![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,382 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Shadowland Member No.: 8,297 ![]() |
Here are some houserules I have been working on. Please critique and let me know if I am missing something.
Since my view of the matrix is crucial to understanding where these houserules came from, here is a quick note on how I see the matrix.
Specific Houserule I wanted to separate this one out because I am still tinkering with it. In order to lessen the BP load on the TM. I am planning on two things:
Each BP purchases 3 CFP to be used to purchase CF per otherwise normal rules. That a TM can manipulate the EM field in the open air with her mind and can't manipulate the EM field around her own body just bugged me. Ok, there they are. Please critique. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 ![]() |
Regarding your assumptions:
1) True. 2) True. You can't edit live wireless broadcasts, not only "old school" transmissions as you said but also from "new tech" wireless transmissions like commlinks. You can't jam transmissions with a commlink, you need a jammer to jam transmissions (hence the name). 3) Makes sense. 4) Huh? Why? As to your houserules: 1-4) Why? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,382 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Shadowland Member No.: 8,297 ![]() |
Ok, point taken on the jammer.
The houserules on cost are a reflection of my bais that they should cost more. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 225 Joined: 13-July 07 Member No.: 12,235 ![]() |
House Rules:
1) Okay. 2) Sure, why not? 3) No big deal. 4) Umm...I...it...I guess if you enjoy formulas, go for it. However, these are all just relatively minor tweaks on matrix stuff. Usually when I see matrix house rules around here it's for stuff like capping program hits and making logic matter and trying to stop Agent Smith - you know, stuff trying to make the matrix work. These house rules of yours are fine and all, I don't think anyone's going to be up in arms about a commlink coming preloaded with an Edit program, but they, well, they're really not that exciting for hackers in your game. If you tell the hacker your house rules are to make some availability and price changes on programs, they'll shrug and go, "Meh." TM Rules: 1) I fully endorse this. You might also want to adjust karma costs for improving CFs. 2) No arguments here. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 ![]() |
I'm actually less convinced of the Matrix being a mesh network than I am that it is a bus network, or more precisely a series of overlapping bus networks.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|||
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 ![]() |
Obviously. I don't want to sound like a smartass, but why? I still don't understand why you think they should cost more. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,245 Joined: 27-April 07 From: Running the streets of Southeast Virginia Member No.: 11,548 ![]() |
Prolly because everyone else's stuff costs more. So why should a hacker get off easy?
Just my two cents and perspective. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 ![]() |
It's because there's no such a thing as a pure hacker anymore. Bunker babies are so 80's. The hacker role has been absorbed into the other character roles. You have to be a tech savvy cyberninja now. Since no matrix test use Logic anymore, you can play a retard cybersam blockhead as an uberhacker with no problem. Technomancers are all that's left of the hacker class, and they don't seem to be very playable.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|||||
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,382 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Shadowland Member No.: 8,297 ![]() |
* Emphasis mine. You are welcome to your opinion on how hacking works for your game. I just don't like that the dumber-than-rocks sammie can out hack the guy who breathes the matrix. Our opinion are just that - opinions that are different, not right and wrong. Concerning the "hacker class"; have you been screened for d20 cancer? :grinbig:
Thanks for the feedback. I'm an engineer; formulas make sense to me. ;) On the TM rules, I am working on the karma costs. I am considering an alternate system for character advancement using BP in place of karma. See Frank's House Rule Thread for an idea. It can be found here. Edited to add link to Frank's House Rules. This post has been edited by Alex: Oct 9 2007, 12:18 AM |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#10
|
|||
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,246 Joined: 8-June 07 Member No.: 11,869 ![]() |
LOL. I'm not saying you're right or wrong, I'm asking for clarification. You aren't really saying what you hope to accomplish. It sounds like you're trying to bring back the dedicated bunker hacker. But I'm saying you can't do that just by raising the prices of commlinks. You'll have to change a lot of the game world before you can do that (starting with eliminating wireless blocking paint from your world). |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,382 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Shadowland Member No.: 8,297 ![]() |
@ Buster
Ok, now I understand. (Must be the hours I'm keeping recently...) No, I don't want the bunker hacker back at all. I just want there to be a separation between the sammie who hacks little old ladies comms for extra beer money (kinda like the script kiddies who phish for Mom's Account on Amazon) and the dedicated hacker who stands a chance against a Rating 6, IC ladden, security spider monitored, corporate system. My hope - please note that the commlink rules aren't play-tested yet - is to persuade fewer PCs to choose to try to be the sub-hacker. NOTE: For me, this is a departure. I hated the Matrix rules in 2nd and 3rd, so even allowing a PC hacker is different for me. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th June 2023 - 09:51 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.