IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> warding armor, can it be done?
can someone capable of crafting wards ward their armor and say a shield?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 34
Guests cannot vote 
Red Fox
post Jun 11 2007, 09:01 AM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 12-December 06
From: Salish-Shidhe territory, near Seattle
Member No.: 10,346



can wards be used to make 'magic armor?' can I overcast a force 12 ward on my armor and then a force 12 ward on my shield and get +24 dice vs. magic spells that had to pass thru the wards to effect me? I have a player posing this question and would like to know the communities take on it.

thanks :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post Jun 11 2007, 09:31 AM
Post #2


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 10,339
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



In order to give extra dice for spell defense, the ward would have to cover/provide a barrier around the whole person, wouldn't it? Armor doesn't do that until you get into full military grade stuff.

A further complication I read in another thread is that wards are made of flat planes of magical energy (with some argument about domes), so boxes are easy to shape (eg. rooms), but complex shapes such as the human body are not easy to make.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner
post Jun 11 2007, 10:02 AM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado
Member No.: 185



As was clarified in the other thread (and the FAQ) wards have a minimum volume around a physical anchor which pretty much negates the warded armor. Wards also require some form of delimitation mark (though this is in the rules it is unclear and will be clarified in upcoming errata), which cannot move in relation to the physical anchor (although both can move if they remain at the same relative distance).

Answer: Try a personal mana barrier spell instead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Jun 11 2007, 11:13 AM
Post #4


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



Can rooms be warded without the ward collapsing everytime a door is open? If not, then it would imply a flexible delimitation mark.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 11 2007, 11:42 AM
Post #5


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,429
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



The ward holds to the shape of the room not the door. So when you open the door you still have a ward accross the doorway. A ward need not neccesarily follow a physical structure at all.

However street magic is much more specific about the options of ward shapes and that you can't move the things. Though maybe Synner knows something and you'll be able to move them in the future, which would be nice because I like having warded vehicles in my game without having to always have a magician somewhere sustaining a mana barrier. Though maybe it's just as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SCARed
post Jun 11 2007, 02:52 PM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 81
Joined: 28-June 06
From: Sol System, Earth, Europe, Germany, Saxony
Member No.: 8,796



look into the FAQ (though it's "only" the FAQ, not RAW).

the explicit example of the warded vehicle is given, IIRC. you can ward cars (or containers - which is clearly an option for high-security-transports).

but in no way i would allow an warded armor. it would have to enclose the person completly, which would require an security-armor at least.

the shield would work - if you don't move it. look at the example about the rock used an an anchor for a ward. that works only until the rock is moved (even a little bit) - the the ward collapses. and so would the ward around the shield.

maybe you should slap your player with a newspaper and advice him to play Cyberpunk if he doesn't like the magic aspect of SR. :rotfl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djinni
post Jun 11 2007, 03:09 PM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 777
Joined: 22-November 06
Member No.: 9,934



QUOTE (SCARed)
but in no way i would allow an warded armor. it would have to enclose the person completly, which would require an security-armor at least.

it would just require being enviromentally sealed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 11 2007, 03:24 PM
Post #8


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,429
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



Ah right the FAQ. I thought I'd read somewhere you could do that and then I forgot where, and figured that it was a pre-street magic source. Thanks SCARed. Although it really doesn't line up with RAW at all, I don't care, it works. It's on the website so it's cannon if not RAW right?

Really I'm betting the reason for all the annoyance with wards that street magic threw at us was because people were making warded bullets, melee weapons, armor and the like.

At any rate if you could ward armor you wouldn't need an enviroseal. They explicitly say that if you punch holes in something holding a ward it's still OK (and by extension you could have holes to start with).

It looks like your snags are the minimum size and "no complex geometry" clauses.

I think the closest you could come is wandering around Solid Snake style in a warded box.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jrayjoker
post Jun 12 2007, 12:59 PM
Post #9


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,453
Joined: 17-September 04
From: St. Paul
Member No.: 6,675



I voted no, but there is one caveat. If the person in the armor were to inhabit it as if it were a very small, man shaped house, and never move, then the ward would work. As soon as s/he moves it is all over.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th September 2025 - 01:33 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.