![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#251
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 276 Joined: 6-August 02 From: Kiel, Germany Member No.: 3,071 ![]() |
Another question came up yesterday on a German board: Discussing the question, wether you could choose to still inflict stun damage with bone density augmentation/bone lacing. From my point of view this is just an issue of not hitting so freakin' hard but then Rotbart hinted at the description of the Sai (p. 39) which states explicitly that the special thing about this weapon's specialty is that one may choose which damage track he wants to fill. He derived from that description that you generally can't choose to do stun damage in melee combat by RAW, even though common sense suggests that at least in unarmed combat or with blunt weapons you could aim to knock your opponent out rather than kill him. Since I didn't come across any other passages concerning this in the rules, this case is rather unclear to me now. I always ruled it as impossible, which lead to runners using boxing gloves... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#252
|
|
Technomancer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 ![]() |
Some more errors I ran into, to whom it may concern:
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#253
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
Another question came up yesterday on a German board: Discussing the question, wether you could choose to still inflict stun damage with bone density augmentation/bone lacing. From my point of view this is just an issue of not hitting so freakin' hard but then Rotbart hinted at the description of the Sai (p. 39) which states explicitly that the special thing about this weapon's specialty is that one may choose which damage track he wants to fill. He derived from that description that you generally can't choose to do stun damage in melee combat by RAW, even though common sense suggests that at least in unarmed combat or with blunt weapons you could aim to knock your opponent out rather than kill him. Since I didn't come across any other passages concerning this in the rules, this case is rather unclear to me now. There was a rule in previous editions whereby a character could choose to do Stun damage by taking a penalty to his attack (reflecting holding back a bit, or trying to hit the right spot, etc.). I am sure it wouldn't be too out of line to give a -2 Dice Pool penalty for any such attempt. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#254
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
THE UNDERGROUNDECONOMY in bookmarks is not aesthetically pleasing.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#255
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 ![]() |
There was a rule in previous editions whereby a character could choose to do Stun damage by taking a penalty to his attack (reflecting holding back a bit, or trying to hit the right spot, etc.). I am sure it wouldn't be too out of line to give a -2 Dice Pool penalty for any such attempt. No such rule. In CC, you simply could choose to do stun damage - but that was a tim where blunt weapons always did stun damage. (And both points are not the general case in SR4 anymore) And you could pull punches and reduce damage with a penalty. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#256
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#257
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6,748 Joined: 5-July 02 Member No.: 2,935 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#258
|
|
Beetle Eater ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,797 Joined: 3-June 02 From: Oblivion City Member No.: 2,826 ![]() |
Another question came up yesterday on a German board: Discussing the question, wether you could choose to still inflict stun damage with bone density augmentation/bone lacing. From my point of view this is just an issue of not hitting so freakin' hard but then Rotbart hinted at the description of the Sai (p. 39) which states explicitly that the special thing about this weapon's specialty is that one may choose which damage track he wants to fill. He derived from that description that you generally can't choose to do stun damage in melee combat by RAW, even though common sense suggests that at least in unarmed combat or with blunt weapons you could aim to knock your opponent out rather than kill him. Since I didn't come across any other passages concerning this in the rules, this case is rather unclear to me now. Well, you can resort to subduing (SR4, pg 152), which would allows you to specifically inflict stun damage; though it would take at least two Complex Actions to even begin inflicting damage... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#259
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,883 Joined: 16-December 06 Member No.: 10,386 ![]() |
That's not really that big of a problem though; the end of the first action they can't fight back through normal means until they break the lock, and once you do start dealing damage you get to use your full strength rather than strength/2; not all that great for the lighter metas who are depending almost completely on the lacing/density for their damage, but for any troll or ork with 6 strength or higher it means that you'll be dealing damage comparable to what you'd do with bone lacing and one or two net hits. It's not perfect, but it does mean that trolls in particular are perfectly capable of bullying weaker opponents quite effectively.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#260
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#261
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,755 Joined: 5-September 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 9,313 ![]() |
After hearing Narcoject dart guns were left out of Arsenal while this type of weapon was mentioned already in bbb, I had a thought. Could you replace Yamaha Pulsars ammo with chem darts. They seem to have all right components, propellant, capacitor/chem reservoir and needle. Doable? Found another reference to "dart guns" in arsenal under heavy armor entry, guess someone did'nt realize they got left out of BBB. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#262
|
|
Beetle Eater ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,797 Joined: 3-June 02 From: Oblivion City Member No.: 2,826 ![]() |
Found another reference to "dart guns" in arsenal under heavy armor entry, guess someone did'nt realize they got left out of BBB. QUOTE (Augmentation page 42) Dartgun: This cyberweapon fires small darts, usually containing
a chemical compound, at the target. If the target takes damage from a dart it is affected by the chemical compound or toxin delivered (see Using Toxic Substances, p. 245, SR4). The dartgun uses light pistol ranges. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#263
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,755 Joined: 5-September 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 9,313 ![]() |
I know theres cyber dart gun and bolt/arrow injector but was wondering if they missed narcoject weapons or just tossed them out of 4th.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#264
|
|
Bushido Cowgirl ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,782 Joined: 8-July 05 From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats Member No.: 7,490 ![]() |
...the Cyber Dart Gun is the Oral Dart (kind of silly if you ask me). The issue with bows, even the pistol crossbow is they are too cumbersome (try to conceal a Jennings compound bow under your longcoat).
The original dart/Narcojet pistol had a concealbility of 7 which in 4th ed would place it in the light pistol class. Now if they grouped the Ares Super Squirt under Pistols skill (as it was in 3rd ed) that would be fine. As a matter of fact I am seriosuly considering doing just that in my campaigns for it is a way too useful weapon to limit to a "special" skill. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#265
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,711 Joined: 15-June 06 Member No.: 8,716 ![]() |
If you take the two weapon style fighting does that negate the -2 to your off hand or would you still need the ambidextrous quality or off-handed training manuever??
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#266
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,883 Joined: 16-December 06 Member No.: 10,386 ![]() |
You need ambi/off-hand.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#267
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 ![]() |
If you lump dartguns, squirters, ect under pistols then lasers should get the same love as well. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cyber.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#268
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 ![]() |
not sure if anyone have asked yet, but have people find any kind of battletac like software or hardware in the recent books?
it seems to have gone the way of the dodo, replaced by a generic +1-3 when cooperating using comlinks and ar... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#269
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
As far as I know, something akin to Battletac will be included in Unwired.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#270
|
|
Cybernetic Blood Mage ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,472 Joined: 11-March 06 From: Northeastern Wyoming Member No.: 8,361 ![]() |
I seem to recall Synner teasing us about it awhile back, in one of the AUG threads if I remember correctly when a poster asked if it was going to appear in ARSE.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#271
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 ![]() |
heh, i should have guessed given how its most likely just a software addon to the comlink now.
something like a specialized im/collaboration tool or something. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#272
|
|
Shadow Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,737 Joined: 2-June 06 From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West) Member No.: 8,636 ![]() |
R3ds4muri wishes to join your network. Accept / Reject? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#273
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 343 Joined: 30-January 06 Member No.: 8,212 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#274
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 ![]() |
ugh, my leetspeak is out of practice. i had to read that 3-4 times before it got the joke (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#275
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th October 2025 - 01:11 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.