 Old school runs and new rules, Which edition to pick? |
  |
 Mar 18 2007, 11:03 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target  Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 16-March 07 Member No.: 11,243  |
So I'm about to dive back into Shadowrun after a 10 year absence. I'm a veteran of Shadowrun 2e and I'm planning to give old campaigns such as Harlequin and Super Tuesday a spin with my new group. However I realize that these old runs might encounter real continuity problem with Shadowrun 4e unless adapted/modded. Adaptions that requires me do do alot of rescripting to a degree that it might sap my enthusiasm or even worse; take away some the magic of the adventures in their original form.
So I'm basically weighing back and forth on what edition of Shadowrun to sink my teeth into for these particular scenarios. While the coninutity is far improved with 3e I at the same time hear that edition is overly complex when it comes to magic for example, which draws me to the more streamlined rules of 4e. Or should I just forget the old adventures and find new material for 4e? Ideas and/or advice? |
 |
 
|
|
Mar 18 2007, 11:08 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Define "overly complex"?
My advice is to go with 3rd edition, but I can't give you reasons that address your concerns unless I have a clearer idea of what those are. ~J |
|
|
|
|
Mar 18 2007, 11:28 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 16-March 07 Member No.: 11,243 |
Well I play RPGs to tell a story basically, I consider the rules system as a means to an end in that respect, but at the same time I want to utilize the given rules for a system as they are presented.
To me something is "overly complex" (a phrase I took from a thread in the SR4e forum of someone describing 3e magic) when it distracts from this story because players have to look up stats and special rules that are to wide to fit on their charsheets. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 18 2007, 11:55 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,640 Joined: 6-June 04 Member No.: 6,383 |
I think that if you try to adopt a 2nd edition run to 4th edition you're going to have a huge headache. They aren't very compatible at all. You might as well rewrite the whole damn scenario and add "wireless" stuff.
3rd edition is the only practical option. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2007, 12:03 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Though I agree with WR, your philosophy of gaming is better served by nWoD or Amber Diceless than either SR.
(Did the person you mention say what exactly they found overly complex?) ~J |
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2007, 12:44 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 668 Joined: 4-September 06 Member No.: 9,304 |
I am running Harlequin in SR4 rules, and have even run SR1 adventures in SR4 rules.
I haven't had any real problem adapting them, nor was it a lot of work |
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2007, 12:54 AM
Post
#7
|
|||
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 6,640 Joined: 6-June 04 Member No.: 6,383 |
But what about needing to add wireless to everything where it was not before? |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Mar 19 2007, 01:06 AM
Post
#8
|
|||||
|
Chrome to the Core Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
Uh, set it before the Wireless addition? SR4 is rules as much as history. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Mar 19 2007, 02:28 AM
Post
#9
|
|||
|
Shooting Target Group: Retired Admins Posts: 1,784 Joined: 28-July 04 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 6,522 |
So, it depends upon how much you insist on having the rules pre-scripted and how much you're comfortable flying by the seat of your pants. All three of these approaches are entirely valid ones. It's just a question of what it is you're looking for in a game. If you're the sort of GM who wants to have everything spelled out, with every "i" dotted and every "t" crossed, then just run 'em using SR2. There are changes between SR2 & SR3 that will change the look and feel of things if that's extremely important to you. (The Skill Web & Grounding are the first two major differences that come to mind.) If you're the sort of GM who's comfortable with a little lee-way, but you can't imagine Shadowrun without Combat Pools and variable target numbers, then you might want to try SR3. SR3 cleans up a lot of things from SR2. Magic, Decking, and Combat are all still pretty different systems. However, the SR3 implementation of them is a whole lot easier than trying to decide if you want to use the rules out of the SR2 core book or the rules out of VR2. (et al) If you're the sort of GM for whom the rules are a nice starting point, but ultimately, you feel that they're just there to sort out the random factors in the storyline, then you'll probably want to switch to SR4. For most people who haven't thought Shadowrun in a while, the SR4 system is a little more intuitive to pick up. However, the stat-lines you see in any SR2 book are going to have a very different effect in SR4. The basic attributes have changed and the values of skills have changed as well. (A character who depended upon a 6 skill in SR2 might only have a 3 in SR4.) For some scenarios -- e.g. Universal Brotherhood -- that wouldn't be a huge problem. There are stats for Insect Spirits in Street Magic. So, you wouldn't need to convert them. For other scenarios -- e.g. Harlequin -- it'd be a bigger problem. Unless you're really flying by the seat of you're pants, you'd probably want to take the time to re-stat a number of key NPCs. There is a character conversion guide that's freely available. So, that'd help. However, you still might find yourself going through it several times for each scenario. The wireless matrix vs. wired Matrix is really more of a paradigm shift than anything else. The hacking rules from SR4 work perfectly well with a wired matrix. They're an abstraction, and you just have to accept that first. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Mar 19 2007, 02:54 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 519 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Queensland Member No.: 3,180 |
If you have your 2nd ed. books still you might as well play the old modules with them, no conversion required.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2007, 04:02 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Free Spirit Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,944 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Bloomington, IN UCAS Member No.: 1,920 |
There are some rule changes from SR2 to SR3, but if you were familiar with SR2, you will find way more in common with SR3, so much that you might not even notice some of the changes. The biggest change when I have adapted the olde adventures is converting Firearms skill to Whatever guns the character uses, consolidating Etiquette, and converting Armed Combat to whatever melee weapons the character uses.
I'd like to know how SR3 magic is more complicated than SR4 magic. SR4 is harder to create a character, and there is no way to say the conjuring rules are simpler. If by simpler, they meant homogenized, then maybe. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2007, 04:34 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 668 Joined: 4-September 06 Member No.: 9,304 |
The way that I convert older adventures into SR4 is pretty straight foward.
For the grunts in the adventures, you can just replace them with the grunts from SR4. For the more important NPCs, you can often just replace them with teh sample chars, or more advanced grunts from SR4. I have been playing them in 2069 without any problems, with wireless. being used, as well as RFID and all the other new toys. Most of the stories transfer over well, as they as setting, flavor, the plot line. I have found that it takes very little work to bring them over to SR4. For Harlequin, for Ehran, instead of him being on the Council of Princes, he is reputed to be a power broker in the new government, with no official title or position, but wielding a lot of influence. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2007, 08:47 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 16-March 07 Member No.: 11,243 |
Regarding the kind of GM that I am I think the dunner got real close with his 2nd/middle ground archetype.
I am also hesitant to alter old scenarios in a way to make them something they are not such as Mistwalkers suggestion for Ehran. It just wouldn't feel... right, for me. I guess I'm just conservative like that. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2007, 02:34 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,095 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Ontari-airee-o Member No.: 1,115 |
I am one of a few sr2 hold outs. I use the vr2 rules for decking. It just seems that sr3 lost some of the original grittiness that I really enjoyed in shadowrun. Magic gets a little boost, and cyberware was dialed back a little with body index being added onto essence. I also really preferred being able to ground spells through foci. my biggest beef with sr3 was the initiative change. I liked sr2 init over sr3 ... but I wound up coming up with a more distributed iniative system where slow mages will act in middle of a speedy sammies multiple actions instead of immediately after their first action.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 05:48 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.