IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> "Threshold increase" alternate combat rule
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 05:42 PM
Post #1


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



I'm considering using the alternate combat rule in the book where some modifiers affect the threshold in combat instead of the attackers dice pool.

I'm thinking of applying it to:
Range
Cover
Background count

So then if you had good cover instead of the shooter rolling 4 less die they would essentially be subracting 4 hits.

What I'm thinking this may do.
-combat becomes tactical again as even good shots would struggle putting solid hits into people with good cover. So considering cover going in, and sending out the adept to flank the enemy after a firefight starts are going to start showing up again.
-shooting at someone in cover is less likely to cause a bunch of guards to roll critical glitches
-combat slows down as people spend time getting cover instead of shooting and spend time missing/not getting solid hits
-risk of encouraging heavier weapons. If you often are only connecting with one hit or two that assault rifle with tracers/grenade launcher starts looking extra tempting.
-as a GM I have to make more maps and the like. If the players really don't care about cover you don't have to go to all the work to describe it.

I'm wondering if you guys have some thoughts and if you've tried it in your campaign? For people who played in previous editions, where this is closer to how it worked, do you envision problems in 4th ed that wouldn't have been around in 2nd?

Do you think aiming should reduce the threshold, if present, instead of always just adding a die?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunchbox311
post Jun 15 2007, 05:50 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Aurora, CO
Member No.: 11,514



QUOTE (sunnyside)
I'm considering using the alternate combat rule in the book where some modifiers affect the threshold in combat instead of the attackers dice pool.

I'm thinking of applying it to:
Range
Cover
Background count

So then if you had good cover instead of the shooter rolling 4 less die they would essentially be subracting 4 hits.

What I'm thinking this may do.
-combat becomes tactical again as even good shots would struggle putting solid hits into people with good cover
-shooting at someone in cover is less likely to cause a bunch of guards to roll critical glitches
-combat slows down as people spend time getting cover instead of shooting and spend time missing/not getting solid hits
-risk of encouraging heavier weapons. If you often are only connecting with one hit or two that assault rifle with tracers/grenade launcher starts looking extra tempting.

I'm wondering if you guys have some thoughts and if you've tried it in your campaign? For people who played in previous editions, where this is closer to how it worked, do you envision problems in 4th ed that wouldn't have been around in 2nd?

This will slow combat to a halt for many, which may not be bad.

One thing I worry about though is that it will not have that horrible of an impact on super gun nuts.

Example:

Guard and PC both get "good cover (-4)

Basic guard has 8-10 dice getting around 3 hits on average... he misses every time on average.

PC gun nut has 18 dice... gets 6 hits on average... 2 net hits.

Guard can dodge the 2 hits easily.

End result: PC has a hell of a time hitting the guard (hello area weapons) but the guard can just NOT hit a PC.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Jun 15 2007, 05:52 PM
Post #3


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



What happens when the threshold exceeds the dice pool?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 05:54 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



@lunch

Actually unless on full defense 2 net hits will usually connect with one against a typical guards reaction.

Still semi stagnant shootouts are a possibility if nobody moves to flank or somesuch.

And, yes, risk of area weapons etc as mentioned above.

@moonhawk. You'd have to spend edge same as in the default case. Except instead of a "longshot" you'd be spending as normal for extra die and exploding 6's
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunchbox311
post Jun 15 2007, 05:55 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Aurora, CO
Member No.: 11,514



QUOTE (Moon-Hawk)
What happens when the threshold exceeds the dice pool?

"Guy jumps over the sofa and you have to shoot at him for 10 F***ing minutes."

(name that movie reference to get a karma)

I guess people are SOL then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Jun 15 2007, 05:59 PM
Post #6


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Boondock Saints
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 06:00 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



Boondock Saints.

Anyway you can negate that modifier by shooting through the sofa. But then the armor value goes up.

EDIT: Argh beaten.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunchbox311
post Jun 15 2007, 06:01 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Aurora, CO
Member No.: 11,514



1 karma each

:D


True barrier destruction would be the way to do it. So the heavy weapons would be used more often.

Wouldn't that also be a blind fire modifier... and therefore lose 6 hits according to the above mentioned rules?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Jun 15 2007, 06:27 PM
Post #9


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



QUOTE (lunchbox311)
Wouldn't that also be a blind fire modifier... and therefore lose 6 hits according to the above mentioned rules?

Indeed. Truely the sofa is an impenetrable defense from small arms fire.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 06:39 PM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



I don't think blind fire counts when you can see the person. And blind fire wasn't explicitly stated as being in the list of things that switch to threshold, though maybe it should be in cases where you only roughly know where the person is and you're trying to hit them. (Such as if they were totally hiding behind a sofa, or if they were invisible).

Still I'm not writing a new game system here. I'm interested in your opinions how the alt rules compares to the default system, which I also think handles blind fire unrealistically.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunchbox311
post Jun 15 2007, 06:51 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Aurora, CO
Member No.: 11,514



QUOTE (sunnyside @ Jun 15 2007, 01:39 PM)
I don't think blind fire counts when you can see the person.  And blind fire wasn't explicitly stated as being in the list of things that switch to threshold, though maybe it should be in cases where you only roughly know where the person is and you're trying to hit them.  (Such as if they were totally hiding behind a sofa, or if they were invisible).

Still I'm not writing a new game system here.  I'm interested in your opinions how the alt rules compares to the default system, which I also think handles blind fire unrealistically.

While it was not listed... full cover is the same as blind fire.

Honestly I think it will do more harm than good. My answer if combat gets too deadly or one sided is to throw some situational modifiers. Many times the environment will be distracting.



Try these on for size:

-If the group is breaking into a place... the guards will have home ground advantage... +2 dice on all tests basically.

-Gunshots are loud.... really loud in an indoor enviroment. If the group does not have proper ear protection then they can lose some dice due to disorientation or similar effects (this also makes non text communication difficult and opens up the door for flanking.)

-Smoke... a little bit goes a long ways especially in an indoor environment where it has no room to escape.

-Infiltration tests can be done to make surprise attacks. Unless a character takes a simple action to observe in detail (minus adepts with multi tasking who get it as a free action) they are -2 dice to notice. This can make surprises happen real fast... especially taking into consideration the incredible movement modifiers in this game.


Also remember that if you are doing blind fire... you use intuition NOT agility as your linked stat... for most gunbunnies that will drop the pool a significant margin.

All that said most combat in shadowrun is fast and deadly. A skilled shooter will hit his mark most of the time and it will usually be deadly.


Edit:

I will run some trials of your system idea with a friend or 2 and see how it plays out. If I find a way to make it work well... I will let you know. Otherwise I will post my comparative results here as soon as I get them.

I agree with you though... I am all for making combat tactical and not just bam bam bam time for the mage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Jun 15 2007, 07:14 PM
Post #12


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (lunchbox311)
PC gun nut has 18 dice... gets 6 hits on average... 2 net hits.

Guard can dodge the 2 hits easily.

End result: PC has a hell of a time hitting the guard (hello area weapons) but the guard can just NOT hit a PC.

You can get two success on average using his reaction of 4? Really? How?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 07:23 PM
Post #13


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



Just to be clear I'm not trying to make combat less deadly. Nor do I really want it to take longer, though that's OK if it's more fun/interesting. I'd rather have 10 minutes of fun/interesting combat than 4 minutes of two groups lining up like redcoats and continentals and just firing away.

Also just a math thing to note. This change doesn't reduce the potential hits at all. i.e. if guards are shooting at you in good cover with 10 die they can get a max of six hits either way. The difference is that before they'd usually connect with a pair of hits, and after the change they'll usually miss. They'll still connect occasionally though.

And if aiming is ruled to also affect thresholds they have a counter if your char stays popped up too long. I think I like that balance. If guards are taking pop shots at you just poking your head up you're hard to hit. But if you just stay there firing back someone will take the time to blow your head off. (ach there's a difference between 2nd and 4th, "headshot" isn't so clearly defined. Used to be if only your head was visible it was a headshot and that was easy to handle).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunchbox311
post Jun 15 2007, 07:31 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Aurora, CO
Member No.: 11,514



QUOTE (kzt)
QUOTE (lunchbox311 @ Jun 15 2007, 10:50 AM)
PC gun nut has 18 dice... gets 6 hits on average... 2 net hits.

Guard can dodge the 2 hits easily. 

End result: PC has a hell of a time hitting the guard (hello area weapons) but the guard can just NOT hit a PC.

You can get two success on average using his reaction of 4? Really? How?

You are correct... it would only be one on average. My oversight.

Still... it gets real hard to hit real fast even for a twinked character.

I did a little sample testing: street sam vs corpsec guard.

The only modifier I placed on either of them was "good cover" (-4 hits)

It took me 9 combat turns (or 27 iniatitive passes) before anyone landed a hit. The street sam had a roll of 6 hits at that point with 4 dropped automatically. Then the guard had a reation test and removed another hit.

1 net hit was damage so it was damage resistance time.
Sam had SMG type with regular ammo. 3 round burst.
So damage was 6 or 8 with burst fire.

Guard had body 3 and armor 6. Rolls 9 dice to drop 8 boxes of stun damage.

I stopped after that because it got boring.

it took 30 seconds for either one to even hit. The guard at this point would not have ANY chance to hit after wound modifiers.




I guess this makes for the hollywood shootouts... but it would bog down combat. This took forever with only 2 characters involved... Imagine the results from a whole group of say 4 runners and a few guards. Combat would take HOURS to resolve for basically a 30 second battle.

As is I stand by my examples above as modifiers to drop those dice pools.... that way a lucky shot can still hit and you do not have people bringing grenade launchers on every run or just blowing the whole place apart.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunchbox311
post Jun 15 2007, 07:34 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Aurora, CO
Member No.: 11,514



QUOTE (sunnyside)
Just to be clear I'm not trying to make combat less deadly. Nor do I really want it to take longer, though that's OK if it's more fun/interesting. I'd rather have 10 minutes of fun/interesting combat than 4 minutes of two groups lining up like redcoats and continentals and just firing away.

Supressive fire is good for that. If they do not go for cover... they will be hit by a bullet or 2 (depends on the number of people using it.)

Supressive fire will force all but the bravest of characters into hiding... and then it can be good cover vs. good cover fights with each side losing 4 or more dice per roll.

Combat could be real interesting then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 07:54 PM
Post #16


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



We're posting at the same time here.

lunch, what would happen if you used the "aiming lowers threshold" and wide burst options?

So the sammie would be rolling their 18 die against a 3 threshold and 1 die for dodging. That should be a hit nearly every time.

Also anyone have any suggestions on offering "headshots" if that's what you're shooting at anyway? Maybe as part of a "good" cover situation you only go against what armor is on the head and get the +4 damage?

This is really a second subject independent of the thresholds discussion. The question being if your player can only shoot at a targets head due to cover, should they count as hitting them in the head, and what should that mean? The only reason its relevant to this discussion is that in "regular" play cover is sufficiantly pointless that the issue won't come up much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Jun 15 2007, 08:11 PM
Post #17


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



I think this could be an interesting optional rule, but at first glance, it seems to me in some situations, you'll just end up with a standoff and I think players could get frustrated with that.

I've been using the skill cap optional rule for a long time and that allows me to not worry about huge dice pools. I know that at some point, the character with x skill is only ever going to get x + 1 hits, so even if they have a dice pool of 100, I don't have to worry about an ungodly amount of hits...

I think its harder for players to see that threshold moving for combat actually causing a lot more difficulty then it looks. But, I think as long as you are only capping one thing at a time, you should be okay...it will definitely give combat a different feel, but seeing most of our combat, say, 4 on 6 in a warehouse, already takes 30-45 minutes for about 2-3 combat turns, I don't see a need to make that any longer:)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunchbox311
post Jun 15 2007, 08:34 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Aurora, CO
Member No.: 11,514



QUOTE (sunnyside @ Jun 15 2007, 02:54 PM)
We're posting at the same time here.

lunch, what would happen if you used the "aiming lowers threshold" and wide burst options?

So the sammie would be rolling their 18 die against a 3 threshold and 1 die for dodging.  That should be a hit nearly every time. 

Also anyone have any suggestions on offering "headshots" if that's what you're shooting at anyway?  Maybe as part of a "good" cover situation you only go against what armor is on the head and get the +4 damage?

This is really a second subject independent of the thresholds discussion.  The question being if your player can only shoot at a targets head due to cover, should they count as hitting them in the head, and what should that mean?    The only reason its relevant to this discussion is that in "regular" play cover is sufficiantly pointless that the issue won't come up much.

So basically take aim actions reduce thresholds by 1 each and wide bursts reduce thresholds as well instead of reduce defense dice?

That could work... I will have to fiddle around with that and see.

BTW: I am using stock sam out of the book who gets 10-12 dice to throw at most attacks just for effect. I will test said 18+ die super killer afterwards.


Edit: or owuld wide bursts still do the wide burst thing?

The problem seems to be landing a hit at all because even with your example corp sec guard has 8 dice (with smartlink) to throw. with a threshold of 3. and now people lose 2 reaction to dodge..... It may work. I will play with that and see.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 08:34 PM
Post #19


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



I queue dice rolls for NPCs (and PCs if they ask) in combat (I roll a bunch and write the results down on paper then read them off line by line as combat goes on). I also drive my players to act quickly in combat (if they stall or ask too many questions it becomes an observe in detail action and I move on, I mean their character has to make a decision in half a second).

So my fights take maybe a fifth the time yours do, maybe less. Therefore I've got some room to grow.

And I agree you could get a "standoff" type scenario. It's called being "pinned down" i.e. they're OK behind the cover and can pop some semi effective shots off with pistols, but they'd get cut down if they just jumped out. That made for some of the more dramatic scenes back in my SR2 days. Doubly so since they can't just "pause" things, if they have to talk for a while gametime is passing and the swat team is getting closer.

What I'm worried about is that happening way to often, or general combat getting too slow, or weird rule interactions that would result that would make the game grind to a halt while they have to be sorted out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 08:38 PM
Post #20


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



Shoot we're still posting simultaniously.

@lunch. Now I was having wide work as normal. Aim reduces threshold 1 each (so you can always drop the threshold by one if you give up a double tap). Wide burst works as normal, it's just more useful than focused in this tactical situation I think.

So threshold goes from 4 to 3 and the guards dodge pool goes from 4 to 1.

Even on 12 die you should hit most of the time. And if you decide that hit counts against a head that hit should hurt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunchbox311
post Jun 15 2007, 08:40 PM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 23-April 07
From: Aurora, CO
Member No.: 11,514



QUOTE (sunnyside)
I also drive my players to act quickly in combat (if they stall or ask too many questions it becomes an observe in detail action and I move on, I mean their character has to make a decision in half a second).


Doubly so since they can't just "pause" things, if they have to talk for a while gametime is passing and the swat team is getting closer.

My players have been doing this lately and I am getting tired of it myself. Honestly I think I may do that as well... problem is that a couple of my players are slower than others (in the head) and the time wasted with them give the others a better idea of what to do.

*shrug*

The threshold idea has merit. I am willing to give it a go for a session and see what happens.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 08:45 PM
Post #22


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



I'd also suggest the queueing thing to anyone. I tried it one day back when I playing a cancer causing game and wanted to have a fight with four dozen NPCs involved (12 with the players 36 against). The fight was fast and fun and I've never looked back. Of course I still roll for really important stuff for dramatic effect.

Again the only reason that's relevant is that it's more likely to be a big deal with the threshold rule, since it's more likely to generate situations where the clever "buy successes" rule isn't going to help you speed things up nearly as much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Jun 15 2007, 09:01 PM
Post #23


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



Yeah, I ended my DMing career going to using pregenerated lists of numbers...it was a lot quicker, but I have to say that my player (back then and now) really like to roll their dice...

But back to the topic, I'd certainly be interested to see how this comes out. I don't think I can do it in my game, just becaue of the already capped skills...but maybe if we run a new campaign down the road, this could be a fun alternate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Jun 15 2007, 09:11 PM
Post #24


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,865
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



Could always try a oneshot seperate game, maybe if a couple people call in sick. :D


And I always let my players roll unless they don't want to. It's only for NPCs.

Anyway I guess at this point I'm sorta asking multiple questions.

#1 Is the threshold thing just a world of hurt or tactical fun. (and does that answer mostly depend on whether a shootout of 6 v 6 in a warehouse takes 45 minutes or 5 minutes for your group if they're using the regular rules.)

#2 What is the best blend of options for the threshold rule. They don't spell it out, they just say some things might affect thresholds. Should smartlinks? Vision modifiers? It's up to the GM. I'm thinking a good blend would be cover, range, background count, and aiming should affect threshold and the rest should affect modifiers as normal.

#3 Should I make a houserule for headshots either involving good cover or not. This didn't need a houserule in earlier editions as they had headshot rules. If only the targets head was visible, it counted as a headshot(the penalty on the attack in those situations was as bad if not than a regular headshot), simple as that. In SR4 I'd need a special ruling because right now you can't shoot someone in the head. You can bypass armor or get +4 damage, but you can't actually shoot them in the head.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Garrowolf
post Jun 15 2007, 09:43 PM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 870
Joined: 2-October 06
From: Athens Ga
Member No.: 9,517



I use this system and it works fine. I think that it makes the game more tactical then the dice pool version. In fact I moved most of the equipment stuff to threshold modifiers.

Basically the way I do it is this:

If it is hindering a character specifically - such as wound penalties, armor, etc then it is a dice pool modifier.

If it is an environmental difficulty - range, visibility, etc then it is a threshold modifier. If the equipment would negate this normally then it reduces the threshold. Most equipment does this instead of adding dice.

The problem is that people want to easily kill all their enemies. That is boring and unrealistic. Most shots in a gun fight miss. I'm not saying that you should have hour long gun fights but second long ones are just as dumb.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 04:58 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.