IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Street Magic Errata, your help is appreciated
toturi
post Dec 24 2006, 04:56 AM
Post #51


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



Don't forget to clarify/errta the Asartu/Norse tradition. Whether it is Earth or Beast spirits for Manipulation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yesman
post Dec 24 2006, 11:21 PM
Post #52


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Joined: 18-September 05
Member No.: 7,758



QUOTE (BookWyrm)
What page, yesman?

whoops sorry. Pg. 96-98 in the spirit stat blocks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BookWyrm
post Dec 26 2006, 12:26 AM
Post #53


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,379
Joined: 16-April 02
From: the LI shadows
Member No.: 2,607



Thanks, yesman. :ok:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NightmareX
post Jan 4 2007, 05:32 PM
Post #54


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 831
Joined: 5-September 05
From: LAX, UCAS
Member No.: 7,687



Just noticed - in the section on Focus Addiction, reference is made to Focus Addiction tests (captilized as such). Does this mean there were going to be rules for such and that they were left out? If so, perhaps this is something to add in the errata or as a bonus on the website?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BookWyrm
post Jan 4 2007, 05:45 PM
Post #55


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,379
Joined: 16-April 02
From: the LI shadows
Member No.: 2,607



Reread the entry. It says it's a variant of the Addiction rules (SR4 p. 80), but also read what the effects are on pg. 27 in Street Magic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NightmareX
post Jan 4 2007, 06:42 PM
Post #56


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 831
Joined: 5-September 05
From: LAX, UCAS
Member No.: 7,687



No offense, but did so. Are foci then a mental addiction, physical addiction, or something else? Further, what threshold are we talking for said tests (SR4 page 248)?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Jan 4 2007, 06:56 PM
Post #57


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (NightmareX)
No offense, but did so.  Are foci then a mental addiction, physical addiction, or something else?  Further, what threshold are we talking for said tests (SR4 page 248)?

We can rule out physical, since the description of physical addiction in the BBB specifically refers to chemical dependence. That leaves Mental, or "something else" and I have a feeling that if they'd meant for it to be "something else" they would have taken the time to spell it out.

As for the threshold used, it's the same threshold that you have for hackers who overuse Hot Sim VR immersion: Unstated, but apparently left to GM discretion. The design philosophy behind the Addiction rules is geared to letting the GM decide what level of addiction is right for their own group.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NightmareX
post Jan 4 2007, 08:18 PM
Post #58


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 831
Joined: 5-September 05
From: LAX, UCAS
Member No.: 7,687



QUOTE (RunnerPaul)
The design philosophy behind the Addiction rules is geared to letting the GM decide what level of addiction is right for their own group.

I gathered as much, but was hoping for a little more clarfication in this case :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larsine
post Jan 29 2007, 11:50 AM
Post #59


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 9-September 03
From: Sorø, Denmark
Member No.: 5,604



Page 14, THE OTHER SIDE, 1st paragraph:
Wrong: While you're our there...
Right: While you're out there...

Page 23, Adepts, 8-9th line:
Wrong: Some ad-epts abilities...
Right: Some a-depts abilities...
Reason: Accoding to my dictionary the word adept should never be divided as it is less than 5 letters long. By adding the "s" at end you break that rule, and should thus divide "by syllables or units of sound", and thus a-depts instead of ad-epts. But this break another rule "never divide a word so that one of the parts is a single letter". Best solution is proberly never to divide the word adept.

Page 27, Geas, 4th paragraph:
Wrong: ... see Acquiring Geasa in Play, p. 29).
Right: ... see Acquiring Geasa During Play, p. 30).

Page 29, SYMPATHETIC LINK, last paragraph:
Wrong: ... Sympathetic Link Modifiers table (p. 27).
Right: ... Sympathetic Link Modifiers table (p. 29).

Page 29, Symbolic Links, 2nd paragraph:
Wrong: ...Symbolic Link Creation table (p. 27)...
Right: ...Symbolic Link Creation table (p. 29)...

Page 39, THE NORSE TRADITION:
The "Spell Category: Spirit Type" table doesn't seem to match with the description of the spirist:
Table:
Combat: Guardian
Detection: Water
Health: Fire
Illusion: Air
Manipulation: Beast
Description:
Those that can cross to Midgard are the fire giants of Muspellheim (fire spirits), the dark fae of Niffellheim (spirits of water), the dwarves of Nidavellir (earth spirits), the storm spirits of Thrudheim (air spirits), and the Valkyrie (guardian spirits).

In fact the dwarves of Nidavellir seem to be much more like the Task spirits than any other type of spirit.

Page 50, BEYOND THE DORS OF PERCEPTION, 1st paragraph:
Wrong: ...the metaplanes of astral space (see p. 130).
Right: ...the metaplanes of astral space (see p. 128).

Page 51, Geas, 3rd line:
Wrong: Choose a geas from the options available on p. 26...
Right: Choose a geas from the options available on p. 27...

Page 55, BASIC METAMAGIC TECHNIQUES:
Wrong: Great Ritual p. 57
Right: Great Ritual p. 57

Page 57, GREAT FORM POWERS, table:
Wrong: Air: Storm (see p. 103)
Wrong: Fire: Storm (p. 103)
Wrong: Water: Storm (p. 103)
Right: Air: Storm (see p. 102)
Right: Fire: Storm (p. 102)
Right: Water: Storm (p. 102)

Page 58, Sympathetic Linking:
Wrong: ...(see Sympathetic Links, p. 28).
Right: ...(see Sympathetic Links, p. 29).
Wrong: ...(see Symbolic Links, p. 28).
Right: ...(see Symbolic Links, p. 29).

Page 60, line 3:
Wrong: ...as a sympathetic link (p. 28).
Right: ...as a sympathetic link (p. 29).

Page 65, THE GROUP BOND, 3rd paragraph:
Wrong: ...as sympathetic links (p. 28) to...
Right: ...as sympathetic links (p. 29) to...

Page 73, PATHFINDERS, Description and Customs:
Wrong: Investigation plays an important a role in their mission...
Right: Investigation plays an important role in their mission...

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Jan 29 2007, 01:45 PM
Post #60


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Larsine)
Page 39, THE NORSE TRADITION:
The "Spell Category: Spirit Type" table doesn't seem to match with the description of the spirist:
Table:
Combat: Guardian
Detection: Water
Health: Fire
Illusion: Air
Manipulation: Beast
Description:
Those that can cross to Midgard are the fire giants of Muspellheim (fire spirits), the dark fae of Niffellheim (spirits of water), the dwarves of Nidavellir (earth spirits), the storm spirits of Thrudheim (air spirits), and the Valkyrie (guardian spirits).

In fact the dwarves of Nidavellir seem to be much more like the Task spirits than any other type of spirit.

Been clarified already. Manipulation was supposed to be Earth but Beast was mixed in because of the Bear Sarks got added into the tradition as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larsine
post Feb 10 2007, 11:52 PM
Post #61


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 9-September 03
From: Sorø, Denmark
Member No.: 5,604



More errata for SM:

Page 81, Fetishes and Talismans, 2nd paragraph:
Wrong: A talisman (see Geasa, p. 27) is...
Right: A talisman (see Geas, p. 27) is...

Page 84, Metamagic Enchantments, Anchoring foci paragraph:
Wrong: ...(see Anchoring Triggers, p. 60).
Right: ...(see Anchoring Trigger Conditions, p. 60).

Page 85, Metamagic Enchantments, Symbolic link foci paragraph:
Wrong: ...Symbolic Linking (p. 28)...
Right: ...Symbolic Linking (p. 29)...

Page 103, Ally Spirit Formula, 4th paragraph:
Wrong: ...a sympathetic link (p. 28)...
Right: ...a sympathetic link (p. 29)...

Page 104, Creating an Ally Spirit, Step 3: Choose Powers paragraph:
Wrong: ...and Sense Link (p. 55) for free.
Right: and Sense Link (p. 54) for free.

Page 105, Sense Link, 1st line:
Wrong: ...power of Sense Link (see p. 55),...
Right: ...power of Sense Link (see p. 54),...

Page 108, Spirit Pacts, last line:
Wrong: ...sympathetic link (see p. 28)...
Right: ...sympathetic link (see p. 29)...

Page 125, Alarm Ward, last paragraph:
Wrong: ...(see Fooling Wards, p. 123).
Right: ...(see Fooling Wards, p. 124).

Page 125, Charged Ward, 1st paragraph:
Wrong: ...Reflecting metamagic technique.
Right: ...Reflecting metamagic technique (p. 61).

Page 125, Charged Ward, last paragraph:
Wrong: ...(see Fooling Wards, p. 123).
Right: ...(see Fooling Wards, p. 124).

Page 131, The Trials, last paragraph:
Wrong: ...see Friends in High Places.
Right: ...see Friends in High Places (p. 132).

Page 136, Using Threats, 2nd paragraph:
Wrong: ...such as shedim (p. 155)...
Right: ...such as shedim (p. 154)...

Page 139, Path of the Dead, 1st paragraph:
Wrong: ...with shedim (see p. 155).
Right: ...with shedim (see p. 154).

Page 154, Hive Mind, 1st paragraph:
Wrong: ...Sense Link power (p. 55)...
Right: ...Sense Link power (p. 54)...

Page 168, [Sense] Cryptesthesia:
Wrong: [Sense] Cryptesthesia (Passive/Directional)
Right: [Sense] Cryptesthesia (Passive, Directional)

Page 176, Empathic Healing, 2nd last line:
Wrong: Empathic Sense may only...
Right: Empathic Healing may only...

Page 177, Gliding:
Wrong: Gliding:
Right: Gliding

Page 177, Gliding, last line:
Wrong: ...uses the Traceless Walk power.
Right: ...uses the Traceless Walk power (p. 180).

Page 180, Artificer, 1st paragraph:
You mention Hephaestus, Daedalus, Goibhniu and Weland, but they are not mentioned on page 183-184 under the Celtic pantheon, Classical deities or the Norse pantheon.

Page 181, Dark Goddess, 1st paragraph:
You mention Kali, but she is not mentioned on page 184 under the Hindu deities.

Page 181, Dragon, 1st paragraph:
You mention the Dragon Emperor, but he is not mentioned on page 183-184 under the Chinese mythology.

Page 182, Lion, 1st paragraph:
You mention Sekhmet and Durga, but they are not mentioned on page 184 under the Egyptian pantheon or the Hindu deities.

Page 183, Phoenix, 1st paragraph:
You mention the Phoenix Empress, but she is not mentioned on page 183-184 under the Chinese mythology.

Page 187, Spell table, Test paragraph:
Wrong: ...Counterspelling), (Success...
Right: ...Counterspelling), or S (Success...

Lars
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BookWyrm
post Feb 11 2007, 12:59 AM
Post #62


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,379
Joined: 16-April 02
From: the LI shadows
Member No.: 2,607



Well done, Larsine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larsine
post Feb 18 2007, 10:19 PM
Post #63


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 9-September 03
From: Sorø, Denmark
Member No.: 5,604



Just found a few more after carefull inspection:

Page 37, Christian Theurgy:
The "Spell Category: Spirit Type" table doesn't seem to match with the description of the spirits:
Table:
Combat: Fire
Detection: Water
Health: Air
Illusion: Earth
Manipulation: Guidance
Description:
Michael (fire), Gabriel (water), Raphael (air), Uriel (earth) and seraphim at the service of the Holy Spirit (man’s immortal soul).

I would assume that Man's immortal soul = Spirit of Man, instead of Spirit of Guidance.


Page 100, Inhabitation Merges, Hybrid Form:
Wrong: ...single dual natured entity (p. 289, SR4).
Right: ...single dual natured entity (p. 287, SR4).

Page 102, Possession and Vessels, 2nd line:
Wrong: ...results is dual-natured, has...
Right: ...results is dual-natured (p. 287, SR4), has...

Page 125, Charged Ward, 3rd paragraph:
Wrong: ...“pressed through” like a standard ward (see p. 186, SR4)...
Right: ...“pressed through” like a standard ward (see p. 185, SR4)...

Page 141, The Toxic Path, 2nd paragraph:
Wrong: ...(see Magical Associations and Drain, p. 169, SR4)...
Right: ...(see Tradition, p. 169, SR4)...
There is no section called "Magical Associations and Drain" in SR4.

Page 147, Toxic Spirit Quick Design, Smog (Toxic Air Spirit):
Wrong: Use the spirit of air as a template...
Right: Use the spirit of air (p. 294, SR4) as a template...
Reason: The Carnage and Contagion toxic spirits has references to their template spirit.

Page 149, Evanescence, 3rd paragraph:
Wrong: ...(see Passing Through Barriers, p. 185–186, SR4).
Right: ...(see Passing Through Barriers, p. 185, SR4).
Reason: Everywhere else you refere to Passing Through Barriers, you only refer to the starting page (p. 185).

Page 151, Wasp, Last paragraph:
Wrong: ...the skill of Flight and the power of Venom.
Right: ...the skill of Flight (p. 286, SR4) and the power of Venom (p. 290, SR4).

Page 151, Cicada, Last paragraph:
Wrong:...the skill of Flight...
Right:...the skill of Flight (p. 286, SR4)...

Page 151, Firefly, Last paragraph:
Wrong: ...the skill of Flight and the power of Confusion.
Right: ...the skill of Flight (p. 286, SR4) and the power of Confusion (p. 287, SR4).

Page 151, Fly, Last paragraph:
Wrong: ...the skill of Flight and the powers of Pestilence (p. 154) and Immunity to Disease.
Right: ...the skill of Flight (p. 286, SR4) and the powers of Pestilence (p. 154) and Immunity to Disease (p. 288, SR4).

Reason for the last 4 erratas: Most other powers are refered, these should aswell.

Page 154, Pestilence, 5th line:
Wrong: ...as a toxin (p. 245, SR4)...
Right: ...as a toxin (p. 244, SR4)...

Page 164, Elemental Effects, Ice:
Wrong: ...vehicles must make a Crash Test (p. 159, SR4).
Right: ...Vehicles must make a Vehicle Test (p. 159, SR4).

Page 168, Thermographic Vision:
Wrong1: ...the cybernetic enhancement (p. 324, SR4).
Wrong2: ...the cybernetic enhancement (p. 324, SR4).
Right1: ...the cybernetic enhancement (p. 333, SR4).
Right2: ...the vision enhancement (p. 324, SR4).
Reason: Page 324 is the normal Vision enhancement, page 333 is the cybernetic version (which refers to page 324).

Page 169, Fast:
Wrong: ...the Disorientation effect, p. 275, SR4).
Right: ...the Disorientation effect, p. 245, SR4).

Page 170, Stim:
Wrong:...the Disorientation effect, p. 275, SR4).
Right: ...the Disorientation effect, p. 245, SR4).

Page 170, Dream:
Wrong: ...ritual sorcery (p. 175, SR4)...
Right: ...ritual spellcasting (p. 174, SR4)...

Page 173, [Element] Aura:
Wrong: ...elemental damage (see p. 155, SR4...
Right: ...elemental damage (see p. 154-155, SR4...

Page 173, [Elemental] Wall:
Wrong: ...the element (see p. 155, SR4...
Right: ...the element (see p. 154-155, SR4...

Page 177, Flexibility:
Wrong: ...Subduing attempts (p. 151, SR4).
Right: ...Subduing attempts (p. 152, SR4).

Page 177, Iron Lungs:
Wrong: ...fatigue sets in (p. 154, SR4).
Right: ...fatigue sets in (p. 155, SR4).

Lars
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BookWyrm
post Feb 19 2007, 02:58 PM
Post #64


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,379
Joined: 16-April 02
From: the LI shadows
Member No.: 2,607



Bravo, Larsine! *applause*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pyritefoolsgold
post Apr 14 2007, 12:50 AM
Post #65


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 163
Joined: 1-February 07
Member No.: 10,861



I don't know if this was intentional, but no prices were given for Talislegger kits or Enchanter's workshops. Both are something my character may become interested in acquiring.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BookWyrm
post Apr 14 2007, 12:54 AM
Post #66


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,379
Joined: 16-April 02
From: the LI shadows
Member No.: 2,607



Good spotting Pyre! *more applause*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sapphire_wyvern
post Apr 14 2007, 03:26 AM
Post #67


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 158
Joined: 4-August 02
Member No.: 3,064



I've got one for you as well. I emailed this to info@shadowrunrpg.com but never got a response, so I don't know if the email was ever read.

Founding a new Initiatory Group (Street Magic, page 69). In previous editions of SR, having previous experience with an initiatory group provided a -2 reduction in the Target Number for the test. Thus, previous experience was a bonus to the check. In Street Magic, for each member of the prospective group with previous experience in an initiatory group, there is a -2 reduction in the dice pool. So in SR4, previous experience is a penalty. Is this an intentional change to the rules or an inadvertent error in the conversion from previous editions?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sapphire_wyvern
post Apr 14 2007, 03:39 AM
Post #68


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 158
Joined: 4-August 02
Member No.: 3,064



QUOTE (toturi)
QUOTE (Larsine @ Jan 29 2007, 07:50 PM)
Page 39, THE NORSE TRADITION:
The "Spell Category: Spirit Type" table doesn't seem to match with the description of the spirist:
Table:
  Combat: Guardian
  Detection: Water
  Health: Fire
  Illusion: Air
  Manipulation: Beast
Description:
  Those that can cross to Midgard are the fire giants of Muspellheim (fire spirits), the dark fae of Niffellheim (spirits of water), the dwarves of Nidavellir (earth spirits),  the storm spirits of Thrudheim (air spirits), and the Valkyrie (guardian spirits).

In fact the dwarves of Nidavellir seem to be much more like the Task spirits than any other type of spirit.

Been clarified already. Manipulation was supposed to be Earth but Beast was mixed in because of the Bear Sarks got added into the tradition as well.

Er. With all due respect, Toturi, I find your response unclear as to which of the two options is correct. I *think* you're saying that Manipulation should still be Earth and the Bear Sark reference was accidentally mixed in. So there shouldn't be any Beast spirits. Is that right?

Where is the original clarification, anyway? I've searched the forum for it but I couldn't find it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larsine
post Apr 14 2007, 11:54 AM
Post #69


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 9-September 03
From: Sorø, Denmark
Member No.: 5,604



QUOTE (Pyritefoolsgold)
I don't know if this was intentional, but no prices were given for Talislegger kits or Enchanter's workshops. Both are something my character may become interested in acquiring.

I think the kits and workshops should be priced just like any other kit, worshop or facilty:

SR4 page 322:

Kit 500 :nuyen:
Shop 5,000 :nuyen:
Facility 100,000 :nuyen:

Lars
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BookWyrm
post Apr 14 2007, 03:11 PM
Post #70


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,379
Joined: 16-April 02
From: the LI shadows
Member No.: 2,607



QUOTE (sapphire_wyvern)
I've got one for you as well. I emailed this to info@shadowrunrpg.com but never got a response, so I don't know if the email was ever read.

Founding a new Initiatory Group (Street Magic, page 69). In previous editions of SR, having previous experience with an initiatory group provided a -2 reduction in the Target Number for the test. Thus, previous experience was a bonus to the check. In Street Magic, for each member of the prospective group with previous experience in an initiatory group, there is a -2 reduction in the dice pool. So in SR4, previous experience is a penalty. Is this an intentional change to the rules or an inadvertent error in the conversion from previous editions?

Nice spotting, Sapphire! *includes applause*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner
post Apr 14 2007, 08:08 PM
Post #71


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado
Member No.: 185



QUOTE (sapphire_wyvern)
Founding a new Initiatory Group (Street Magic, page 69). In previous editions of SR, having previous experience with an initiatory group provided a -2 reduction in the Target Number for the test. Thus, previous experience was a bonus to the check. In Street Magic, for each member of the prospective group with previous experience in an initiatory group, there is a -2 reduction in the dice pool. So in SR4, previous experience is a penalty. Is this an intentional change to the rules or an inadvertent error in the conversion from previous editions?

This is an intentional shift.

However the modifier should be clearer. The -2 modifier was intended to impact only perspective members who are already initiated members of another group (meaning actively belong to another group).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Apr 15 2007, 10:52 PM
Post #72


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...while we're on the subject of groups. With respect to Adepts, somehow requiring Arcana skill as a prerequisite to join an adept group doesn't make sense to the concept, particularly if the character is a physad. The description of the skill and it's various specialisations all relate to spell design and conjuring/focus creation formulae and have little if anything to do with Adepts (with the exception of Mystic Adepts). I believe in the case of Physads and Social Adepts, there should have been a different criteria for the bonding process more appropriate to the nature of the character, like say a challenge combat (physads) or successfully performing some form of service for the group.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Apr 16 2007, 04:43 PM
Post #73


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



QUOTE (NightmareX)
QUOTE (RunnerPaul @ Jan 4 2007, 01:56 PM)
The design philosophy behind the Addiction rules is geared to letting the GM decide what level of addiction is right for their own group.

I gathered as much, but was hoping for a little more clarfication in this case :(

Basically they develop a mental addiction to the focus that probably is somewhat different based on the focus. In the case of a power focus they get addicted to the rush or extra power, in the case of a sustaining focus they develop more a dependency on not needing to sustain a spell themselves. If you wish to really take it a step further, loss of said foci they have become addicted to could cause a crisis of faith and the character could potentially have to pick up a geas. My reasoning for this being that they don't believe they have the extra power they once had and are now useless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demerzel
post Apr 20 2007, 03:07 AM
Post #74


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,206
Joined: 9-July 06
From: Fresno, CA
Member No.: 8,856



Page 44, The Speaker's Way:
Wrong: ...the aleph of every group and social network.
Right: ...the alpha of every group and social network.

This may be ethnocentric of me, but don't we generally use the first letter of the greek alphabet rather than the hebrew alphabet to denote the dominant of a pack?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ophis
post Apr 20 2007, 04:39 PM
Post #75


Mystery Archaeologist
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,906
Joined: 19-September 05
From: The apple tree
Member No.: 7,760



Aleph can also mean centre point, the thing the networks would revolve around. Alpha would imply leader.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th February 2025 - 09:03 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.