Magic Charactors Better than Mundane?, A discussion comparing mundayne to magic |
Magic Charactors Better than Mundane?, A discussion comparing mundayne to magic |
Dec 25 2006, 08:03 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,955 Joined: 6-December 06 From: Payson, Utah Member No.: 10,237 |
Ive been playing for a year, and sort of developed my own oppinions about certain types of charactors. One of which, being that I beleive that awakened charactors have a bigger advantage over mundayne charactors. Anyone agree?
I've always followed one rule in SR combat, "Kill the mage first." fistandantilus3.0 - Edit:Title Spelling Corrected. :) |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 08:06 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 349 Joined: 16-January 05 Member No.: 6,984 |
Mundane, the word you are looking for is mundane.
Mages are one of the first things to go for, but in a sustained fight, they can damage themselves trying to take out opponents, whereas a street sam needs to use grenades and the like to do that. |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 08:25 AM
Post
#3
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 619 Joined: 18-April 03 From: The UV Nexus Member No.: 4,474 |
You mean, "Spot the mage first; kill the mage second". |
||
|
|||
Dec 25 2006, 08:33 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,955 Joined: 6-December 06 From: Payson, Utah Member No.: 10,237 |
No, i mean kill the mage first. Its worked out for me since the beggining. But i like your way of putting it.
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 09:10 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,526 Joined: 9-April 06 From: McGuire AFB, NJ Member No.: 8,445 |
I like how everyone always thinks that the mage stands out like Gandalf in a firefight. Come on, people. You really expect it to be that easy to see a mage?
1 - A mage doesnt have to gesture to cast a spell 2 - A mage doesnt have to speak to cast a spell 3 - A mage wears normal cloths just like your standard mundane 4 - He can use a pistol or other weapons just like any other meta-human 5 - Unless you yourself are awakened, odds are, you wont recognise someone as a mage. It's not like D&D where you can just do the quick checks for Robes, Staff and Pointy hat... |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 10:19 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
doesn't SR4 have rules similar to SR3 for noticing a spell being cast? if not, spotting a mage isn't too hard; your mage will have to spot them astrally, then mark them in VR. if so, spotting mage will be easy--he'll be the guy you notice casting a spell.
as for advantages... well, i've heard lots of people complain that mages and adepts are too powerful in SR3. i haven't encountered that problem myself; i find both character types to have strengths and weaknesses that make them different from, but not better than, other character types. the arguments i hear about mages and adepts being overpowered in SR4 are very similar to the ones i hear about relating to SR3, so i'm not inclined to give them much credence. |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 10:36 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 619 Joined: 18-April 03 From: The UV Nexus Member No.: 4,474 |
I agree with Konsaki about mage spotting. The only thing that gives the mage away is the lack of obvious cyber, or a katana. A runner is either a sammi or a mage, right?
Another possibility, you are meta-gaming, and recognize the mage because the GM is using DnD miniatures. :spin: Or maybe you just announce, "I shoot the mage", and your GM doesn't ask you, "which figure is the mage?". OR!!! maybe your game is like the one I am playing in. The last few runs, ALL the opponents were either mages or spirits; bug shamans and bug spirits, blood mages and blood spirits; etc. You say, "I shoot the mage", and the GM responds, "Which one?" :D |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 01:58 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 269 Joined: 8-November 04 Member No.: 6,817 |
My upcoming campaign will have half or so of the players awakened, I think they'll see a lot of magical opposition. Geek the mages first indeed.
Actually for combat alone, is magic really that much better than mundane? It seems to me that if you can carry a few big guns to the fight you get bigger bangs than with most spells, of course spells are easier to sneak past security with than big guns. |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 02:40 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,955 Joined: 6-December 06 From: Payson, Utah Member No.: 10,237 |
Thats the point I was trying to make. Also, if you had the choice, would you take really big guns that go bang? Or spells?
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 03:08 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 289 Joined: 20-February 04 From: in the matrix Member No.: 6,091 |
it is all personal opinion. In my campaign, there is not one "mage" in the bunch. We have street sammies, TM and adepts (physical/gun/charisma). So what is better? it all just depends. mages are better at countering other mages. Mages vs Sammies? it just depends.
I normally play non-mages. Either cybered sammie or adept (physical/gun). But I do on the occasion play the mage type. so the question is "what" do you want to do? "how" do you want to accomplish it? there are sooo many options... dog |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 03:43 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,955 Joined: 6-December 06 From: Payson, Utah Member No.: 10,237 |
And the award for most dramatic speach goes to....
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 04:42 PM
Post
#12
|
|||
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
One reasoning for this, i think, is defense. Ok, take combat situation. Anyone can wear good armor, and have a good Dodging skill and can defend against gunshots. A pistol shot fired off by the same guy vs. a mundane wearing an armored jacket with a say, 4 body, is no more or less effective vs. a mage wearing an armored jacket and a 4 body, if say average successes were rolled(of course, glitches happen, as do critical successes.) Now, a force 5 Manaball vs. a group of mages with a 4 willpower can hurt. A force 5 manaball vs. a group of mundanes with a 4 willpower can drop the whole lot of them. Simply put, while anyone can defend against firearms or melee weapons, only mages have that extra defense versus magic, and that can make a world of difference.(getting more technical, mages also have spells that can increase their firearm and melee defense.) Combat spells aside, the same can go for controlling spells and the like. In the case of Adepts, i can see why some folks have the issue, their mundane Face is going to have a lot of problems being as good as what they do as the adept Face. A cybered gunman will have an edge...and Adept gunman can get a bigger edge. Same with melee. Unarmed is almost cornered by the Adept...when it comes to doing physical damage...an adept with the killing hands/critical strike combo outmatches the sammie with muscle augmentation and bone lacing...since critical strike has a limit equal to magic rating. Ive used this and its ugly. Not to mention the adept's ability to get extra skill dice. (Tho i have to say the difference between cyber/adept gunman/melee is much less than the cyber vs. adept face. It's pretty much been proven..if you want a hardcore face, go adept.) Now, of course as a counterpoint, you can argue that the adept or mage has to pay for their abilities in other ways...having to purchase magical ability, an extra stat to worry about and in case of a mage, extra skills to worry about limits what else they can do. Ive also found you can easily make a very effective combat mage, with the limited resources. Another reasoning behind the 'magical ability is better' is the Karma bit thats been discussed....while magically active people do sink alot of karma...if a GM doesnt use a karma for cash system the wired fellow is at the mercy of payment, not to mention finding docs to implant his things. The skills only go so high, so the mundane will no doubt have a wide array of skills...thus outdoing the magically active person in a kind of variety in a way. (though ive seen plenty of effective mages with a lot of skills.) Funny thing is, in the case of the Tech Awakened(Resonance) vs. Mundane computer freaks, the mundanes are argued to have the edge ive noticed. Not having played an SR4 Technomancer or hacker yet(ive done deckers), im wondering about this. Ok, after the long-ass discussion i managed to type...I really dont know if i can finger one as blatantly 'better' even if in a lot of what i said seems to lean toward the magically active. I agree with the quoted statement above, i think, that each type has a sort of advantage over the other in ways. (The big mage difference, IMO, is the 'if you cast spells all day, your luck will run out and you will eventually drop from drain'. Not to mention even a couple Drains will knock you back alot with decreased die pools.) |
||
|
|||
Dec 25 2006, 04:51 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,526 Joined: 9-April 06 From: McGuire AFB, NJ Member No.: 8,445 |
You are correct ElFenrir, TMs are on the low end of combat prowess compared to everyone else. Though they can be gods in the matrix given enough time, and can perform combat through a drone or through drone hoards. Of course, if a TM were to sacrafice 1 point of resonance for Synaptic Boosters II, discounting how the TM got 160,000 cred, their combat ability goes up drasticly, but that can be said of any PC.
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 06:45 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
Yeah, it's kind of strange in a way. Ok, speaking straight defense ability...you can make a hacker, mage, or face with the ability to defend themselves if necessary(ie, they dont suffer from that classic 'gotta stay in the center of the party' syndrome of varied fantasy systems. ;)) But technos seem to need a lil extra protection. I guess this can simply go toward the number of BP that must be spend on a techno to make them really effective. While hackers can get Electronics and Cracking Group and call it a day(and some resources...thankfully no longer needing gobs and gobs of nuyen like deckers did), Technos need the above plus Tasking, and the big BP sink are the complex forms...technically speaking, a hacker can spend 80 BP for groups to max his skills and have a ton left over, if a techno wants to max the skills(groups), its 120 BP and at least 40 for the complex forms...thats coming dangerously close to half.
Ive also heard that even IN the matrix Technos have a little bit of a harder time against straight hackers...but i suppose after karma and submersion happened they'd catch up. I'd like to see a technomancer with grades of submursion under his belt...talk about nightmare to anyone with assets. :grinbig: I actually like technos alot. Hmm...got a little derailed with magic vs. mundane..maybe because i just cant help but consider Resonance as the 'Tech Magic'. As for pure magic...its power balance i suppose will be relative. If a campaign takes place in a part of the Barrens with gangs that wouldn't know magic if it shot em in the ass, one mage in the party can really shift the balance. If a campaign takes place dealing with Austrailian Awakened Creatures, mages in the party won't make it that much more powerful. If anything, it'll make it survivable. :D |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 08:35 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
even if a mage has high Dodge, they tend to lack the attributes to back it up. they can't wear as much armor as a street sam, because a) a street sam generally has higher Body, allowing more armor; and b) a street sam can have cyberware and bioware that increases their armor even further. not to mention that the lower Body of the mage means less soak--another place that enhancement can give the sam an edge.
and, yes, mages can sustain an armor spell--thus decreasing their effectiveness at other magical activities. that's the key to why mages aren't overpowered: just about everything they do draws from a single pool of resources, meaning that increasing their defense (physical or magical) detracts from their offense, and vice-versa. a street sam might have a lower maximum defense or offense, but he's got a higher average level of both than a mage can maintain. the amount of offense/defense a mage can maintain can be increased by sustaining foci and the like, but but by that point, a street sam can up his general level of effectiveness even further. |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 09:45 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 323 Joined: 17-November 06 From: 1984 Member No.: 9,891 |
I really prefer playing magicians over mundanes. But mainly because I love spellcasting and interaction with spirits (that being powerful helps ;)).
However, looking at starting characters and maybe at the first 100-150 karma mundane runners might have the edge over a caster. After that, it goes downhill pretty fast. That wasnt different in SR3 and did not change much to SR4. Alot of good comparisons have been done in this threat and there isnt much too add without repeating myself, so i wont :D |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 09:53 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 393 Joined: 20-June 06 Member No.: 8,754 |
In my last group (before an unfortunate TPK), the sammy was by far the biggest threat in a gun fight. He rarely took any damage, and routinely had the most kills. Though it helped that he had 7 edge and well optimized cyber, and the group mage usually acted more as a buffer than spellslinger.
So I wouldn't say that magic characters are better than mundanes. They both can fill their roles well. |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 10:38 PM
Post
#18
|
|||
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
Well, if i learned one thing in SR4...you dont need uber attributes to be effective. Well, looking at things a few ways, my adept had 4's in his physical attributes and in Intuition, since he was a fighter-type. But he had nothing higher than a 4 in attributes. However, he seriously did his job well, with the adept powers. a 4 body seems to be about the body stat for a combat oriented character(natural, and human im talking, of course orks naturally have more.) Most combat mages ive seen out of the box pack the 4 body...about the same as most sammies...the sammies have the advantage of cyber which can boost their damage resistance. Armored jackets seem to be the typical armor for the protective-concious. The sammie rolls a few more defense dice, sure. Of course, sustaining foci can help(not too many, or you get the walking christmas tree syndrome.) But i do hold that both sides do their jobs well, when it comes to sammie vs. combat mage. (I will also hold that ork combat mages are some of the nastiest characters around in the magical sense. :D) However, i am willing to go out on a limb and say a social adept kicks the ass of about any other kind of face. Magical type face coming in second(lots of spells that help with that), with mundane faces a distant third. All they have are tailored pheremones to boost their abilities. I'm also willing to say that when it comes to the stealthmonkeys...magical characters have an edge here as well. |
||
|
|||
Dec 25 2006, 11:11 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,150 Joined: 19-December 05 From: Rhein-Ruhr Megaplex Member No.: 8,081 |
The baddest magician out there is a strong mind controlling one. Luckily, my players don't exploit this because it's not fun.
(They might command the security guard on the other side of the door to open it, but they don't charm half the oppononents and command them to kill the other half). That face adepts can be on the far side has been proven. But on the stealth monkey... I am pretty content with my mundane, she is imo on par with an adept, unless the adept is build exclusively for that role (For my char it's only one facet, alltough the biggest one). Mages ore mystical adepts are better, if they don't trip astral security. |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 11:57 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,011 Joined: 15-February 05 From: Montréal, QC, Canada Member No.: 7,087 |
It's not always about killing the mage first.
It's about getting the best ratio of effort expanded versus threat neutralized. For exemple, even though a mage sniping at you safely from behind enemy line with great cover is a major nuisance and possibly the gravest threat you are facing, you're a full blown moron if you put all your effort into killing him at the expense of very dangerous and more readily accessible mundane threat firing at you with heavy ordinance at close range. You are far better off containing the mage (Minimizing or breaking LOS by using the terrain and various technique to reduce visibility such as smoke grenade) and staying within LOS of your own mage to get counterspelling protection while eliminating the closest and most readily available targets as fast as possible and work your way to the mage. Now if the mage does you the courtesy of starting the combat 10 meter away from you in the open, then by all means kill him in the first IP. When you are in a fight, the objective isn't to kill the mage. It is to win the fight. Be efficient. --- Spotting the mage : Damn easy if he is within LOS and using decent power spell. If he's casting force 2 manaball at you it might be troublesome, but since the threshold for the perception test if 6 - force, you'll spot him readily enough if he's casting serious stuff at you within LOS. Even with -2 for being distracted most observant runner will see which member of the opposition cast a Force 4 or 5 spell. If the mage is hidden like a sniper, life is a lot tougher and your team's mage will likely have to earn his pay. |
|
|
Dec 26 2006, 12:01 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 211 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,444 |
As a general rules, the balance between awakened and mundane characters is kept by the GM. In games where karma is easier to come by, awakened characters have the advantage because they can improve their specialty, plus improve other magical abilities, and have a nearly unlimited range of abilities to choose from. In a game where tech toys (and cash) are more plentiful, cybered characters have the advantage, because the toys they use are directly related to their party role, and don't cost karma to start using.
There is no real way to perfectly balance availability of tech and karma that keeps the awakened perfectly balanced with the sleepers unless the players accept the GM awarding more karma to awakened characters and awarding expensive cyber with installation to non-awakened characters. No cash/karma trade ends up being perfectly fair, but GMs can attempt to create a story that gives each character a chance to shine both individually and a as group, so each player feels he belongs in the party and has an equally important part to play. (Something hard to do without a lot of cooperation with the players) |
|
|
Dec 26 2006, 12:12 AM
Post
#22
|
|||
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Doesn't need to be hidden like a sniper. Being in combat counts as a hectic situation - right(I am not going into that discussion again)? So mage tells spirit - dude, Conceal me and my buds, dude... (-5) from concealment + (-2) from distracted = -7 I don't think you'd be noticing much. |
||
|
|||
Dec 26 2006, 12:38 AM
Post
#23
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,011 Joined: 15-February 05 From: Montréal, QC, Canada Member No.: 7,087 |
Please. That's still just one success required (for a powerful spell) when most runners have 10+ dice pool for visual perception : Vision enhancement III and the visual specialisation give an easily accessible and powerful +5 dice to such pools. Most runner have these +5 dice to go with Intuition + Perception (at least within 7 or so runs). A powerful spell will be spotted easy enough if the mage is in sight. Beside, at worst you just suspect the mage is the one guy who hasn't shot at you during the pass where you got magic thrown at you. It's really being dereasonable to insist the runner don't know who is the mage when they have them in sight. It's the one guy who doesn't seem too interested in firing burst after burst of bullets at the runners but somehow still want to keep LOS on them. |
||
|
|||
Dec 26 2006, 12:50 AM
Post
#24
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 619 Joined: 18-April 03 From: The UV Nexus Member No.: 4,474 |
So we are back to spot the mage first, kill the mage second. Except you are giving the opponents a free round to kill you while you all observe in detail as to who is the mage. Course if the mage is shooting at you with his Ingram while his Spirits engulf you, you will be more than a little distracted. Note: Magic doesn't require the mage to be in your line of sight. He can be behind you. EDIT: There is a big difference between perceiving magic, and perceiving a mage. You can use all the tricks you mentioned to perceive the mage. Magic is another matter. The effects are not always visible, so visual enhancements don't always help. What does a mana spell look like? |
||||
|
|||||
Dec 26 2006, 01:25 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 |
if the mage casts a force 6 or higher spell, the threshold to notice it is 0. even with a dice pool of 0, it is highly probable (to say the least) to achieve a threshold of 0. therefore, the mage is probably either handicapping himself pretty heavily, or is likely to be spotted, because i don't think it's too unreasonable to suppose that, out of a group of, say, 4 runners, at least one will have a 12+ dicepool for perception...
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd December 2024 - 02:01 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.