IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Arise, humanity!, Is the Humanis Policlub all that bad?
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 23 2008, 12:07 AM
Post #26


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



...when you grow up on the "other side", for example, a human in Salem, TT (pre-crash 2.0), you usually end up with a very low opinion of your persecutors. However would this make such a person a racist because, based on their experiences, they have developed a strong distrust of, and dislike for elves?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FriendoftheDork
post Jan 23 2008, 12:24 AM
Post #27


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,288
Joined: 4-September 06
From: The Scandinavian Federation
Member No.: 9,300



Ah, this is a nice topic. I want to quote 3-4 posts and make my comments and corrections, but that will take ages so instead I'll just post to everyone and noone.

First of all, Mr. Nasser's take on HP is excelent, well written and very realistic. Not only does it show HP can be persuasive, come with arguments that almost sound plausible, but also how normal people not really wanting to beat up orks for fun can still join and support an organization that is essentially racist.

I can think of interesting characters involved with HP without necessarily being "bad", or actually playing racist, assholes, facists etc. without having to see a shrink. After all, we do quite often play bad guys, and this setting lends especially well to it as Shadowrunners are indeed criminals who at times murder innocents for money. And if you go around shooting unaware security guards or even unarmed employees just because they're in the way to get the 1000k nuyen mcguffin, are you any better than people influenced by fear of the unknown to turn to hate and racism?

Communism is IMHO a much better ideology on paper than Facism though. Communism has the values of community, racial tolerance, gender equality, financial equality. The goal is to create a communist state run by the people for the people, where everyone are free, get what they need and give what they can. Now does that sound so bad?

Problem is, no state has ever reached this utopian communist state, and even Soviet didn't dare call themselves that (United Soviet SOCIALIST Republics). According the the bolcehviks they were in a temporary state of the despotism of the majority. It is probably true that the numbers of people dying from purges, starvation and reappropriation in communist states worldwide (or perhaps just USSR) is greater than the death toll of the Facist states.

Facism however is IMHO wrong even on paper. The idea here is that the strong has a right to oppress the weak, and that social darwinism is nature's way of making the human race strong. This ideology does not care about people's rights, but expects individuals to sacrifice themselves to further the people or even the State. The only sympathetic values here could be comraderie among soldiers, nationalistic pride, and elitism.

I liked Starship Troopers, and found it funny that the heroes were members of a facist worlwide superpower - sorta ironic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryu
post Jan 23 2008, 01:16 AM
Post #28


Awakened Asset
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,464
Joined: 9-April 05
From: AGS, North German League
Member No.: 7,309



QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)
...when you grow up on the "other side", for example, a human in Salem, TT (pre-crash 2.0), you usually end up with a very low opinion of your persecutors. However would this make such a person a racist because, based on their experiences, they have developed a strong distrust of, and dislike for elves?

A racist is still a racist after you understood his motives. There are different shades of black, even real dark grey.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Buster
post Jan 23 2008, 01:24 AM
Post #29


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,246
Joined: 8-June 07
Member No.: 11,869



QUOTE (Kyoto Kid)
...when you grow up on the "other side", for example, a human in Salem, TT (pre-crash 2.0), you usually end up with a very low opinion of your persecutors. However would this make such a person a racist because, based on their experiences, they have developed a strong distrust of, and dislike for elves?

LOL. Racists always have a reason for hating someone based on their race. They always think they're perfectly reasonable and rational for thinking the way they do. They're still racists.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Jan 23 2008, 01:32 AM
Post #30


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (FriendoftheDork)
Communism is IMHO a much better ideology on paper than Facism though. Communism has the values of community, racial tolerance, gender equality, financial equality. The goal is to create a communist state run by the people for the people, where everyone are free, get what they need and give what they can.

Actually, the ideals that the NAZIs sold that the voters bought were group solidarity, return to nature, return to National Greatness, etc. The whole "jew are racially inferior and must be expunged" part really appealed to a small portion of the voters, but it didn't bother that many.

"Nazism: Born of a fusion of Environmental, Youth and Health movements. Elevated a pagan cult of nature over traditional religion. Near-total suppression of traditional religious instruction for youth by '41. Syndicalist links of gov't to business, radical subordination of business to the political apparat. Loudly proclaimed policies in favor
of social welfare and taming capitalism."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BishopMcQ
post Jan 23 2008, 01:37 AM
Post #31


The back-up plan
**********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 8,423
Joined: 15-January 03
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,910



With luck I will get a much longer post up in a few hours when I get home...but here is my PoV in a nutshell.

Leave racism at the door. The Humanis Policlub can serve as a foil against Orks, Trolls, and the like but that's too easy.

Take the Transhumanist angle and show how Humanis is effectively trying to save Humanity from itself--with the integral argument of humanity and its failure to compete with technological advancement in the cyberpunk genre, a group which tries to distinguish Humans vs Elves can gain a lot more depth with Cyborgs.

Which person has betrayed their humanity more, the elf-poser or the street-sam with .1 essence remaining?

Instead of playing HP as a bunch of ignorant bigots, they can be a foil against the "humans" in your PC group who get implants. Implantation and Cybernetic enhancement can be just as bad as UGE.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ranneko
post Jan 23 2008, 02:01 AM
Post #32


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 16-January 05
Member No.: 6,984



QUOTE (BishopMcQ)
Which person has betrayed their humanity more, the elf-poser or the street-sam with .1 essence remaining?

The elf, definitely.

Humans invented that stuff to beyond those pesky dandelion eaters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zhan Shi
post Jan 23 2008, 02:17 AM
Post #33


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 609
Joined: 13-August 07
Member No.: 12,615



From my personal reading of Humanis dogma, most of the HP would be comfortable with cyber/bio implants, at least to a certain degree. What they'd be against would be cyberzombies/cyborgs (for all intents and purposes they are no longer human), "poser" implants (making yourself look like an elf, orc, changeling, etc., except maybe for espionage), transgenic alterations/bioware, and probably symbiotes. Sure, a street sam looking more like a T-800 than a human being would freak out a Humanis member, but it would also make almost everyone else uncomfortable as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FriendoftheDork
post Jan 23 2008, 02:43 AM
Post #34


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,288
Joined: 4-September 06
From: The Scandinavian Federation
Member No.: 9,300



QUOTE (kzt)
QUOTE (FriendoftheDork @ Jan 22 2008, 05:24 PM)
Communism is IMHO a much better ideology on paper than Facism though. Communism has the values of community, racial tolerance, gender equality, financial equality. The goal is to create a communist state run by the people for the people, where everyone are free, get what they need and give what they can.

Actually, the ideals that the NAZIs sold that the voters bought were group solidarity, return to nature, return to National Greatness, etc. The whole "jew are racially inferior and must be expunged" part really appealed to a small portion of the voters, but it didn't bother that many.

"Nazism: Born of a fusion of Environmental, Youth and Health movements. Elevated a pagan cult of nature over traditional religion. Near-total suppression of traditional religious instruction for youth by '41. Syndicalist links of gov't to business, radical subordination of business to the political apparat. Loudly proclaimed policies in favor
of social welfare and taming capitalism."

Yes, and they still doesen't appeal to me. Group solidarity in this case apply only to "aryans" which makes it inherently flawed. And I couldn't care less about national greatness.

Then you have the hate againts jews, gypsies, communists, dissenters and "untermench."

Nope, not really appealing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Jan 23 2008, 02:56 AM
Post #35


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (Buster)
QUOTE (Kyoto Kid @ Jan 22 2008, 07:07 PM)
...when you grow up on the "other side", for example, a human in Salem, TT (pre-crash 2.0), you usually end up with a very low opinion of your persecutors.  However would this make such a person a racist because, based on their experiences, they have developed a strong distrust of, and dislike for elves?

LOL. Racists always have a reason for hating someone based on their race. They always think they're perfectly reasonable and rational for thinking the way they do. They're still racists.

...though this person's dislike stems directly from the mistreatment received at the hands of her racist persecutors and not some dogma she was raised on as might be the case for a kid growing up in an HP indoctrinated family. Keep in mind I said "distrust" and "dislike" not open malevolent hatred. More often than not she would just try to avoid contact with elves as much as possible and watch her back a bit more.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jack Kain
post Jan 23 2008, 02:57 AM
Post #36


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 906
Joined: 16-October 06
Member No.: 9,630



Remember groups never refer to themselves as anti- that just to negative.
Pro-White, Pro-Black, Pro-Family Values, Pro-Human, Pro-Christian values
Its a little trick to hide the real meaning, saying your an anti-group just makes you sound negative right from the start but being pro is positive and positive is good.
Its a funny mask

The Humanis group is no different then the KKK its ripped right from history with no attempt to mask it. They mask there anti-metahuman views in the name of protecting humanity. Just as the KKK hides its racism in the idea of protecting whites.

On a similar note to this, look at X-Men?
The entire comic was conceived during the 1960's on the idea of racism, bigotry and prejudice
Humans started evolving and getting superpowers. (which can easily be compared to the awakening in shadowrun)..
So you have groups such as the Friends of Humanity which is EXACTLY like Humanis.

So are the Humanis bad, YES they hate metahumans for no other reason then they are metahumans.


The cyber angle is a bit different and interesting but a key difference is while Humanis would hate metahumans by and large. Many Transhumanist would pity the guy with .1 essence remaining and want to find ways to remove cyberware and restore lost essence. (which is impossible to restore but that doesn't stop anyone from trying to find away).

Some religious groups may reject certain medical procedures even when they are life saving.
Pig heart valves, appendix removal,
A key doctrine of the Jehovah's Witnesses religion forbids blood transfusions. A case happened in Canada in 2005 where a Judge ordered that a 14 year old recovering from cancer undergo the Transfusion.
(she likely would have died after under going all those surgeries and chemo treatments without getting a transfusion).

In this end I'd see them trying to perhaps sabotage cyberware facilities.
hijack a shipment of parts attack cyberdocs and cyberclinics. But runners aren't as likely to run into these types. I don't really see them sending a goon squad to beat up heavily cybered individuals in that type of group.

A group of three or more Humanis goons and easily overwhelm the typical Orc, Elf or Dwarf.
Though the typical Troll may cause them to attack armed or with a couple more guys then normal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zhan Shi
post Jan 23 2008, 03:17 AM
Post #37


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 609
Joined: 13-August 07
Member No.: 12,615



Some time ago, I was reading a book by a certain historian, but for the life of me I can't remember his name or the title. Anyway, he made an interesting point. Hitler convinced many people that blond, blue eyed aryans were the master race. These people accepted that view, despite the fact that the messenger was niether blond, nor blue eyed, nor (technicaly) even German. The SS was even more incredible. They were suposed to be the purest of the pure, but i've seen pictures of Heydrich. The man looked damn near mongoloid, and he was also part jewish.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kingmaker
post Jan 23 2008, 04:48 AM
Post #38


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 16-June 07
Member No.: 11,924



Never discount the ability of hopeless people to swallow bullshit if it gives them an opportunity to look on the bright side again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Jan 23 2008, 05:00 AM
Post #39


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



I have a hard time seeing Humanis as anti-cyber (although an anti-cyber group would be interesting). They are already anti-meta and anti-magical; I imagine a lot of them would embrace cyberware as a major "equalizer" against enemies that include huge hulking trolls and those evil spellslingers.


Humanis are definitely the bad guys (along with the Tir and the Sons of Sauron), but that doesn't mean they have to be the stock cardboard cutout bad guys. Bad guys have reasons for being bad, and usually have a lot of reasons and justifications they can offer up for their behavior. Not valid ones, of course, but still understandable ones.

And you can introduce ambivalence by having someone who is "good" in other ways, but still racist. Like maybe a razorgirl saves the group by shooting the ork gangers who were about to ambush them. As they are about to thank her, she kicks one of the bodies contemptuously and says something about "dirty trogs". And maybe they learn later that she was brutally attacked, and her younger sister killed, by the Sons of Sauron when she was a child. Which doesn't excuse her attitude in any way, but does give her some depth beyond a generic villain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Jan 23 2008, 05:41 AM
Post #40


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



The end of skin color racism was very silly, particularly accompanied by the rise of Fantasy Race racism, given that practically every metahuman would have extended relatives of a different race. I must say that it makes sense that in some parts of the world white humans would treat a white troll than they would treat black human.

More importantly, the proximity of the NAN to the UCAS along with tensions from the War, the GGD, and everything, should make Seattle and other boarder areas very inhospitable to the a man with a redish hue, not to mention those places which were directly hit by the GGD. With the ethnic conflicts and ethnic nationalist movements that accompany the extreme balkanization experienced by the Sixth World, the simple dismissal of conventional racism is ludicrous.


Also remember that one of the original big leaders of the violent human supremacy movement was, in fact, a troll. Many saw UGE as a disease, including many of those who goblinized. Humanis may be distrustful of metahumans, but they aren't going to exclude metahumans who hate what they are enough to join them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Riley37
post Jan 23 2008, 08:43 AM
Post #41


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 573
Joined: 17-September 07
Member No.: 13,319



Yes, humans hold a smaller piece of the power pie than they did in 2010, *if* you divide the pie along metatype lines. But that's only one way to draw "us" and "them", and not the best way. That's my main beef with the concept of Humanis: they jump to the conclusion that nonhumans are necessarily unfriendly rivals of humans. Cf. OMFWOG, and by the way, hats off to Knasser for writing that, one of my favorite bits of SR fluff.

If I'm a major stockholder of Ares, my interests align to large extent with any other stockholder of Ares, regardless of their race. When MCT and Renraku back the campaigns of JIS politicians who favor invasion of Silicon Valley, so that they can raid Ares facilities, well, that's a whole bunch of humans whose interests now oppose mine. I'm better off defending Ares turf with allies of all metatypes, than with only fellow human allies.

Take the parable of the Good Samaritan. Cast yourself as the traveller who gets ambushed and left for dead. Who is truly your neighbor: the fellow human who walks past you, or the dwarf who gives you water and carries you to shelter? Oh noes, she's short and not like you! Get over the surface differences, and be glad that *she* doesn't limit her compassion to her own metatype.

Which has the better talent pool options: the Urban Brawl team which only recruits humans, or the one that can also choose the agile elf, the big strong troll/ork, or the indomitable dwarf? Which is the stronger nation: the one that only taps the talents of its blue-eyed blonde citizens, or the polycultural multiracial meritocracy? There's a strong theory that Black civil rights and feminism emerged in the decades after WWII, because America started letting blacks and women out of their narrowly-defined roles in order to tap their efforts in the war effort, and then had a hard time putting all the blacks back into Colored Only zones and putting all the women back into the kitchen, because so many blacks and women had tasted responsibility and accomplishment, and so many of them liked the taste. Maybe someday we'll even have a military that would accept Alexander the Great as a soldier if he were born again in our generation. (He would not pass the heterosexual-only test. Athlete, tactical genius, natural leader, but the Army cares more about the gender of his lover(s) than whether he can lead a successful mission with minimal losses. Feh. If I were a soldier, I'd rather serve in a unit led by an Alexander type, than by a heterosexual who tends to lead the unit into ambushes. But I digress.)

There are a lot of different things that have been called "communist", so usage of the term can become unclear without context. But one saying I like is that communist nations have committed atrocities in betrayal of their stated ideals... while facist nations have committed atrocities in realization of their stated ideals.

As for "Starship Troopers": can anyone cite any line anywhere in Heinlein's book indicating that the narrator's nation has single-party government, oppression of minorities by race or religion, oppression of political dissenters, or any other defining quality of facism? One of the core ideas is making darn sure that voters care about their franchise, and will fight to defend it; as a consequence, I imagine that they don't have the contemporary American dynamic of lots of voters who don't much care and just vote according to whose ads get more air time. I'd imagine that multiparty issues-based democracy is a lot stronger in that setting, than it is in contemporary America.

Finally... I'm with hyzmarca about skin color racism. It's so strong in so many people's minds, that it would not vanish in 2011, especially with the NAN *defining* their ruling caste along racial lines. SR4 BBB also says that sexuality discrimination ends in the Fourth World, and I find that implausible. I personally favor treating sexuality between consenting adults as part of one's personal life and not the business of the State, but still, a) some people disagree really strongly and that doesn't change overnight, and b) there's a difference between couples who have children easily, vs. those who need to adopt or use high tech.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Jan 23 2008, 08:55 AM
Post #42


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



A core element of the novel "Starship troopers" that was left out of the movie was that only people who served in the army could vote, but everyone, no matter their abilities, could serve - you had a right to serve in the army, and the army was obligated to find a post for you. The actual example used in the book was (paraphrasing from memory) "if you're blind, deaf and paralysed, and can only move your left hand, then we still have to find a job for you - maybe as a sponge tester".

As far as racism goes, people who shoot others for money or kicks (and how many sociopathic runners do we know?) complaining about racism sounds hypocritical to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Jan 23 2008, 10:53 AM
Post #43


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



QUOTE (FriendoftheDork @ Jan 22 2008, 09:43 PM)

Yes, and they still doesen't appeal to me. Group solidarity in this case apply only to "aryans" which makes it inherently flawed. And I couldn't care less about national greatness.

Then you have the hate againts jews, gypsies, communists, dissenters and "untermench."

Nope, not really appealing.

I presume you are aware that the Italians went in for the entire facist dictatorship thing, but didn't really buy into the aryan master race bit.

Group solidarity definately did apply to other things than 'aryans' in 'facist regimes' I suspect a better defination is extreme nationalism, strong militarism (though this may be an artifact of WWI?), labour organization and big government.

That said pining down a real ideal for fascism seems tricky, and whatever it is, its still stupid.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Jan 23 2008, 11:16 AM
Post #44


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
The end of skin color racism was very silly, particularly accompanied by the rise of Fantasy Race racism, given that practically every metahuman would have extended relatives of a different race. I must say that it makes sense that in some parts of the world white humans would treat a white troll than they would treat black human.

I agree with you here, although I understand why they didn't put it in the book.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cardul
post Jan 23 2008, 12:17 PM
Post #45


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 992
Joined: 2-August 06
Member No.: 9,006



QUOTE (Fuchs)
A core element of the novel "Starship troopers" that was left out of the movie was that only people who served in the army could vote, but everyone, no matter their abilities, could serve - you had a right to serve in the army, and the army was obligated to find a post for you. The actual example used in the book was (paraphrasing from memory) "if you're blind, deaf and paralysed, and can only move your left hand, then we still have to find a job for you - maybe as a sponge tester".

Unfortunately, the book that you can buy in book that you can buy in book stores now is also an abridged, sanitized version. While it kept some of the political discourse, it dropped about half of it, and about half the page count. It was edited to more closely match the movie in what it covered. But it still left out the main character going to OCS. It left out his father being the squads Chaplain at the end(heck, it left out the Chaplain entirely!) And, over all, the movie was butchered compared to the book..but the book you can get now is as butchered to the original as the movie was to the edited, butchered book.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ranneko
post Jan 23 2008, 12:27 PM
Post #46


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 349
Joined: 16-January 05
Member No.: 6,984



QUOTE (Mercer)
QUOTE (hyzmarca @ Jan 23 2008, 05:41 AM)
The end of skin color racism was very silly, particularly accompanied by the rise of Fantasy Race racism, given that practically every metahuman would have extended relatives of a different race.  I must say that it makes sense that in some parts of the world white humans would treat a white troll than they would treat black human.

I agree with you here, although I understand why they didn't put it in the book.

They have mentioned that kind of thing in other books though.

I think I remember hearing in Target: Awakened Lands that in many areas of Australia appearing foreign resulted in more distrust than being a meta.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kremlin KOA
post Jan 23 2008, 01:10 PM
Post #47


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,590
Joined: 11-September 04
Member No.: 6,650



Unsurprising, seriously down here, today if an ork appeared and was born in Oz and spoke the slang. We would have no probs with the cobber
But the Seppo human walking down with the high and mighty vibe? nah his blood aint worth bottlin'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yoan
post Jan 23 2008, 04:16 PM
Post #48


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Joined: 8-June 05
From: Montréal, République du Québec
Member No.: 7,433



QUOTE (Zhan Shi)
Some time ago, I was reading a book by a certain historian, but for the life of me I can't remember his name or the title. Anyway, he made an interesting point. Hitler convinced many people that blond, blue eyed aryans were the master race. These people accepted that view, despite the fact that the messenger was niether blond, nor blue eyed, nor (technicaly) even German. The SS was even more incredible. They were suposed to be the purest of the pure, but i've seen pictures of Heydrich. The man looked damn near mongoloid, and he was also part jewish.

BRB hijacking.

Find me passages claiming that these blue-eyed people were the best; it`s more or less a commonly repeated myth today. Not that it wasn`t an "ideal", sure... but it was never actively stated except, I suppose, among Himmler and his nutty inner circles. Himmler and Heydrich (who was PROBABLY part Jewish, paternally, which was not frowned upon as much as paternal, uh, "Jewishness"-- he was still batshit crazy in his hatred, though) and Goebbels were surely not of the Nordic ideal. Neither were most Germans. It was never explicitly stated that "lol we want blondes with blue eyes", it was more like "We want all Germans in one state".

Not to offend any Austrians on the board, but I see Austrians as Germans seperated by circumstance (for better or worse, I have no opinion on Austria; but consider that Bavaria, Prussia, etc were all independent German states before unification of Germany).

---

As for playing devil`s advocate vis a vis Humanis: I suppose it can be done, seen as an umbrella for concerned Humans on many stripes (even more violent or miscreant ones, who will probably end up closer to Alamos). But Shadowrun needs the bad guys! Especially if they are oppressing the downtrodden.

I personally use more Neo-Communists (especially in obscure South-East Asian areas) then anti-meta mobs, I see the MegaCorps either as Capitalism-gone-Mad or, an extreme, nationless Corporatist clique; Mussolini claimed that his Fascism could be called "coporatism" as it merged the interests of the state with the interest of business, but the Megas are not tied to any state and in many ways only keep them around as a formality or, because it is easier to let them deal with the infrastructure etc... Does anybody else see it as this?

Kind of got off track. If I was on track to begin with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kindalas
post Jan 23 2008, 04:26 PM
Post #49


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 20-December 07
From: Canada
Member No.: 14,737



QUOTE (Cardul)
QUOTE (Fuchs @ Jan 23 2008, 03:55 AM)
A core element of the novel "Starship troopers" that was left out of the movie was that only people who served in the army could vote, but everyone, no matter their abilities, could serve - you had a right to serve in the army, and the army was obligated to find a post for you. The actual example used in the book was (paraphrasing from memory) "if you're blind, deaf and paralysed, and can only move your left hand, then we still have to find a job for you - maybe as a sponge tester".

Unfortunately, the book that you can buy in book that you can buy in book stores now is also an abridged, sanitized version. While it kept some of the political discourse, it dropped about half of it, and about half the page count. It was edited to more closely match the movie in what it covered. But it still left out the main character going to OCS. It left out his father being the squads Chaplain at the end(heck, it left out the Chaplain entirely!) And, over all, the movie was butchered compared to the book..but the book you can get now is as butchered to the original as the movie was to the edited, butchered book.

You can still get the original printing, just avoid the based off of the movie edition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheOneRonin
post Jan 23 2008, 04:41 PM
Post #50


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,109
Joined: 16-October 03
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 5,729



QUOTE (Riley37)
Maybe someday we'll even have a military that would accept Alexander the Great as a soldier if he were born again in our generation. (He would not pass the heterosexual-only test. Athlete, tactical genius, natural leader, but the Army cares more about the gender of his lover(s) than whether he can lead a successful mission with minimal losses. Feh. If I were a soldier, I'd rather serve in a unit led by an Alexander type, than by a heterosexual who tends to lead the unit into ambushes. But I digress.)


I left the Army in 2000, so some things might have changed drastically over the past 8 years. But when I was in, the general rule was "Don't ask, don't tell" in regards to sexual orientation. The Army as an entity didn't really care if you dreamed about sodomizing your battle buddy. As long as you kept it in the closet, you were good to go. And based on my experiences, the guys in my old unit would have much preferred following a skilled leader than a poor one, regardless of said leader's sexual preference. And this might be a long shot, but I'd be willing to bet you haven't served. If you did, you probably wouldn't have drawn those incorrect conclusions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th February 2026 - 12:36 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.