IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Parry question?, Complex?
farlanghn
post Jan 22 2007, 11:31 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17-July 06
Member No.: 8,905



Parrying I'm pretty sure it is a complex action but I couldn't find it in the book. Is parrying in game basically a complex action? So if you were in a fist fight and you wanted to parry your action would be done and you couldn't hit back if you went second, right?Parry (reaction+weapon skill)...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demerzel
post Jan 22 2007, 11:57 PM
Post #2


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,206
Joined: 9-July 06
From: Fresno, CA
Member No.: 8,856



Parrying is not an action, it happens anytime you are wielding a weapon and are attacked in melee and choose to use your melee combat skill to defend.

Full Parry is a Complex action, you can claim it at any time and it consumes your next complex action, but if you are in full parry you get it against all incoming melee attacks, until your next action.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
farlanghn
post Jan 23 2007, 02:26 AM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 17-July 06
Member No.: 8,905



QUOTE (Demerzel)
Parrying is not an action, it happens anytime you are wielding a weapon and are attacked in melee and choose to use your melee combat skill to defend.

Full Parry is a Complex action, you can claim it at any time and it consumes your next complex action, but if you are in full parry you get it against all incoming melee attacks, until your next action.

So with a regular parry you can only parry once. And In a full parry you get it against all incoming attacks. Do you still get to use reaction on both?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demerzel
post Jan 23 2007, 02:28 AM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,206
Joined: 9-July 06
From: Fresno, CA
Member No.: 8,856



You are eligible to parry any incoming melee attack if you are wielding a weapon, as many as you like, unlimited, at no cost of an action ever.

The way full parry works is you declare it as what they call an interrupt action and you get a bonus to all your future parrys until your next action. This however costs you your next complex action.

EDIT: I should note that the the caveat "if you are wielding a weapon" is only there because if you are using unarmed to defend against a melee attack it is called a block.

To clarify:
You always get your reaction.

Parry is Reaction + Melee Combat Skill apropriate to the weapon wielded.
Block is Reaction + Unarmed Combat Skill
Dodge is Reaction + Dodge skill, you do not have to be wielding a weapon.

These are free and you can do one of them any time you are attacked in melee with no loss of action.

If you choose Full Parry, you get Reaction + Melee Skill + Melee Skill
If you choose Full Block you get Reaction + Unarmed + Unarmed
If you choose Full Dodge You get Reaction + Dodge + Dodge against Melee, and Reaction + Dodge vs. Ranged.

This costs your next complex action.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deva
post Jan 23 2007, 02:01 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Tampere, Finland
Member No.: 8,432



By the rules, there's no such thing as Full Block.
But there's Gymnastic Dodge in which IMO you roll Reaction + Dodge + Gymnastics. Can also be used in Ranged Combat. Daa-a.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demerzel
post Jan 23 2007, 03:43 PM
Post #6


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,206
Joined: 9-July 06
From: Fresno, CA
Member No.: 8,856



Full Parry technically allows you to use Unarmed, so it is basically Full Block. It's a failure in consistancy of termonology IMO.

And if you use Gymnastics dodge in ranged combat you only get Reaction + Gymnastics not Reaction + Dodge + Gymnastics.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jan 23 2007, 05:38 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,920
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



Actually if you take a gander at p 150 you get -1 to your defense roll for every additional attack you avoid. I think that's one of those rules people tend to forget along with the range on small arms.

Anyway my issue with the system is being able to block a monowhip. Personally I think there are some things you should have to dodge or parry. Especially things with reach where you can't just grab the other guys arm like in a knife fight.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jack Kain
post Jan 23 2007, 05:53 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 906
Joined: 16-October 06
Member No.: 9,630



QUOTE (sunnyside)
Actually if you take a gander at p 150 you get -1 to your defense roll for every additional attack you avoid. I think that's one of those rules people tend to forget along with the range on small arms.

Anyway my issue with the system is being able to block a monowhip. Personally I think there are some things you should have to dodge or parry. Especially things with reach where you can't just grab the other guys arm like in a knife fight.

As I believe was said before(another thread) you can hit the weighted tip and knock the monowhip way.
The other side of the issue is how do you block or parry with a monowhip?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorechaser
post Jan 23 2007, 06:27 PM
Post #9


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,333
Joined: 19-August 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9,168



QUOTE (sunnyside)
Actually if you take a gander at p 150 you get -1 to your defense roll for every additional attack you avoid. I think that's one of those rules people tend to forget along with the range on small arms.

Anyway my issue with the system is being able to block a monowhip. Personally I think there are some things you should have to dodge or parry. Especially things with reach where you can't just grab the other guys arm like in a knife fight.

Why can't you block someone's hand when they're using a monowhip? You don't stay at max range and take a swing at each other one at a time. You're moving, changing range, etc all the time.

It's part of what is abstracted by combat, really.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jack Kain
post Jan 23 2007, 06:31 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 906
Joined: 16-October 06
Member No.: 9,630



I'm going to side with lorechaser, also I don't want to necropost another monowhip debate thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jan 23 2007, 06:48 PM
Post #11


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,920
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



Well I think all the basic rules are here now. Just pay attention to all the modifiers. There are a bunch of them, and they add flavor to the game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Jan 24 2007, 04:06 PM
Post #12


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



I agree with lorechaser and Jack Kain. You need to move farther in the direction of "SR melee combat is an abstraction". When you "block", they are not standing in front of you swinging once and you're blocking once. "Block" is just a short way of saying "avoid being hit by using your unarmed skill, which could consist of blocking and/or misdirecting the weapon and/or hand of the opponent, or by feinting, which can include a nearly infinite number of possible actions and tactics, or any other of a number tactics gleaned from your unarmed training which causes them to attack in a less than optimal or perhaps more predictable way, or possibly just to use your unarmed training to get out of the way" which is different from "dodge" which is sort of short for "avoid being hit by using your skill at staying away from dangerous things, which may include mainting distance, interposing environmental objects, or perhaps an incredibly finely honed 'duck' reflex."

Whew, okay, that's enough "gratuitous" quotes for "now", I'll "try" to "avoid" doing it in the "future." " :-D "
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 02:01 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.