IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Combat Sense, Can it be used offensively?
Kurukami
post Dec 4 2003, 12:42 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 4-August 03
From: Amidst the ruins of Silicon Valley.
Member No.: 5,242



During last night's game session, the question was raised whether the adept ability Combat Sense can be used to add to dice for an offensive surprise test. That is, if you (the adept) are trying to ambush/hit somebody from behind, can you use Combat Sense to add to your surprise dice?

Much of the consensus around the table was "no", given that the ability states stuff about "perceived threats" and whatnot, but the player insists that his take on it is correct and that the book doesn't say it can't be used when you're the one who's trying to surprise.

Opinions?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chodav
post Dec 4 2003, 12:54 AM
Post #2


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: 26-November 03
Member No.: 5,852



I just reread it and all it says is "surprise situations", with no regard to who is doing the surprising. I would allow the player to use the Combat Pool dice for the surprise test, which is what I think you are asking. Here's my rationale:

Your character is setting up an ambush. His senses are heightened, as the adrenalin starts to flow and he psychs himself up for the coming violence. Every nerve is stretched tighter than the high strings on a guitar . . . On top of that, he's an adept with the magical ability of Combat Sense, which gives him an instinctive sense about the area he has set his ambush up in, and any threats nearby. Here come his targets, and he tries to surprise them. All parties involved roll a Reaction (4) test; the ambusher gets a -2 bonus making his test a Reaction (2) test instead. Because he is so in tune with his environment and aware of the situation, he gets his Combat Sense benefit and has a few extra dice to roll . . .

I just don't see it as bad or unbalancing. And if you read most of my posts, you'll see that I hate high-powered munchkinism . . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azryl
post Dec 4 2003, 01:05 AM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 7-September 03
From: Holiday,fl
Member No.: 5,595



I would shockingly have to agree with chodav. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongoose
post Dec 4 2003, 01:24 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 588
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 227



Absolutely you should be able to use the ability that way. If you roll a bunch of 1's (and maybe a single 2, to avoid "rule of 1) on your surprise test, you will be surprised- even if you were the one doing the ambushing! There's no difference in mechanics (besides the TN) between being the ambuseher and he ambushed, so why would the ability function in one case, and not the other?

I truth, I actually used to play a samurai with a 17 reaction who often did out-roll people who tried to ambush him, unless something jacked his TN above 4. A good adept with "combat sense" could realise his "victim" was sly (and cranked to the gills) and should be able to handle it, neh?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BumsofTacoma
post Dec 4 2003, 01:28 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 142
Joined: 2-December 03
Member No.: 5,871



QUOTE (Azryl)
I would shockingly have to agree with chodav. :D

Good call. I agree.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grey
post Dec 4 2003, 01:41 AM
Post #6


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,035
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Anahiem, CA
Member No.: 100



QUOTE (Kurukami)
Much of the consensus around the table was "no", given that the ability states stuff about "perceived threats" and whatnot, but the player insists that his take on it is correct and that the book doesn't say it can't be used when you're the one who's trying to surprise.

"Perceived threats"? Well, the adept is looking at the guy, hence "perceiving" him, and he is about to attack the guy, which makes him a "threat". How is that in question?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gknoy
post Dec 4 2003, 01:46 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 413
Joined: 20-November 03
Member No.: 5,835



QUOTE (Kurukami)
That is, if you (the adept) are trying to ambush/hit somebody from behind, can you use Combat Sense to add to your surprise dice?

I must have always mis-read Combat Sense -- I thought it only allowed you to use your combat pool in surprise sitiuations when you wouldn't normally be able to (e.g., having a tickle in the back of your mind that prompts you to dive behind a concrete bench as a sniper's bullet streaks towards you.) If it allows you more goodness than that (well, aside fom adding to Combat pool, which is great in its own way), then I need to re-read that section, hehe!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kurukami
post Dec 4 2003, 01:48 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 4-August 03
From: Amidst the ruins of Silicon Valley.
Member No.: 5,242



QUOTE (Grey)
QUOTE (Kurukami @ Dec 3 2003, 04:42 PM)
Much of the consensus around the table was "no", given that the ability states stuff about "perceived threats" and whatnot, but the player insists that his take on it is correct and that the book doesn't say it can't be used when you're the one who's trying to surprise.

"Perceived threats"? Well, the adept is looking at the guy, hence "perceiving" him, and he is about to attack the guy, which makes him a "threat". How is that in question?

For some reason, a lot of the people thought it was completely a defensive ability -- keeping your character from getting ambushed. I personally would be more inclined to define a person a character of mine was about to ambush as "victim" rather than "threat"... :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Dec 4 2003, 01:55 AM
Post #9


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



Just read what "surprise situations" means in the rules. It's found on SR3 p. 109. "To resolve surprise situations, all participants must make Reaction Tests."

'Nuff said.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 11:02 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.