IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Shiny New Boards
Redjack
post Feb 9 2008, 01:11 AM
Post #151


Man Behind the Curtain
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 14,868
Joined: 2-July 89
From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road
Member No.: 3



QUOTE (Tanka @ Feb 8 2008, 07:06 PM) *
By design or mistake?

Design. Guests do not see avatars, etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 9 2008, 01:56 AM
Post #152


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Did you institute a feature that checks open and closed tags? I just got an error message (correctly) that prevented me from posting, while telling me that my tags didn't tally.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redjack
post Feb 9 2008, 02:10 AM
Post #153


Man Behind the Curtain
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 14,868
Joined: 2-July 89
From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road
Member No.: 3



I have found several tweaks and features (meant in the true sense of the word, rather than the Microsoft definition) since we upgraded. The post checking was one I definitely liked. While not perfect, it is a good step forward.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 9 2008, 02:32 AM
Post #154


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Yeah, it's nice. Might cut down on those edits I have to make to correct my clumsy typing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Feb 10 2008, 05:56 AM
Post #155


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



QUOTE (Redjack @ Feb 8 2008, 08:11 PM) *
Design. Guests do not see avatars, etc.

Bandwidth conservation, I'm assuming?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 10 2008, 02:19 PM
Post #156


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



[b]Testing

Edit: wait, what actually triggers the tag-checker?[/i]

Edit^2: obviously nothing useful

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 10 2008, 03:42 PM
Post #157


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Unmatched 'quote' tags triggered it for me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanee
post Feb 10 2008, 04:03 PM
Post #158


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 8,006
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



QUOTE (Thanee @ Feb 8 2008, 07:35 AM) *
...if I find the time today, I'm gonna change it a little and post the icon here. You can use that, then, if you want. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


Found some nice free icons to use as a base in the meantime, but didn't find the time to really put something together, yet. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Definitely gonna post some ideas (hopefully) soon (next couple days or so), though.

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 10 2008, 08:23 PM
Post #159


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



[/quote]
[quote name='Fortune' date='Feb 10 2008, 10:42 AM' post='633318']
Unmatched 'quote' tags triggered it for me.


But not for me.

Not either way, apparently.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 10 2008, 08:47 PM
Post #160


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



[quote[But not for me.[/quote]

Strange.

Edit: The 'bad quote' above is exactly what gave me an error message (and prevented posting) last time. This time I got no such message, obviously. Maybe the function was disengaged while fixing something else.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Feb 12 2008, 10:11 PM
Post #161


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



How come when I quote a post with a quote in it, I only quote the text from that post, but not the sub-quoted text? That sentence doesn't even make sense.
Okay, so if I were to quote Tanka's post up there, I wouldn't get Redjack's quote from that very same post, just the stuff that Tanka added. No more nested quote of a quote of a quote. Is that a bug or a feature?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 12 2008, 10:35 PM
Post #162


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



It's a feature, according to Redjack.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redjack
post Feb 12 2008, 11:08 PM
Post #163


Man Behind the Curtain
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 14,868
Joined: 2-July 89
From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road
Member No.: 3



Yea, I'm thinking that is a feature more in the 'Microsoft' sense of the word...(IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 12 2008, 11:22 PM
Post #164


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Meh! I hate Quote Trees, and can usually follow the conversation well enough (and can refer back if I lost track), so it doesn't really bother me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Feb 12 2008, 11:22 PM
Post #165


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,526
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



i must have pushed a wrong button somewhere < = blatant Tron Reference
because now i get this kinda view only when trying to look at threads:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2202/226173...ea4f4c2_o_d.jpg
anybody know how to fix it so it goes back to old style postings? x.x . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Feb 12 2008, 11:27 PM
Post #166


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Oh, okay. I understand, I just wasn't sure if it was supposed to be like that.

You know what the biggest surprise for me was in the new boards? My own post count.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redjack
post Feb 13 2008, 02:21 AM
Post #167


Man Behind the Curtain
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 14,868
Joined: 2-July 89
From: End of the Yellow-Brick Road
Member No.: 3



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Feb 12 2008, 05:22 PM) *
i must have pushed a wrong button somewhere < = blatant Tron Reference
because now i get this kinda view only when trying to look at threads:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2202/226173...ea4f4c2_o_d.jpg
anybody know how to fix it so it goes back to old style postings? x.x . .

You are in outline mode. Go to the right side of the top green bar on that page and click on 'Options'.
Second from the bottom is Standard or Switch to Standard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Feb 13 2008, 09:47 AM
Post #168


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,526
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



aaaaah! Much better now!
thanks Redjack ^^
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tisoz
post Feb 13 2008, 03:28 PM
Post #169


Free Spirit
*******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,928
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Bloomington, IN UCAS
Member No.: 1,920



QUOTE (Platinum @ Feb 7 2008, 09:01 PM) *
I really don't like sr3 and sr4 forums being combined. People are not tagging their posts, and I wind up reading about a whole bunch of stuff that I don't want to.

The tagging discipline is actually better than I foresaw. Maybe the admins are going through and editing them?

Solutions I have thought to try:

Respond to the thread as though it pertained to the edition you want to read about. When someone says the poster was referring to edition X, or better yet, that it was obvious from "some edition specific language" that the original poster was referring to edition X, act all innocent and reply that you were confused by the omission of any edition tag. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/spin.gif)

Nag Politely ask the original poster to properly tag his thread. If the thread cannot be tagged after posting by the OP, politely asking will do no real good for that thread, but it will serve as a polite nag for everyone else. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Nag Politely request the admins to edit the thread to include the proper tag. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I do like the concept of having all the editions combined and using the edition tags, but edition tag discipline needs to be observed to make it work.

If there is a good solution, such as mandatory edition tagging to post a new thread, or something else, I am all for hearing about it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Feb 13 2008, 04:08 PM
Post #170


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



QUOTE (Redjack @ Feb 12 2008, 06:08 PM) *
Yea, I'm thinking that is a feature more in the 'Microsoft' sense of the word... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)

It's, unfortunately, one of the "upgrades" IPB decided to use instead of keeping quote trees.

Granted, there was a way a few versions back to overload the thread and make it load up blank after so many quote tree quotes.

Why they can't just have it check how deep the tree is and automatically prune is beyond me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanka
post Feb 13 2008, 04:10 PM
Post #171


Chrome to the Core
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,152
Joined: 14-October 03
From: ::1
Member No.: 5,715



Double post, blah blah blah.

Any way to make the navigation links at the top of the page change color on hover? (Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > etc etc)

I'm a stickler for knowing when a link is a link and when text is just text. Not being able to differentiate easily is kind of annoying, to be honest.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Telion
post Feb 14 2008, 07:50 PM
Post #172


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 152
Joined: 11-May 06
Member No.: 8,547



I've also found finding some of the SR3 posts hard to locate, is or will there be any means to filter the board so I can avoid scrolling for posts on a version?

Something where I could filter out SR4 material based on the tags or something of the sort would be beneficial.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th April 2022 - 03:51 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.