IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Emergence Review, Is it good?
Buster
post Aug 27 2007, 11:15 PM
Post #26


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,246
Joined: 8-June 07
Member No.: 11,869



QUOTE (Malachi)
Finally, I would like people to keep in mind this: criticism is easy, creation is hard. So, if you are someone who finds it very easy to spout off what a "bad idea" some things are, I would like you to speak up with some better ones. I'm sure Catalyst could always use more Freelancers.

I'd like to take a moment to criticize that. :D

So you're saying that only Isaac Asimov is allowed to speak up, the rest of us should just pay our $35 and shut the hell up?

Yes we do need to speak up and risk being labeled a critic because if you buy the PDF you're SOL because they don't give you your money back if it sucks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 27 2007, 11:16 PM
Post #27


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



QUOTE (Malachi)
Finally, I would like people to keep in mind this: criticism is easy, creation is hard. So, if you are someone who finds it very easy to spout off what a "bad idea" some things are, I would like you to speak up with some better ones. I'm sure Catalyst could always use more Freelancers.

QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein)
If anything, I'd be surprised if in a far more plausible take of the events, the majority of the public wouldn't be suspecting the Crash 2.0 was all a ploy by the megacorporations to force everyone to use their new Matrix and mass-produced Commlinks that just came out of thin air. And that the real witch hunt wouldn't be aimed at them. (And nevermind that this would have been a perfect way to write in a means of having governments regain some of their lost power base as a result.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner
post Aug 27 2007, 11:17 PM
Post #28


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado
Member No.: 185



QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein @ Aug 27 2007, 11:09 PM)
QUOTE (Synner)
Most people don't have hacking software. Most people won't be able to hack you accounts or your home system even with a computer. Most people won't even know how to get the software to do it.

Most people know people can do that. Most people know the limits of what you can do on the Matrix. I mean, I'm not a hacker in real life yet I'm certainly not pissing myself at the thoughts of all those evil, malicious virii and hackers out there! OOH, SCARY! And I sure as hell don't think it takes a magician ("but not really magicians, honest!") to do that shit. Or that if, suddenly, people were able to interact with the web, all the technological limits in place instantly become useless. Just because they don't need a computer to do it, you see.

So you've seen personally seen loved ones die and hundreds of thousands lose their lives and livelihoods because those evil, malicious virii and hackers out there...

You've also lived with the fact exactly how that happened is still beyond the grasp of even the best computer specialists and techs - because, you know, they couldn't do it even if they tried and they certainly couldn't stop it last time.

And you know that these people, if they even are people, are unstable and crazy enough to trigger something like that. Hell, their own powers apparently drive them insane.

QUOTE
And most people will probably be a little scared of individuals that, you know, can conjure sentient monsters inside the ubiquitous computers systems everywhere around you (and anywhere reachable by Matrix for that matter), can knock out wireless electronics with a flick of his fingers, or hack the brain of anyone linked to the Matrix and psychotropically program them to do his bidding or possibly even download his mind into their bodies. 

QUOTE
As opposed to those who can do all those things outside of the Matrix, amirite?

Nope, don't think I ever said that. The difference is that people have had 60 years to come to terms with Magic and when magic emerged things were almost as bad (though not quite as bad since the media and the corps didn't take the reigns of the situation and weren't fearful of the potential threat emerging as they are in 2070). They've also been told this isn't magic. And for all intents and purposes it isn't, a baseline technomancers is able to do things that no magician has ever been able to in all of the recorded history of thaumaturgy.

QUOTE
Or the existance of software that can do the same thing, and has been able to do the same thing for decades now. (See: BTLs, moodchips, personafixes, etc.)

All of which is mastered by a skilled select few and costs thousands of nuyen in hardware and software to produce - where as these technomancers can do it with their minds alone, they can do it intuitively, they might be even doing it without knowing, hell their sprites might do it for them without them even knowing its being done.

To use the X-men comparison that's been bandied around its like saying people won't be scared of individuals capable of firing beams of coherent light from their eyes because the end effect is the same as firing a big gun that anyone can buy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 27 2007, 11:20 PM
Post #29


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



QUOTE (Synner @ Aug 27 2007, 05:17 PM)
So you've seen personally seen loved ones die and hundreds of thousands lose their lives and livelihoods because those evil, malicious virii and hackers out there...

You've also lived with the fact exactly how that happened is still beyond the grasp of even the best computer specialists and techs - because, you know, they couldn't do it even if they tried and they certainly couldn't stop it last time.

In context of the 2070's? Yep. Happened back in the 20's, didn't it? Back when Technomancers weren't around at all, in fact! Even after 50 years, experts still don't fully know how that crazy virus got to be so superpowerful...

QUOTE
And you know that these people, if they even are people, are unstable and crazy enough to trigger something like that. Hell, their own powers apparently drive them insane.

As opposed to all those stable magicians and alien entities involved with the Universal Brotherhood, or who took out an entire major UCAS city, killing, torturing, experimenting on, and infecting with God knows what?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Buster
post Aug 27 2007, 11:20 PM
Post #30


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,246
Joined: 8-June 07
Member No.: 11,869



QUOTE (Synner)
Most people don't have hacking software. Most people won't be able to hack you accounts or your home system even with a computer. Most people won't even know how to get the software to do it. And most people will probably be a little scared of an individual that can, you know, conjure sentient monsters inside the ubiquitous computers systems everywhere around you (and anywhere reachable by Matrix for that matter), can knock out wireless electronics and cyberware with a flick of his fingers, or hack the brain of anyone linked to the Matrix and psychotropically program them to do his bidding or possibly even download his mind into their bodies like you've heard his AI masters were able to do.

Yup, I can see where the big difference is.

Um, didn't you just make Funk's point? Mages CAN do all that and more. And the masses don't need to be told lies, they've actually seen mages do it on TV. And yet mages are not hunted, technomancers are.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Aug 27 2007, 11:25 PM
Post #31


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Keep in mind that a large part of the public's perception of technomancers has to do with how they were exposed; people would look at Al Quaeda differently if they tried to discredit political leaders with embarrassing photos instead of terrorize a nation with coordinated mass murder.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Buster
post Aug 27 2007, 11:28 PM
Post #32


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,246
Joined: 8-June 07
Member No.: 11,869



So in the entire timeline of Shadowrun, no magician, cybersam, or hacker has ever killed lots of people? No group of magicians has ever conjured volcanos or brought plagues of demons to earth?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Naysayer
post Aug 27 2007, 11:29 PM
Post #33


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 325
Joined: 9-December 06
From: the Maaatlock-Expressway!
Member No.: 10,326



But magicians also had 60 years to show the world that they are, while still powerful and generally awesome, not ALL-powerful and also not all crazy ghost-dancers (who,at their peak, still need to commit ritual suicide by the hundreds to blow up one or two volcanos), while TMs are this years new big scary thing and for all you know, one of these ... things might just be able to blow up a power plant just by thinking hard at it. IN FACT, HE MIGHT BE DOING IT RIGHT NOW! Plotting the downfall of all you hold dear! OH NOES! Technomancers are the Al Quaida of the 2070's.

EDIT: while i was typing away with my big sluggish fingers, AH made the exact same comparison... scary...

Let's mob up and burn something!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Buster
post Aug 27 2007, 11:30 PM
Post #34


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,246
Joined: 8-June 07
Member No.: 11,869



But mages CAN blow up a power plant just by thinking hard at it. People don't need to be lied to about it, they've seen it on TV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner
post Aug 27 2007, 11:35 PM
Post #35


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado
Member No.: 185



QUOTE (Buster @ Aug 27 2007, 11:20 PM)
QUOTE
Yup, I can see where the big difference is.

Um, didn't you just make Funk's point? Mages CAN do all that and more. And the masses don't need to be told lies, they've actually seen mages do it on TV. And yet mages are not hunted, technomancers are.

No, because as I've pointed out technomancers are doing similar things to what mages can accomplish and things that cannot be explained by magic, that in fact are completely impossible to do with magic, and that when witnessed by a magician will be certified as not being magic by any accepted definition of the term in 2070.

And to repeate myself - if mages were depicted as:
  • directly linked to the force behind the single most catastrophic event in recent history the cause of hundreds of thousands of deaths worldwide,
  • defined as crazy, schizoid nutjobs wielding uncontrollable powers that actually contribute to make them more unstable,
  • described as able to spontaneously generate computer code, speak to Matrix dwelling entities unknown to anyone else, and potentially create another Crash virus,
  • inexplicably being able to do with their minds, what it costs an mundane human thousands of dollars and considerable skill to replicate,
  • allegedly linked to alien artificial intelligences that hide in the Matrix.
... then they would be hunted too.

Note mages were indeed hunted, strung up and killed, for a lot less way back in the day and they didn't have the media and a significant portion of the corporations actively working against them.

That society has come to understand magic better and live with it doesn't mean it is accepted and not viewed with suspicion. However, society has had 60 years to learn that magic has limits and consequences, that there are countermeasures and responses available to the powers that be, and that ultimately magic is understandable. Technomancers benefit from none of that. They are clearly not mages, their abilities drive them nuts, and no one knows what their true potential is and what it takes to unlock it (to a possibly world devastating effect that 60 years of information tells us no magician could hope reproduce).

As Ancient has mentioned the manner in which technomancers emerged, the specific events and the manner they were already being portrayed in the media, further fans the flames of doubt and fear.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knasser
post Aug 27 2007, 11:40 PM
Post #36


Shadow Cartographer
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 2-June 06
From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West)
Member No.: 8,636




EDIT: n/m. I've been through this once already and have no wish to appear as though I have a vendetta against this book. It's Shadowrun 4th Edition and available as a PDF. People might as well just buy it and see if they like it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Buster
post Aug 27 2007, 11:45 PM
Post #37


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,246
Joined: 8-June 07
Member No.: 11,869



QUOTE (Synner)

No, because as I've pointed out technomancers are doing similar things to what mages can accomplish and things that cannot be explained by magic, that in fact are completely impossible to do with magic, and that when witnessed by a magician will be certified as not being magic by any accepted definition of the term in 2070.

And to repeate myself - if mages were depicted as:

  • directly linked to the force behind the single most catastrophic event in recent history the cause of hundreds of thousands of deaths worldwide,
  • defined as crazy, schizoid nutjobs wielding uncontrollable powers that actually contribute to make them more unstable,
  • described as able to spontaneously generate computer code, speak to Matrix dwelling entities unknown to anyone else, and potentially create another Crash virus,
  • inexplicably being able to do with their minds, what it costs an mundane human thousands of dollars and considerable skill to replicate,
  • allegedly linked to alien artificial intelligences that hide in the Matrix.
... then they would be hunted too.

Note mages were indeed hunted, strung up and killed, for a lot less way back in the day and they didn't have the media and a significant portion of the corporations actively working against them.

That society has come to understand magic better and live with it doesn't mean it is accepted and not viewed with suspicion. However, society has had 60 years to learn that magic has limits and consequences, that there are countermeasures and responses available to the powers that be, and that ultimately magic is understandable. Technomancers benefit from none of that. They are clearly not mages, their abilities drive them nuts, and no one knows what their true potential is and what it takes to unlock it (to a possibly world devastating effect that 60 years of information tells us no magician could hope reproduce).

As Ancient has mentioned the manner in which technomancers emerged, the specific events and the manner they were already being portrayed in the media, further fans the flames of doubt and fear.



Who in the world would care if a terrorist was using magic, "virtuakinetics", nanites, bioweapons, nukes, or opening the Arc of the Covenant? Mages can create, have created, and have the potential to once again create disasters on a huge scale. Just like technomancers. And unlike technomancers, no one has to lie to them about it, they've seen mages do it on TV. And yet technomancers are hunted and mages aren't.

It's like Emergence exists in its own universe where everyone has forgotten about ghost dances, insect spirit invasions, and every act of terrorism a mage, adept, gun bunny, or scriptkiddie has perpetrated on the world.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knasser
post Aug 27 2007, 11:49 PM
Post #38


Shadow Cartographer
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 2-June 06
From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West)
Member No.: 8,636



One last thing before I jack out for the night... I've just opened up Emergence for the first time in ages and can't find a quick answer to this. I can't remember why the media is so dedicated to whipping up fear and hatred of technomancers? Anyone?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Naysayer
post Aug 27 2007, 11:49 PM
Post #39


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 325
Joined: 9-December 06
From: the Maaatlock-Expressway!
Member No.: 10,326



QUOTE (Buster)
But mages CAN blow up a power plant just by thinking hard at it.  People don't need to be lied to about it, they've seen it on TV.

Except in Karl Kombatmage sims maybe, when was the last time in SR history that something bigger than say, a car, was openly and publicly blown up by magic? (The late President Dunkelzahn nonwithstanding, as he was a dragon, and those are wierd anyway and if you elect a lizard thensomething funky is just bound to happen).
For all I know, that would be around the tme of the GGD.
Since then, I'd estimate that far more people have been healed of cancer and gutshots than have been hated to death by magic.
AND don't forget that it's still stated that the general population still distrusts magic and magic users. They've just moved on from torch and pitchfork-style distrust to something a little more subtle.

Compare McCarthy era USA to post 9/11 USA. back then, being suspected of being a commie would get you in real bad trouble. Now, it's still kinda suspicious, but if something scary happens, it's the guy in the turban you go looking for first the for blame game.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner
post Aug 27 2007, 11:54 PM
Post #40


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado
Member No.: 185



QUOTE (knasser @ Aug 27 2007, 11:40 PM)
QUOTE (Ancient History @ Aug 27 2007, 11:25 PM)
Keep in mind that a large part of the public's perception of technomancers has to do with how they were exposed;

I recall a certain Danial Howling Coyote wiping out an entire airbourne division of the USA and burying a city with a volcano.

I'm also unclear as to why the media stokes such a hysteria in the Emergence book. It seems counterproductive.

And the result was a megapower brought to its knees and forced to bargain with the Natives. At the time this was the equivalent of Emergence and the consequences were equally far reaching, however, the dangerous foe was a skulking Indian shaman bent on avenging his people and hiding somewhere in the North American hinterland - not your next door neighbor or the guy in the next cubicle who are slowly being driven insane by AIPS.

QUOTE
I'm also unclear as to why the media stokes such a hysteria in the Emergence book. It seems counterproductive.

Chapter's 2 and 3 Game Info covers most of it.

The media is at the service of the megacorporations and (most of) the corporations want technomancers either under their control or eliminated as a threat (they don't want another Pax emerging). Even Evo and Horizon are initially undecided and go with the flow.

The best way to accomplish this, given that technomancers can be anyone anywhere and are at large, is to scare them into submission and give them nowhere to hide. If at the same time the megacorps can scare governments and the masses into sanctioning their pogroms, they'll be able to get exactly what they want - not genocide, but experimentation camps and government sanctioned labs working on figuring out what makes technomancers tick and how to reproduce those abilities (or failing that counter or detroying them). The media campaign both backs technomancers into a corner and influences lawmakers and the public to support the corp agendas - and if it costs a few lives, it's just a few less wild cards out there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner
post Aug 28 2007, 12:07 AM
Post #41


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado
Member No.: 185



QUOTE (Buster @ Aug 27 2007, 11:45 PM)
It's like Emergence exists in its own universe where everyone has forgotten about ghost dances, insect spirit invasions, and every act of terrorism a mage, adept, gun bunny, or scriptkiddie has perpetrated on the world.

Actually if you reread SR3 material following Bug City and the Shedim emergence you will realize that similar phenomenons and witch hunts did happen in the 50's - and the worldwide bug hunts that followed Chicago were just as impressive as the witchhunts in Emergence. In fact backlashes of this sort were why Tehran was razed.

The issue is simple. Technomancers are linked, correctly or not, to the single most traumatic event in recent memory and they roam freely and hidden amongst the population. If left unchecked their powers might, just might, potentially wreck havoc on an a scale unimaginable for any terrorist, mage, adept, script or gunbunny could ever hope to achieve.

The scale and scope of the damage of the first and second Crash far outstrips anything the Bugs have and unlike any other disaster or threat that's menaced the Sixth World this one touched almost everyone the world over.

Who is to say that the crazed schizophrenic mind of just one technomancer couldn't spawn that degree of devastation again - possibly even unwittingly? Events in Hong Kong seem like evidence that they are able to do just that...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Prime Mover
post Aug 28 2007, 12:22 AM
Post #42


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,755
Joined: 5-September 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 9,313



Much like real life rational has nothing to do with the heart of the matter.

Reminds me of one of my favorite quotes.

"What people don't understand they fear and what people fear they try to destory."

Human nature really 1 in 4 people really are just sheep waiting for the nightly news (trid,matrix blog) to tell them what to think, what is the "real truth".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Aug 28 2007, 12:32 AM
Post #43


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



QUOTE (knasser)
One last thing before I jack out for the night... I've just opened up Emergence for the first time in ages and can't find a quick answer to this. I can't remember why the media is so dedicated to whipping up fear and hatred of technomancers? Anyone?

Ratings. That, and it might suit the purposes of the megas that own the news outlets to report it in this fashion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 28 2007, 12:38 AM
Post #44


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



Yes. Because the one thing you want to encourage the entire world to switch to your new Matrix protocols and buy your new commlinks (that just HAPPENED to have been mass produced, distributed, and ready to go for this entire fiasco) is to instill trust in both them and the new network in exactly that fashion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Malachi
post Aug 28 2007, 12:45 AM
Post #45


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,228
Joined: 24-July 07
From: Canada
Member No.: 12,350



Well it seems Dr. F didn't like Technomancers from the start, so it's obvious that he wouldn't like a plot book about them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Aug 28 2007, 12:55 AM
Post #46


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Give the Doc the benefit of the doubt, it's a fair point. However, at the time when the events of Emergence occur the wireless world is practically integral to day-to-day living. Billions of people literally could not live without the Matrix, there would be no money, no food, no power, no government, no GridLink, no trideo. You might get a few people that decide to go off somewhere without the Matrix and "live on nuts and berries and commune with what's left of bloody Nature," but they're the wild fringe. The rest of the world will go through varying periods of mass hysteria and then come to grips with things - one way or another.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Aug 28 2007, 12:56 AM
Post #47


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



QUOTE (Malachi)
Well it seems Dr. F didn't like Technomancers from the start, so it's obvious that he wouldn't like a plot book about them.

I like Technomancers just fine. What I don't like is how they're handling them, and what I really don't like is how they handled them in the past ("kids who burn-out at puberty! Wewt! What a great idea!").
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Big D
post Aug 28 2007, 01:23 AM
Post #48


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 524
Joined: 12-April 06
Member No.: 8,455



Note that if the GGD had happened in 2011, right after VITAS and before the Awakening (where there were plenty of scares, but also governments claiming to have things under control, Dunk on TV telling people not to panic, etc.), and the GGD had been portrayed as being the result of *anybody* who Awakened... the results would have been more alike.

Instead, people had 5 years to get used to the idea that magic was around, and lots of people dreamed of magic while they were children, so it had a decent shot at developing a positive connotation before the GGD happened.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Buster
post Aug 28 2007, 02:29 AM
Post #49


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,246
Joined: 8-June 07
Member No.: 11,869



QUOTE (Big D)
Instead, people had 5 years to get used to the idea that magic was around, and lots of people dreamed of magic while they were children, so it had a decent shot at developing a positive connotation before the GGD happened.

When I was a kid, I was the one who always had to change the channel on the TV, so I grew up wishing I could change the channel without having to get up off the couch. Then they invented the remote control. My childhood fantasy has been fulfilled. Harry Potter's got nothing on me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zhan Shi
post Aug 28 2007, 02:35 AM
Post #50


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 609
Joined: 13-August 07
Member No.: 12,615



As far as actually playing Emergence goes, the main options would be:

a TM trying to avoid the dragnet

a runner helping/rescuing TMs

working for the one or two remaining independent (mostly) news outlets to discover the truth

or, if you're really sick, rounding up TMs to deliver them for vivisection
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th December 2025 - 06:46 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.