IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> no "moving target" modifiers in sr4?, where and why'd they go?
fourstring_samur...
post Sep 22 2006, 01:53 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 189
Joined: 17-December 03
From: Louisville, KY
Member No.: 5,912



am i right to assume that in the newest incarnation of SR there aren't moving target modifiers? is there a reason for this?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 22 2006, 02:09 PM
Post #2


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



The defender gets a bonus when running.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zeb.hillard
post Sep 22 2006, 02:26 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 124
Joined: 26-July 06
From: Columbus, OH
Member No.: 8,965



I ran with a very simple House Rule.
If the defender is doing nothing but moving, the attacker loses 1 die to his firearms pool. If the defender is actually using the RUN action, the attacker loses 1 die, plus 1 additional for every hit the defender scored on the RUN check.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Sep 22 2006, 02:33 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



If an attacker is in a moving vehicle they get a -3. I am also pretty sure that an attacker running get a -2. Yep, just looked it up...

And yes, the defender gets a +2 if running.

I don't think house rules are needed above this as it is quite clear...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Sep 22 2006, 06:21 PM
Post #5


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (deek)
If an attacker is in a moving vehicle they get a -3. I am also pretty sure that an attacker running get a -2. Yep, just looked it up...

And yes, the defender gets a +2 if running.

I don't think house rules are needed above this as it is quite clear...

The attacker running modifier is hugely too low. It's very difficult (I'd almost say nearly impossible) hit anything at a run even if the the target is only 10-15 meters away. You can shoot fairly accurately moving at a quick walk pace (once you learn how to do it), but shooting running is really hard. It's vastly easier to shoot a running target with you standing than to shoot a standing target when you are running.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zeb.hillard
post Sep 22 2006, 07:08 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 124
Joined: 26-July 06
From: Columbus, OH
Member No.: 8,965



QUOTE (kzt)
The attacker running modifier is hugely too low. It's very difficult (I'd almost say nearly impossible) hit anything at a run even if the the target is only 10-15 meters away. You can shoot fairly accurately moving at a quick walk pace (once you learn how to do it), but shooting running is really hard. It's vastly easier to shoot a running target with you standing than to shoot a standing target when you are running.

That's why I decided to put the penalties on a sliding scale. It's far more difficult to hit someone who is running quickly than it is to his someone who is jogging. Just like it's more difficult to hit someone while you are running, as opposed to walking or jogging.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Sep 22 2006, 07:23 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



I guess some people just need to put more reality into the game...I agree with what you are both saying, but until my players start whining about how the current modifiers aren't realistic enough for their tastes, I'm just going to leave it alone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Slithery D
post Sep 22 2006, 09:20 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 750
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 9,059



QUOTE (kzt)
QUOTE (deek @ Sep 22 2006, 09:33 AM)
If an attacker is in a moving vehicle they get a -3.  I am also pretty sure that an attacker running get a -2.  Yep, just looked it up...

And yes, the defender gets a +2 if running.

I don't think house rules are needed above this as it is quite clear...

The attacker running modifier is hugely too low. It's very difficult (I'd almost say nearly impossible) hit anything at a run even if the the target is only 10-15 meters away. You can shoot fairly accurately moving at a quick walk pace (once you learn how to do it), but shooting running is really hard. It's vastly easier to shoot a running target with you standing than to shoot a standing target when you are running.

When determining this sort of thing you need to consider average dice pools. Does it make it enough more difficult for someone tossing 4-6 dice? If you put too high a penalty, average people with professional skill levels won't ever be able to do it. A beat cop should have 5-7 dice. Could someone like that hit a stationary target not trying to dodge (one hit) at short range more often than not when he's running? Then 2 dice is probably the right penalty.

Penalties are where the men really get separated from the boys at the high end of attribute/skill dice pools. 12 dice isn't much better than 10 until you get a 7 dice penalty.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Sep 22 2006, 10:07 PM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (Slithery D)
When determining this sort of thing you need to consider average dice pools. Does it make it enough more difficult for someone tossing 4-6 dice? If you put too high a penalty, average people with professional skill levels won't ever be able to do it. A beat cop should have 5-7 dice. Could someone like that hit a stationary target not trying to dodge (one hit) at short range more often than not when he's running? Then 2 dice is probably the right penalty.

Penalties are where the men really get separated from the boys at the high end of attribute/skill dice pools. 12 dice isn't much better than 10 until you get a 7 dice penalty.

Some things are just too hard for anyone except experts. Typically shooting on the move is something that they don't even try to teach you until you are able to draw and shoot a target twice at 10 meters in two seconds reliably. And then they teach you to move at a very smooth walk where you maintain a stable shooting platform. Running you can't maintain that stable platform.

I would expect that someone with a total of 6 dice of skill equivalent could probably empty their gun at a stationary target and not reliably get a single hit while running at 5 meters. If they were stationary I'd expect that they would be able to hit a running target at 5 meters as often as they could in the target was 10-15 meters away.

Running you are shooting with one hand and you can't use the sights because they are bouncing around too much. So you are relying on aiming the gun in the general direction of the target and hoping for the best. (This is one place a smartgun link could be extremely useful, if the link could determine that the gun as aimed center of mass and fire it at the right moment.)

Shooting at a running target while stationary you just need to track the target and keep the gun moving with the target as you shoot. It is fairly easy if you have a reasonable level of marksmanship, as you can use both hands and the sights.

So I'd argue that your example of a -7 is the right area for the penalty for shooting while running, while the -2 for shooting at a running target is reasonable. (Assuming he's running across, as it's no problem to shoot at something running directly at you).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 01:59 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.