IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Hey, how about a Character Dossier thread?
Adam
post Nov 18 2003, 10:28 PM
Post #26


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



I fear no proofreader; they are a different breed from editor entirely.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larsine
post Nov 18 2003, 11:31 PM
Post #27


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 9-September 03
From: Sorø, Denmark
Member No.: 5,604



Quite nice, but as usual with things like this, it will never satisfy me 100%, but it will add inspiration for my own homemade sheets.

QUOTE
The cover is new and different old art, not the same as the old work-up cover.


Where is the new part? The three drawing used are from Bottled Demon, Lone Star Sourcebook and DMZ

QUOTE
This looks like it was proof-read to hell and back.


Well they could have done a better job. Here are the mistakes I've found so far:

Tables of Note (inside cover):
Attacker's/defender's/target's/weapon's/spell's should be attackers/defenders/targets/weapons/spells. You only use ' when you shorten things like "do not -> don't".
Driving (under body skills) should be diving.
Aura reading (under intelligence skills) should have a *, since you can't default to this skill.
Hovercraft (under reaction skill) is missing.

Weapons of choice (page 2?): Many of the ranged attack target numbers are wrong. Here are the corrected ones according to my calculations:

Smart goggles**: 3 4 5(7) 8
Smartlink-2 w/ Range Finder: 2 3 3(5) 5
Image Magnification Level 1: 4 4 5(5) 6(8)
Image Magnification Level 1 with Laser Sight+: 3 3 4(4) 5(7)

Gas Venting (Rating ---) should be Gas Venting (Rating___)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Nov 18 2003, 11:58 PM
Post #28


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE
You only use ' when you shorten things like "do not -> don't".

Incorrect. The ' symbol is also used to show possession as in "the attacker's guns" and for plural attackers "the attackers' guns".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moosegod
post Nov 19 2003, 12:16 AM
Post #29


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,047
Joined: 12-November 03
From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation.
Member No.: 5,818



However, he's right in this instance- the last two should have no " ' "
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BIG BAD BEESTE
post Nov 19 2003, 12:33 PM
Post #30


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 379
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Earth
Member No.: 1,274



Don't get me started on English Terms...

Defence, Armour, Specialisation, etc.

Ho-hum.

BTW Adam, you quite correct old bean. Proofreaders are a totally different breed than Editors. Beware the Proofreader, but Bribe the Editor! :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pistons
post Nov 19 2003, 01:47 PM
Post #31


Not Cameron Diaz
**

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 472
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Newark, Delaware
Member No.: 188



QUOTE (BIG BAD BEESTE)
Don't get me started on English Terms...

Defence, Armour, Specialisation, etc.

Ho-hum.

That would only be a problem if SR used the English (UK) dictionary rather than the English (US) dictionary. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Nov 19 2003, 02:31 PM
Post #32


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (BIG BAD BEESTE @ Nov 19 2003, 07:33 AM)
BTW Adam, you quite correct old bean. Proofreaders are a totally different breed than Editors. Beware the Proofreader, but Bribe the Editor! :D

I do quite frequently thank editors for making my work look better than it actually is... no reason to bribe them. I want my work to be twisted into the best possible form; my words are not precious.

[Incidentally, using the UK dictionary at my day job at the US dictionary for most of my freelance work... that's a pain in the arse. ;-)]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Patrick Goodman
post Nov 19 2003, 06:40 PM
Post #33


Tilting at Windmills
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,636
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Amarillo, TX, CAS
Member No.: 388



I can't speak for all the proofreaders who might be looking this thread over, but I know that when I proofed the thing (and I did proof it to hell and back, as anyone who's seen my proofing style will tell you) I didn't get the chance to look at what the inside covers were going to have; all I had to go on was a rough mockup of what the sheets inside were going to look like.

Just wanted to clarify that little tidbit for our usual band of hecklers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KosherPickle
post Nov 19 2003, 07:53 PM
Post #34


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 1-July 02
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,921



QUOTE (Larsine)
QUOTE
The cover is new and different old art, not the same as the old work-up cover.


Where is the new part? The three drawing used are from Bottled Demon, Lone Star Sourcebook and DMZ


Given some reading comprehension, you'd know that the cover of Character Dossier is not the same as the mock-up that was available some time ago. Hence, new and different old art.

QUOTE
QUOTE
This looks like it was proof-read to hell and back.


Well they could have done a better job. Here are the mistakes I've found so far:

Tables of Note (inside cover):
Attacker's/defender's/target's/weapon's/spell's should be attackers/defenders/targets/weapons/spells. You only use ' when you shorten things like "do not -> don't".


Maybe you forgot that there are things in the English language called possessives.

QUOTE
Driving (under body skills) should be diving.


Good catch.

QUOTE
Aura reading (under intelligence skills) should have a *, since you can't default to this skill.


Err...Astrally active characters Astrally Perceive using their Intelligence. Aura Reading is a complementary skill to that.

In addition, Cyberzombies can use Intelligence as their Astral Perception skill at a +4 modifier, but can pick up Aura Reading later.

QUOTE
Hovercraft (under reaction skill) is missing.


Yup.

QUOTE
Weapons of choice (page 2?): Many of the ranged attack target numbers are wrong. Here are the corrected ones according to my calculations:

Smart goggles**: 3 4 5(7) 8
Smartlink-2 w/ Range Finder: 2 3 3(5) 5
Image Magnification Level 1: 4 4 5(5) 6(8)
Image Magnification Level 1 with Laser Sight+: 3 3 4(4) 5(7)


I'll take your word for it. I'm sure the correct tables exist in Cannon Companion, anyway.

QUOTE
Gas Venting (Rating ---) should be Gas Venting (Rating___)


In the second "Primary Ranged Weapon" box, yes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KosherPickle
post Nov 19 2003, 07:58 PM
Post #35


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 1-July 02
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,921



QUOTE (moosegod)
However, he's right in this instance- the last two should have no " ' "

God, you're still wrong.

"spell's Drain Code". "spell's outcome". "Weapon's Power". These are direct quotes from the inside cover. These are correct.

Give these people a little credit for knowing basic apostrophe usage.

And for those that don't, Bob the Angry Flower is always ready to drop some knowledge on anyone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Nov 19 2003, 08:46 PM
Post #36


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



Patrick is correct about the inside covers not getting the same proofing as the interior.

I've still yet to see my copies, btw, which is why I haven't responded to some of the more specific points; I'll write up an errata for Rob when I finally get my copies and have some free time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BIG BAD BEESTE
post Nov 20 2003, 01:47 PM
Post #37


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 379
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Earth
Member No.: 1,274



Wow Kosherpickle, that Flower is sure angry all right.

Please keep of the grass folks, you're only going to upset the flower (and those pesky druids...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Connor
post Nov 22 2003, 09:02 AM
Post #38


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 30-May 03
From: Tulsa, OK
Member No.: 4,652



I'd like to add one comment on the Character Dossier. The section for keeping track of your karma expenditures is a great idea, but I feel the execution could have been done a lot better. Something like getting frid of the boxes and just having the blank line area labeled at the top of the column would allow for a lot more updates to be logged there or have them take up less space for more in the "notes" section below it.

Overall, I think it's a great tool and I'm going to move my group over to using it. Especialy since most of them are horrible at keeping track of character stuff.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larsine
post Nov 23 2003, 10:44 AM
Post #39


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 9-September 03
From: Sorø, Denmark
Member No.: 5,604



QUOTE
QUOTE
Aura reading (under intelligence skills) should have a *, since you can't default to this skill.


Err...Astrally active characters Astrally Perceive using their Intelligence. Aura Reading is a complementary skill to that.

In addition, Cyberzombies can use Intelligence as their Astral Perception skill at a +4 modifier, but can pick up Aura Reading later.


But you still can't default to Aura Reading:

SR3 page 86-87: Aura Reading: Default: None. Either you have it or you don't.

and here: Official SR3 Eratta

Lars
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larsine
post Nov 23 2003, 11:48 AM
Post #40


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 9-September 03
From: Sorø, Denmark
Member No.: 5,604



QUOTE
Maybe you forgot that there are things in the English language called possessives.


Damn. I knew there was something i forgot since I've had English 20 years ago :-) Well at least I've learnt something today.

QUOTE
I'll take your word for it.  I'm sure the correct tables exist in Cannon Companion, anyway.


But SCD is till wrong, and what's the point of having the same information several places if only one of these are correct. Half the time you will be looking at the wrong tables, and somebody is bound to use the wrong numbers.

In any case CC is also wrong, but only in one place (Image Magnification 1 with Laser Sight) which should be: 3 3 4(4) 5(7)

Lars
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spotlite
post Nov 28 2003, 05:42 PM
Post #41


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 611
Joined: 21-October 03
From: Yorkshire Toxic Zone
Member No.: 5,752



I like it, but at £3.50 (that's UK) a pop, I'll be buying them for those already retired or retiring characters which are old and falling apart, so I can have a nice permanent record.

But even though overall I think its really very good (worth it for the inside covers and character portait/record of activity pages alone imho) I was a bit narked that the adept and otaku bits filled the same page. Both of those, for my money, have a lot more to say than that. The powers section could have been expanded to allow people to keep a shorthand record of what individual powers do or any special effects that go with them (eg one of my adepts has a street fighter 2 style effect when he does killing hands/distance strike. Its fluff, it does more harm than good, but its the character's trademark and its cool, so I have it), or other notes (geases and what form they take for each power etc), and the otaku section could've been expanded to cover things in more details.

However, i do realise you must've agonised about what to put in and leave out for a goodly while and you absolutely can't please everyone, so I'm still giving it 4 out of 5 because of all the other really good stuff in it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th February 2026 - 03:33 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.