standard 123-125) will only encourage munchkins to do their worst, because now the only way to have a strong character will be to exploit the rules as much as possible... You can have a munchkin in a campaign of any power level.
On top of that, it's going to hit various archtypes unequally - riggers and deckers will have the easiest time of all, street sams will get screwed, but will at least be able to substitute for lousy stats with chrome, and physads (and most non-aspected magicians, probably) will completely get the shaft. Have you considered simply not playing with munchkins? |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 01:03 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
The only way to curtail munchkinism is through strict policing of characters prior to the start fo the game to make sure they're alright. Every system that allows a decent amount of choices can be cheesed.
|
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 01:05 AM
Post
#11
|
|||
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Hah. Not a chance. Have you seen the kind of crazy skill-monkies BeCKS can churn out? "Jack of all trades, nearly a master at all of them!" ~J |
||
|
|||
Apr 18 2006, 01:22 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 6-June 05 Member No.: 7,431 |
as to this Additional item are you thinking of trodes as described on page 17 of matrix? or just tortoise mode such as page 42. Incase you don't have that book trodes reduce reaction and initiative but work otherwise like a datajack while tortoise mode is decking without simsense and is severely restricted in speed, sensor, and detection factor.
|
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 01:29 AM
Post
#13
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 164 Joined: 7-July 03 Member No.: 4,891 |
Eeh, I still don't buy this. A bunch of fours is no more unbalancing than, say, the bunch of sixes that one essence worth of Skillwires + CED can buy you. |
||||
|
|||||
Apr 18 2006, 01:34 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
I don't disagree with you, I just don't consider that a defense of BeCKS.
~J |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 01:54 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 21-March 05 From: Freeport NY Member No.: 7,205 |
Okay, few things that were I guess unclear:
Its gonna be one, 2-3 hour long session a week, plus extras. SR3 The reason for the low skill cap is because those 25 extra points tend to get thrown into skills, and in the end everyone winds up with high firearms, stealth, and ettiqute. I want more specialization, as well as a bit of a growth curve on the munchkins. Since I'll likely be playing with both n00bs and skilled players, there's no way to stop some munchkining, but if its not extreme it allows the n00bs a chance to get skill of their own, rather than just depending on one or two dudes. |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 02:03 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
A lot of the time those 25 extra points actually get thrown into being Awakened, or an Otaku, or a race other than Human or Dwarf.
That said, while there's some degree to which you can help make a system ungameable, ultimately a rules-based approach to munchkinism is doomed to failure. For all but the most extreme Predator Omega-style munchkins, the rules are their element. Fighting them where they are strongest is at best a waste of energy. ~J |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 02:04 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
Well said.
|
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 03:29 AM
Post
#18
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 164 Joined: 7-July 03 Member No.: 4,891 |
Wait, wait, back up the truck. You're fighting munchkins by encouraging specialization? That's...novel. Usually, the problem with munchkins is getting them to diversify. Speaking as an inveterate munchkin, there's not a lot you can do to restrain them within the rules if they're not willing to restrain themselves. Imposing a resource constraint only increases the challenge and hence the pleasure of the payoff.
The rest of what you've written looks good. Work the out-of-game time angles as hard as you can; one of the things I regret about SotSW (our on-line game) is that we do lots of things in chat that we could do on the forum between sessions, because we're not in the habit of checking the forum regularly. Kagetenshi: Ok, so perhaps the CED is Some Good. But, isn't there a fairly long list of skills that every shadowrunner ought to have at least a few points in? Athletics, Etiquette, Negotiation, the things that everyone ought to have to survive alone but which are big fat wastes of valuable points in a team setting? If you wind up with a team where no one sucks at Etiquette or Stealth, and everyone has at least a rudimentary combat skill, isn't that a good thing? |
||
|
|||
Apr 18 2006, 03:33 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
Depending on the tone of the campaign, I might even refuse to run with someone that didn't have good stealth abilities.
|
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 04:00 AM
Post
#20
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,590 Joined: 11-September 04 Member No.: 6,650 |
streetsam with theSkillwires CED combo is the way to munch out thehundred points
30 polints for the million 52 points for stats (6 int 5 qui 3 str 4 everything else) 05 points for dwarf making stats 5 5 5 4 6 5 06 points for main combat skill 06 points for secondary combat skill 01 points for goodlooking and knows it buy the Skillwires/CED combo and a subdermal pocket, with a datajack in it get a skillsoft jukebox, place in pocket, and have it connect to the datajack haqve pocket sealed, they need to surgically open you up to find it spend half or so of the million on other ware to make you a combat god leaving a couple hundred thousand for skillsofts, and similar for contacts and lifestyle and gear you will have 6 dice in most skills your lowest stat is your charisma of 4 as quickness got boosted by muscle toner. suggested ware (all alpha for the cyber) dermal sheath 1 kevlar bone lace smartlink range finder cyber ears with bal aug and dampner the skillwire combo flare comp electronic magnification 3 low light vision essence loss 3.2 bioware muscle aug 4 cerebral boost 2 enhanced articulation synaptic accel 1 superthyrhoid gland synthacardium 2 muscle aug 1 bio index 5.5 final stats body 6 (9) quickness 10 strength 7 charisma 4 intelligence 8 willpower 5 Reaction 11 initiative 11 +2D6 magic 0 essence 2.8 bio index 5.5 skills Unarmed 6(7) Pistols 6(7) (skilled chips for just about everything else) 3 with dedicated pools of 3 = 6 except athletics which gets + 3 dice for 9 and -2 TN in most situations there see 100 points doesn't stop munchkins few active skills he did not cheat on butmany knowledge skills (40 pointsworth) so he spent most of his time reading andwatchingtrid, then got the skillwires coz his dad had some cashcash EDIT: Oh james. 7 dice of stealth enough? |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 04:03 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,430 Joined: 10-January 05 From: Fort Worth, Texas Member No.: 6,957 |
Anyone who takes the million should be shot. :)
|
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 04:12 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,590 Joined: 11-September 04 Member No.: 6,650 |
wellthere goes my rigger/decker concept where being rigger as well as decker I don't take up half the game time
|
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 04:30 AM
Post
#23
|
|||||||
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,640 Joined: 6-June 04 Member No.: 6,383 |
So, wait. Let me get this straight. You want people to not simultaneously have firearms, stealth, and ettiquette? That makes no sense. You really want some people to *not* have stealth?
You want people to take Electronics *instead* of firearms through point starvation?
I mean, really, dude. You want shadowrunners, that is to say professional mercenaries, to not be good at stealth, firearms, and ettiquette? WTF? |
||||||
|
|||||||
Apr 18 2006, 04:41 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 21-March 05 From: Freeport NY Member No.: 7,205 |
LOL I don't think any of my players that know the game that well would want to take the million nuyen plunge, for simple reason that they would find themselves either not enjoying the game as much due to their elite skill, or not enjoying the game as much due to the fact that money, in my sick and twisted mind, brings fame - and within two runs their character would be ambushed and smoked ;)
But yeah, resource-restriction is the only way I've thought up to restrict super-generalization. - Edit to respond to Robin - Maybe I do! Or maybe I don't want the team Decker to be able to shoot with the accuracy of a street sam? Or for the Adept to be able to computer hack because he had left-over points... Remembering that a stealth of 3 is average, is it much to ask for a runner to only have 4, rather than 6? |
|
|
Apr 18 2006, 04:47 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Man In The Machine Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,264 Joined: 26-February 02 From: I-495 S Member No.: 1,105 |
Id post my own reason Ill never let players use BECKS, but hes currently involved in a game over in WttS... mundane human = GODLIKE skills.
But I agree, the lower build cap almost forces you player to be MORE streamlined with his build. There are just some core skills each archtype needs to exist, and another set a shadowrunner needs to live. And stealth, athletics, ediquitte, and a gun skill are the biggies. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 04:10 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.