IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Updated SR Archetypes - Old Editions to New, I have a strange urge to update the old SR1/2 archs to 4e
Drogos
post Mar 20 2008, 11:39 AM
Post #51


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 573
Joined: 6-March 08
Member No.: 15,746



He was an Ork in SR3, and I would suggest a return to that. It makes a world of difference in a mundane.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
suppenhuhn
post Mar 20 2008, 11:51 AM
Post #52


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 268
Joined: 14-February 08
Member No.: 15,682



I like the detective being human again, though ofc orc would be better statwise.
As for suggestions i would maybe get rid of photographic memory and buy homeground instead. Also maybe consider don't buying stealth as a group so you can get higher shadowing than 2.
And yes uncybered mundanes always are a bit dissappointing but the detectives better off then the ribesman, considering he's not a fighting char (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fleming
post Mar 20 2008, 12:01 PM
Post #53


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 17-March 08
Member No.: 15,787



I like what I'm seeing here so far; always nice to exchange ideas with others (and get some NPCs one doesn't need to spend time on building...).

If nobody minds, I'd like to try my hand on the Street Shaman and the Orc Street Samurai. Okay?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Mar 20 2008, 12:08 PM
Post #54


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Feel free ... even if someone does mind. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

And welcome to Dumpshock. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paws2sky
post Mar 20 2008, 12:21 PM
Post #55


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,162
Joined: 16-November 07
Member No.: 14,229



QUOTE (suppenhuhn @ Mar 20 2008, 06:51 AM) *
I like the detective being human again, though ofc orc would be better statwise.


Agreed. And technically the ork from SR3 was The Investigator anyway. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

QUOTE (suppenhuhn @ Mar 20 2008, 06:51 AM) *
As for suggestions i would maybe get rid of photographic memory and buy homeground instead. Also maybe consider don't buying stealth as a group so you can get higher shadowing than 2.
And yes uncybered mundanes always are a bit dissappointing but the detectives better off then the ribesman, considering he's not a fighting char (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Yeah, I'd looked at Home Ground. Problem with it, as I see it, is that its too specialized. A neighborhood? A host system / node? And it can't be changed? I mean, its great for NPCs, but for PCs its seems like a points sink, IMO. I'd almost rather dump it entirely for more skill points.

Good suggestion on the Stealth Group though. Shadowing 4 and Infiltration 1 sound about right? Kinda hate to give up the Palming skill, but I do agree that his Shadowing should be higher.

QUOTE (Fleming)
I like what I'm seeing here so far; always nice to exchange ideas with others (and get some NPCs one doesn't need to spend time on building...).
If nobody minds, I'd like to try my hand on the Street Shaman and the Orc Street Samurai. Okay?


I was going to take a shot at the Ork Street Sam once I get the Tribesman and Detective finalized, but by all means, have at it!

Ah, oh yeah, welcome to DS. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paws2sky
post Mar 20 2008, 02:46 PM
Post #56


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,162
Joined: 16-November 07
Member No.: 14,229



Tribesman (400 BP Total)
version 2

[ Spoiler ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paws2sky
post Mar 20 2008, 03:42 PM
Post #57


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,162
Joined: 16-November 07
Member No.: 14,229



Yay for spoiler tags. Here's the revised version of The Detective.

Detective (400 BP Total)
Version 2

[ Spoiler ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paws2sky
post Mar 20 2008, 05:53 PM
Post #58


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,162
Joined: 16-November 07
Member No.: 14,229



And while I'm thinking about it, here's The Rocker:

Rocker (400 BP Total)

[ Spoiler ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Mar 30 2008, 06:00 AM
Post #59


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



Whoops. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/embarrassed.gif)

I posted a rocker in the Sample Characters thread - didn't know someone had already done one. Well, now there's two versions, I guess.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paws2sky
post Mar 31 2008, 02:24 PM
Post #60


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,162
Joined: 16-November 07
Member No.: 14,229



No problem, Glyph.

I haven't cross-posted these last few ATs to the Sample Characters thread yet because I'm not really satisfied with how they came out. I'd like these to be ATs that people most people would, you know, actually consider playing. Just because I would play them, I feel like most wouldn't. Maybe that's just a Dumpshock thing. Maybe that's me being stuck in the 2050's when it comes to character design. *shrug*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wesley Street
post Mar 31 2008, 04:58 PM
Post #61


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,851
Joined: 15-February 08
From: Indianapolis
Member No.: 15,686



I totally want to play a Rocker now. Brilliant work guys! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
counterveil
post Apr 2 2008, 05:04 AM
Post #62


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,720



QUOTE (Colin Chapman @ Mar 12 2008, 09:18 PM) *
Appropriate copyright for the images and fluff would be included, etc. of course (along with links for Catalyst), so I can't see anyone bitching about the use of old edition illustrations, which (let's face it) will never see the light of publication again. Plus, I'll have finished my current freelance rpg assignments by then, so I can relax and do it properly.

If Catalyst would have a problem with this, I'm sure they'd let us know before things got started anyway.


It seems to me there would be an issue with image reproduction in a non-Catalyst-sanctioned piece of work, but then again what do I know? Lots of us have websites re-using the images and naught has come of it, so maybe there's something there.

Catalyst, please let us know if there are issues with re-using the images in a not-for-profit (community) work. I'm also very interested in this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th April 2025 - 04:21 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.