IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> SR4 on a battlemap, looking for some examples
masterpenguin
post Apr 24 2006, 03:13 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 24-April 06
From: Albany NY
Member No.: 8,499



If this is a reposted question, then please just link me, however I did search for it, and couldn't find anyone who posted about this.

I'm looking for examples of how to run battles on a battlemap (either hex or square), as the book doesn't seem to touch on it at all. Any suggestions or pointers?

I'd hate to come up with my own system because I'll feel like I'm reinventing the wheel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_dunner
post Apr 24 2006, 03:30 PM
Post #2


Shooting Target
****

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 1,784
Joined: 28-July 04
From: Cleveland, OH
Member No.: 6,522



Not to be snide, and perhaps I'm being naive, but ... Movement rates are SR4 p.138. Ranges are p. 139. Cover modifiers are p.140. What are you looking for beyond that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dcpirahna
post Apr 24 2006, 03:30 PM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 17-April 06
From: Germantown, MD
Member No.: 8,476




We use squares and just kind of assume that every square equal X meters, depending on your environment. For most situations we use an X=3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ki Ryn
post Apr 24 2006, 03:37 PM
Post #4


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 15-April 06
From: Louisville, Kentucky
Member No.: 8,467



We use a hex mat and call the hexes 2m each. Unlike some other games, SR4 is married to any particular mat layout.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 24 2006, 03:39 PM
Post #5


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



We use squares and every square is equal to 1 or 2 meters depending on the environment. We haven't had a fight spread out far enough to need more than that yet, but we've also only played three sessions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
masterpenguin
post Apr 24 2006, 03:39 PM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 24-April 06
From: Albany NY
Member No.: 8,499



QUOTE
Not to be snide, and perhaps I'm being naive, but ... Movement rates are SR4 p.138. Ranges are p. 139. Cover modifiers are p.140. What are you looking for beyond that?


well sure the rates are there, however, they aren't in any easly divisable number IE: walking rates for dwarfs vs trolls is 8 and 15. A running characters speed is also modified by a dice pool. Unless I was to make every square 1m (Which I think would be too small for most combat situations) there doesn't seem to be a good way to standardize the map.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dissonance
post Apr 24 2006, 03:51 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 515
Joined: 19-January 04
Member No.: 5,992



You could always just round up to an even number after all the modifiers are in place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NightHaunter
post Apr 24 2006, 04:18 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 18-March 02
From: Plymouth UK.
Member No.: 2,408



QUOTE (dcpirahna)
We use squares and just kind of assume that every square equal X meters, depending on your environment. For most situations we use an X=3.

Thats about it really.

You don't need anything else, but the rule book and some models.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Waltermandias
post Apr 24 2006, 04:23 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 137
Joined: 21-February 06
From: Lenexa, Kansas (Yes Kansas, we ain't all hicks y'all.)
Member No.: 8,291



We have done 1m squares, but that is definately too small. I would recommend two or three and just round. A square here or there doesn't make too much difference. If it really comes down to it just roll a die (4-6 in favor of players, 1-3 otherwise.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
coolgrafix
post Apr 24 2006, 04:56 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 453
Joined: 15-August 02
From: Kansas City, MO
Member No.: 3,116



The SR miniature movement system is more akin to other non-gridded systems like Battletech, Warhammer 40k, and the more recent MechWarrior and the other WizKids clickable games. There are no grids, just a scale (1" = x meters). If your miniature is supposed to move 7 meters in one turn then on a 1 inch scale surface he moves 7 inches. If he moves some oddball fraction because of multiple actions, then he just moves some oddball fraction (e.g. 7 inches over 3 actions = 2 2/3 inches per action). Measuring tape makes this all possible and it's been done since long before gridded mats were even available. =)

As others have pointed out above, this can be roughly adapted to a gridded surface.

In our game, we use the gridded surface mainly for scale and as a guide for drawing building walls along straight lines. =)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Apr 24 2006, 05:33 PM
Post #11


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (masterpenguin @ Apr 24 2006, 08:39 AM)
QUOTE
Not to be snide, and perhaps I'm being naive, but ... Movement rates are SR4 p.138. Ranges are p. 139. Cover modifiers are p.140. What are you looking for beyond that?


well sure the rates are there, however, they aren't in any easly divisable number IE: walking rates for dwarfs vs trolls is 8 and 15. A running characters speed is also modified by a dice pool. Unless I was to make every square 1m (Which I think would be too small for most combat situations) there doesn't seem to be a good way to standardize the map.

We use a large map all the time. The scale varies depending on what it represents but when it's go-time, 1 square (or hex) = 1 meter. Since movement is m/turn we use 1:1 most often.

Rather divide your movement by the number of passes per round, it's a whole lot easier to just always assume 4 passes per Combat Turn and divide that way. Everyone will know how far they can walk or run unless they choose to Sprint.

Just like regular combat, you can always move, but can only act if you have the IP to do so:

SR4.138 : Movement Rate Table becomes:

Humans, elves, orks: 10/25 (3,3,2,2 / 7,6,6,6)
Dwarfs: 8/20 (2,2,2,2 / 5,5,5,5)
Trolls: 15/35 (4,4,4,3 / 9,9,9,8)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
coolgrafix
post Apr 24 2006, 05:44 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 453
Joined: 15-August 02
From: Kansas City, MO
Member No.: 3,116



[insert discussion of how moving diagonally on a square grid quickly throws movement rates way, way the hell off]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 24 2006, 06:21 PM
Post #13


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



Just count double for each odd square. Not exactly pythagorean, but close enough for government work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Apr 24 2006, 06:46 PM
Post #14


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



Meh, its close enough for game purposes since everyone's bound by the sames rules but you're right, hexes are better.

Edit - With a nice large map, you could just measure out distances with a paper tapemeasure and avoid the hexes or squares all together. Just have a compass, ruler and tape handy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 24 2006, 06:58 PM
Post #15


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



The problem we've had with hexes is that they work very poorly when it comes time to start drawing walls because you have to cut hexes in half.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Apr 24 2006, 07:15 PM
Post #16


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



QUOTE (James McMurray)
The problem we've had with hexes is that they work very poorly when it comes time to start drawing walls because you have to cut hexes in half.

Yeah James its a dual-edge sword it is. I think the easability of drawing is why my group gravitates towards squares more often than not.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ki Ryn
post Apr 24 2006, 07:29 PM
Post #17


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 15-April 06
From: Louisville, Kentucky
Member No.: 8,467




There's actually no reason to round movement just because you are on a grid. If you start in a 2m square and move 5 meters, you just end up standing on a line.

This isn't D&D. There's no "1 character per square" rule or even a rule that says you have to be in a square (or hex). Live life on the edge!


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 24 2006, 07:36 PM
Post #18


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



There are no "one character per square" rules because there are no square rules at all. If using 1m squares there's probably no way for two people to occupy the same square without some penalties or grappling.

And if you're just going to ignore the squares, why use them at all? Use a tape measure instead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Apr 24 2006, 07:41 PM
Post #19


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



Digital vs. Analog, you make the call!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mdynna
post Apr 24 2006, 09:38 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 371
Joined: 10-January 06
From: Regina
Member No.: 8,145



The bottom line: unlike D&D where every combat seems to operate on a "virtual grid", SR is not bound to such a system.

Come up with whatever rules you and your group thinks is fair and go with that. I have only used a battlemap in SR in very rare, large-combat sequences. Even then, everyone knew it wasn't an "exact scale" sort of thing. It was there for general, relative positioning purposes. My players will still ask me, "How far am I from this guy?" and I would just wing it with a "Ehhhh... (blah) metres." My opinion is: if you want something more exact, play a minitures game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Apr 24 2006, 09:44 PM
Post #21


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



SR can be a miniatures game if that's what works for the group. you don't really need anything more than some squares/hexes and a size for each of them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Apr 24 2006, 11:58 PM
Post #22


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



Having played both hex-based and tape-based (no grid of any kind, you simply use a tape measure or ruler) miniature games, I vastly prefer tape-based. Makes it easy to figure out stuff like going around corners, zig-zagging down a hall, that kind of thing... and it prevents the guy making the map from trying to force it to conform to the lines on the paper. Diagonal hallways, round rooms, that kind of thing all become relatively easy to do.

And it's more conducive to making terrain that players can look at and go "OOooo..."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TBRMInsanity
post Apr 25 2006, 01:27 PM
Post #23


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,002
Joined: 22-April 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 8,494



Any time I have to use a map I have a squared map board. Normally I would say you should use a no grid board as it is more accurate to the fluid nature of the SR system. The rules cover movement in the SR 4 book on page 138.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pyrius
post Apr 25 2006, 08:43 PM
Post #24


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 7-September 05
From: near Cologne
Member No.: 7,705



Probably you might find something of interest in this older DS thread.

Unfortunately the link to the pdf file doesn´t work anymore. Maybe Veggiesama (who originally posted the pdf) can fix it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CONAN9845
post Apr 26 2006, 05:51 AM
Post #25


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Joined: 30-May 02
From: South Jersey
Member No.: 2,798



I bought two 34.5" by 48" mats that has 1" squares subdivided into 1/4" squares. I then bought two pieces of clear vinyl to put over them to use the dry erase markers on to protect the mats. This covers my entire, rather large, table. Then we use 1" = 1m for most times, and if we need a larger environment, we use smaller marker die, where 1/4" = 1m. We also keep a tape measure and ruler around for quick measurements. It helps to save time instead of counting boxes. We haven't had any problems yet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 09:15 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.