![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#51
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 438 Joined: 21-September 07 From: Houston Member No.: 13,369 ![]() |
An all Dragon campaign? I can see it nowthe "2070 Council of Wyrms" Boxset ooh maybe they could join Ghostwalker in Denver! wait i know 5 dragons of varying types and colors could become a powerful force to fight darkness "Shadowrun Dragon Rangers!!" (IMG:style_emoticons/default/twirl.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#52
|
|
Genuine Artificial Intelligence ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 ![]() |
wait i know 5 dragons of varying types and colors could become a powerful force to fight darkness "Shadowrun Dragon Rangers!!" (IMG:style_emoticons/default/twirl.gif) Aw, I miss emosamurai. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#53
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 718 Joined: 10-September 05 From: Montevideo, in the elusive shadows of Latin America Member No.: 7,727 ![]() |
ha! me too
Cheers! Max P.S. It IS a joke, come on! Now, I would really dig AI PCs, just take the hurt out of TMs (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#54
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,159 Joined: 12-April 07 From: Ork Underground Member No.: 11,440 ![]() |
hmm lets look at the poll results so far...
First Section Good 48 votes Bad or Joke 68 Looks like by the first section disapproval Second Section For 33 Against/joke 76 Neutral 7 Again disapproval Third Section For 63 Against/joke 69 Neutral 21 Another round of disapproval WMS |
|
|
![]()
Post
#55
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
just because i think it was a joke, doesn't necessarily mean i disapprove.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#56
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,300 Joined: 6-February 08 From: Cologne, Germany Member No.: 15,648 ![]() |
Exactly.
And more than 40% approval, even without the percentage of approving people who believe this to be a joke, sounds fair enough for an optional rule in a book consisting only of optional rules expansions. Besides that, i have yet to read a valid argument against the preview besides "that's not my style of game". Which is, thinking about it, also kind of moot in a sourcebook dealing with alternative game styles... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#57
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,653 Joined: 22-January 08 Member No.: 15,430 ![]() |
@Rasumichin: Shhhh! Don't tell people on Dumpshock that their opinions aren't facts! It makes them CrAzY! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rollin.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#58
|
|
Project Terminus: Soul Hunters ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,052 Joined: 6-November 03 From: Casselberry, Florida U.S.A. Member No.: 5,798 ![]() |
hmm lets look at the poll results so far... First Section Good 48 votes Bad or Joke 68 Looks like by the first section disapproval Second Section For 33 Against/joke 76 Neutral 7 Again disapproval Third Section For 63 Against/joke 69 Neutral 21 Another round of disapproval WMS OOO OOO my turn I want to play too. What do you think of the previewed rules for dragon PCs? They are good. [ 49 ] Approve They are bad. [ 6 ] Disapprove This is a joke. [ 62 ] Left out as no one can say for sure if these voters approve or disapprove Result hands down an approval. (49 - 6) Would you use them in your game? Yes, certainly. [ 12 ] Approve Likely. [ 22 ] Approve Rather not. [ 19 ] Hum rather not lets say undecided. Why if they were sure one way or the other there are options for yes or no. Hell no!!! [ 13 ] Disapprove I still think this is a joke. [ 44 ] Left out as no one can say for sure if these voters approve or disapprove I got no idea. [ 7 ] Undecided Result hands down an approval. (34 - 13) If you would use these rules, which BP amount would be sufficient in your opinion? 400 BP or less. [ 15 ] Approve < 400-500 BP [ 24 ] Approve <500-600 BP [ 14 ] Approve <600-700 BP [ 10 ] Approve More than 700 BP [ 11 ] Approve I said it before, i won't use this in my game. [ 19 ] Disapprove I still hope this is a joke. Please, this is a joke, isn't it? [ 50 ] Left out as no one can say for sure if these voters approve or disapprove I still got no idea. [ 9 ] Undecided I wouldn't charge BP for this type of game. [ 13 ] Approve Result hands down an approval. (87 - 19) Ok NO offence meant towards you WMS but anyone can interpet voters numbers anyway they wish and put what ever spin is needed to make it sound believable. Just my opinion nothing more. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#59
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
just as a side note, the last vote you could actually choose multiple options, so the 44 who voted joke still had the chance to vote for and/or against =P
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#60
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,300 Joined: 6-February 08 From: Cologne, Germany Member No.: 15,648 ![]() |
@Rasumichin: Shhhh! Don't tell people on Dumpshock that their opinions aren't facts! It makes them CrAzY! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rollin.gif) Hey, i'm just trying to fit in with the customs here. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif) You know, telling people they are utterly wrong while i am obviously and totally right, writing lenghty posts on p-fixed catgirl prostitutes, doing obscene rules twinking and appreciating threads about vending machine drones running amok in the inner city. Hell, i love this place. Ok NO offence meant towards you WMS but anyone can interpet voters numbers anyway they wish and put what ever spin is needed to make it sound believable. Yeah, gotta love those malleable statistics. Personally, i interpret current results as "this is a joke, but still, include these rules in the companion and suggest them as an option for specially themed 450-600 BP games". Which, as i have just noticed, also happens to be my opinion on the matter...hm. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th September 2025 - 09:28 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.