Essense Loss and Magic Increase, Where has the magic gone? |
Essense Loss and Magic Increase, Where has the magic gone? |
Jan 14 2008, 04:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 698 Joined: 26-October 06 From: Iowa, United States Member No.: 9,720 |
Ok last session my group had an in character discussion, that then had to go out of character to speak mechanics.
The in character discussion, our cyber face trying to explain to a (technologically inept) adept that he could increase his peformance by adding cyberware, if he went sparingly and selective the boosts out of the cyberware could offset his loss of magic prowess. The mechanics, when do you increase your magic? Before implant, after the implant, or it doesn't matter. The player that is the face is of the opinion that since your magic drops, from 5 to 4, the cost to raise your attribute is 15 Karma (New attribute value x 3). This is the base reading from the book. But I feel that since cyberware inhibits your magic you would still have to pay for it compensating for the essense loss. Since in creation this must be done, it only makes sense for it to be done during play as well. Unfortunately there is no place in the book that goes into this. Here's where I see the problem with just allowing the attribute x 3. Here are 3 characters that are exactly alike, only difference is their timelines. The cyber spirit slayer, has 1 adept power of astral sight, 5 essense worth of cyberware installed, and carries a weapon foci.. All of these end with Magic of 1, and Essense of 1 1-Ready at creation (65 BP) 2-Basic Adept (Mag 1, 0 BP), who increased his Magic over time to 6 (60 Karma), then decided to go chrome and replace everything with cyber except for the 1 point. (0 BP, 60 Karma) 3-The Muchkin... Basic Adept (Mag 1, 0 BP) In Game Increases his magic by 1 (6 Karma), then installs another Essense of Cyber (Magic +1, Essense -1) Rinse and Repeat this until he is the same as the others (0 BP, 30 Karma) So there's the breakdown should the Muchkin be able to do this using half the karma as the other person. Creation doesn't differentiate from when you got the gear so why should in game? |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 04:36 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
...the way I understand it, if the character loses 1 MA to implants this drops her cap to 5 for the purpose of requiring initiation. So, if she wanted to later raise her MA to 6 she would also have to initiate.
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 04:45 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Technomancer Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
@Nightwalker:
You have one problem with your example: adept with astral sight begins game with a Magic of 1 that "may not be increased during character creation or raised with Karma" (p. 24, Street Magic). Thus, a person with that quality and 5 points of cyberware no longer has a Magic of 1. However, your question is still valid for other examples. If you have a character A with a magic of 1 who subsequently pays 6 karma to raise her magic to 2 and the installs 1 point of cyberware, re-lowering her magic to 1 and also lowering her cap to 5, one can repeat this process 5 times spending a total of 30 karma. However a second character first raises his magic from 1 to 6 for a total of 60 karma and then installs the same 5 points of cyberware. These two characters might end up numerically similar, but have spend vastly different amounts of karma. I don't know that I have a problem with this. One represents the very careful manipulation of the body's energies with respect to cyberware and magic -- probably a long term goal or experimentation over the course of years by a corporate R&D lab or some such. The latter seems to represent a life-changing event in the course of someone's life, perhaps an accident? Either way, two different ways to end up at the same place. |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 04:52 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Awakened Asset Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
You can save a few points of karma if you go with low magic for quite some time. That is balanced, so we go with new attribute*3, based on magic after implants. RAW does not support a virtual magic rating anyway.
(Ruleswise you are fine (for implants below 1.0 Essence cost) to go 2-1-2-1with presaved karma, and go straight for max magic afterwards. I personally would have a talk about metagaming vs. gaming with the player in question.) |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 06:44 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 71 Joined: 29-July 06 From: Orlando, FL Member No.: 8,981 |
Yes Actually, I'm planning on making an adept with the Synaptic Boosters. Much more Magic Effective than the adept ability. But in order to get rating 3 Synaptic booster I need to purchase 2 more points of magic, so I can inturn lower two points without affecting my other Adept abilities. Full speed adept with lower cost to essence.
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 07:55 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 698 Joined: 26-October 06 From: Iowa, United States Member No.: 9,720 |
Adept Power Astral Sight, not Astral Sight Positive quality for any that misunderstood.
I like the idea of the person carefully working, in order to do it. It sounds great, but the karma reflects that they actually put half of the effort into it than the other person. The way our group started drawing this out is like a circuit. You have 6 lights, if you install cyberware it doesn't just remove one of the lit ones, it effectively replaces that light with a resistor. You need the same amount of magic to maintain as you did before just 1 point of that you're not getting anything out of. |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 08:21 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Awakened Asset Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
What is the problem with different costs for different histories? You have the same issue with different costs for attributes bought at/after chargen, so you could say the same about min/maxing there (We houserule attribute increase cost for the attribute before racial mods, reducing the effect).
About the only thing I care for is that a magic 6 character with cyberware will have spend much karma on maintaining that magic rating. A weak magic rating is easy to repair, it should be cheaper than maintaining the maximum natural magic rating (which would even require initiation for that). And most magic 6 builds I´ve seen could, from the power level, well take the disadvantage of a few karma compared to the rest of the group. |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 08:47 PM
Post
#8
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 |
There is a tradeoff. It's not like someone is sitting around doing nothing while earning the karma for the big bump life altering event. During that time the advantage of the high Magic isn't available. So yes, karma efficient, but will actually survive to spend it?
So I don't think there's any difference in which approach, up to the player, there are tradeoffs. |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 09:28 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,416 Joined: 4-March 06 From: Albuquerque Member No.: 8,334 |
It'd take more bookkeeping, but I'd prefer to run it as the karma expenditures being based off the "unaltered" magic attribute, meaning, what it was before you cybered up. So if you started at 5, and took 2 points of 'ware, then it'll cost you the same cost to move from your current 3 to a 4 as it would for an uncybered person to move from 5-6. Your ability to improve your arcane connection should not get easier with the more ware you install.
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 09:37 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 |
.in previous editions this was the way I went with adepts - most notably the original KK (#94) because I was reluctant to take her MA above 7 due to the Magic loss rule for wounds. With that now gone in 4th ed, I am more likely to keep an adept purely magic (Ki, chi or whatever you want to call it) based without optimising through Bio/Cyber implants.
Yeah, increasing MA above 6 is expensive Karma wise (& the dumb er I mean, Short One will most likely never be able to find a group as that requires an Arcana [logic] test), but the idea of running a totally "pure" physical/gunslinger adept is now more intriguing. True the slightly augmented adept is more powerful but also more limited if she wants to mprove her adept abilities at a later time as this will cost more Karma. Also doing so at Chargen it is a more expensive proposition for as I illustrated in another thread, that Synaptic booster I effectively costs 16 BPS on top of the 10 BPs (possibly 25 if she starts with an MA of 6) for the MA point sacrificed. KK4.1 (the "test"version for learning the 4th ed ruleset) with an MA of 5 and no implants was pretty darned effective and that was in a fairly tough campaign. |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 09:41 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Awakened Asset Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
The way I´m comming from, you are not improving your arcane connection, but you have to repair it. And your overall potential shrinks. If I improve something, I want it to be better than before.
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 09:50 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,416 Joined: 4-March 06 From: Albuquerque Member No.: 8,334 |
EDITED:
Recreating this post due to me being able to better address your concern, once I actually paid attention to it. You're still improving your attribute. Say you have a magic of 5 with 2 points of essence lost. Effective magic of 3. You pay the karma costs to improve your magic rating to 6, raising your effective rating to 4, because 2 points are still inhibited by unnatural modifications. That's how I see it anyway |
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 10:05 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Awakened Asset Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
Ah ok, that is valid. Deviations from RAW are par for the course.
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 10:12 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,416 Joined: 4-March 06 From: Albuquerque Member No.: 8,334 |
Don't have my books with me, atm due to being at work. So RAW basically states that they get the lower cost? Damn. Nod to the cybered goons again I guess. *shrug*
|
|
|
Jan 14 2008, 10:21 PM
Post
#15
|
|||
Prime Runner Group: Banned Posts: 3,732 Joined: 1-September 05 From: Prague, Czech Republic Member No.: 7,665 |
Well, many people don't like that either. Both Serbitar and myself have house rules which eliminate that particular discrepency. -Frank |
||
|
|||
Jan 15 2008, 02:09 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 573 Joined: 17-September 07 Member No.: 13,319 |
I'd write MAG stat in a format similar to aumented stats, as if Essence penalty was a negative form of Augmentation. If you start with 5 STR and 5 MAG, then you get Muscle Augmentation 2, you end up with STR 5/7 and MAG 5/4.
If you then spend 15 Karma on STR, you get STR 6/8 If you then spend 15 Karma on MAG, you get MAG 6/5 If you start with 5 STR and MAG 1, though, and get Muscle Augmentation 2, you end up with STR 5/7 and MAG 1/0, and once MAG reaches 0, it stays 0 forever (BBB p.164) |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 02:35 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 |
Do you also do the same for Edge?
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 03:24 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 573 Joined: 17-September 07 Member No.: 13,319 |
Cogent point - if you burn Edge for Hand of God, what do you pay to increase it?
Edge 3/1 if you started with 3 and burned Edge twice? Then pay 12 Karma to go to 4/2? If you have Edge 1, and burn it, what happens? 3 Karma to increase 0 to 1? If you just pay based on current value, I can see the temptation to take Edge 1, and occasionally burn Edge for a critical success, and regain it for 3 Karma. But that's not my own play style. |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 03:28 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 |
My perhaps mistaken understanding is that the Devs have said that you only pay your current Edge when increasing it, which is one of the reasons that I went and house-ruled Magic Loss so heavily in my games.
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 05:37 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 698 Joined: 26-October 06 From: Iowa, United States Member No.: 9,720 |
Justifications- For various things
As to metatypes not having to pay for their racial bonuses. physical attributes should be harder to boost as you reach the high end, just by the amount of effort to keep breaking a higher and higher barrier. And for metatypes with bonuses how can you improve yourself when most equipment isn't made for that STR or BOD, or whatever you are trying to exercise. How can an elf improve his CHA when the number of people he can talk to on his own level is so few, he has to dumb down his negotiations so he doesn't loose the gangers he's talking to. If you were hit by some paralyzing car wreck that actually lowered you existing attribute and your max, you should pay more karma to raise it. Its the price of overcoming your handicap. And its this principal that makes me think that a mage should have to pay to overcome his handicap, the cyberware. Burning edge doesn't lower your max edge. So its really not a permanent affect on your character. He's not inhibited so much as used up his luck in that one shot. But yes this can easily be abused, and if someone was burning edge at least once per session for critical hits, I would recommend charging more for his edge. Can only ask so much from the Hand of God, before its going to want more in return. |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 06:05 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,416 Joined: 4-March 06 From: Albuquerque Member No.: 8,334 |
In the case of a permanent burn of Edge, sure, I'd make him play by the same rules we're suggesting for magic or attribute loss.
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 06:14 PM
Post
#22
|
|||
Genuine Artificial Intelligence Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 |
I know you're just trying to justify the way things are, but just for the sake of devil's advocacy: You're suggesting that a strength training Troll is unable to find a heavier object to lift? Sure, maybe the Chuck Norris Home Gym isn't made specifically for him, but he can just bench press the couch. Unless of course you make it a habit of charging karma based on the quality of their exercise equipment. Based on your argument for the Elves, would you charge them less if they were living in one of the Tir's and everyone else they interacted with (even the gangers) had the same +2 Cha they did. And Elf in Elfland gets just as much Charisma-exercise as a human in humanland, after all. I don't generally mind the disconnect between BP and karma, although I know it bothers some people more than others. But when it comes to positive attribute adjustments the disconnect is absolutely massive. |
||
|
|||
Jan 15 2008, 07:54 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,416 Joined: 4-March 06 From: Albuquerque Member No.: 8,334 |
Hmm... Yeah, attribute improvements like that would be out of sync. Maybe the base (non-racially-modified) stat for physical attributes, and the racially modified version for mental attributes. That would seem to deal with the disparity...
Of course, all this leads to a silly amount of bookkeeping. |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 08:05 PM
Post
#24
|
|||
Genuine Artificial Intelligence Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 |
Agreed. You pretty much have to settle for raising them based on racial modifiers or not. Fortunately, SR4 doesn't have any negative racial modifiers (just lower maximums) complicating the issue. |
||
|
|||
Jan 15 2008, 11:57 PM
Post
#25
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 861 Joined: 27-November 07 Member No.: 14,397 |
I'll present you with a bit of research I came up with after the question came up in the thread for a PBP game. It was most notable because of the fact that we where starting the game with 300 karma spent, and so of course this question came up with an adept. We ended up ruling to use the augmented idea for the sake of stopping easily passing the akward phase of gaining 30 karma with 1 magic. (Granted it was a social adept so much more plausable) Here is some stuff that I've come up with since then.
Unfortinatly this is virtually (maybe even entirely) the only quote in the entire book relating to the magic loss from essence. Now, there are some important things to note here. First off, nowhere does it mention anything about 'augmenting' the magic rating. It says loss. Next note that it says that the maximum rating for magic is 6 + initiation grade. Note that it doesn't say 'the maximum augmented rating...' If you take this, then you are faced with a choise of either a. it is a loss and not augmented, or b. having a 6(5) magic rating with 5 essence would be impossable without going through an initiation, since the maximum would be exceeded. Now, this may not be enough to convince everyone, so I have one other thing to present.
So, this quite clearly indicates that magic is a stat that is lost from losing essence, not adjusted. Otherwise it would be impossable to do a latent awakening if your essence was less then 6, because your magic would be 1, adjusted to less then 1 by your lowered essence. Notice that it once again states that the maximum magic possable (not current magic) is augmented based on the lowered essence. I think the cause of the 'unclarity' here is the fact that if you read just the rules on magic loss, there is no reason to think it would be an augmented stat. It is only when you consider that most other stats are augmented in some way, and you look at the option of min/maxing, that it is considered. Since the rules as writen offer nothing that says that the magic stat acts as an augmented stat, there was no reason to spesificly state that it wasn't augmented, as it was assumed people would take 'lose a point of magic' to mean 'lose a point of magic' and not 'your magic stat is augmented to be one lower then it previously was'. Of course I agree with what some others have said. If someone wants to save a bit of karma by slowly building up their cyberware and karma, then fine, they'll be paying for it early on by being much less powerful. Also, since they arn't contributing as much, they are likely to get less karma (Unable to get some of the bonuses because they arn't as powerful as they should be perhaps) and thus it evens out in the end. Especially since the same thing holds true of stats. It is cheaper to start with a stat of 1 and raise it with karma, but you have to live with a stat of 1 for a while. Anyway, I think I've said enough here. Oh, and if I didn't say it already, I did orignially assume the augmented stat idea as well, but reading more carefully seems to clearly indicate that magic doesn't get augmented like that. |
||||
|
|||||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th November 2024 - 01:17 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.