IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Searching, slain by web 2.0
Kagetenshi
post Feb 19 2008, 05:50 PM
Post #1


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



So to access the search interface in any useful manner (the full-option search) now requires three clicks—one on Search to bring up the quick search panel, another on "more search options" to get to a page that's almost identical in functionality (it allows selecting forum to search in, at least), and then a third click on "more options" to finally get to the proper search interface.

Is there any chance that this can be reduced? Best would be getting rid of the quick search panel and just going directly to the "advanced" search interface, but getting rid of the "slightly-more-featureful-but-not-really" page would be a significant improvement, at least.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Feb 19 2008, 09:35 PM
Post #2


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



I was going to mention this the other day and forgot.

PLEASE to make the search link just go straight to the "advanced" (i.e. useful) search page.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Feb 19 2008, 11:37 PM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



I would strongly support skipping straight to advanced search too (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caine Hazen
post Feb 19 2008, 11:46 PM
Post #4


MechRigger Delux
***

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 1,151
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Hanger 18, WPAFB
Member No.: 1,657



I believe I just took at least 1 step out. Redjack's better at the interface than me, so I'm not sure about getting rid of the "Quick Search" feature and just warping to "Advanced Search"

Give it a try and see if it eases your pain a bit though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Feb 20 2008, 01:50 AM
Post #5


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Thank you!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Feb 20 2008, 03:23 AM
Post #6


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Pain slightly eased, much appreciated!

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Feb 20 2008, 02:54 PM
Post #7


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



That is a bit better. Halfway there! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Feb 21 2008, 02:22 AM
Post #8


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



That is great (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) The only strictly improvement would be making the drop down quick search menu a 'mouse over' drop down OR changing it so a second click on search took you to advanced search (I would like this too)

But this is certainly usable. Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Mar 4 2008, 05:48 AM
Post #9


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



Hey, would it be possible to eliminate that "One of your keywords was 4 characters or less; you fail" condition? Searching long threads for specific words shouldn't be this impossible, and the four-letter thing fails even if the word is in the middle of a long quote.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Mar 11 2008, 09:36 PM
Post #10


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



Huh. I guess that's a no then? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Mar 12 2008, 07:55 PM
Post #11


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE (Eyeless Blond @ Mar 3 2008, 11:48 PM) *
Hey, would it be possible to eliminate that "One of your keywords was 4 characters or less; you fail" condition? Searching long threads for specific words shouldn't be this impossible, and the four-letter thing fails even if the word is in the middle of a long quote.


I love this idea.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dashifen
post Mar 14 2008, 09:52 PM
Post #12


Technomancer
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,638
Joined: 2-October 02
From: Champaign, IL
Member No.: 3,374



I didn't even know it was a problem, but I, too, support the idea.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eyeless Blond
post Mar 15 2008, 05:36 PM
Post #13


Decker on the Threshold
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,922
Joined: 14-March 04
Member No.: 6,156



"One or all of your search keywords were below 4 characters or you searched for words which are not allowed, such as 'html', 'img', etc, please go back and increase the length of these search keywords or choose different keywords."

Well, still there. Is there a problem indexing small words or something? What's really annoying me is how the search fails even if the 3-4 letter word is part of an exact quote.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Mar 16 2008, 07:23 PM
Post #14


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



QUOTE (Eyeless Blond @ Mar 15 2008, 06:36 PM) *
Well, still there. Is there a problem indexing small words or something? What's really annoying me is how the search fails even if the 3-4 letter word is part of an exact quote.


Yeah, that's really annoying.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th November 2024 - 09:37 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.