![]() ![]() |
Aug 8 2006, 08:09 PM
Post
#51
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 24 Joined: 20-July 06 Member No.: 8,921 |
32 Acres here, 7.3 planets
I gotta tell you, it doesn't bother me at all that I live better than most people on the planet. I'm going to take advantage of what living in this rich nation has to offer, as long as I can. I would think that most of us would live as high a lifestyle as possible, given available resources and personal wealth. I doubt that most people living in poor countries would act any differently, given the opportunity. |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2006, 08:17 PM
Post
#52
|
|||||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 120 Joined: 3-May 04 Member No.: 6,298 |
Yes, but if I don't buy the new one, someone else can, which means a different new one doesn't have to be purchased. It's not like all the washing machines that will ever be made have been manufactured, and are waiting around for us to pick them up, so we might as well go get them now. What we buy has an affect on what is manufactured. |
||||
|
|
|||||
Aug 8 2006, 08:32 PM
Post
#53
|
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
That's true. However, you cannot factor in the cost of disposing the old machine unless you're planning to keep your old machine forever or you're reasonably certain that the cost will decrease (in which case you can only factor in the deduction, not the entire value). As long as you are going to throw that machine away at some point in the future, for the purposes of the cost/benefit analysis you're throwing it away right now.
Large efficiency gains are rarely outweighed by other considerations for items lasting a decade or more. ~J |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2006, 08:47 PM
Post
#54
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,556 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Seattle Member No.: 98 |
I'm a little dubious of the math here. I live in a 4 person house, we have energy conservation in place, it's got less than 1500 square feet, and that's still eating up 3.5 of my allocated 4.5 acres?
The fricking house was built in 1923, and has been redone with good insulation and a number of other ecological upgrades. How does it warrant 3.5 acres of land being used up? |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2006, 10:34 PM
Post
#55
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 527 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,118 |
I find it telling that this quiz only measures waste produced and transportation costs. If my energy usage was factored in, I'm sure I would need a planet just to myself, made entirely of coal and oil.
|
|
|
|
Aug 9 2006, 12:15 AM
Post
#56
|
|
|
Decker on the Threshold ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,922 Joined: 14-March 04 Member No.: 6,156 |
Yeah, that quiz does make a lot of assumptions, many of which are probably false. And mfb's absolutely right that 4.5 is a false standard. It is, however, going to become more and more important to lower our footprints as large countries like China and India gear up and start becoming even bigger polluters than we are. Eventually so many people are going to be living like we are now that it's going to affect everyone's quality of life. It's already starting, and it's going to get much worse before people like Teux wise up, if they ever do.
As for solar panels, yeah, they're not for everyone, that's true. But they kinda are for everyone in southern California, and for most of the people in the southwest US, which is all I was really thinking about at the time. By the by, my score? 13.5 acres. Hey, I never said I wasn't part of the problem, just that the problem isn't solely or even primarily the fault of oil companies. |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2006, 12:25 AM
Post
#57
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
interesting, from copyright to enviroment...
|
|
|
|
Aug 9 2006, 12:26 AM
Post
#58
|
|||
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Fixed that for you :) ~J |
||
|
|
|||
Aug 9 2006, 01:13 AM
Post
#59
|
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 3,929 Joined: 26-February 02 From: .ca Member No.: 51 |
Fixed this thread.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st April 2026 - 12:37 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.