Social Adept, is this wrong? |
Social Adept, is this wrong? |
Dec 2 2007, 11:12 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Copenhagen, Denmark Member No.: 911 |
We've just started a 4th edition campaign and I've created a social adept. He's a person who uses adept powers to socially manipulate people.
My problem is that he seems massively overpowered. He's an elf with charisma 7, Influence 4, Kinesics 4, Commanding Voice 4 & the "First Impression"-quality. So if he enters a room and gives somebody an order (like "Everybody lower your weapons"), he'll have 21 dice to roll. And in a "commen" negotiation, he'll have 15 dice. Is this correct? does Kinesics & Commanding Voice stak? He'd be capable of standing up in the middle of a fire-fight and yell: "Drop ypur weapons!" and people would do it. Is this bad mojo for SR? A. |
|
|
Dec 2 2007, 11:14 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
Welcome to SR4. What you did isn't even considered the most extreme, i'd even call it 'near typical' in terms of a social adept. Social Adepts are _stupidly_ good.
|
|
|
Dec 2 2007, 11:16 PM
Post
#3
|
|||
panda! Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
i have no idea where this one comes from... but beyond that, do a search on the pornomancer :silly: |
||
|
|||
Dec 2 2007, 11:24 PM
Post
#4
|
|||
Ain Soph Aur Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,477 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 600 |
No, they wouldn't. Read the rules for Commanding Voice again. The best he an do is confuse people and make them hesitate, causing them to lose a Turn. Hardly overpowered. Using the same action, a mage or a sammy could have killed a guy. Not that it's a lame power, either. In the right situation, making everyone lose a turn can win you some precious time. |
||
|
|||
Dec 2 2007, 11:29 PM
Post
#5
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Copenhagen, Denmark Member No.: 911 |
I know, it's crazy shit. I've deliberately not min/maxed him, as the campaign is meant to start of as low key gangbanging. But I still think it's rather hardcore. ...and it's going to sooo much fun talking my way past security.... A. |
||
|
|||
Dec 2 2007, 11:33 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 315 Joined: 12-October 03 From: Germany, Regensburg Member No.: 5,709 |
Kinesics is simply to cheap. Imagine a "Better Combat" power that gives +1 to every combat roll and costs 0.5 points...
Anyway, the easiest solution is: Talk with your players and agree what style you want to play. If you want to play street level, 22 dice are probably to much. |
|
|
Dec 2 2007, 11:42 PM
Post
#7
|
|||
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
That's the thing. Making a character ''really good at social stuff' is just ok in a fair amount of people's minds. People who make a character who can beat/cut someone up or shoot them really well, and they're powergamers. In SR, it's the _non_ combat people you have to watch out for. Trolls with PAC's are easy to ID and catch. Faces tend to get away with murder and then blend in and escape, foiling plans left and right. :P EDIT: Sorry for the little rant; i love all types of characters, and aren't accusing anyone of anything. But too many times the gun adept gets shot down(rimshot) but the other crazy non-combat builds end up running rampant. (I think it's because the 'combat powergamers' are easier to catch, so to speak, than the non-combat ones.) |
||
|
|||
Dec 2 2007, 11:45 PM
Post
#8
|
|||
Immortal Elf Group: Validating Posts: 7,999 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,890 |
Except that it was worse in SR3. |
||
|
|||
Dec 2 2007, 11:49 PM
Post
#9
|
|||||
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,168 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 7,337 |
Didn't the powers cost more in SR3? I don't have my MiTS book here, but i could swear alot of powers from then to now lessened quite a bit. |
||||
|
|||||
Dec 2 2007, 11:54 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,883 Joined: 16-December 06 Member No.: 10,386 |
Yeah, my group long ago doubled the cost of Kinesics. Even at 1 Power Point per level the ability is essentially like having more than 4 levels of Improved Ability, and the fact that it's a dicepool bonus rather being subject to maximum modified skill rating means it can still stack with Improved Ability, a great benefit, even if it is limited to face-to-face encounters only. Even at double cost Social Adepts can end up with really formidable piles of dice, especially if they mix in the Vocal Range Enhancer and Pheromone line of bioware.
This post has been edited by Whipstitch: Dec 3 2007, 12:05 AM |
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 12:00 AM
Post
#11
|
|||
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Commanding Voice doesn't have levels. It is just a single Power costing .25 PP. |
||
|
|||
Dec 3 2007, 12:32 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
The GM would be within his rights to say that first impression wouldn't apply (using commanding voice isn't exactly "attempting to fit into a new environment" - First Impression gives a bonus in certain circumstances, not all of the time). The GM might even disallow Kinesics adding to the roll, also, since a power that improves your nonverbal communication cues wouldn't really apply to a purely verbal power. And keep in mind that the target needs to understand you - a target who has his cyberears turned off, or a Seoulpa Ring stringer who only speaks Korean, will both effectively be immune to this power.
Even with the full 17 dice to roll, though, the character still wouldn't be overpowered. You've spent lots and lots of build points to have one decent attack that lets you mess up your enemies for one action - you should get what you pay for. There are enough limitations to it that you shouldn't dominate every combat encounter. There are lots of overpowered attacks in SR4 - like someone else said once, it's a game of "eggshells with hammers". |
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 12:49 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,883 Joined: 16-December 06 Member No.: 10,386 |
Yeah, you haven't really seen overpowered until you've seen a clever player milk Phantasm and Control spells for all they're worth. Commanding Voice is really the least of my worries when it comes to Social Adepts. It's not so much that I think they're overpowered or anything I just think Kinesics is just a pinch too cost effective and social adepts can lose a die or two without really being nerfed.
|
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 01:08 AM
Post
#14
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 |
Well I agree that trying to order people around doesen't fit with First Impression, but other than that it seems to me there are few situations where the face does not try to fit into a new environment, making new contacts etc. Sure, when dealing with his contacts it doesen't help, or the second time he's talking to someone, but in most adventures there are 2-3 times where he gets to use it. Still, 5 BPs for 2 bonus dice at some situations isn't that bad when a specialization only costs 2 BPs, and which use is often just as common or even more so. I'm also inclined to agree Kinetics should not apply - only the voice is used in a "Bene Gesserit" way. Backgammon, I just read up on the power and it says the target(s) is more likely to obey the more net hits the adept has. So If the adept got say, 10 net hits, I think making people drop their weapons is valid. The question is, is that enough for "shoot yourself"? Just like Control Thoughts, the power does not specify which commands will always be ignored, if any. But it does leave it up to the GM. |
||
|
|||
Dec 3 2007, 01:21 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 315 Joined: 12-October 03 From: Germany, Regensburg Member No.: 5,709 |
I agree, neither "First Impression" nor "Kinesics" should help with "Commanding Voice", so the elf would have 7+4 dice vs. the highest defender (let's say 8-9) plus +5 for more than one target - makes 11 vs. 13 at least, seems fair. And even if the Elf wins, he only used one round to gain one round - a nice entry, but nothing more.
|
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 01:24 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 906 Joined: 16-October 06 Member No.: 9,630 |
As I read commanding voice it be charisma+leadership and kinesics wouldn't apply for some of the reasons stated above.
(keep in mind I'm currently playing a Social Adept with commanding voice so I'm not just some huffing GM) I also read it as effecting only one target Also the sound of combat may make using the power impossible as the target can't hear you clearly. For amusement we role played through a border crossing and I mimiced Obi-Wans "these aren't the droids your looking for" lines. Despite the words having no baring on the situation we got through. Stuff like kinesics are cheep because being a fast talker may help you avoid a fight get payed more or even get gear faster, but it won't help you in a fight. It won't help in the matrix and alone it won't get you past security into the corp building. Most runner groups will have but a single face. A second hacker, a second combat specialist, a second mage can add greatly to a group. But a second face has very limited use if the group doesn't split up often. |
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 02:01 AM
Post
#17
|
|||
Freelance Elf Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 7,324 Joined: 30-September 04 From: Texas Member No.: 6,714 |
Which is just poor GMing, in my opinion. If what you're saying makes absolutely no sense at all and has nothing to do with crossing the border, I don't give a fuck what the dice say -- it won't work. In the same way, if a street sammie is in the middle of a fight and decides "for amusement" to go on a shooting spree with his thumb and forefinger shouting "bang!" like a comedian, it won't get him any kills no matter how many Pistols dice he has. |
||
|
|||
Dec 3 2007, 02:05 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 |
a second face can provide teamwork bonuses. sometimes, that can be quite handy ;)
also, a second face could be useful because of different knowledge skills and specialisations. a team with an elven face who specialises in corporate etiquette, diplomacy, and seduction is good... having an ork face who specialises in street etiquette, fast talking, interrogation, and bargaining in the same time means that they could both be useful in different situations (especially if they have different complementing knowledge/background skills). throw in a human face with matrix etiquette, impersonation, etc and you've got a third face who would be useful in completely different situations (though 3 faces in the same party does still seem a little bit much, i still can see it as being useful occasionally). frankly, as far as i'm concerned, just about every member of a shadowrun team should have at least a little bit of face in them... an inability to lie well on the part of even one member of the team can be absolutely crippling in certain situations. this is not to say that everyone should be throwing 20 dice or anything... but everyone should be able to throw maybe 6 dice or so on at least etiquette and probably con tests, imo, just to keep them alive. having a good judge intentions check wouldn't hurt any either. |
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 11:07 AM
Post
#19
|
|||
Mystery Archaeologist Group: Members Posts: 2,906 Joined: 19-September 05 From: The apple tree Member No.: 7,760 |
It's resisted by the highest will+leadership pool in the guards ( 8-9 seems high unless they are elites with a serious officer in the lead) +1 per extra person. Social adepts are only problematic if the GM allows then to do things that are stupid, ie turning sec guards gay in one conversation. |
||
|
|||
Dec 3 2007, 02:35 PM
Post
#20
|
|||
ghostrider Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,196 Joined: 16-May 04 Member No.: 6,333 |
Amen. |
||
|
|||
Dec 3 2007, 03:00 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Copenhagen, Denmark Member No.: 911 |
I fail to see the analogy (BTW: you'd be surprised at what you can get away with by using the right words; I use this in pick-up).
It seems to me that a lot of people seem to forget that the social adepts powers are magic, - and not just massive social skills. The criteria for whether of not a social adept could pull something of shouldn't be whether or not it is socially realistic, - but whether it's within the definition of the power and that fullfledged mage will be capable of doing it with spells. Adept powers aren't massive social skills, - they're magic. A. |
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 03:20 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 633 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 8,301 |
Actually, adept powers are generally magic used to grant massive skills (or similar). That's what I like about adepts. They're somewhere between plausible and "MAGIC!".
|
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 03:51 PM
Post
#23
|
|||||||
Bushido Cowgirl Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
...they did, plus Kinesics (at 1 PP X rating) had a rating cap of 3 so you didn't have a character with Kinesics 4 or 5 or the Great Mother forbid, 6. |
||||||
|
|||||||
Dec 3 2007, 04:24 PM
Post
#24
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 |
Generally speaking, yes. Then there are powers like Commanding Voice and Mystic Armor that are obviously magic. |
||
|
|||
Dec 3 2007, 04:27 PM
Post
#25
|
|||||
Ain Soph Aur Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,477 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 600 |
Well, yes and no. A good GM knows that the point of the game is for everyone to have fun. If a player says that with good dice roll and everyone laughs, I don't see the problem. If you go "ok, ok, but seriously bob, the guard opens fire on you", I think that makes you a much worse GM than letting a funny but unrealistic line go through. |
||||
|
|||||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 05:13 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.