IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Broken Cyberware—too bad
Eyeless Blond
post Jan 27 2008, 06:58 AM
Post #1


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



What do you think are the most useless pieces of cyberware/bioware/nanoware in the SR3 books? In this case, "too bad" means that it is insufficiently useful in some manner (for example by providing negligible benefits (or detriments outweighing benefits), by having a cost in nuyen or Essence that is too high to justify the benefits it provides, or by being too narrowly applicable), or is rendered worthless by one or more pieces of gear (cyber or non-cyber) being strictly or almost strictly better than it.

Canonical examples include:

Move-By-Wire, which is fantastically expensive in cash and Essence while also being a one-way ticket to the grave
Cyberhorns and Cyberfangs (for being almost strictly worse than the bare fist)
Math SPU ratings other than 3, for being so close to the SPU 3 in costs but meaningfully less in benefits
The Adrenal Pump, for having a bad trigger and also for the punishing "drain"
Pain Editor, for having no effect whatsoever on Physical damage while having penalties other anti-wound-penalty gear doesn't get. Additional penalty points for not working on injuries that High Pain Tolerance will work on.

Others?

(Note: This thread is an offshoot of the SR3R -- Shadowrun Revised project. The project is being hosted elsewhere, to divorce concerns over copyright from Dumpshock, but topics like this I feel are perfectly fine on these boards, and may help garner more responses. If you prefer, you are more than welcome to register on the SR3R forum and post there; we would love to have more fresh bodies working on this project.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Jan 27 2008, 02:55 PM
Post #2


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



Cyberlimbs. Too expensive (both in money and essence) and completly useless apart of style-reasons.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fix-it
post Jan 27 2008, 03:55 PM
Post #3


Creating a god with his own hands
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,405
Joined: 30-September 02
From: 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1
Member No.: 3,364



QUOTE (Grinder)
Cyberlimbs. Too expensive (both in money and essence) and completly useless apart of style-reasons.

needs repeating.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Jan 27 2008, 04:46 PM
Post #4


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



needed fixing, done in SR4 . . just bribe your GM to let you convert the SR4 Rules to SR3 *g*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Snow_Fox
post Jan 27 2008, 05:21 PM
Post #5


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,577
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gwynedd Valley PA
Member No.: 1,221



Isn't there a similar thread about bads cyber where here?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 27 2008, 05:32 PM
Post #6


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



It's only similar in the most tenuous of ways. You were looking for the worst piece of cyberware. This thread is looking for all cyberware that is in its current incarnation not good enough to justify taking in nearly any circumstance.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jan 28 2008, 02:41 AM
Post #7


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Snow_Fox)
Isn't there a similar thread about bads cyber where here?

There's a thread about pretty much anything here somewhere. Since when has that ever stopped us? :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Jan 29 2008, 03:28 AM
Post #8


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



Headware radio/phone?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jan 29 2008, 04:07 AM
Post #9


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



QUOTE (Eyeless Blond)
Headware radio/phone?

Actually, headware radios have a purpose. Just not the purpose you'd expect.

They're utter crap of course, for any constructive use, but they're dirt-cheap and have a huge Essense cost. Ergo, you use these things when you want to burn a Magician's Essence below 1, so he can't use magic anymore.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 29 2008, 04:22 AM
Post #10


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



"So why do they call you Mr. Signal?"

"Well, it's because I've got these seven radios in my head…"

"What the hell? Why do you have seven radios in your head?"

"I use to be a mage…"

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jan 29 2008, 04:25 AM
Post #11


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Hey, it could be worse.

They might have sabotaged the radios so they were all set to different frequences and coulden't be re-tuned. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravor
post Jan 29 2008, 04:34 PM
Post #12


Cybernetic Blood Mage
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,472
Joined: 11-March 06
From: Northeastern Wyoming
Member No.: 8,361



I seem to recall reading a story once where a runner was hurt serious enough that he couldn't speak, and his implanted radio was stuck on a god-awful station at full volume throughout the entire recovery time.

He was never quite the same afterward...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jan 30 2008, 12:27 AM
Post #13


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Which reminds me of one of the funnier jokes to come out of my former group:

Q: "What do you get from interrogating a mage with stim patches?"
A: "A very pissed off Samurai."

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Jan 30 2008, 01:12 AM
Post #14


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



VCR, at least in its current form. it's too multi-purpose and too expensive; it's hugely expensive and provides a wide array of large bonuses. i think it should be broken down into less expensive pieces of 'ware which each provide lesser, narrower bonuses. if you get all the VCR-related 'ware, you end up with what is now a full VCR, but you don't have to dedicate a giant chunk of resources and essence to getting a full VCR if you only want certain abilities/bonuses. seems like someone wrote up some rules for that, once...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 30 2008, 01:42 AM
Post #15


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Duh buh wha?

You sure you didn't mean to post the VCR in "too good"?

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Jan 30 2008, 01:51 AM
Post #16


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



Sometimes "bad" means "good".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Jan 30 2008, 01:59 AM
Post #17


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



the VCR is not too good, in terms of what it can do compared to how much it costs. it costs the right amount, relative to the bonuses and abilities it provides. the bad part is that you have to buy all of the bonuses and abilities, rather than picking and choosing. for instance, i don't see why one should have to pay for the initiative bonus and the control pool bonus, if all one wants is the control pool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Link
post Jan 30 2008, 03:30 AM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 519
Joined: 27-August 02
From: Queensland
Member No.: 3,180



The VCR's power has gradually crept up throughout the years. The VCR originally only gave reaction/initiative bonuses.
QUOTE
Vehicle Control Rig: These are neuro-enhancers and muscular signal
transference (MST) Interfaces. Each level adds +2 to the user's Reaction while rigging. Each level also allows an additional + 1D6 Initiative die when the user is controlling a vehicle through a datajack that is equipped with vehicle control gear.

The RBB expanded this to include the Control Pool while R2 gave the driving TN adjustments.
You could remove these additions and instead provide a control pool to all drivers based on skill with perhaps the VCR's rating added to the pool. The TN adjustments could be disposed of altogether.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 30 2008, 03:56 AM
Post #19


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Well, that brings up another problem, which is that a number of vehicles are effectively undrivable without either modification or VCR TN adjustments, with the Lockheed C-260 Transport dropping below two nines (~93.5%) in terms of success probability on fifteen dice without TN mods, but that's not a matter of the cyber itself.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Link
post Jan 31 2008, 02:27 AM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 519
Joined: 27-August 02
From: Queensland
Member No.: 3,180



The rules for driving tests say that they are only used in extreme situations so you could consider that taking a vehicle with 6 handling out of it's comfort zone is a recipe for disaster.
Actually, the C-260 has a 6 handling rating so shouldn't 6 dice be enough to make a single success probable?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jan 31 2008, 04:49 AM
Post #21


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



Link, I'm fairly certain the problem is that although the introduction says the rules are only to be used in extreme circumstances, the Rules As Written clearly seem to indicate otherwise - which is why there tend to be modifiers (hostile ones) for things like combat damage to the vehicle (which I would consider an extreme situation), but the base check seems to come into play any time you want to do something - like land an aircraft.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jan 31 2008, 06:03 AM
Post #22


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Link)
The rules for driving tests say that they are only used in extreme situations so you could consider that taking a vehicle with 6 handling out of it's comfort zone is a recipe for disaster.

Like taking off or landing in adverse weather, for example—see the example with Whiz Kid at the end of the modifier list.
QUOTE
Actually, the C-260 has a 6 handling rating so shouldn't 6 dice be enough to make a single success probable?

Slightly over 66% of the time, yeah. I don't really think that counts as acceptable for something like flying a transport or passenger aeroplane, though.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post Jan 31 2008, 09:09 AM
Post #23


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



No, it really dosen't. That would mean one out of three would fall out of the sky, and that's if the pilot is as good a stunt pilot as Richard Petty is a racecar driver.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Jan 31 2008, 12:47 PM
Post #24


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



And don't you have to make the check every three seconds as well? Yikes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post Jan 31 2008, 11:28 PM
Post #25


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



It means one out of three would not be a clean and proper take off/landing in adverse conditions. A critical failure would cover planes dropping out of the sky.

Hypothetically, failed pilot test, followed by a crash test (if at an airport, usually wide oper terrain making that TN easier) and then potentially a body test to see if there is any sort of damage.

I imagine it's harder to flip a C-260 than a jeep, and usually there's enough runway to give the pilot a few chances at takeoff and some extra space to slow down during a landing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th August 2025 - 10:34 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.