![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#26
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
"Suspect", please, unless they've been convicted.
~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 ![]() |
To give an international perspective to the comments about 'gun culture' in the police force, let me offer up some commentary about australia.
In Australia the use of firearms by criminals is mostly confined to a few 'bad' suburbs, and other than that, it's not really an issue. Many cops would prefer not to carry their service pistol and instead move to a british model with no guns. there has also been a demographics shift in the Australian population, which means for most cops (probably the majority especially at more junior levels), the only gun they have ever seen or shot with is their service pistol. Completely different look at things for a police force that carries 9mm pistols like they do in new york! unfortunately i don't have any information on accuracy, but I have every reason to believe its quite high from purely anecdotal evidence. Conversely because most cops are not shooting at people with guns, usually knives and other weapons, accuracy rates might be different in a real 'gunfight' |
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 519 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Queensland Member No.: 3,180 ![]() |
or "person of interest", used hereabouts. "Suspect" may perhaps be seen as prejudicial.
POI = PC |
|
|
![]()
Post
#29
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
Well, in the case of the man who at the time was suspected of having killed Deputy Vernon Matthew Williams in Florida, and who was shot at 110 times and hit 68 times (because "that's all the bullets we had", according to the Sheriff, always a man for respecting due process), we get something like the following:
Range: Short or Medium Recoil: presumably fluctuating between 0 and 1 Other mods: Target Stationary for -1 We have a TN fluctuating between 3 and 4 or 4 and 5, with an overall hit rate of just under 62%. At Medium range it's not actually possible to get that close to 62% expected hit rate, but the closest I can get with the time I have is 54.17%, which means that the cops have Pistols 1 and spend one point of Combat Pool on their TN 4 shots. Edit^2: further investigation suggests that they may actually have been using submachine guns, which changes the math drastically. I need to get back to work, though, so no modification here from me. Edit: well, "suspect" does carry a negative connotation, but it's an implicit one that will only be transferred to any replacement term via the euphemism treadmill, so I'll stick with it. "Perp", however, is explicit: the perpetrator is the one who perpetrated, no question about it. I suppose there's a certain degree of vagueness as to whether criminality is implied, as in some cases it can be clear that someone performed an action despite it not being clear that they are criminally culpable, though I'd still prefer to leave that question to a judge in cases of police involvement. ~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 ![]() |
Another interesting point about firearms accuracy. In WWII less than 1% of bullets fired actually hit anything. Lots less than 1% if I remember correctly i think it was less than 0.1% (It could very well have been 0.01% or 0.001%)
Which probably has more relevant to the shadowrun milleu, because lots of that would have been suppressive fire, which has been undermodelled in every RPG ever. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#31
|
|||
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 ![]() |
The whole idea of dodging and shooting is silly. It's quite difficult to shoot accurately when moving straight towards the target at a walk at anything over a few meters. To have any chance at all you have to use a rather unusual way of walking. Shooting on the move is really hard and you have to be able to shoot very accurately and quickly standing still before they try to teach it to you. You are simply going to shoot up the neighborhood if you are trying to "dodge" and shoot back. You are never going to hit the target other then by total chance at more than arms length. If you don't have a stable weapon and an adequate sight picture of the guy you are shooting at you are not going to hit him. And if you are dodging you won't have either. This is why the approach to gunfighting that is taught to students is to, when possible, get to cover and shoot from cover. You can't dodge bullets. NOBODY teaches people to be in the open and "dodge bullets" while shooting back. It's insane. If you are a good shooter and you are caught in the open the suggestion is to keep moving, all the time, typically perpendicular or away from the bad guys. You'll hit the bad guys less than if you established a perfect weaver stance and aimed carefully, but they will hit you a lot less too. If the real world, unlike SR, moving targets are harder to hit, particulary under pressure. Shooters who are moving at a slow walk hit their targets less than if they didn't move, and they hit them with much less precision. Nobody shoots a 1 inch 6 round string shooting on the move. Running or sprinting it's just about hopeless. Suppressive fire is the best most mortals can expect. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#32
|
|||
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6,640 Joined: 6-June 04 Member No.: 6,383 ![]() |
WWII fighting also often took place at longer range, too. Agree about the suppressive fire. I really am looking to try and do a good implementation of suppressive fire. Hell, not even video games do it well. The only game that too suppressive fire seriously that I know of is Electronic Arts' SEAL Team, which is an old title. Delta Force: Black Hawk Down did it poorly but at least it sort of worked. Most FPS games for some reason don't want to have any suppressive fire effects. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#33
|
|||||
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 ![]() |
I think suppressive fire is under modelled because it is (I think) that it's terrible game design to model it correctly. Taking control of someone's avatar away from them is inherently 'unfun.' As for range, yeah, WWII engagements where typically (AFAIK) for individual weapons at the 40-100 meter range, with crew served machine guns typically engaging at the sort of 600 meter threshold, but potentially engaging at kilometer ranges or more if used as indirect fire (something they did in WWI with machineguns, not sure how widespread the practice was in WWII if at all). But still if your barfing out 10k rounds to actually HIT someone, let alone KILL THEM, something is up even before the addition of modern body armour and other tricks people are running around with. I would doubt most shadow runners would fire 10k rounds in their career ever. |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#34
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
To put it in perspective, my longest-running character has acquired ~2,000 MMG rounds, 400 MMG tracer rounds, and 100 sporting rifle rounds over the course of the game, and has fired 363 of those rounds (and some grenades and ATGMs I'm not going to try to count). Granted, there's been some use of the bumper of the van as a weapon, and we've been in ammo-conservation mode for over a year out-of-character because of Bug City, but even with the occasional use of suppressive fire we're going through rounds far too slowly to hit 10k in any kind of reasonable timeframe.
I guess it makes up for ¥2-a-pop bullets. Edit: for more perspective, consider that the ammo load of a Strato-9 is 500 rounds, or about 137 more than I've fired over the entire campaign. ~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 ![]() |
And to cast THAT in perspective, a british operator of a Bren Gun in could expect to be carrying 700 rounds into battle between him and his fellow assistant, and another 300 rounds carried by everyone else in the squad, or in the APC.
But that is a different type of fighting than SR, I suppose the closest numbers would be vietnam. I dug around - small arms fire was a much bigger killer, and the US estimated it was spending several thousand rounds to actually hit someone - my source for that isn;t that great though. Weapons are much more comparable to SR to boot. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#36
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 ![]() |
IIRC, in Vietnam the amount of small arms ammo expended per kill weighted more than the average soldier. It's a huge number of rounds. Some of it was due to things like "Mad Minutes" and recon by fire, but a lot of it was due to the fact that people under great stress typically can't shoot worth a damn. Even at silly close range I've known people who got missed.
The main modifier that is missing from pretty much all RPG is some universal negative when your character would feel like he is in great danger of being killed or severely wounded right now. So it wouldn't apply when you ambush someone (because they are not shooting at you) or if you are a police sniper, but it sure would if you are shooting it out in an alley with some thug. This would allow for the great shooting people do at the range, and the crappy shooting most people do on the two-way range. Typically it seems the more times someone gets shot at the better they are at handling this, so there might possibly be some sort of mechanism to reduce it effects. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#37
|
|
Freelance Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 7,324 Joined: 30-September 04 From: Texas Member No.: 6,714 ![]() |
But that's because, in most games focused on combat, not many people feel like role playing the guy that pukes up his lunch at a near miss, or the guy with the sweaty palms and the shaking hands. Folks want to play the steely-eyed veteran, for whom a two-gun shootout is just another day at the office; Bobby De Niro from Heat, not Sean Bean.
Which is part of why it's so difficult to find "realism" in an RPG. So many of the things that make for wildly inaccurate fire IRL -- the physiological responses to danger, all the little quirks that go into good shooting, the weirdness of recoil, even the deeply ingrained idea that killing someone else is wrong (thought to be responsible for quite a few of those WWI and WWII misses) -- don't come up in most RPGs any more than they come up in most action flicks. Even for folks that know that stuff exists and worry about it, it's not really fun stuff to deal with. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#38
|
|||
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
I don't know what cops you have been talking to, but I have never found this to be the case. As for minimal gun use in Oz ... don't believe the media. I have seen just as many guns on the streets and in non-legal hands here as I have in the States. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#39
|
|||||||||
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 ![]() |
The handful of cops I know are young guys, natch, because I'm a young guy - but I've heard from 'reliable sources' accounts of police misidentified berrattas as glocks, and WWII era pistols presumably brought home from WWII as current defense service pistols when both weapons turned up in raids. A possible bias factor in my sample space is I'm from canberra and every sworn officer I have ever talked to is in the AFP but in the canberra local policing side. I'm not sure there has been a shooting death here for quite some time. To be honest I've never seen the issue of police firearms discussed in the media beyond issues like replacing service revolvers with semi automatics and the associated complaining about how it wasn't happening fast enough.Infact I would have liked to see more discussion because our initally half assed implementation of gun controls resulted in you being able to buy all the parts to make a gun from different states and assemble it yourself due to different parts of the gun being controlled. We now have a national system but that stupid mistake resulting in unlicensed guns ending up in unsavoury hands was just moronic. But beyond that declining rates of gun ownership in australia tell you all you need to know. The number of households owning a gun has gone down from 20% in 1989, to 17% in 1992 to 10% in 2000. I'd like some more recent numbers, but I have no reason to suspect the trend has abated? With lower gun ownership, the younger generation of police coming up through the ranks is simply not going to have had the same exposure to firearms. Also from a 2000 CSIRO paper (well, the abstract) http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file..._id=NB03014.pdf The study is provided merely to provide some numbers to support my point of view about firearms crime rates.
Demographics of both violent crime and gunownership in australia are really changing, and I expect that it will take a while before it really becomes noticeable. Remember the firearms are only a 'recent' invovation for the Australian police forces, only being universally deployed in 1980? if I remember correctly. Thats only 27 years of history :) Prior to that all police forces except NSW followed the british model. @critias
This study has been discredited AFAIK, his methadology was .. err.. dicey. However you do touch on a salient point. US forces operating in Somalia where so much more accurate than the local militas that it was a subject of significant comment. Training and iron discipline really does make a difference. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
![]()
Post
#40
|
|
Freelance Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 7,324 Joined: 30-September 04 From: Texas Member No.: 6,714 ![]() |
Just because some cops get their handguns mixed up, etc, doesn't really mean diddly squat about "Australian Police" taken as a body. Some people, even in law enforcement (or the military, for that matter!) just aren't gun guys! That doesn't mean most cops or soldiers are eager to turn theirs in, by a longshot.
And, please, let's move the conversation away from gun control laws and their supposed effect on violent crime. Else I'm liable to get myself banned again by replying. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#41
|
|||
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 ![]() |
I am making my point badly then. The thrust of my remarks are thus Gun ownership is declining and so is crime involving firearms in australia (A statement of fact, lets not look at the reasons) Young cops are therefore much less likely to have ever been exposed to firearms in civilian life, and are also much less likely to be in a situation where a firearm is involved. As you put it, they are less likely to be 'gun guys' Universal service firearms are also a compartively new factor in australian history. I'm trying to dig up a support to support my cops are less than enthused about the entire having guns annecdotal evidence thing, but I'm not having much luck. I also wanted to tag Fortunes 'just as many guns' point because that is not supportable by any evidence. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#42
|
|||
Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet; ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,546 Joined: 24-October 03 From: DeeCee, U.S. Member No.: 5,760 ![]() |
I should be more clear. Base damage for an Ares Pred is L to the extremities. Every success stages it up one, M to the torso and abdomen, 3 is Serious, a hit to the lungs or heard, 4 is Deadly, a headshot, 5 is LN, between the eyes. So damage staging is mirrored by the description of shot placement. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#43
|
|||
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 ![]() |
Moving back to the point :D The numbers on Casulties vs Ammo fired that would be really intresting is somalia. That is the closest parallel to shadowrun in that the comparatively hard bitten US forces on one side vs the Militias. CP2020 was also fond of quoting a study by the NYPD into gang gun fights and the astounding inability to hit anything. Maybe that is another touchstone? |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#44
|
|||
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
Dude. Australia contains a long history of armed law enforcement, especially with firearms, going back to well before the days of Ned Kelly and Captain Moonlight and the other bushrangers. Universal deployment of firearms is not really an indication of much, other than the world becoming an even more dangerous place (or the cops becoming smarter). In fact it argues against your assertion that guns are decreasing in Oz. If that were the case, then why the sudden need only 27 years ago to universally arm all police officers? Maybe I just have more unsavory 'contacts' here in Sydney. :D Seriously though, I have been all over the country, and while the statistics might say that legal gun ownership is down, they don't take into account the plethora illegal guns out there. As an example, when I first got to Sydney in '97, knowing nobody at all (and having very little money), it took me less than an hour to find a number of pistols for sale. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#45
|
|||
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
How can I prove anything other than recount my personal experiences. Not much in the way of a paper trail when it comes to statistics about illegally owned firearms, especially taking into consideration all the weapons on the market (and in hordes) that are not known about ... yet. ;) |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#46
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,577 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gwynedd Valley PA Member No.: 1,221 ![]() |
I don't think you can really worry about accuracy- it will vary from unit to unit. I think you have to be more aware of what the police are carrying. For example look at the first two terminator movies- in the first one, most police are carrying revolvers. By T-2 most had semi-auto's.
In the mid 80's the LAPD did not have long arms-the infamous case of bank robbers with body armorand AK's causing police to run into a gun shop to borrow weapons, by comparrison at the same time, when an NYPD officer standing guard at a witness' house was murdered, ther NYPD turned out in full body armor carrying Steyres. You could also look for when leagally thingsl ike assault rifles dissapeared from the world where they could be legally bought. The other big thing is communications- I mean I remember back then the fin antenna on the back of limos that had car phones (Remember the Crocadile Dundee bit?) now my cell phone can fit into a pocket so I don't even need a bag to carry it. when was the last time you saw a pay phone in the US? They were big then. CD's and DVD's? Heck, is the VCR VHS or Beta? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#47
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 ![]() |
Laserdisc.
~J |
|
|
![]()
Post
#48
|
|
Prime Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,577 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gwynedd Valley PA Member No.: 1,221 ![]() |
Atari and only real geeks, whom I would never even think of dating, knew what the hell to do with those big floppy discs. No PC's but you got time at the school lab.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th February 2025 - 10:03 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.