IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> SHP v1.9, Including 1.5 Errata and FAQ
Serbitar
post Dec 10 2006, 04:09 PM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,498
Joined: 4-August 05
From: ADL
Member No.: 7,534



I started to add a change history, so here are the changes.
Maybe somebody can look for serious flaws and problems. Especially with my new ruling for Cyberlimbs. With the simple damage resistance rule, they should be much better and offer additional style.
  • changed maximum number of rolls for skilltests to skill+1
  • skipped magical drain healing rules, they are now RAW
  • skipped spirits on away missions rule, as it is now RAW
  • skipped changes to ammunition (except stickNshock), as RAW ammunition was changed
  • added alternative rigging attribute table
  • changed the area attack rules from the FAQ
  • skipped the area rule for direct combat spells, at it is now RAW
  • added +1 to all cyberlimb base attributes, added damage resistance
  • technomancer threading slightly for balancing reasons
  • deleted ``2x maximum cap'', further unified skill and attribute caps
  • added rules for cyberware/bioware compatibility
SHP v1.9

For 1.10 I want to attack mage creation rules to get a little more out of aspected magicians.
The idea is to make the mage edge much more expensive and throw magic 3 in from start. The aspected magicians edge will be much cheaper.
Knack stuff and latent awakening will then make sense again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JongWK
post Dec 10 2006, 04:33 PM
Post #2


Shooting Target
****

Group: Validating
Posts: 1,618
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Montevideo, Uruguay.
Member No.: 3,992



You might want to update your sig. :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Konsaki
post Dec 10 2006, 04:33 PM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,526
Joined: 9-April 06
From: McGuire AFB, NJ
Member No.: 8,445



SHP v1.9 Errata

Table 1 - Karma cost to raise attribute from 1 to 2 should read 10 Karma.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serbitar
post Dec 10 2006, 05:26 PM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,498
Joined: 4-August 05
From: ADL
Member No.: 7,534



Ah thanks. Corrected. Seems like I had only uploaded my "pre error searching" version. Right one should be up now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SCARed
post Dec 11 2006, 09:36 AM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 81
Joined: 28-June 06
From: Sol System, Earth, Europe, Germany, Saxony
Member No.: 8,796



QUOTE (Serbitar)
[*]skipped the area rule for direct combat spells, at it is now RAW

maybe you want to add an in- before the direct ...

otherwise i just scanned through the rules. well done as usual!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serbitar
post Dec 11 2006, 09:48 AM
Post #6


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,498
Joined: 4-August 05
From: ADL
Member No.: 7,534



ah true, boosting direct combat spells would be a little silly
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matsu Kurisu
post Dec 11 2006, 09:26 PM
Post #7


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 8-September 06
Member No.: 9,334



Thanks for yet another great job. We are assessing at the moment and will probably implement a lot of your suggestions in our current game

fLaSh!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 06:00 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.