Recruiting:(title to be named later) |
Recruiting:(title to be named later) |
Aug 24 2006, 10:43 PM
Post
#76
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 164 Joined: 9-December 04 From: former Bug City, now CFS Member No.: 6,875 |
I don't have Street Magic, but my adept character is going down the Path of the Warrior (in case you couldn't tell).
edit: No religious beliefs, although he's read up on Taoism and Buddhism and had Episcopalian parents. |
|
|
Aug 24 2006, 11:08 PM
Post
#77
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,485 Joined: 4-January 05 Member No.: 6,931 |
Scholar type- Chaose Mage most likely.
|
|
|
Aug 24 2006, 11:19 PM
Post
#78
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
Also, any religious beliefs
|
|
|
Aug 24 2006, 11:33 PM
Post
#79
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 684 Joined: 8-April 06 From: My dorm room Member No.: 8,438 |
I'm sorry, but I'm going to sit this one out. I'm already in another game now, and I don't want to risk biting off more than I can chew. :( Please feel free to steal my character concepts.
|
|
|
Aug 25 2006, 02:32 AM
Post
#80
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 |
Shamanic Tradition - Dragon Mentor - Christian (Catholic)
|
|
|
Aug 25 2006, 06:13 PM
Post
#81
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
Sorry to lose you FanGirl but, Thank you for posting your withdrawl.
|
|
|
Aug 25 2006, 08:55 PM
Post
#82
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 12-August 06 Member No.: 9,097 |
Right now - Vodun, Adversary mentor
I'm actually thinking about changing Clay's tradition to Hedge Witchcraft. There's just something about a male hedge witch that makes me snicker. |
|
|
Aug 26 2006, 12:16 AM
Post
#83
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,485 Joined: 4-January 05 Member No.: 6,931 |
Rules Question:
With a spell sustaining foci, can the magician to whom the foci is bonded voluntarily 'disrupt' the sustained spell at will? Page 191 doesn't talk about it and I can't find any references in Street Magic. It says if a spell foci's spell is disrupted the magician can use the sustaining foci to sustain another spell. p. 191 SR4. Does 'deactivation' of the sustaining foci cause disruption? Can a magician use the Force 3 sustaining foci to sustain a physical barrier and then decided to dump the physical barrier and immediately cast and use the foci to sustain a detect enemies spell? Are their any tests involved or anything? Does a deactivated sustaining foci become blank, or upon activation does it immediately 'restore' the spell it was previously sustaining, because that would mean the character whose focus is snatched away from his person would have to recast the spell to get the benefit of the sustaining focus again. I'm posting here to and elsewhere, sorry if this question doubles up. |
|
|
Aug 27 2006, 05:35 AM
Post
#84
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 115 Joined: 28-August 04 Member No.: 6,609 |
Sorry for the delay after spending some time studying the traditions provided in the Street magic Ill have to say that Leo would be closest to the Druidic tradition, definitely shamanic as he has a mentor spirit (Lion). Please let me know if something doesn't jive with the above. I am not set in this but it seems to be the best choice.
Cedric I may be out of line answering your question but it is my understanding that the person bonded to the focus can as a free action turn it off at any time. This effectively kills the spell it was sustaining. When turning it back on it will no longer have a spell and will have to have the spell cast into it again. Sorry if I am out of order here please just say so. |
|
|
Aug 28 2006, 03:09 PM
Post
#85
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
I'm away from my books at the moment (school) but when I get home I'll look into it. From first glance I think Mek is right, but like I said I'm away from my books so i'll look at it later.
Mek, is Lion one of the Druidic totems? (not near book at the moment) |
|
|
Aug 28 2006, 04:32 PM
Post
#86
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,485 Joined: 4-January 05 Member No.: 6,931 |
Mekalus, no problems answering, I'll take data anywhere I can get it.
I've talked it over and in looking at p. 191 and was reminded that each spell focus has to be attuned to a specific category (Detection, Combat, etc.) so I couldn't go from manipulation to detection at the least. As for the 'disruption' the general consensus seems to be the same as your answer. Thanks. |
|
|
Aug 29 2006, 12:58 AM
Post
#87
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
Quick notice and a bump
For those still interested (and havent posted a BG/CS wednesday the 30th is deadline) Mek, there are 3 types of druids, and since you're a shaman so that takes away one type. |
|
|
Aug 29 2006, 01:24 AM
Post
#88
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 115 Joined: 28-August 04 Member No.: 6,609 |
Ok so I am a wild druid then? Sound good? Only downside is he has a lot of tech so not sure how thats gonna work. Hmm maybe he should be Hindu? Problem here for me is when I created him I didn't pay very close attention to the traditions as you are the first GM interested in them as part of the chracter background. I will go with wild druid unless you think thats a bad fit in which case I will give the Hundu tradition a try.
|
|
|
Aug 29 2006, 06:37 PM
Post
#89
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
I think wild druid is hard since you'd shun the modern world, but the 'new age' druid (the non hermetic one) would fit. It comes down to what you want to roleplay in the end. I can only provide guidance (which amounts to my 2 cents) the rest is up to your personal likes
|
|
|
Aug 29 2006, 08:29 PM
Post
#90
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,485 Joined: 4-January 05 Member No.: 6,931 |
I got my finalize CS and BG off to you JackRipper, via PM
|
|
|
Aug 30 2006, 06:21 AM
Post
#91
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 115 Joined: 28-August 04 Member No.: 6,609 |
OK thats cool new age sounds better to me also.
|
|
|
Aug 30 2006, 08:43 PM
Post
#92
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
Okay folks its the deadline date, so those of you who havent posted/pm'ed a bg/cs you need to by midnight.
Those of you who have and still in please post saying so. Thanks |
|
|
Aug 30 2006, 08:45 PM
Post
#93
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 |
so....
I'm in, can't wait for the extended philosophical arguments. |
|
|
Aug 30 2006, 08:54 PM
Post
#94
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
That'll be good roleplay, which I reward
|
|
|
Aug 30 2006, 10:53 PM
Post
#95
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,485 Joined: 4-January 05 Member No.: 6,931 |
I'm still in, my CS and BG were finalized and re-sent yesterday.
|
|
|
Aug 31 2006, 12:08 AM
Post
#96
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 745 Joined: 12-August 06 Member No.: 9,097 |
I'm totally in.
|
|
|
Aug 31 2006, 05:32 AM
Post
#97
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 115 Joined: 28-August 04 Member No.: 6,609 |
Im in
|
|
|
Aug 31 2006, 08:22 PM
Post
#98
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
Hmmm...seems we already have casualties to our list.
I'll be giving another day to post interest from prior submitters.(But can run with what I have) Our thread (which I'll ask you all not to post on yet) is called Malleus Maleficarum. |
|
|
Aug 31 2006, 08:33 PM
Post
#99
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 30-May 06 From: Leesburg, Florida Member No.: 8,623 |
PLEASE READ THE OOC THREAD....BONUS AWARD AVAILABLE.
|
|
|
Aug 31 2006, 10:46 PM
Post
#100
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 111 Joined: 28-January 06 Member No.: 8,207 |
I'm still in too.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th January 2025 - 11:58 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.