IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Damage Variant Question
Darksyde
post Oct 18 2007, 11:20 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 25-August 07
Member No.: 12,876



I've just come out of a couple short lived adventures thru SR4 and while I think the system changes from previous additions are great the game played da little more lethal than I think I like. In preperation for possibly running a game of my own I've been dabling in simple ways to tweek the situation that don't re-wright the ruels.

The one I've settled on currently is takeing a nod from Exalted and rolling damage. So once all is said and done that 8 damage you dake is a damage pool of 8 dice that you roll and each success is 1 box of damage.

I was wondering if any else has given such a system a try. The absolut max damage stays the same but you ar elikely to take less. Currently the only down side I can find is that it may bog combat just that much more. I haven't had a chance to fully test this out however so figured I'd ask around in the inturm.

Thanks much for your time and input.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GryMor
post Oct 19 2007, 12:25 AM
Post #2


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 91
Joined: 24-September 07
Member No.: 13,404



You are going to have some issues with vehicles. Currently, an armor 8, body 22 vehicle will auto bounce 8p or less damage, and can be expected to normally soak, 10 damage. With rolled damage, it's going to still bounce 8p or less raw damage, but it's going to normally soak 30p raw damage.

That is, your going to need something on the order of a force 15 spell, rolled with 45+ dice to have a 50/50 chance to score a single hit against that kind of target. Same thing goes for spirits.

Even the 15+ Str uber trolls with super bows (point for point, the deadlies man portable, non magical, weapon around), are going to have issues doing anything to well armored borgs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darksyde
post Oct 19 2007, 12:43 AM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 25-August 07
Member No.: 12,876



True, I had not considered vehicle armor. We had never gotten to a point that it was much of an issue. Beings that I'm steering toward a more cinematic direction it may come down to rolled damage VS PC's and main character NPC's and unmodified damage against vehicle class armor. Vehicles ignore the stun damage issue which plagues squishy targets any hoo.

Thanks for pointing that out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
venenum
post Oct 19 2007, 12:48 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 168
Joined: 6-August 06
Member No.: 9,033



QUOTE (GryMor)
Even the 15+ Str uber trolls with super bows (point for point, the deadlies man portable, non magical, weapon around), are going to have issues doing anything to well armored borgs.

Thats why the smart ones put explosives on the end. :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
raggedhalo
post Oct 19 2007, 09:09 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 343
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Birmingham, UK
Member No.: 13,515



If you wanna go really Exalted, give unmodified damage against grunts, too...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ruknabard
post Oct 19 2007, 01:46 PM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 5-December 06
Member No.: 10,236



I think you might find that all that dice chucking may slow things down to a crawl. A good way to make the game less lethal without having to chuck extra dice is to simply make armor a fixed vale, instead of rolling it every time you make a damage resistance test.

When armor automatically deducts from the DV of a weapon, the results tend to favor the defender, hence, less lethal results.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 06:10 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.