IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The Shadowrun FPS, Again.
Moon-Hawk
post Mar 1 2007, 09:05 PM
Post #51


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



QUOTE (Lindt)
I just want to know how long its going to take for the 360 users to start screaming 'OMG nErF!' to the PC users.

Why only the 360 users? Won't the PC users also be screaming 'OMG nErF!' to the 360 users?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crakkerjakk
post Mar 2 2007, 08:19 AM
Post #52


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 24-January 07
Member No.: 10,756



The other problem with that quote is that I haven't seen anything drastically innovative in the game. Don't know which trailers he's been looking at.

As to why the 360 users will be wanting the PC users nerfed, because a laser/optical mouse is WAY more sensitive/accurate than a thumbstick. I'd be suprised if they aren't including some sort of "balancing mechanic"(read fuzz factor on PC accuracy or auto lock on x-box) to balance the sides out, otherwise it's gonna be a slaughter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Mar 3 2007, 01:54 AM
Post #53


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



I always was a lot faster with target acquisition in FPS games with a mouse than with a joystick. I'm utterly mystified why everyone seems to claim that using a joystick on a controller is supposed to be so much easier than using a mouse.

When I'm playing a FPS and using a mouse I don't have to think about the controller. Everything happens very naturally. I feel like if I want to put the cursor on my opponent's head I just have to make a slight movement.

On the other hand, with joysticks I'm always having difficulty with targeting because of how far you're pushing the joystick affecting the speed at which the cursor moves. It's easy to overshoot your target because you're not doing a halfpush when under fire and the full push makes your reticle overshoot. You can't just place the cursor where you want it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ranneko
post Mar 3 2007, 02:26 AM
Post #54


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 16-January 05
Member No.: 6,984



Console FPSes use various compensating factors, such as slight auto-aim and target tracking.

Shadowrun by all reports does this, in order to put each platform on roughly the same level.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crakkerjakk
post Mar 3 2007, 11:39 AM
Post #55


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 24-January 07
Member No.: 10,756



This really sticks in my craw. I know, it's not rational, but I want games to be "fair," and for some reason my definition of the word involves the same code for both machines, at least as far as aiming goes. I don't like it that console gamers get a little extra help, just cause their controller is by it's very nature less efficient than a mouse. Does anyone know if Microsoft(or Sony , for that matter) sells mouse/keyboard stuff for their consoles?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 3 2007, 01:53 PM
Post #56


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Sony doesn't sell a mouse and keyboard for the PS3 that I'm aware of, but you can certainly plug one in. Whether games will use them is another matter—it's the whole "Linux installation made easy" bit that requires the keyboard.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Mar 3 2007, 07:47 PM
Post #57


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



QUOTE (Crakkerjakk)
This really sticks in my craw. I know, it's not rational, but I want games to be "fair," and for some reason my definition of the word involves the same code for both machines, at least as far as aiming goes. I don't like it that console gamers get a little extra help, just cause their controller is by it's very nature less efficient than a mouse. Does anyone know if Microsoft(or Sony , for that matter) sells mouse/keyboard stuff for their consoles?

Doesn't fair mean "balanced" so shouldn't something be done to balance if one side is blatantly worse?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fix-it
post Mar 3 2007, 08:18 PM
Post #58


Creating a god with his own hands
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,405
Joined: 30-September 02
From: 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1
Member No.: 3,364



no, it means those stupid console jockeys should buy a PC and play some real games
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 3 2007, 08:30 PM
Post #59


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (James McMurray)
Doesn't fair mean "balanced"[…]?

Nope. "Fair" doesn't mean anything at all (or more accurately, means several different contradictory things), which is really the problem with making things that are fair.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crakkerjakk
post Mar 3 2007, 08:46 PM
Post #60


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 24-January 07
Member No.: 10,756



Yeah James, I know it doesn't really make sense. It just feels like cheating to me when the console jockeys get a lil help from the game itself. And yes, I realize that without that help, PC gamers would own them(well, if everyone was equal skillwise) because our controls are more precise. But some part of me wants the console gamers to get better controls, if thats the case. Which again, is not a realistic expectation, it's just this feeling I get in my gut anytime I hear about tweaking so that a game is "easier" for console gamers than PC gamers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Mar 3 2007, 09:23 PM
Post #61


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 3,929
Joined: 26-February 02
From: .ca
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Fix-it)
no, it means those stupid console jockeys should buy a PC and play some real games

Just like those damned "roleplayers" -- who would want to do something that lame?!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rajaat99
post Mar 4 2007, 06:50 AM
Post #62


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 24-August 02
From: Magna, Ute Nation
Member No.: 3,166



QUOTE (Adam)
QUOTE (Fix-it @ Mar 3 2007, 03:18 PM)
no, it means those stupid console jockeys should buy a PC and play some real games

Just like those damned "roleplayers" -- who would want to do something that lame?!

I agree roleplaying sucks. Let's go play some video games and eat cheetos.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 4 2007, 07:20 AM
Post #63


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Crakkerjakk)
It just feels like cheating to me when the console jockeys get a lil help from the game itself.

if it's like every other auto-aim i've seen, it will favor body shots. any PC gamer with half a brain will go for headshots--and even if they don't, the mouse's higher precision means they'll probably be as accurate with body shots on average as the console gamers. i think you'll see PC gamers generally doing better than the console gamers, even with the auto-aim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Trigger
post Mar 4 2007, 01:59 PM
Post #64


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,468
Joined: 5-December 06
From: Somewhere in the Flooding, CalFree
Member No.: 10,215



You wanna know what....

Get a Wii!!!

Just thought I should add...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post Mar 4 2007, 02:10 PM
Post #65


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



No other game system lets your reflexive aiming of the controller actually help (or hurt) your performance.

Actually, I want the Wii-rifle controller expansion. Lie down on the carpet and start sniping.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Mar 4 2007, 03:39 PM
Post #66


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



QUOTE (Trigger @ Mar 4 2007, 08:59 AM)
You wanna know what....

Get a Wii!!!

Just thought I should add...

After that commercial, I'm afraid that the Wii will give me an STD.

To add insult to injury, the wiimote is a bluetooth HID device and is compatible with Windows, Mac, and Linux using homebrew drivers. Do not only can PC users aim with the mouse, they can also aim with the wiimote.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fix-it
post Mar 4 2007, 07:26 PM
Post #67


Creating a god with his own hands
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,405
Joined: 30-September 02
From: 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1
Member No.: 3,364



here's another good one dealing with the wii
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Trigger
post Mar 4 2007, 07:28 PM
Post #68


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,468
Joined: 5-December 06
From: Somewhere in the Flooding, CalFree
Member No.: 10,215



I love VG Cats...I laughed so hard the first time I saw that after it came out on Monday.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Mar 5 2007, 12:55 AM
Post #69


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



QUOTE (Herald of Verjigorm)
No other game system lets your reflexive aiming of the controller actually help (or hurt) your performance.

Actually, I want the Wii-rifle controller expansion. Lie down on the carpet and start sniping.

Once in Montreal I stopped by a random arcade that had a Japanese World War II versus Zombies game that used a big light rifle. It was quite akward, actually, for the following reasons.

1.) I'm cross dominant. Blearg.
2.) The game actually had a little zoom view over where your rifle was pointing. This was really strange-feeling and difficult to handle, probably because I was trying to use the rifle properly and the zoom view was designed for retards firing from the hip.
3.) The game engine was similar to any other shooter, i.e. guys would jump out at you really close as well as from really far away. I don't think my brain was able to neatly process trying to align my sights to plink a really distant guy and then all of a sudden have a giant target appear in the foreground.

In other words they used a big plastic rifle as your input device but the action in the game was not conducive to actual rifle use.


This is coming from a guy who always holds light pistols "correctly" in shooter games. When I beat Time Crisis 2 I never hit my girlfriend a single time during the last boss fight because I was taking only correctly aimed shots.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Mar 5 2007, 04:37 AM
Post #70


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



QUOTE (Wounded Ronin @ Mar 4 2007, 07:55 PM)
I never hit my girlfriend a single time during the last boss fight 

Really you probably shouldn't hit your girlfriend at all, boss fight or no. I know it's annoying sometimes when they interupt, but you gotta have some control man.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rajaat99
post Mar 7 2007, 03:43 AM
Post #71


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 24-August 02
From: Magna, Ute Nation
Member No.: 3,166



QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0 @ Mar 5 2007, 04:37 AM)
QUOTE (Wounded Ronin @ Mar 4 2007, 07:55 PM)
I never hit my girlfriend a single time during the last boss fight 

Really you probably shouldn't hit your girlfriend at all, boss fight or no. I know it's annoying sometimes when they interupt, but you gotta have some control man.

I thought the same thing when I read that post. I've never played Time Crisis 2, so I have no idea what he's talking about. All I could think was, "Why would he hit his girlfriend during a boss fight?" Which is sad, because I should've been thinking, "Why would he hit his girlfriend?"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Mar 7 2007, 05:59 AM
Post #72


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



:rotfl:

Just proves that we're all bad people really.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Mar 7 2007, 07:49 AM
Post #73


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



You all should know that, being a gamer, it would impossible for me to get females to like me in real life, therefore there's no way I could have been talking about literal girlfriend-hitting.

I am, of course, refering to this game: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Crisis_II

In the final boss fight the bad guy grabs your pink-themed anime chick girlfriend and holds her as a human shield while attacking you. If you accidently shoot her you lose life just as if you yourself had taken a hit. Her head is right next to his head the entire time so if your aim is off by a small amount you are penalized. While I was playing through this game I never hit the wrong target. At the time I played the game I was also taking a firearms class so all the aiming stuff was real fresh on my mind and in my muscle memory.

EDIT:

Here we go, an actual Time Crisis 2 FAQ!

QUOTE

The final area, and boy is this fight pretty hard. First of all, kill all of
the soldiers, and carefully try and shoot Ernesto. Try not and shoot Christy
of course. After some shooting, and careful aiming, you'll proceed to the
next screen.


http://faqs.ign.com/articles/394/394313p1.html


Ho ho ho! It's "pretty hard" for a mere mortal, but not for the triple initiated physad with the deadly physad power Improved Ability: Arcade Game Lightguns! :rotfl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Mar 7 2007, 02:26 PM
Post #74


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



I'm a fan of the one where you have a pump shotgun and fight a bunch of zombies. Unfortunately, the name eludes me at the moment. Used to play it in D&B's in Honolulu. We'd hold the blue plastic shotgun by the grip and pump it by shooting our arm straight out. Movie style, absolute realism. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd February 2026 - 04:54 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.