![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|||||||||
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 80 Joined: 4-December 02 From: Québec, Bounty Hunter Region Member No.: 3,677 ![]() |
(Sorry, doing the topic here 'cause the Lounge is closed) Yeah, fear the CIN ! The "Carte d'Identité Nationale" or in english NIC "National Identity Card". The French have started it since 1955 ! The CIN is :
or for the english ones :
It's the basic of the SIN, fear it ! SIN appeared in 2036, we are in 2003... And now, Canada want to get that CIN card ! What does CIN do ?
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 305 Joined: 24-September 03 From: Albany, OR Member No.: 5,643 ![]() |
Sounds like a passport to me. What am I missing?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 80 Joined: 4-December 02 From: Québec, Bounty Hunter Region Member No.: 3,677 ![]() |
Yeah part of it is a passport but it's a identity card too.
It's sure that I'm not a French but it's look like something to prove that you are one, around the globe and in your country. That's not obligatory but I think that in some years.... maybe.... Edit : And if some country start to create a CIN, in a near future something unilateral will be made like the SIN, maybe... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 71 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Kirkland, WA, USA Member No.: 1,816 ![]() |
So? The US has been talking about implementing those recently. And they're doing practically the same thing already with Driver's licenses. Land of the free my ass... Still, it's better than any of the alternatives...
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|||
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
Switzerland. Canada. Australia. ~J |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#6
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 2-September 03 From: San Antonio Member No.: 5,571 ![]() |
If you're referring to the ability to move anonymously within society, pick up stakes, move on, and start anew, that pretty much died in the States with the implementation of the Social Security number. Plus, it's also a function of governmental control. Now that the tech exists to monitor the citizenry to this degree, it WILL be employed. But hey, take heart, I've lived my whole life on the U.S.-Mexico border and the ability to spoof I.D. is terrifyingly easy as evidenced by the large amounts of illegal aliens recieving welfare under fake names 'round these parts so the system is far from fool proof. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 113 Joined: 5-January 03 From: Butte County, CA Member No.: 3,836 ![]() |
Yeah, the Shadowrun SIN's don't spook me for the same reason... but if it (the tech) ever gets implanted... *shiver*
This post has been edited by ShieldT: Oct 23 2003, 07:09 AM |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 26-February 02 From: .se Member No.: 625 ![]() |
So? We have had that for what seems like an eternity here. We are already in a world of SIN :)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|||
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,545 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gloomy Boise Idaho Member No.: 2,006 ![]() |
Let's see I have been moving my whole life and never once, not ever have I ever been harrased or barred entry from a state. At one point my mail was two states behing me until I changed it. So let's back off the black helicopters please and live in the real world. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#10
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 2-September 03 From: San Antonio Member No.: 5,571 ![]() |
Did I say that? I'm referring to the fact you can no longer just up and ignore the paper trail that starts accumulating the moment you're born. You can't just up and travel a few states over, claim a new name, and start living out a new ID without any sort of connection to your past. A SSN is nowhere near the level of a SIN, but it's still a nationalized database. If you're thinking I'm referring to the men in black staring in your windows at night, you read wrong. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 731 Joined: 25-March 02 From: Rye, New York Member No.: 2,470 ![]() |
This has been suggested in the US from time to time, but usually gets shouted down. The Federated system of our government would make it hard to do since it would be a combination of state and federal gov't agencies giving info. They can't even agree on gun checks
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
Truthfully, I'm not adverse to a standardized version of the driver's license and a national database of that information.
The individual states can have their own logo -here- and still implement their own requirements, but call me a nut -- I like the idea of a highway patrol officer in Florida being able to verify a South Dakota driver's license. -Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Validating Posts: 1,618 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Montevideo, Uruguay. Member No.: 3,992 ![]() |
We've had "SINs" in Uruguay since as far as I can rememebr. We call it C.I. / Cédula de Identidad. It has your name, birthdate, birthplace, thumb fingerprint, an eight-digit numerical code, your signature, your photo, date of emission and of expiration.
We also have a Civic Credential, where you register every time you've voted in an official event (elections, referendums, etc.), voting in elections is mandatory here (you are fined if you don't vote). Trust me, a C.I. is a far, far step from an intrusive, big-brother style SIN (and it actually helps: for example, we don't need passport to go to Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Paraguay... I cant remember about other Latin American countries). I don't understand why do they have so much trouble in the US implementing such a system (although I'm open to an explanation). :) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Validating Posts: 1,618 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Montevideo, Uruguay. Member No.: 3,992 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
Because we have a whole "personal freedom, wild wild west frontier" mindset.
We have an instinctive dislike of a big Federal Government with a big Brother mentality. Which comes up every election (go figure). The same reason why we hold so dearly to our right to bear arms and defend it in the face of common sense and all practicality. Check out: http://www.nra.org/ For some insight into the mindset. -Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,759 Joined: 11-December 02 From: France Member No.: 3,723 ![]() |
I think I can say, for having lived in the French system for some time now, that we're pretty far from a SIN. First you're not forced to establish an ID card. Myself I don't, though I should (I keep using an old passport as an ID piece, but I should return it to the legal owner, the state, as it reached its use-by date).
The most important difference is that the different documents are not merged. I have different numbers on my passport (foreign affairs ministry), social security card (ministry of health), student card (education & research), as I would on my identity card (Interior ministry) if I established one. And so do my bank account number. 'They' still have use my name and my birth to jump from one database to another. But if you want some other parallels with SIN system, the chip on my social security card stores all my medical files (or should if the doc always thought about using it). The one on my credit card store basic information about my last expense. Heck, we even have "certified credstick" called Moneo and making a flop (okay, limited to 100 euro, but for the rest it's exactly that). The ID card has no chip but there can be some sort of "handscripted data trail" as when you're paying by check: above a certain sum, shoopkeeper often ask for an ID card and write the number on the back of the check. The databases interconnection might be the last thing really missing. BTW, in France the police can conduct identity check (I let you imagine it has often to do the color of your skin or the way you're dressed) to prevent disturbance of the public order, or in any case when you're at less than 20km from the border, or in an airport or a similar place. If you can't produce an ID piece (anything with a picture and a name if the cop is in a good day...) or at least been identified by a parent or a friend (who has himself a piece), they can detain you for 4 hours max to check it by themselves (and if they find you're a criminal or an illegal immigrant, switch to a more problematic situation for you). A lack of cooperation can also result in a fee or prison. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 2-September 03 From: San Antonio Member No.: 5,571 ![]() |
Because like Siege said, America is built on the idea of keeping the government intentionally weak so it cannot infringe on personal liberties. This is done in two ways: First, there is the bill of rights and other amendments plus the constitution to specify what the government can and can't do. Secondly, the government is intentionally made to be inefficient so the various part of it will always be infighting and can't turn their attention to squashing civil liberties. It's the idea of limited government: government designed to do just the bare minimum it is required to do while maintaining maxium freedom for it's citizens. Many Americans, myself included, are against most National databases for the simple reason that we want the government's information about us to be limited, or at least force them to send out the black helicopters to spy on us if they want it :) |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
The predecessor to the Constitution was a failure because the principle of keeping government weak was so ingrained as to make the thing powerless. The Constitution was written to keep government just strong enough to ensure personal property rights.
~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 2-September 03 From: San Antonio Member No.: 5,571 ![]() |
Well, yeah, that's what I meant to say; government that's strong enough to enforce basic rights like right to property etc, but still limited so as to assure those liberties. However he failure of the weak central government of the AoC doesn't mean we should take a flying leap in the other direction to compensate and thankfully, the drafters of the constitution agreed.
Not saying that the Articles of Confederation were a brilliant idea, but there is a good amount of debate among historians if ANY government could have been successful in the early years of the Nation, given all the hoopla that was going on at the time. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|||||
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 71 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Kirkland, WA, USA Member No.: 1,816 ![]() |
Switzerland: Sure, they seem pretty free, but they've got a horribly socialist regime, taxes are through the roof, and I'm not sure they take kindly to refugees. Canada: It's Canada. Socialist BS, draconian firearms laws, and an economy that's even slower than ours. Australia: Again, draconian gun laws, socialist government, high taxes... BTW, thanks, Siege... glad to know I'm not the only NRA-pimp around here. |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
I'm not a big fan of the NRA, but it does provide an insight into the "right to weapons" mindset and into the "no big government" mindset as well.
-Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|||
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 80 Joined: 4-December 02 From: Québec, Bounty Hunter Region Member No.: 3,677 ![]() |
And that's why we have 50x less murder by guns than US 8) Same for Australia and Swist, they have around 100-150 kill per year. US have 11.000 per year. Have you seen the movie Bowling for Columbine ? |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 ![]() |
Anyone want to do the extrapolation of relative population size?
-Siege |
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 80 Joined: 4-December 02 From: Québec, Bounty Hunter Region Member No.: 3,677 ![]() |
China have 50 kill by gun per year, and they are more than US.
Look at the movie... you will get a better idea of the subject. Better, it's made by a US producer, Micheal Moore. Edit : US have a population around 242 million. Canada around 31 million. US have 9x more population. So if we get the kill by gun of Canada (around 250) to the population of US, x9, we get 2250 kill by gun so... 4x less than US now. Edit : And I don't to start a flamme war to "Who is better", nah. It just that I think that our firearm legislation is way more secure than the US one. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|||
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
Draconian firearms laws? That being why gun ownership is significantly more common than in the US? As for taxes, a public service announcement: TAXES, IN ANY QUANTITY, ARE NOT IN AND OF THEMSELVES BAD. It's taxes you don't see returning value for that are bad. High taxes isn't a black mark in my book. However, since you're an advocate of the NRA, odds are that we're not about to see eye-to-eye anytime soon, and I'd rather not turn this thread into a flamewar. Agree to disagree? ~J |
||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th August 2025 - 10:36 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.