IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> LOS and FBA, Encasing yourself in opaque materials
Samaels Ghost
post Jul 3 2006, 09:06 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 984
Joined: 15-June 06
Member No.: 8,717



A) One of my PCs asked whether a mage could cast a spell against you (we'll go with Manabolt here since it only affects the living) if your body was encased in opaque materials like when wearing the Full Body Armor.
He brought up the point that you couldnt see through walls while you were astrally perceiving (one of my PCs wanted to do that but we figured the RAW said no) so your aura wouldn't bleed through that armor either, would it? Auras don't 'bleed' through things unless you're forcing your way through, right?

B) Also, would coating your armor with mirror-like rflective material reflect spells back at a mage or other reflected objects?

C) Would readying an action to raise a mirror at the same time as a mage is casting his Manabolt spell at you reflect it away, possibly at the mage if you know where you're pointing the mirror?

Note: I haven't let any of this affect my game yet. No one has gotten away with any of this yet so please no "don't be a pussy GM" or "Just fudge rolls and drop cows on them if they're trying to be clever and inventive" comments. Thank you any help you may give :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Jul 3 2006, 09:14 PM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



a) They can still target you. Your aura encompases your body and a small field around you. I can't point to an SR4 rule because I have no books handy, but this has been the way it's worked in all editions. Clothing or armor by itself cannot make you immune to magic.

b) No. Targetted spells are targetted on the person, not on "whatever is in front of my eyes." You could possibly cause the caster to catch unintended targets in the area if their reflection is in your mirror, but for something with as many angles as armor it would be pretty rare IMO.

c) Again no, because targetted spells target the person. The comments about targets for area spells also apply here, but a flat mirror will be much easier to use for the purpose.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevebugge
post Jul 3 2006, 09:22 PM
Post #3


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,026
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Seattle (Really!)
Member No.: 7,996



Keep in mind that by most fluff magic works metaphorically, not according to mundane things like physics. While the armor isn't technically part of the person by physical standards, metaphorically it is part of the person because dress makes up as much, or more, of a person's apperance or image as does hairstyle or eye color. The only way a combat spell would ever deflect or reflect off a mirror is if it were a light based elemental effect, say for example your mage had written himself a "Laser Beam" spell for some incomprehensible reason.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demon_Bob
post Jul 3 2006, 09:26 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 24-March 05
From: On a ledge between Heaven and Hell
Member No.: 7,226



A) Yes. A persons aura is supposed to surround the body extending to several cm. Kind of how an electromagnetic field surrounds planets and some electromagnetic devices. The stronger the persons health and essence the brighter and larger the field is supposed to be. The clothing can not push aside the field because it is fully contained within it, where a wall can.

B) I supposed you could get some kind of enchanted counterspelling focus clothing, or when Street Magic come out something that acted like the Reflective Metamagic in 3rd. Regular mirrored clothing would not affect spell casting because the mage can still see guy in mirror suit looking for the disco. However, you might give the mage some flash modifiers depending where the sun, or other bright lights are. :grinbig: Mirror outfit and flash grenade.

C) NO. It would have to be a pritty good sized mirror to block LOS.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Jul 3 2006, 09:27 PM
Post #5


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



I look at it from a D&D point of view (just follow me here). If a character has a tower shield, they can take full cover behind it, making it so that all attacks hit only the shield. However, spells can still target the character normally because the shield is "part" of them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Samaels Ghost
post Jul 3 2006, 09:31 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 984
Joined: 15-June 06
Member No.: 8,717



No, no. I definetly follow the D&D example (and the rest for that matter.)
There's nothing wrong with D&D, except maybe the Book of Vile Darkness. Pregant four armed demons is messed up :|
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Jul 3 2006, 10:27 PM
Post #7


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



ah, magic vs "physics"...

magic targeting have allways been a bit wierd in SR, and SR4 dont help it (suddenly you must see people even when you use a elemental area attack?).

heh, there is even a canon comment about looking thru a keyhole to focus a area spell onto a single target (the book in question, sr2 grimoire, more or less suggests hitting the player over the head with a book).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geekkake
post Jul 3 2006, 10:35 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 475
Joined: 13-March 06
From: dusty Mexican borderlands
Member No.: 8,372



QUOTE (stevebugge)
Keep in mind that by most fluff magic works metaphorically, not according to mundane things like physics.

NOOOOOOOOOOO

THIS IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH MY HERMETIC LEANINGS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Jul 3 2006, 10:36 PM
Post #9


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



Then stop being such a hermit ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geekkake
post Jul 3 2006, 10:37 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 475
Joined: 13-March 06
From: dusty Mexican borderlands
Member No.: 8,372



QUOTE (X-Kalibur)
Then stop being such a hermit ;)

That would be "hermitic leanings", which, considering the extremely low frequency at which I leave my house, is also applicable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevebugge
post Jul 3 2006, 10:41 PM
Post #11


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,026
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Seattle (Really!)
Member No.: 7,996



QUOTE (Geekkake)
QUOTE (stevebugge @ Jul 3 2006, 04:22 PM)
Keep in mind that by most fluff magic works metaphorically, not according to mundane things like physics.

NOOOOOOOOOOO

THIS IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH MY HERMETIC LEANINGS

It could be worse, it could have been designed by Terry Pratchet and Piers Anthony and would work entirely off of bad puns.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Jul 3 2006, 10:55 PM
Post #12


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



QUOTE (Geekkake)
QUOTE (stevebugge @ Jul 3 2006, 04:22 PM)
Keep in mind that by most fluff magic works metaphorically, not according to mundane things like physics.

NOOOOOOOOOOO

THIS IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH MY HERMETIC LEANINGS

heh, maybe so. but it works wonders if your into chaos magic ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Jul 4 2006, 12:50 AM
Post #13


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



QUOTE (stevebugge)
It could be worse, it could have been designed by Terry Pratchet and Piers Anthony and would work entirely off of bad puns.

Piers Anthony actually had some (incredibly distantly) shadowrun-esque books with his Incarnations of Immortality. And by Shadowrun-esque I mean he mixed magic and technology, but that's about it. That world didn't run on bad puns, nor did his Bio of a Space Tyrant 5 part space opera. Most of his stuff involves puns, but most of it is also directed at older children / young adults.

I'm actually looking forward to the next book I read with my son (he's 4). I'll be grabbing a copy of The Source of Magic, the first Xanth novel. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Apathy
post Jul 4 2006, 01:10 AM
Post #14


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,408
Joined: 31-January 04
From: Reston VA, USA
Member No.: 6,046



Related question: The books do specify that visual modifiers apply to casting magic, including partial cover (good cover = 50% hidden = -4). How much of a person's aura must be exposed in order to target someone? If someone just sticks a finger around the corner can they be targeted? What if they're leaning against the car's tinted windows - some of their aura would supposedly be poking through the glass?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Jul 4 2006, 01:14 AM
Post #15


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



I've always played it as "you are what you are plus what you wear." Leaning against a window won't make you targettable if that window is opague. That's just me though, and I don't have any rules references for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Samaels Ghost
post Jul 4 2006, 01:20 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 984
Joined: 15-June 06
Member No.: 8,717



QUOTE (James McMurray)
I've always played it as "you are what you are plus what you wear." Leaning against a window won't make you targettable if that window is opague. That's just me though, and I don't have any rules references for it.

I think I'm gonna end up running it like that. If Invisiblity includes what you wear, why not spell targeting?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Frag-o Delux
post Jul 4 2006, 01:39 AM
Post #17


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,213
Joined: 10-March 02
From: Back from the abyss.
Member No.: 2,316



QUOTE (stevebugge)
...say for example your mage had written himself a "Laser Beam" spell for some incomprehensible reason.

There was a Laser spell (single target) and a Nova (area effect) spell in the SR3 Magic in the Shadows book.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jul 4 2006, 08:38 AM
Post #18


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Bearing in mind I'm probably completely unqualified to say this...

If one were so inclined as to tote along a full tower shield with the express intent of denying mages LoS to their body, I would allow it. Actually, that's not a bad idea - a couple of guys could take cover behind a troll-sized tower shield. :)

Plus of course, it's going to have a barrier rating of like, 12 or so, meaning you can advance under fire. (Carefully, and being wary of grenades.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ornot
post Jul 4 2006, 02:25 PM
Post #19


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,266
Joined: 3-June 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,638



And weigh a shit-load :D I'm not convinced I'd deny mages LOS, maybe just give the target some cover modifiers. Although it'd be easiest for the runners to just run in the oher direction. Shield guys aren't going to be able to keep up.

Speaking of the Book of Vile Darkness, I have a friend who can't read that without giggling (at length) about the Nipple Clamps of Exquisite Pain. That is the primary reason to discard the Book of Vile Darkness.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Samaels Ghost
post Jul 4 2006, 11:42 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 984
Joined: 15-June 06
Member No.: 8,717



Or the zombie spewing cauldron. :rotfl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Jul 4 2006, 11:53 PM
Post #21


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



Zombie spewing cauldrons are fun! If you're looking to play a zombie filled town where the goal is to escape before dying zombie spewing cauldrons are the easiest way to set it up. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PH3NOmenon
post Jul 5 2006, 12:41 AM
Post #22


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 80
Joined: 9-January 06
Member No.: 8,143



QUOTE (Samaels Ghost)
A) One of my PCs asked whether a mage could cast a spell against you (we'll go with Manabolt here since it only affects the living) if your body was encased in opaque materials like when wearing the Full Body Armor.
He brought up the point that you couldnt see through walls while you were astrally perceiving (one of my PCs wanted to do that but we figured the RAW said no) so your aura wouldn't bleed through that armor either, would it? Auras don't 'bleed' through things unless you're forcing your way through, right?

"No, ruling thusly would unneccesarily unbalance the game... now soak the damage as a good little boy."



Playability > realism even more so when magic is involved. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Jul 5 2006, 02:41 AM
Post #23


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (ornot)
Speaking of the Book of Vile Darkness, I have a friend who can't read that without giggling (at length) about the Nipple Clamps of Exquisite Pain. That is the primary reason to discard the Book of Vile Darkness.

Dude, tell me more about these nipple clamps.



Mages are subject to visual penalties when casting. A tower shield would count as full cover.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Jul 5 2006, 03:29 AM
Post #24


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



You're immune to all effects taht work off pain as they convert all pain to pleasure. It doesn't change the damage you take, but may change how you react to it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Samaels Ghost
post Jul 5 2006, 03:45 AM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 984
Joined: 15-June 06
Member No.: 8,717



Plus they have little tassles you can twirl 'round for your girlfriend :oops:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd March 2026 - 02:56 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.