Vehicle combat |
Vehicle combat |
Sep 27 2006, 01:20 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 8,301 |
I'll bet I'm missing something that's in the book, but I'm trying to figure out what gets rolled for defense when a vehicle gets shot at in combat. The way I've been running it has been the driver's Reaction + the vehicle's Handling (+ the vehicle skill if on full defense). And the vehicle skill gets added to the roll if the attack is melee. (Which I imagine mostly matters if the cybered-up troll decides he wants to punch a sedan.) Anyway, is this how other people are running this? It hasn't come up too much in our game, but I'd like to be able to solidify this rule.
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 01:47 PM
Post
#2
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 |
p. 161
"When a vehicle is attacked in ranged combat, the driver rolls his Reaction +/– Handling as the defense part of the Opposed Test. Drones roll their Pilot +/– Handling." the full dodge\full defense equivalent is also described immediately afterward. "Evasive Driving Vehicles that are under attack can take a Complex Action and undertake evasive driving—the vehicle equivalent of full defense. Th is means the driver of the vehicle can add his Vehicle skill dice to the defense dice pool to dodge ranged attacks (drones add their Defense autosoft rating, see p. 239). Evasive driving cannot be used against ramming attacks." So it looks like what you are doing seems correct. |
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 02:05 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 8,301 |
Odd. I'm not sure I understand why evasive driving doesn't help against ramming. It seems like exactly the sort of thing that would help when someone tries to hit you with their car.
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 04:21 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 668 Joined: 4-September 06 Member No.: 9,304 |
Probably because evading gunfire is different than trying to evade a ramming attack. Two different driving methodes. One, you are jinking back and forth, the other, you are trying to move as fast as possible to one side to avoid the big nasty vehicle trying to hit you.
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 08:06 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 8,301 |
It makes sense that the maneuvers are different, it just doesn't make much sense to me that there is no such thing as evasive maneuvers against ramming.
|
|
|
Sep 27 2006, 08:30 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,206 Joined: 9-July 06 From: Fresno, CA Member No.: 8,856 |
It probably has something to do with the ramming mechanics being significantly different from the ranged mechanics? That's just a guess though, since I haven't got a book handy.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 07:02 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.