IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Seattle and the Death Penalty
FlakJacket
post Nov 24 2006, 04:07 PM
Post #1


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



I don't have my books in front of me at the moment, but does the Seattle Metroplex have the death penalty on the statute books? Doing a quick search it seems that the current day Washington state has the death penalty, but I don't remember any of the sourcebooks mentioning it for Shadowrun's Seattle one way or the other.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Nov 24 2006, 05:51 PM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Official death penalty, or "Breathing While SINless And Running Into A Lone Star Officer" penalty?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penta
post Nov 24 2006, 08:30 PM
Post #3


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,978
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 500



I presume he means official.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Nov 24 2006, 10:09 PM
Post #4


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Well, according to the most recent source (ha ha ha), Seattle does not have a death penalty. Federal law may be a little different.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Snow_Fox
post Nov 25 2006, 02:36 AM
Post #5


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,577
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gwynedd Valley PA
Member No.: 1,221



RL current washington state does have the death penalty. The condemned may choose death by leathal injection or the noose.

There was a case a few years back where a man choose the noose them put on weight and appealed against execution claiming he was now so fat he would be decapitated by the noose. the judge put him on a diet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post Nov 26 2006, 01:51 AM
Post #6


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



Hanging? Now that's cool. If I had to choose a way to be executed it'd have to be a choice between either firing squad or the long drop. I'm surprised that Shadowrun's Seattle doesn't have a death penalty though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Nov 26 2006, 01:57 AM
Post #7


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



I think it's unconscionable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penta
post Nov 26 2006, 02:00 AM
Post #8


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,978
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 500



Leaving aside moral points *glares at SL James's transparent trolling*, it's worth noting that Seattle and the environs is traditionally very liberal politically; There's something of a divide between Eastern Washington state (conservative and rural), and Western Washington (liberal and urban), in terms of general political tendencies.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 26 2006, 02:10 AM
Post #9


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



There used to be an old urban legend that a person who survived execution had to be set free, this is untrue for technical reasons. However, I wonder about people who are magically resurrected. If you're sentenced to be hung by the neck until you are dead, and that sentence is carried out, it seems that the reanimated individual should be free to go, assuming that his reanimation has more to do with 4th World Wizard spells than with Shedim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Nov 26 2006, 02:15 AM
Post #10


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



I meant it's unconscionable that SR's Seattle doesn't have a goddamn death penalty. Given Lone Star's more-than-willing to kill people reputation, what the Hell difference would it make?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penta
post Nov 26 2006, 02:23 AM
Post #11


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,978
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 500



Simple: Easier to switch contracts than change statute.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Nov 26 2006, 04:05 AM
Post #12


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



QUOTE (SL James)
I meant it's unconscionable that SR's Seattle doesn't have a goddamn death penalty. Given Lone Star's more-than-willing to kill people reputation, what the Hell difference would it make?

Makes better business sense, really. After all, why get paid to kill a murderer once when you can charge the metroplex to hold him for the rest of his/her natural life?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
krayola red
post Nov 26 2006, 04:11 AM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Joined: 12-August 06
Member No.: 9,097



Er, doesn't that argument advocate in favor of a death penalty? Capital punishment is a policy decision that lies within the domain of the Seattle government, not Lone Star, and why pay to hold a murderer for the rest of their natural life when you can just kill them?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emo samurai
post Nov 26 2006, 04:22 AM
Post #14


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,589
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 8,019



It's the government. The government doesn't care about efficient spending.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 26 2006, 04:29 AM
Post #15


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



The government is run by people who get paid a very small amount of money considering how important their job is. There are two ways that they can balance this. They can continue to hold a regular job and neglect their official duties, which is what may do at the local levels, or they can rely on what are called kickbacks for their income.

Kickbacks work quite simply and very nicely. If you have hiring power then a company who is looking or an individual for a job will pay you to hire it. Since the money used to pay for the job does not come out of your pocket you make a profit. The bigger the kickback, of course, the bigger the profit you make, so it is best the hire the companies that are willing to provide the best kickbacks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Nov 26 2006, 06:43 AM
Post #16


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



QUOTE (Ancient History)
QUOTE (SL James @ Nov 26 2006, 02:15 AM)
I meant it's unconscionable that SR's Seattle doesn't have a goddamn death penalty. Given Lone Star's more-than-willing to kill people reputation, what the Hell difference would it make?

Makes better business sense, really. After all, why get paid to kill a murderer once

Because it's not like you can kill him again anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PlatonicPimp
post Nov 26 2006, 06:57 AM
Post #17


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,219
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lofwyr's stomach.
Member No.: 1,320



There are ways, SL james. There are ways......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Nov 26 2006, 07:22 AM
Post #18


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



Of course there are, but it's not worth the time and effort.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Nov 26 2006, 02:05 PM
Post #19


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
I wonder about people who are magically resurrected.

If there is a resurrection spell in SR4 I am going to scream. If you're talking about Shedim (or zombies or other spirit possession), it's a new entity in an old body and should be treated as such, generally with a flamethrower.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Nov 26 2006, 02:11 PM
Post #20


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (nezumi)
QUOTE (hyzmarca @ Nov 25 2006, 09:10 PM)
I wonder about people who are magically resurrected.

If there is a resurrection spell in SR4 I am going to scream. If you're talking about Shedim (or zombies or other spirit possession), it's a new entity in an old body and should be treated as such, generally with a flamethrower.

Umm... My group is using Microsoft rules... :evil:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Konsaki
post Nov 26 2006, 02:24 PM
Post #21


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,526
Joined: 9-April 06
From: McGuire AFB, NJ
Member No.: 8,445



So when the rezed body suddenly turns blue and stops moving, we know where the refference came from, gotcha.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Nov 26 2006, 11:16 PM
Post #22


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



Oh, also while you can kill the body quite a few times, you can only send them to Hell once (unless Seattle somehow gets ahold of some cybermantic ritual-capable mages).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 27 2006, 04:35 AM
Post #23


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
However, I wonder about people who are magically resurrected.

They get tossed into the lava sea.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dog
post Dec 2 2006, 05:17 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 7-February 03
Member No.: 4,025



QUOTE (krayola red)
Er, doesn't that argument advocate in favor of a death penalty?

Depends on if you're the guy paying, or the guy getting paid.

I'd be less concerned about the Metroplex government allowing the death penalty than I would about any of the extraterritorial corps kicking around. After all, if you've done something that might warrant the death penalty, chances are at some point that a corp will be involved.

I imagine that Lone Star has some policy like this. Say you've committed mass murder of non-corp citizens on municipal territory and LS comes to arrest you. If you go quietly, they are expected to follow the municipal laws and once you're convicted you go to jail for life. But if you kill some cops before they grab you, LS gets to invoke some sort of clause where they can sentence you to death under their corp laws before the Seattle government gets you. (Which is redundant in a few ways, I realize.)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Dec 2 2006, 05:22 PM
Post #25


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Dog @ Dec 3 2006, 04:17 AM)
I imagine that Lone Star has some policy like this.  Say you've committed mass murder of non-corp citizens on municipal territory and LS comes to arrest you.  If you go quietly, they are expected to follow the municipal laws and once you're convicted you go to jail for life.  But if you kill some cops before they grab you, LS gets to invoke some sort of clause where they can sentence you to death under their corp laws before the Seattle government gets you.  (Which is redundant in a few ways, I realize.)

I imagine Lone Star has the policy that if you off a cop or two, especially when they are in the process of arresting you, then your head is going to spring a leak as soon as they get a chance. No death sentence needed when you are killed while resisting arrest.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 04:19 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.