IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Contact Lens
Dr. Dodge
post Jun 21 2006, 03:39 PM
Post #26


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 137
Joined: 8-June 06
From: Present day, Detroit
Member No.: 8,683



QUOTE (ornot)

But then I pwn them when it comes to biotech knowledge. Go Team Biology!

WOOOOOOOOOO...

oh wait it's kinda quiet in here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nim
post Jun 21 2006, 03:57 PM
Post #27


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 244
Joined: 8-June 06
Member No.: 8,681



The biggest problem I have with the contacts is the power supply. But SR seems to have Magic Batteries anyway, so that's not an issue....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Jun 21 2006, 05:30 PM
Post #28


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



They'd work the same way a lot of stuff in SR seems to work: using the electric field from your body. It's not magic batteries, quite... just phenomenally low current draw :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Jun 21 2006, 06:19 PM
Post #29


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



microsoft have a patent (or patent request) about using the body as a network. i think they even had a part about transmitting power around.

still, i fail to see how one is to power some of the more hungry devices that way.

hmm, one way could be to have a capitator/battery attached to it so that it changes from the power trasmitted, but eats from the battery while in use. this is mostly for devices that you only use now and again rather then continualy tho.

something tells me that the contacts will be using some kind of transparent e-ink display. that way it only needs energy whenever its changing what its displaying, and that energy can be transmitted along with the signal. basicly the same way that a passive RFID works.

still, SR is about sci-fi, and a lot of sci-fi is never explained that much...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kigmatzomat
post Jun 21 2006, 09:21 PM
Post #30


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 909
Joined: 26-August 05
From: Louisville, KY (Well, Memphis, IN technically but you won't know where that is.)
Member No.: 7,626



Contact lenses with virtually anything other than display link have to have a camera/sensor. Face it, where does the image from low-light come from? Thermograph?

And as far as smart-link, we've assumed there is a camera on the gun that provides a video feed and the eye/contact provides another and the computer figures out where on the eye's field of view the gun is pointing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Jun 21 2006, 10:59 PM
Post #31


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



a low-light sensor dont have to be digitaly made. it can be that the surface of the lense is created with more light sensitive particles then the normal eye, and that these are connected to light generating particles or something so that you basicly amplify the available light ;)

thermograph can be similar, only that now they react to the infra-red part of the em spectrum rather then visual light...

still, i will add that i reacted when i first read about contact lenses that was able to do all this stuff. glasses ok, but lenses. way beyond nanotech ;)

still, its in the game. and if its in the game it will probably be used, just for the hell of it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shrike30
post Jun 21 2006, 11:59 PM
Post #32


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,556
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 98



I'll be honest, I really do *not* like the amount of stuff you can put into contact lenses, especially when players layer them with glasses or something equally dumb.

Kind of amusing when someone puts thermographic vision inside of their sunglasses, though :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Xenith
post Jun 22 2006, 12:31 AM
Post #33


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 399
Joined: 27-May 04
Member No.: 6,361



Heres a thought... on a contact lens... wouldn't someone else be able to see the data being transmitted to your eye, if backwards and really small?

How about glasses, shades, and goggles for that matter? I know that those three can be mirrored oneways, but you might have ahard time on a contact lens without looking really freaky... and being singled out by security...

Now what would happen if people began using an image link combined with some sorta of specialized zoom application that reverses it so they could see what you see in your contact lens or glasses....

That, in and of itself, justifies having a cybereye... so very much...

Mwaha.... that awesome... :love:

What say you? :rotate:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Jun 22 2006, 01:09 AM
Post #34


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



two things:

1)
QUOTE (BBB page 311)
The smartgun system connects a firearm
or projectile weapon directly to a user’s smartlink (see p.
323). It incorporates a laser range finder and a small camera...


2)
QUOTE (BBB page 323)
The image link either displays visual information
(text, pictures, movies) in the field of vision or
projects it onto the user’s retina with a laser.


so as a matter of fact, smartguns do have cameras, that's not just a houserule. and image links can project onto the retina of your eye, which means you don't necessarily have anything showing on the outside.

hope that helps.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Xenith
post Jun 22 2006, 01:15 AM
Post #35


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 399
Joined: 27-May 04
Member No.: 6,361



Lasers in a contact lens? OK... thats where I draw the line... *thumbs down*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Jun 22 2006, 04:09 AM
Post #36


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



meh. if you can generate light in that small of an area, putting in some kind of microscopic system to focus it into a direct beam isn't that big of a deal, imo. i mean, the laser has to go, what, like, 3-4 cm? and we've already got these contacts broadcasting some ridiculous distance anyways...

unless you're talking about the smartgun laser... but in that case, you're mistaken. that's on the gun, not the eye =P remember there's two parts to a smartgun system... the gun itself has a device in it, and then the visual thing will have a receiver device attached to it. don'y get the smartgun system mixed up with the smartlink =D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Jun 22 2006, 05:05 AM
Post #37


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



hmm, i belive someone have allready managed to build a microchip laser irl...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 06:38 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.