IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Autorevolver
Snow_Fox
post Apr 20 2006, 02:54 AM
Post #26


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,577
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gwynedd Valley PA
Member No.: 1,221



AE- the S&W is wonderfully accurate, especially loaded with 38 specials. I don't want to mess with that for a little lighter trigger.

For personal defense, yes I have a permitt, I usually carry a .380 Baretta Cheetah or .25 Baretta bobcat (I'm small It's the only thing I can wear with a business suit) With each of those I can mannually cock it but after the first round, the action cocks it without me having to do it again or a DA pressure. The first shot takes a little more pull, after that it's fine
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
De Badd Ass
post Apr 20 2006, 03:07 AM
Post #27


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 619
Joined: 18-April 03
From: The UV Nexus
Member No.: 4,474



QUOTE (Raygun)
That said, given the choice, I'd rather not put my hand in front of the cartridge. It's the statistically insignificant occasional mishap I'd be thinking about while doing it.


What you call "the statistically insignificant occasional mishap" is what Shadowrun rules call a "glitch". Those never happen on a reloading test. :eek:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lindt
post Apr 20 2006, 04:09 AM
Post #28


Man In The Machine
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,264
Joined: 26-February 02
From: I-495 S
Member No.: 1,105



QUOTE (Raygun)
Hmm. A full-auto caseless revolver. Well past "silly" and approaching "regoddamndiculous" at speeds heretofore unknown to man. :)

Wow, now you have to deal with both recoil AND torque effects. Pulls up and hard to the left.

Snow, you are one of the reasons I would never be able to mug someone. Cause you never know when that person is skilled in a small arsonal of weapons, and can break your arm in 3 places, all while wearing heels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Apr 20 2006, 04:19 AM
Post #29


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



QUOTE (De Badd Ass)
What you call "the statistically insignificant occasional mishap" is what Shadowrun rules call a "glitch". Those never happen on a reloading test. :eek:

This is why you must Know Your GM. Only a particular kind of sadistic bastard would have you blow your own hand off, as opposed to dropping the ammo or some other minor difficulty. :)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Apr 20 2006, 02:51 PM
Post #30


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



QUOTE (Raygun)
I don't see why not.

Hmm. A full-auto caseless revolver. Well past "silly" and approaching "regoddamndiculous" at speeds heretofore unknown to man. :)

Hm. Well, not caseless, but now that I think about it, isn't this basically how the Pancor Jackhammer works? Recoil-operated revolving cylinder?


-karma
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daddy's Litt...
post Apr 20 2006, 04:25 PM
Post #31


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 976
Joined: 16-September 04
From: Near my daughters, Lansdale PA
Member No.: 6,668



QUOTE (Lindt)
QUOTE (Raygun @ Apr 19 2006, 09:33 PM)
Hmm. A full-auto caseless revolver. Well past "silly" and approaching "regoddamndiculous" at speeds heretofore unknown to man. :)

Wow, now you have to deal with both recoil AND torque effects. Pulls up and hard to the left.

Snow, you are one of the reasons I would never be able to mug someone. Cause you never know when that person is skilled in a small arsonal of weapons, and can break your arm in 3 places, all while wearing heels.

She is also a great cook. But I do not think she does anything with knives.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 20 2006, 06:57 PM
Post #32


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



Even cut the food she's cooking? I guess she just shoots it into bits? :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Apr 20 2006, 07:01 PM
Post #33


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



guns are helpful household tools. i use mine in place of a remote for the TV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Apr 20 2006, 07:01 PM
Post #34


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Tragically, it only has an "off" button.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Apr 20 2006, 07:28 PM
Post #35


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i don't find that tragic in the least.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Apr 20 2006, 07:36 PM
Post #36


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



I'm sure your brain appreciates that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Apr 20 2006, 07:45 PM
Post #37


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



QUOTE (KarmaInferno @ Apr 20 2006, 02:51 PM)
Hm. Well, not caseless, but now that I think about it, isn't this basically how the Pancor Jackhammer works? Recoil-operated revolving cylinder?

Well, insofar as both would operate full auto and fire from a rotating cylinder, they're basically similar, but that's about it. The method of operation is drastically different.

The Jackhammer is actually gas-operated, with the barrel itself acting as a forward-travelling piston which pulls an operating rod with it when fired. The operating rod cocks the striker as well as indexes and locks the magazine in place.

In the Mateba, the upper half of the revolver (barrel, cylinder) simply recoils rearward when a shot is fired, pushing the hammer, which is part of the lower assembly, rearward and so cocking it again. When the upper half returns forward, the cylinder is rotated, indexing the next chamber.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Apr 20 2006, 08:42 PM
Post #38


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



There was once a Western called The Rifleman which featured a lever-action Winchester rifle which was modified to fire as soon as it was cocked, eliminating the need to operate the trigger.

This may explain the SA pump action shotguns. At the very least, it provides a justification for modifying SS weapons into SA and looks downright cool on screen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Daddy's Litt...
post Apr 20 2006, 08:48 PM
Post #39


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 976
Joined: 16-September 04
From: Near my daughters, Lansdale PA
Member No.: 6,668



QUOTE (James McMurray)
Even cut the food she's cooking? I guess she just shoots it into bits? :)

I meant she never refers to knives as weapons. Though if po'ed in her kitchen, she has been known to through produce at the offender until they retreat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Birdy
post Apr 21 2006, 10:38 AM
Post #40


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 637
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,528



Pitchforks! The most useful household tool is a Pitchfork!

+ You can use it to clean up the stable
+ You can use it to clean up the bachlor appartment
+ It make a good "Religious fanatic repellant"

Definitly a must have
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Snow_Fox
post Apr 22 2006, 03:07 AM
Post #41


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,577
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gwynedd Valley PA
Member No.: 1,221



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
There was once a Western called The Rifleman which featured a lever-action Winchester rifle which was modified to fire as soon as it was cock, then eliminating the need to operate the trigger.

This may explain the SA pump action shotguns. At the very least, it provides a justification for modifying SS weapons into SA and looks downright cool on screen.

That was with chuck Conners and it was a neat actuion. he would just work the pump and it went off. but he realy fired from the shoulder so I'd say accuracy was way the hell off.

For bolt actions don't underestimate real speed. In 1914 British infantry were required at a mimimum to fire 15 bulls eyes in 1 minute. Firing a .303 SMLE-a bolt action rifle with a 10 round mag. Most were able to fire in exess of that and some were nearly 30 shots. it was called the "mad minute," speed and accuracy, not ust volume. At mons in august 1914 German forces that went head on at these men were stopped cold, survivors reporting they faced massed machine guns, so fast and deadly was the fire form the British lines they couldn't believe it was aimed rifle fire.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Apr 22 2006, 05:57 AM
Post #42


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



QUOTE (hyzmarca @ Apr 20 2006, 08:42 PM)
There was once a Western called The Rifleman which featured a lever-action Winchester rifle which was modified to fire as soon as it was cock, then eliminating the need to operate the trigger.

Well, sort of. The trigger still had to be operated. The rifle on The Rifleman was a Winchester 1892, modified with that distinctive large loop lever. The lever itself had a screw extending through the bottom of the trigger guard so that when the lever was brought fully up and the bolt locked into battery, the screw would hit the trigger, firing the rifle. The screw could be removed, allowing the rifle to operate normally. I understand what you mean, though. As long as the screw was there, all the shooter had to do was swing the lever down and back up again to get a bang.

I've thought about buying another lever for my Winchester 94 to see if I could make that work (heh, sweet), but I have so far been unsuccessful in convincing myself to follow through with that. Besides, 30-30 Win is a different beast from 30-20 WCF. Probably would not be much fun to shoot that way. I have an 1892 as well, but I'm not about to mess with it as it's worth a few bucks (thanks to The Rifleman and Cowboy Action shooting).

QUOTE
This may explain the SA pump action shotguns. At the very least, it provides a justification for modifying SS weapons into SA and looks downright cool on screen.

Obviously, you couldn't accomplish the same thing with a pump action unless you went about it much differently. While modern pump action shotguns are designed specifically to prevent this kind of thing from happening (for safety reasons), some older designs, specifically the Winchester 97, will fire every time the action is racked, so long as you hold down the trigger and have the ammo.

Oddly enough, the Winchester 97 is still made in China by Norinco. In fact, they make a right awesome copy of the WWI-era "trench broom". Slap a 1917 Enfield bayonet on there and the boche will run in sheer terror (thought you might like that one, Snow_Fox). ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Snow_Fox
post Apr 23 2006, 02:53 PM
Post #43


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,577
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gwynedd Valley PA
Member No.: 1,221



lol, and the boche, who introduced poison gas ot the battle field, made formal complaints to geneva about that weapon.

This thread has made me think. Why would you want an auto-fire revolver? The idea of a revolver is more reliable but slower. autofire would take care of the 'reliable' issue but all that will do it empty the gun faster. Ultimately this was historically proven to be an unacceptable situation. That's why semi-auto's are the norm now.

So we're back to where this started. A revolver gives a level of style or if you are not too technical reliability but for most gun folks, semi-auto's would be the weay to go.

Personally, although I love my S&W, it is the only fire arm that has ever caused me grief. (though that was not the gun itself but crappy Winchster rounds that the brass warped in the chamber making extraxtion a bitch.)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Voran
post Apr 23 2006, 03:34 PM
Post #44


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,401
Joined: 23-February 04
From: Honolulu, HI
Member No.: 6,099



Basically I was thinking autorevolver because, to me, it looked cool. Something about the alignment of the barrel to the bottom of the cylinder was kinda cool. I start thinking 'vash the stampede'. Although I don't believe his gun was actually an autorevolver. (Fusion cannon!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Apr 23 2006, 03:51 PM
Post #45


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



QUOTE (Snow_Fox)
This thread has made me think. Why would you want an auto-fire revolver?

Because it's unusual, thus cool. And that's pretty much as far as it goes. Fashion over function.

QUOTE
The idea of a revolver is more reliable but slower.

Which, as we've seen with the ever-popular Miculek video, is not necessarily the case. Double action revolvers can be operated on par with semi-autos as far as speed is concerned, and are certainly fast enough as far as practical applications go. In fact, there's very little difference between how DA revolvers and DAO autos operate in terms of speed, and there's only a slight advantage with DA/SA autos. Once again, it depends largely on the skill of the shooter.

QUOTE
autofire would take care of the 'reliable' issue but all that will do it empty the gun faster.

Especially since the revolver is likely to carry less than half the amount of ammunition that a comparably-sized auto will.

QUOTE
So we're back to where this started. A revolver gives a level of style or if you are not too technical reliability but for most gun folks, semi-auto's would be the weay to go.

Yep.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HMHVV Hunter
post Apr 23 2006, 07:29 PM
Post #46


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,353
Joined: 5-June 02
Member No.: 2,840



Aren't revolvers also less likely to jam? Wouldn't that be a selling point for them?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Apr 24 2006, 06:31 AM
Post #47


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



Yes, it is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Voran
post Apr 24 2006, 08:08 AM
Post #48


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,401
Joined: 23-February 04
From: Honolulu, HI
Member No.: 6,099



On a psychological kinda side of things, would you be more afraid (in the SR world I mean, since I'd be scared outta my ass if I had even a fricking hold out pistol pointed at me) of the gunbunny who's doing the john woo doublefisted SA pistol action or the guy who gets the same job done, carting around a 6 shooter? A six shooter he could probably beat you to death with if unloaded.

Maybe its just me, but through my experience in SR, my chars tend to go "why is that guy only carrying one gun?" and spend a little more time worrying about what his stats looks like, than another gunbunny clone :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
De Badd Ass
post Apr 24 2006, 08:14 AM
Post #49


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 619
Joined: 18-April 03
From: The UV Nexus
Member No.: 4,474



QUOTE (HMHVV Hunter)
Aren't revolvers also less likely to jam? Wouldn't that be a selling point for them?

Exactly! So why negate that selling point by designing an auto-revolver. So you can have some bling that jams?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Voran
post Apr 24 2006, 08:15 AM
Post #50


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,401
Joined: 23-February 04
From: Honolulu, HI
Member No.: 6,099



Do autorevolvers have a jamming problem too?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 03:07 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.