IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Shadowrun Trideo, How Runners are featured in the Media
Drraagh
post Jan 21 2007, 06:54 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 308
Joined: 1-June 06
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Member No.: 8,631



I was originally thinking about what sort of stuff would be on the trid, but that's been covered by the themebooks that Fanpro did as well as Shadowbeat. Not to mention some movies have given some ideas like "The Running Man" (not to mention "Climbing for Dollars"), "Anthrax Cat", "The Record with Robert McX" and "The Sex Puppets" from Transmetropolitan, "Buster Friendly and His Friendly Friends" from Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, and the list goes on. Fictional TV Programs at Wikipedia for a good selection, not to mention Shows within a Show. I've even used a few of the movies that were mentioned in F/X the Series as stuff that would be playing, and I had a Hitchcock movie playing in a theater where Runners met their Johnson, partly because of the tastes of the Johnson, and partly because I didn't want the table making jokes while they dealt with their Johnson during an adult film.

But what I ended up with, after seeing someone ranting somewhere about why shadowrruners would ever become a media icon, having trid shows and moves done about them since they are supposed to be secret, is exactly how the Shadowrunners are shown in the movies, since Karl Kombatmage apparently proves that they are to some degree known.

I mean, to the entertainment division, Shadowrunners could be little more than their generations A-Team or The Fugitive, people on the run from the law, doing what they can to survive. Throw in a magic user, change the metatype of a few characters and they might fly. However, given the audience's taste for violence you could probably have them killing people.

Then you've got shows like COPS, or movies like Series 7: The Contenders and even the SQUID in Strange Days showing the holdup, where you've got live recording of a specific event in their lives. I could see that working for Shadowrunners, though there are a few problems I see at the same time. Even if you digitally blur out the faces, you're still leaving evidence of where you've been. You could blur or cut out any references to a company or identifying landmarks, but even then... sure it might make it onto a pirate channel that is spreading the word against corporations, or if you're lucky might get on some action channel.

And finally, let's not forget children's markets. Just look at cartoons and live action childrens shows of today. Ninja Turtles, The Tribe, Power Rangers, Justice League, Kim Possible and so forth. There's a lot of action, a lot of fighting, and usually a lot of marketing as well. So, you could create a Shadowrunner cartoon show, sort of like the Commander Cash show in Robocop, but put it in a criminals perspective though you paint them to be the good guy, fighting the corrupt law. Lone Ranger, Zorro, ring any bells?

But what would this do for public opinion of the Shadowrunners. Sure, some would think them nothing more than trideo characters and maybe see it as a catchall term in the news like 'Hacker' is today. But then might there not be some to whom a Shadowrunner is a cool thing? Imagine on the playground, "When I grow up, I'm going to be a Doctor." "When I grow up, I'm going to be Lone Star." "When I grow up, I'm going to be a Shadowrunner". Not to mention in the teenage age range, there might be those that would help shadowrunners, seeing it either as a way to rebel against authority or something.

Just my ten cents, since I'm sure this is more than just two of them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Jan 21 2007, 07:05 AM
Post #2


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



Remember that in Queen Euphoria the Johnson took footage from the run and edited it into a blockbuster movie. The contract pretty much screwed the runners out of any royalities, too. This is why my shadowrunners often explicitly retain a percentage of the film rights whenever they make a contract with a Johnson.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drraagh
post Jan 21 2007, 07:09 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 308
Joined: 1-June 06
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Member No.: 8,631



QUOTE (hyzmarca @ Jan 21 2007, 02:05 AM)
Remember that in Queen Euphoria the Johnson took footage from the run and edited it into a blockbuster movie. The contract pretty much screwed the runners out of any royalities, too. This is why my shadowrunners often explicitly retain a percentage of the film rights whenever they make a contract with a Johnson.

But how often do they exercise those rights? Does the Johnson regularly sell the video, or do the runners ever do it? And if so, what sort of fallout would you say it would have on the runners?

I remember playing the old Marvel Super Heroes RPG and in one of the X-men supplements it had a chart showing a Positive and Negative Mutant Populace. The max was +20 or -20, and the middle was of course 0. At zero it was like mutants were normal people, they weren't different in any way. +20, there might be a Mutant Day parade, -20 there might be Mutant Hunting Month, which the person to bring in the most mutants gets a free trip to anywhere in the world. Somewhat based on the character's actions and somewhat on how the GM makes the story go, the Mutant Index would rise or fall, so the public's reception of Mutants could vary in a game session. One minute, they might love you for saving the world from certain doom, but now Magneto has his asteroid set to blow up earth and gives mutants free passage up to safety, so all mutants are feared.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cetiah
post Jan 21 2007, 07:14 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Joined: 2-January 07
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,510



I was planning on having a television broadcast at some point in my next session, as a sort of foreshadowing for later. It was going to be a scene where the governor says in a public statement:

"The destruction of AmmoMax's warehouses were tragic, and many good people were killed. A detailed investigation proved the explosion to be the result of misapplied packaging constraints of sensitive materials. All the appropriate legal measures are being taken against AmmoMax at this time. I don't understand why the media is so fascinated with inventing boogiemen at tragic times like these. I want to reassure the people of Seattle, once again, THERE... ARE... NO SUCH THING... AS SHADOWRUNNERS."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 21 2007, 07:16 AM
Post #5


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



(Note: I'm very tired and haven't made sure this is actually what I think. It seems reasonable right now, but again, very tired.)

My view seems to be that there are two primary depictions of Shadowrunners. On the one hand you've got your Good Shadowrunners, who fight against horrible things like insect spirits and rogue magical threats and criminal organizations and corporations who happen to be the major competitor of the corporation where the show is being broadcast. These Shadowrunners may really be company men, but such distinctions are not dwelt upon. On the other, you have your ruthless horrible killers who butcher nice security guards and shoot babies in the face so they can steal their candy. These are the Shadowrunners that attack friendly corporations, and they always get their comeuppance when Storm Saxon (or his local corporate analogue) enters the picture.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thane36425
post Jan 21 2007, 06:32 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 21-December 06
Member No.: 10,416



How Shadowrunners are presented depends on the runners and the bias of the presenter. Shadowbeat had some to say about this in the form of an interview. Some of the people were prorunner and some were anti-runner. Those were the "experts". On the other hand, most people on the street didn't think runners were real or that they were something created by the media to get ratings and make movies.

Another way to look at it is how the runners do their work. If the runners are discrete, get in and out with being detected, then it isn't a newsworthy story. If they do their job and just take down some guards without killing them, that might get a small mention buried way under the main stories in the local media. On the other hand, if they really hose up, set fire to a major office building and have a big shootout on the streets with corpsec and Lone Star with all kinds of news drones flying around, then it will be national news and be seen very negatively.

Generally though, most runners should try to be so low key that they don't get media attention. Those that do are probably trying to retire from the scene and are getting publicity to use it as a shield. If a major pop star like Karl Kombatmage got whacked, then there would be calls for an investigation. Even if the guilty party was not brought in for trial, if the attack was linked to a corporation, it would be bad news for them businesswise, at least for the short time it took the public to go from Karl, hurray! to Karl who? or about 5 minutes.

Runners probably are big in entertainment. They are today after all. Look at all the movies like Mission Impossible, Ocean's 11, Ronin and all the other "spy" thrillers. There are so many it would be impossible to list them all. But bascially anything spyish or where a small group is given a non-military mission against a corporation or crime gang fits the bill. There are loads of them.

Some of the older canon material did mention a show like Cops with runners. It didn't last too long though after one of the runner teams was whacked because the corp they raided figured out who they were from the filming company. Still, if the runners find something really nasty going on, they coudl shoot their own video and sell or give it to a reporter contact to air, then hide deep for some time.

As for the violent games, those exist too, Shadowbeat talks about them. Some games are really fun versions of Survivor. One example would be a bunch of "players" are dropped into hostile territory and only the first person the reach the goal will be "rescued." One of the places mentioned was the Sahara Desert complete with hostile tribesmen offered bounties one the players, just to make it more interesting. Others were from prisons where inmates had to fight for food, space, etc. The shows you mentioned also exist in one form or another.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thane36425
post Jan 21 2007, 06:43 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 21-December 06
Member No.: 10,416



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
(Note: I'm very tired and haven't made sure this is actually what I think. It seems reasonable right now, but again, very tired.)

My view seems to be that there are two primary depictions of Shadowrunners. On the one hand you've got your Good Shadowrunners, who fight against horrible things like insect spirits and rogue magical threats and criminal organizations and corporations who happen to be the major competitor of the corporation where the show is being broadcast. These Shadowrunners may really be company men, but such distinctions are not dwelt upon. On the other, you have your ruthless horrible killers who butcher nice security guards and shoot babies in the face so they can steal their candy. These are the Shadowrunners that attack friendly corporations, and they always get their comeuppance when Storm Saxon (or his local corporate analogue) enters the picture.

~J

Very good. Very much the way it probably really is. Today, you don't hear much beyond the local news about a bankrobber who walks in passes a threatening note and gets a little cash and leaves without hurting anyone. But, when you have a big shootout like that one in L.A. some years back, it is international news and special programs are still being made about it. Same thing in the 1920's. Most of the gang hits never made the news and there were hundreds of them. But we all remember the St. Valentine's Day Massacre.

These days there aren't things like Insect Spririts and the police take a very dim view on vigilantes. By the same token, people protesting corporations are often treated as kooks, unless they happen to be standing knee deep in toxic run off from the factory at the time of the protest. I don't reall think vigilantes would get good press these days, not like they may have in the Old West or even in the 1920's. The few instances that I can think of in the last 15 years or so have been very negative, like mobs beating up a known child molester or rapist. On the other hand, non-violent solutions don't even make the media. In some places around here we had very successful neighborhood watch programs that cleaned up some bad areas. That was done simply by having people call the police whenever something funny was going on. The bad guys learned to move on. All it got was little stories buried in the back pages of the local paper.

I think you are right though. Runners that focussed on Threats like bugs and toxics probably would get good press while those that went after corporations, especially those with good PR departments are taking their chances. Just remember that scene in Running Man. They had escaped from the airport without causing real harm, but the news showed a dead officer lying on the ground. Don't put it past the corp to fake something like that or even kill the "incompetant" secman as a warning to the others, but blame it on the runners.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DV8
post Jan 22 2007, 09:24 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .nl
Member No.: 116



Please, someone, anyone -- Flak! Paul! Quick, stop me before I engage in this thread...!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Jan 22 2007, 03:25 PM
Post #9


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



In my last game, one of the characters was a huge fan of the "Shadowrun" movies, and actually decided to leave Africa and move to Seattle to be a Shadowrunner after watching a marathon of such movies while drunk.

Shadowrunners are portrayed in my games, but are usually done so much in the way gangsters are portrayed in most movies. There are "bad guy" shadowrunners that always get theirs, and there are "good guy" shadowrunners (usually subtly or not so subtly employed by the "good corp"), and very few of these movies/shows/etc. are very accurate in the way they portray the shadows.

Also in my games, you will never see a "real" or direct connection between the fictionalized version of SRing/ers and the real thing. You won't see, for example, a Shadowrunner with a corporate sponsor, wearing their logo on his Ares shoes, etc. (I seem to recall hearing that that was actually the case in the canon fiction somewhere, I think it's silly). There's no more connection between the Shadowrun of the movies and real shadow ops than there is between James Bond and the run of the mill CIA operative. It's all eye candy for the masses (and of course, pro-corp advertising).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post Apr 1 2008, 12:14 AM
Post #10


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



QUOTE (DV8 @ Jan 22 2007, 10:24 AM) *
Please, someone, anyone -- Flak! Paul! Quick, stop me before I engage in this thread...!

Bwahaha! Shoe rant! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
b1ffov3rfl0w
post Apr 1 2008, 01:11 AM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 464
Joined: 3-March 06
From: CalFree
Member No.: 8,329



QUOTE (hyzmarca @ Jan 21 2007, 02:05 AM) *
Remember that in Queen Euphoria the Johnson took footage from the run and edited it into a blockbuster movie. The contract pretty much screwed the runners out of any royalities, too. This is why my shadowrunners often explicitly retain a percentage of the film rights whenever they make a contract with a Johnson.


I retain animation rights and we go back to single dip.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 05:41 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.