IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Dikote, Any rules until Augmented?
Cynic project
post Sep 20 2006, 02:54 AM
Post #26


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,032
Joined: 6-August 04
Member No.: 6,543



look i need Dikote for my Ally spirit....SO i can make it into a ares... gun and um...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zen Shooter01
post Sep 20 2006, 03:24 AM
Post #27


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 932
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Orlando, Florida
Member No.: 1,042



It would have been nice if someone who'd seen a gun had walked past the equipment list while it was being written.

I started on a firearms rewrite, but I thought I'd wait until after Arsenal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Sep 20 2006, 03:30 AM
Post #28


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (Zen Shooter01)
I started on a firearms rewrite, but I thought I'd wait until after  Arsenal.

Speaking of Arsenal, I wonder if they are going, yet another time, confuse the word "velocity" with the phrase "cyclic rate"? Want to bet? :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 20 2006, 10:04 AM
Post #29


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



I surely hope they wont implement any rules for engines in Arsenal... it so depressing to see SR limp behind actual developments. (Hybrid cars? Ethanol? Combined? uh...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post Sep 20 2006, 01:39 PM
Post #30


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
QUOTE (Mistwalker @ Sep 19 2006, 08:26 PM)
Dikote could work on the plates that are optional on some armors.

Those plates are nearly as hard as Dikote itself... and Dikote only adds a very thin layer.
It would be hard to even measure the difference...


Back in the days of yore, when I actually worked in a lab that did diamond deposition, the rule of thumb from my literature searches on diamond applications was, "Diamond makes anything better," superhard ceramics included.

The difference in ballistic resistance is measurable even with a thin film diamond coating, even on boron nitride or other superhard ceramics. Projectiles just tended to skitter off the surface a little more often with the diamond coat present. It's a matter of percentages, but it's just at the edge of equaling a +1 armor bonus on the SR3/SR4 armor scales. Thus, allowing Dikote to deliver a +1/+1 to armor is, IMO, defensible (pun intended.)

Giving a damage or AP bonus to a dikoted edged weapon is...well, it's more of an exaggeration. I wouldn't mind a 1-point AP bonus to dikoted edged weapons in my games, but if it chaps your ass, leave it out.

QUOTE
There is that. You'd need it on a metalic armor, like steel or titanium I'd think. Might work on carbon fiber, but materials science isn't close to what I got my degree in.


OTOH, it's just what I got my degree in. :)

Dikote should work on any material that is
a) fairly rigid (like steel or a ceramic)
b) can survive the heat of the deposition process

Therefore, any armor with rigid ballistic plates with a hard face of steel, ceramic, or maybe titanium [1] could include dikoting.

In my games, I always allowed "vest with plates," security armor, and military grade armor to receive dikoting. Helmets could receive it, but wouldn't provide a separate armor bonus - you'd only get one +1/+1 for a suit of dikoted armor and helmet.

[1] I wanted to exclude titanium as a dikote target as having too low a stiffness, but that was a brain fart. I still have some titanium target plates (uncoated, alas) from the lab. There was an experiment to deposit diamond on titanium for medical implant purposes - diamond was laudably hydrophobic, so slime and bacteria didn't cling.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 20 2006, 02:29 PM
Post #31


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (Cray74)
The difference in ballistic resistance is measurable even with a thin film diamond coating, even on boron nitride or other superhard ceramics. Projectiles just tended to skitter off the surface a little more often with the diamond coat present.

Was the reason for this determined? Though BN has a lower hardness than diamond, it has a greater pressure resistance.

Granted, I was mainly remembering aramide demonstrators coated with silicon carbide... which failed as miserably as the ones without.

QUOTE (Cray74)
OTOH, it's just what I got my degree in.

Any recommondations on current literature? ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post Sep 20 2006, 03:16 PM
Post #32


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
QUOTE (Cray74)
The difference in ballistic resistance is measurable even with a thin film diamond coating, even on boron nitride or other superhard ceramics. Projectiles just tended to skitter off the surface a little more often with the diamond coat present.

Was the reason for this determined? Though BN has a lower hardness than diamond, it has a greater pressure resistance.

Part of the issue was the surface modification - a deposited diamond coating could be slicker than a typical sintered ceramic surface. Some of it, IIRC, was also chalked up to hardness, but the whole reason wasn't entirely understood at the time (c1995).

Coatings in general just seem to help ballistic resistance, wear applications, etc. A diamond coating does wonders for the wear life of tungsten carbide drill bits, for example - up to 10-fold life increases.

QUOTE
Any recommondations on current literature?


If you want to know about corrosion or textbooks for masters-level courses, yes. If you mean on diamond deposition, no, nothing cutting-edge current.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 20 2006, 03:42 PM
Post #33


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (Cray74)
Coatings in general just seem to help ballistic resistance, wear applications, etc. A diamond coating does wonders for the wear life of tungsten carbide drill bits, for example - up to 10-fold life increases.

Unless you plan to drill steel, of course.

QUOTE (Cray74)
If you want to know about corrosion or textbooks for masters-level courses, yes. If you mean on diamond deposition, no, nothing cutting-edge current.

Thanks - the former sounds interesting, as, unfortunately, the textbook of my course concerning materials science partially is... uh, historic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post Sep 20 2006, 07:29 PM
Post #34


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
Unless you plan to drill steel, of course.


Oh, right. Iron does love that carbon.

QUOTE
QUOTE (Cray74)
If you want to know about corrosion or textbooks for masters-level courses, yes. If you mean on diamond deposition, no, nothing cutting-edge current.


Thanks - the former sounds interesting, as, unfortunately, the textbook of my course concerning materials science partially is... uh, historic.


I'll look into it tonight, if I remember after getting this get-it-done-yesterday proposal off my desk. I know a couple of my undergrad text books (used mid-90s) were referenced extensively in the grad-level materials course I took last semester.

Offhand...

A handy generic reference book is "Metals Handbook, Desk Edition, 2nd edition," by ASM International. I've used that several times in gaming debates, like how toxic depleted uranium isn't (on par with other heavy metals, like lead), plus a few times at the office while actually doing materials engineering rather than pushing paper.

Also, "Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, 2nd edition," by Denny A. Jones. That's come in useful several times at the office.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 21 2006, 02:25 PM
Post #35


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



Thanks a lot - those look like serious material.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cray74
post Sep 21 2006, 06:21 PM
Post #36


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,428
Joined: 9-June 02
Member No.: 2,860



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
Thanks a lot - those look like serious material.

Porter & Easterling's "Phase Transformations" is a key, basic book. It's turned up in both my masters and bachelor's courses at two different universities.

Ohring's "Material Science of Thin Films" also turned up in both places but, like the corrosion book earlier, it's a bit specialized.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 22 2006, 05:55 PM
Post #37


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



Though those look indeed more specialized, they might come handy - thanks. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ankle Biter
post Sep 23 2006, 07:20 PM
Post #38


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 671
Joined: 9-March 06
Member No.: 8,353



I reckon dikoted materials are not mentioned mainly because the SOTA is now such that diamond is a less desireable material to coat blades with then what they come with naturally.

And, frankly, a thin layer of diamond on armor that is even slightly flexible will shatter as soon as anything hits it anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Killgore
post Oct 8 2006, 05:06 PM
Post #39


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 11-July 06
Member No.: 8,865



So here's a question. Could you (in theory) dikote bullets (Just the tips, before propellants are added, obviously), and what would that do for you in game terms? Granted, you'd probably have to use special material to withstand the process, but would it be worthwhile?

And what would the interaction be between Dikote Bullets vs Dikote Armor?

Also, cost was mentioned earlier in this thread. Since so many other previously high costs have come way down (cyberarms, for example), it seems likely to me that Dikote could come down too, becoming a cost effective purchase?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Slithery D
post Oct 8 2006, 05:14 PM
Post #40


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 750
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 9,059



If you Dikote cheap, scratchy brown toilet paper, does it still burn your ass? Is it in fact too smooth to pick up any, ah, "material" at all? If it was stuck to the bottom of your shoe, would you slip? If not, what would happen if you stepped on a contact explosion land mine?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Garrowolf
post Oct 10 2006, 04:31 AM
Post #41


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 870
Joined: 2-October 06
From: Athens Ga
Member No.: 9,517



I use a form of the old Hardened Armor rules with a twist or two. You could use this to represent the Dikote armor.

Hardening
Some armors have a hardening rating representing hard plates. This has the following effects:
· If the DV is less then or equal to the Hardening then the attack just bounces off. There is no stun roll made.
· It reduces the AP of any attack up to the rating.
· It adds it’s rating to both the ballistic and impact ratings (reduced by how much it is counteracting the AP)

Hardening is noted after the Ballistic and Impact in parenthesis. Cyberlimbs can have a point or two of hardening if they have armor. Hardening is not available in civilian armors. Security armor can have up to a 4 with a security license. Military armor goes up to a 6. After that they use Hard Suits or vehicles instead.

Ex: Full Body Armor becomes 6/4(4)
An attack with a heavy pistol 5p -1ap looses the AP on the hardening and leaves 6/4(3) so add the ballistic plus left over hardening (9) to body test.
That heavy pistol with APDS would become 5p -5ap so the armor becomes 5/4(0) as the -5 removes the hardening and one point of armor.
But a light pistol doing 4p 0ap bounces right off the hardening. A knife doing 4p would also skip right off.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dabigz732
post Oct 11 2006, 05:18 AM
Post #42


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 3-October 06
Member No.: 9,527



QUOTE (Cray74)
The difference in ballistic resistance is measurable even with a thin film diamond coating, even on boron nitride or other superhard ceramics. Projectiles just tended to skitter off the surface a little more often with the diamond coat present. It's a matter of percentages, but it's just at the edge of equaling a +1 armor bonus on the SR3/SR4 armor scales. Thus, allowing Dikote to deliver a +1/+1 to armor is, IMO, defensible (pun intended.)

Giving a damage or AP bonus to a dikoted edged weapon is...well, it's more of an exaggeration. I wouldn't mind a 1-point AP bonus to dikoted edged weapons in my games, but if it chaps your ass, leave it out.

By the way, speaking as someone in Baghdad at the moment and with some friends who stupidly sit partially exposed in the rather inhospitable environment I have to say a change of even a tiny amount can save your life. We had a ESapi plate come by a while ago that had the tip of a 7.62 round JUST sticking through it. Painful? Yes, but pain is good, it reminds you that the bad guy didnt just shatter your sternum creating high velocity bone fragments.

Once I get some pictures of all the gear we wear I'll prolly post 'em and give you guys some idea just how much we wear. But for a teaser let me just say the Michelin Man has NOTHING on me.

Z
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Oct 11 2006, 09:30 AM
Post #43


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



QUOTE (dabigz732)
We had a ESapi plate come by a while ago that had the tip of a 7.62 round JUST sticking through it.

Holy fuck! Any idea how that happened -- do they have WC core ammo out there or did it hit right on top of an earlier impact or something?

You can see the full setup with ESBIs here (PDF file) -- apparently not quite the same you're wearing, but pretty bulky nevertheless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th October 2025 - 08:47 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.