IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Desparate Circumstances, What have your characters survived?
Fortune
post Nov 15 2007, 07:56 AM
Post #51


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Glyph)
... but the Ranger Arms SM-3 has a combined silencer and gas-vent-2 recoil compensator.

My savior. I knew there was one! :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 15 2007, 08:15 AM
Post #52


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Well, it shouldn't. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 15 2007, 12:52 PM
Post #53


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Falconer)
Assuming they have some kind of really nifty futuretech explosive, that's gotta have more report than BLACKPOWDER in a firecracker.

Argh! No! Once again, what do you think the purpose of a firecracker is? What do you think it is designed to do, its sole purpose in life? A firecracker is at every turn (except the ones that increase price, natch) designed to maximize the noise it makes.

It's just a bad comparison, and everyone should stop using it.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DireRadiant
post Nov 15 2007, 02:22 PM
Post #54


The Dragon Never Sleeps
*********

Group: Admin
Posts: 6,924
Joined: 1-September 05
Member No.: 7,667



I thought firecrackers were used to scare away the bad spirits every new years. At least that's what I do with them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 15 2007, 03:59 PM
Post #55


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



And then mechanism by which they are supposed to drive away spirits is…

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Nov 15 2007, 09:53 PM
Post #56


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...According to Chinese legend...

...the universe was believed to have good forces of energy (shen or "benevolent spirits") and bad forces of energy (kuei or "malevolent spirits"). Creating a din, especially by using firecrackers was believed to dispel the malignant spirits.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 15 2007, 10:15 PM
Post #57


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



The bit I was looking for was the first clause of your last sentence.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 16 2007, 07:43 AM
Post #58


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Guys, it's FutureTech!

If we can accept Great Dragons, cybernetics, missions to mars and orbital weapons being deployed to kill one man, is it so hard to buy that they've engineered an explosive with the ridiculous energy density by mass to fire an explosive bullet from a pistol or rifle?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 16 2007, 07:55 AM
Post #59


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Guys, it's FutureTech!

If we can accept Great Dragons, cybernetics, missions to mars and orbital weapons being deployed to kill one man, is it so hard to buy that they've engineered a bullet that does extra damage and pierces armor better, without popping like a firecracker for no good reason?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 16 2007, 08:01 AM
Post #60


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



QUOTE (Critias)
Guys, it's FutureTech!

If we can accept Great Dragons, cybernetics, missions to mars and orbital weapons being deployed to kill one man, is it so hard to buy that they've engineered a bullet that does extra damage and pierces armor better, without popping like a firecracker for no good reason?

Yes. Yes, it is. We call that 'APDS' already. Whereas Ex-Ex is clearly understood to stand for EX-Explosive. Emphasis on Explosive.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 16 2007, 08:14 AM
Post #61


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Except that they're described as being frangible, making "EX EX" just as silly a name as "APDS" for what the bullet actually does.

Why are people so into bringing realism to Shadowrun firearms just to make a suppressed weapon make sound (from teh bullet-bombs, zomg!), but so quick to shrill and wail and complain when the firearm realism crowd wants guns to actually work right? Does your desparate circumstances story matter that much to you, despite already being debunked as a crappy story due to illegal gear combinations being at the core of it?

We get it. You think the guy was being stupid, and you think bullets explode. Okay.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 16 2007, 09:51 AM
Post #62


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Are there explicit rules for the modifier to sound-based perception checks for, say, a laser firing? A high-capacity capacitor discharging all of it's juice in one go? A car crashing into a building? A dikoted katana-form Ally Spirit being used to cleave a motorbike in two? A troll using a sledgehammer to smash through a wall? A roadway construction crew with pnumatic hammers and heavy equipment? The constant whistling sound of steam from a pipe? The sound made when a troll uses a urinal as a melee weapon to smash it over someone's head? The sound of the john flushing?

I coulden't find any, but I think we can all agree that those all would make a significant and distinct sound. Specifically, in order, they would make the following sounds:
Freeeeeeeem!
Ka-BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZAPT!
Ke-raaaaash!
Schling! *clatter clatter*
SMASH!
Various construction site sounds.
Hissssssssssssssssss!
Porcelean smashing loudly and crinkling to the ground.
Ka-flush.


So, given that, and given the obvious incongruity of a frangible round being better able to pierce armor than regular, the only obvious conclusion is that Ex-Explosive ammuntion is actually explosive, and powerfully so.

I'm taking it as a given that we can all define an explosion as a great amount of pressure generated as a small amount of solid (or liquid) turns into a lot of hot gas in a very short time, and then proceeds to expediently and energetically expand to fill the volume of the container it is in, thus bursting that contain (the bullet) and dealing some fairly significant damage from overpressure alone to the surrounding objects.

Given that, it is also a given that, barring magical or technological interferance, the sound made is "BANG", as the overpressure waves slam into the metahuman eardrum, registering as a loud sound.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DTFarstar
post Nov 16 2007, 10:42 AM
Post #63


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,269
Joined: 18-September 06
Member No.: 9,421



Two things, one how is APDS a stupid name for what it does? It is armor piercing ammunition by virtue of it's discarding sabot structure. Now, granted the discarding part is kind of redundant, but that's the military for you. I mean, you get a much greater grain load to great alot more force and fire a small aerodynamic projectile much faster than if you had in fact used a bullet with a grain capacity the size of the small projectile. F = MA so since you increase A a lot to make up for lost mass, the bullet strikes with the same Force focused into a much smaller target area and shazam it penetrates armor in a much more efficient fashion.

Second thing, the Javelin missile system we have today has an armor piercing design(so do alot of other missiles) that basically explodes when it hits the target to blast off the top layer or so of armor, allowing a secondary cartridge to penetrate further into the target and then explode as well. With the nanotech and all that jazz, I see no reason you couldn't transport that same idea into a much much smaller form. Bullet impacts, small high grade explosive charge on the outer casing goes off destroying some of the outer layer of armor, bullet penetrates and explodes itself once inside, increasing damage. Thus, Ex-Explosive.

Not a gun fanatic so feel free to offer real world proof of why these wouldn't work. I'll feel free to ignore you, well, unless you actually make a really good point then I might change my mind. It has happened before.

Chris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 16 2007, 11:31 AM
Post #64


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Oh, well, shit. You typed up some sound effects. I'm out of my league. The guy was a doof, bullets explode just like minigrenades, and your story was awesome. You win.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 16 2007, 02:02 PM
Post #65


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685 @ Nov 16 2007, 02:43 AM)
If we can accept Great Dragons, cybernetics, missions to mars and orbital weapons being deployed to kill one man, is it so hard to buy that they've engineered an explosive with the ridiculous energy density by mass to fire an explosive bullet from a pistol or rifle?

Yes. Why? Because they happen to have state rules for explosives elsewhere in the book, which reflect the fact that they have in fact not engineered such an explosive.

And, in fact, I at least cannot accept orbital weapons being deployed to kill one man, at least not the one man involved—though at least it's easier to accept than that one man was to begin with.

QUOTE (DTFarstar)
One how is APDS a stupid name for what it does? It is armor piercing ammunition by virtue of it's discarding sabot structure.

The problem isn't that it's a stupid name for what it does, it's that it's a stupid name for what it does for something you can put into something like a pistol or assault rifle.

QUOTE (DTFarstar)
I see no reason you couldn't transport that same idea into a much much smaller form.

Argument through incredulity is not useful.

(Note to self: do not try to make sense when tired)

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warmaster Lah
post Nov 16 2007, 02:07 PM
Post #66


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 124
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 2,072



Sorry Imperialis :wobble:

twas good while it lasted...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Nov 16 2007, 02:19 PM
Post #67


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



I've only played 4th.

QUOTE

Explosive Rounds: Explosive rounds are solid slugs designed to fragment and explode on impact. They increase the DV by 1 and decrease the effectiveness of Ballistic armor (AP –1).

Explosive rounds will misfire whenever a critical glitch is rolled. When this occurs, the character firing the weapon is automatically struck by one “attack,� with a Damage Code equal to the normal damage done by the weapon. The character may make a damage resistance test as normal. Any attack the affected character is making at the time misses.


Now I can see why you think they are frangible rounds, which makes sense due to the 'fragment' bit of the description.

However the flipside makes sense because it says the world 'explode' (I know it can mean distintergrate or though it's not entirely clear how that could explode and hit you in the face). I mean, a fragmentation grenade fragements and explodes.

So yeah either argument is probably viable given the entire two paragraphs to operate off.

If something else says something different though fair enough.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 16 2007, 03:15 PM
Post #68


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Something else does say different. In particular, two something elses (Fields of Fire and the SR3 core book) say two differents (round explodes and round just fragments, respectively).

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Nov 16 2007, 05:25 PM
Post #69


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Is it possible that the first Ex in Ex-Ex is in fact Experimental? IE: Not stable in batches large enough to prove useful as a blasting agent for purposes such as demolitions, but useful for squeezing a few droplets inside a bullet?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Nov 16 2007, 05:44 PM
Post #70


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (DTFarstar @ Nov 16 2007, 03:42 AM)
Two things, one how is APDS a stupid name for what it does? It is armor piercing ammunition by virtue of it's discarding sabot structure. Now, granted the discarding part is kind of redundant, but that's the military for you.

If it's an armor piercing round without a sabot it's called AP. There are lots of variations on this, but it's a nice generic phrase that doesn't bring other baggage along with it.

APDS requires a sabot on the bullet that is discarded. That's why it is called an Armor Piercing Discarding Sabot. Small arms rounds don't use sabots for armor piercing, it's what larger support weapons use. This is because of several reason.

One is that they don't work. Lots of time and money was invested in trying to make a 7.62mm SLAP work, and it usually did, except when it exited out the side of the machine gun barrel. This was considered a bad thing.

The other is that you have the pieces of the plastic sabot flying out of the muzzle at some silly velocity and expanding in a cloud to the front. This is a cloud of small, very hot, very fast moving particles. So it will chew a person (or other non-armored object in front of the barrel) up something awful. This is why Tanks and IFVs shooting sabot have this warnings in the manual about not shooting over troops within 500 meters IIRC.

There is a 50 cal SLAP round that works, and there was a not disastrously unsuccessful non-ap round called the Remington accelerator. It was a hunting round shooting a .223 hollow point bullet out of a .308 IIRC. Which didn't go through the side of rifles barrels on sabot failure because it wasn't made of a superhard armor piercing metal, but it was a commercial failure none the less.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MaxHunter
post Nov 16 2007, 05:57 PM
Post #71


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 718
Joined: 10-September 05
From: Montevideo, in the elusive shadows of Latin America
Member No.: 7,727



but mom, I wanted to know what have the runners survived!!!!

-I second whoever said ammo discussion belong into another thread-

Cheers.

Max
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pendaric
post Nov 16 2007, 06:49 PM
Post #72


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 993
Joined: 5-December 05
From: Crying in the wilderness
Member No.: 8,047



Derail a thread with firearms? Why it must be dumpshock!

Thirded on return to thread subject.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 16 2007, 06:53 PM
Post #73


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Congratulations, you've derailed the thread with votes to return from derailment. Maybe if you, you know, actually posted on the original topic it might work better?

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pendaric
post Nov 16 2007, 07:07 PM
Post #74


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 993
Joined: 5-December 05
From: Crying in the wilderness
Member No.: 8,047



Working on it. Though technically your continuing the derailment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pendaric
post Nov 16 2007, 07:53 PM
Post #75


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 993
Joined: 5-December 05
From: Crying in the wilderness
Member No.: 8,047



I had my team of runners wander into a ambush which I did not give them an escape route from.
They where sent on a dummy run into a renraku subsidiary, the plans from the Johnson showed a fake sensor gap they could exploit.
To use this they had to traverse from the outer fence, cross fifteen meters to production facility roof then across ten meter gap to the office building roof.
The four runners faced a six man team of Red samurai including a mage, all equivalent on karma to the runners. In addition they had fifteen on site sec guards.
The plan was to wait till the runner tried to get to the office building and then hit them with a two samurai fire platforms and the secguards covering the ground escape. The mage had summoned a force ten elemental especially for the group as he had faced them before. At best the runners would be trapped on the production facility roof facing grenades from the Red samurai.

All goes well for the Red samurai till the street sam spots a hidden camera in the sensor gap. He alerts his team. To late however the runners are now on the production buildings roof.
Enemy elementals appear, full recoil comp hvar opens up, two red samurai snipe from other rooftops.
All the exits are closed.
The runner mage elementals are falling to the enemy spirits.
The runners cower behind the one foot high wall on the roof.
All looks bleak.

Then the street sam risks death to cut open a hole in the roof with his dikoted katana. Dodgy a hail of bullets he hacks open an escape route. The runners levitate or rappel out of being pinned just as the first grenades start falling.
They now have out manoeuvered the red Sammies.
Inside the production facility, they take on the sec guards. The street sam gets turned invisible and goes on a killing spree to create an escape route. The mage takes on the bound spirits inside the building. The others provide covering fire.
Blood bath ensues.
Then the four of the red samurai breach the exits to block escape. The red sam mage levitates to the hole in the roof to lightning bolt the runners.
The mage gets hit by a arrow from the physad, the runners take out the red samurai in the building but are still trapped inside by the hvar, mage and force ten elemental.
Breathing space. Everyone is hurt bad.
The runners mage goes toe to toe with the elemental and wins. The decker runs for the gate under fire, a distraction for the physad and the street sam to climb back to the roof. The runner mage goes invisible and escapes the gate.
The phys ad and the street sam climb back up to the roof and to take out the mage.
The mage casts lightning bolt through his ally spirit only to miss and the combat decker too snap shot the ally spirit but good.
The phys ad takes out the mage from behind and the street sam shots dead a Red Samurai on the opporsite roof.
One hvar toting red samurai stand between them and freedom.
The red samurai starts throwing grenades. The street sam throws them back!

Final score. Renraku 0 runners 18 and change
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th September 2025 - 01:54 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.