Matrix defaulting, getting technical again... |
Matrix defaulting, getting technical again... |
Jun 12 2007, 05:18 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 14-September 03 From: Belgium Member No.: 5,617 |
Searching this forum, I get different results on how and when to default
in the matrix. I think it comes down to the interpretation of this: BBB, p223: "When you are directly interacting with a device, make Hacking Tests using Hacking skill + Logic. If you are utilizing a hacking program, makes tests using Hacking skill + program rating." The same is stated for Computer (BBB, p218) and Electronic Warfare (BBB, p255). Data Search and Cybercombat have different descriptions (*). So my interpretation would be: Situation A. Logic + Hacking If you don't have the hacking skill: roll (Logic-1) Situation B1. Program or Complex Form(as substitute of attribute) + Hacking If you don't have the Hacking skill: roll (Program or Complex Form -1) If you don't have the Program or Complex Form: can't do it If you don't have both: can't do it Situation B2 (alternative of B1). Program or Complex Form(as ?) + Hacking If you don't have the Hacking skill: roll Program or Complex Form + (Logic -1) If you don't have the Program or Complex Form: can't do it If you don't have both: can't do it Question 1: When to use A or B? I.e. what does "directly interacting with a device" means? For Cybercombat and Data Search, situation A doesn't seem covered in BBB (*). But what about shutting down a host or device? Question 2: Use B1 or B2? B1 seems more logical because "not having the Program or Complex Form" results in "can't do it" and so the "substitute for attribute" makes sense. |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 05:36 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,904 Joined: 31-December 06 Member No.: 10,502 |
B2 is right out (logic -1 often being higher than hacking and then you can avoid a whole slew of skills).
I'm actually inclined to allow defaulting either way. no prog/cf use hacking-1 (coding on the fly, used to be in the rules in other editions). no hacking? Prog-1 (someone using their rudimentary computer knowledge to just run an executable) If you really want to pick one or the other I would advise treating hacking as the attribute (so no hacking you can't do it). The reason being that it fits the old rules better, it's nice if a player/technomancer is short a prog as can happen, and keeps the script kiddies down a little. The FAQ (google shadowrun FAQ) has some info on A vs B. |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 06:18 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 14-September 03 From: Belgium Member No.: 5,617 |
The FAQ indeed mention: "In cases where a program would apply, but isn't available, the character must default." Using hacking-1 doesn't fit in the general mechanics, but maybe this is the best option.
You're right about B2. That would be like attribute + (attribute -1) when defaulting any task. No point in having skill :) |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 08:23 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,706 Joined: 30-June 06 From: Fort Wayne, IN Member No.: 8,814 |
My understanding of "directly interfacing with a device" is when you may be sitting an a terminal using an Edit program to draw a picture or create a document. You are physically sitting at a keyboard and working within its constraints...therefore, Hacking + Logic.
Now, if you are AR or VR, doing the same task and have the Edit program to draw a picture or create a document in a node (which may be that very same terminal you were just sitting at), you using Hacking + Program Rating. I've also had players role Hacking + Logic or Computer + Logic when they are standing in front of a control panel with a bunch of buttons, to figure out how to use it. They are directly interfacing with the control panel, and therefore the use of a program on their commlink is not pertinent. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 02:39 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.