IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What counts as 'Natural Vision', LoS for Mages
Screamin Demon
post Apr 15 2008, 07:15 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 143
Joined: 23-March 08
Member No.: 15,807



A recent post on a thread about magic and cybernetics has caused me to wonder what counts as natural vision for Mages.

Vision enhancement Goggles?
Does AR count?

If cybereyes count as natural vision, does that give the mage los through any point the cyber eyes are looking from (Like wirelessly connected to the camera down the hall?

I thought it was all about optic fibers and mirror tricks... Where is the line drawn?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Apr 15 2008, 07:16 AM
Post #2


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



Any line of sight which is:
1) Established via one's natural eyes;
2) Established via cybereyes that you have paid essence for and are still within the body. I.E. no eyeball drones.
3) Either of the above, magnified by purely optical means such as glass lenses. I.E. not digitally processed.

Vision enhancement goggles enhance vision using digital signal processing, so probably are out. Depends on if the GM says the enhancements are displayed on clear glass or if the entire shades are blurred via digital info.
AR does not count under any circumstances.

Wirelessly connecting to a camera will not establish Line of Sight between the mage and the target - it will establish LoS between the camera and the target. What's more, the signal (both in the camera and from camera to mage) is most certainly digital (not analog) information.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Screamin Demon
post Apr 15 2008, 07:19 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 143
Joined: 23-March 08
Member No.: 15,807



So AR lockon stuff to point out where someone is with a handy indicator or digital tracing won't help the mage see the person? Even if the image that is being highlighted and automatically zoomed in on and focused by your essence paid for cybereyes?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Apr 15 2008, 07:20 AM
Post #4


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



Up to your GM. I would rule yes, since there's no way to 'enhance' what you're seeing without digital signal processing. At the very least, I would negate the vision enhancement bonus for perception tests to target with spells.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sunnyside
post Apr 15 2008, 07:21 AM
Post #5


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,627
Joined: 31-December 06
Member No.: 10,502



Basically consider that the actual photons from whatever it is have to be hitting the mages eyes/cybereyes in their head somehow.

So fibre optic cables work because they just channel the photons. Ditto a telescope. Though when doing this stuff it's custimary to give some penalty.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KCKitsune
post Apr 15 2008, 09:09 AM
Post #6


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,186
Joined: 9-February 08
From: Boiling Springs
Member No.: 15,665



QUOTE (Adarael @ Apr 15 2008, 03:20 AM) *
Up to your GM. I would rule yes, since there's no way to 'enhance' what you're seeing without digital signal processing. At the very least, I would negate the vision enhancement bonus for perception tests to target with spells.


Actually, since vision enhancement is in the eyes and ANYTHING in the eyes counts for LoS purposes of targeting a spell then it should work. The problem comes when you try to cyberware ultrasound system &/or Radar sensor. Since they're not in the eye they don't count.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Screamin Demon
post Apr 15 2008, 10:00 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 143
Joined: 23-March 08
Member No.: 15,807



Agreed on the goggle rule. There isn't really any way to both enhance your vision and maintain the photon stream coherency. Except of course for magnification through conventional lenses.

I feel very inclined to home-rule that a mage with cyber-eyes is seeing everything digitally processed and cannot target spells with vision. It seems the most logical place to draw the line for me. Would I be mistaken in doing so, do you think?
I feel to do otherwise opens the door to a lot of gray areas. Mages don't deserve vision enhancements anyway. Let em squint through heavy smoke/rain like everyone else.

[edit]And not to add to an already full plate, but what about bioware? I don't have a problem with magic going through bioware eyes. Being that they are all pretty much exclusive to eachother and as constantly active visual mediums (Once you implant thermals you always see in thermal vision) they seem natural enough to me to count for magic. Cybereyes... Too invasive I say. [/edit]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
krakjen
post Apr 15 2008, 10:09 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 280
Joined: 21-November 07
From: Shadows of France
Member No.: 14,312



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Apr 15 2008, 11:09 AM) *
Actually, since vision enhancement is in the eyes and ANYTHING in the eyes counts for LoS purposes of targeting a spell then it should work. The problem comes when you try to cyberware ultrasound system &/or Radar sensor. Since they're not in the eye they don't count.


Wrong. Although it's on your eye and you paid for it, you can't target via a digital zoom or any non-optical only device.
Most likely even (unnatural) night/thermographic vision won't work as there is digital image processing...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Malicant
post Apr 15 2008, 10:19 AM
Post #9


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,173
Joined: 27-July 05
From: some backwater node
Member No.: 7,520



QUOTE (Screamin Demon @ Apr 15 2008, 12:00 PM) *
I feel very inclined to home-rule that a mage with cyber-eyes is seeing everything digitally processed and cannot target spells with vision. It seems the most logical place to draw the line for me. Would I be mistaken in doing so, do you think?

Yes, you would be mistaken. Logic is always beaten by gameplay. The mage already lost Essence and a point of Magic because of the eyes, losing the ability to cast at all on the physical plane might be a little (read: completly) too much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larme
post Apr 15 2008, 10:26 AM
Post #10


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,653
Joined: 22-January 08
Member No.: 15,430



They got rid of the whole digital vs. optic thing in Shadowrun 4. You can't buy optical goggles or anything, goggles never count as natural vision for spells. And cyberware vision enhancements always count as natural because you buy them with essence, it doesn't matter whether they're considered digital or not.

The only thing in cybereyes that counts as natural vision, however, is enhancements that actually work based on vision. Ultrasound and radar, since they are not based on sight, but rather on ultrasound/radar waves, can't count as vision and won't work for spell LoS.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
krakjen
post Apr 15 2008, 10:31 AM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 280
Joined: 21-November 07
From: Shadows of France
Member No.: 14,312



QUOTE (Larme @ Apr 15 2008, 12:26 PM) *
They got rid of the whole digital vs. optic thing in Shadowrun 4. You can't buy optical goggles or anything, goggles never count as natural vision for spells. And cyberware vision enhancements always count as natural because you buy them with essence, it doesn't matter whether they're considered digital or not.

Did they?

QUOTE (BBB Pg 324)
Mage Sight Goggles: These heavy goggles are connected to a myomeric rope (p. 329) wrapped around a fiberoptic cable that ends in an optical lens.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
masterofm
post Apr 15 2008, 10:31 AM
Post #12


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,058
Joined: 4-February 08
Member No.: 15,640



Wasn't this already covered in a really long thread a few months back?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ArkonC
post Apr 15 2008, 10:37 AM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 536
Joined: 25-January 08
From: Can I crash on your couch?
Member No.: 15,483



QUOTE (Larme @ Apr 15 2008, 12:26 PM) *
They got rid of the whole digital vs. optic thing in Shadowrun 4. You can't buy optical goggles or anything, goggles never count as natural vision for spells. And cyberware vision enhancements always count as natural because you buy them with essence, it doesn't matter whether they're considered digital or not.

The only thing in cybereyes that counts as natural vision, however, is enhancements that actually work based on vision. Ultrasound and radar, since they are not based on sight, but rather on ultrasound/radar waves, can't count as vision and won't work for spell LoS.

Exactly, with cybereyes, it's not the digital vs optic thing, it's the sight vs not sight thing, if you could implant eyes that convert smells to visual impulses, it would not let you use that to target since smell, even seeing smell, is not sight...
With tools as visual enhancements, it is an issue, a mage using digital magnification cannot target with spells, one using optical magnification can...

EDIT: Serves me right for opening this in a tab and taking to long to answer...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larme
post Apr 15 2008, 10:39 AM
Post #14


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,653
Joined: 22-January 08
Member No.: 15,430



QUOTE (krakjen @ Apr 15 2008, 05:31 AM) *
Did they?


Yes? At least for everything except mage sight goggles. Which can't have vision enhancements.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
krakjen
post Apr 15 2008, 10:44 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 280
Joined: 21-November 07
From: Shadows of France
Member No.: 14,312



Yes but that means that anything purely optical will work too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sma
post Apr 15 2008, 10:50 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 160
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 282



foiled by tabbed browsing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Apr 15 2008, 05:35 PM
Post #17


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Apr 15 2008, 01:09 AM) *
Actually, since vision enhancement is in the eyes and ANYTHING in the eyes counts for LoS purposes of targeting a spell then it should work. The problem comes when you try to cyberware ultrasound system &/or Radar sensor. Since they're not in the eye they don't count.


I was responding to a question about glasses/goggles, not cybereyes. We have already established that cybereyes are paid for with essence and are therefore fine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
O'Donnell Heir
post Apr 15 2008, 05:45 PM
Post #18


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 6-April 08
Member No.: 15,853



QUOTE (Larme @ Apr 15 2008, 05:26 AM) *
They got rid of the whole digital vs. optic thing in Shadowrun 4. You can't buy optical goggles or anything, goggles never count as natural vision for spells.


Actually it specifically says you can cast spells using magnification enhancement on goggles in the street gear section "(Ideal for spellcasting at distant targets)". Which means in itself, that you can use goggles for natural spell sight.

Basically, enhancement and magnification just edit are what you are already seeing. You see the target even without them, they just pick it out for you and make it easier to recognize the target. It's not adding something that you're not seeing already, like looking through a clairvoyance spell or a camera. It's still natural sight, just enhanced a little.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Apr 15 2008, 06:07 PM
Post #19


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



QUOTE (Larme @ Apr 15 2008, 03:26 AM) *
They got rid of the whole digital vs. optic thing in Shadowrun 4. You can't buy optical goggles or anything, goggles never count as natural vision for spells. And cyberware vision enhancements always count as natural because you buy them with essence, it doesn't matter whether they're considered digital or not.


QUOTE (O'Donnell Heir @ Apr 15 2008, 10:45 AM) *
Actually it specifically says you can cast spells using magnification enhancement on goggles in the street gear section "(Ideal for spellcasting at distant targets)". Which means in itself, that you can use goggles for natural spell sight.

Basically, enhancement and magnification just edit are what you are already seeing. You see the target even without them, they just pick it out for you and make it easier to recognize the target. It's not adding something that you're not seeing already, like looking through a clairvoyance spell or a camera. It's still natural sight, just enhanced a little.


Wrong. SR4, 324 says, "This zoom function magnifies vision by up to 50 times, allowing distant targets to be seen clearly. It is available as both an optical (ideal for spellcasting at distant targets) or electronic (with real-time image correction) enhancement."

The optical vs digital IS STILL THERE.

Also, to lend credit to that, SR4, 324, "These optical aids have many uses, one of which is enabling a magician to obtain optical (non-electronic) line of sight for spellcasting from cover. Spellcasting targeted through optics this way suffers a –3 dice pool modifier."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WhiteWolf
post Apr 15 2008, 06:21 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 100
Joined: 13-March 08
From: Texas! Giddy Up!
Member No.: 15,770



Line of Sight (LoS) is having a straight view from you to your target meaning you are able to see your target with little to no obstructions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
O'Donnell Heir
post Apr 15 2008, 06:32 PM
Post #21


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 6-April 08
Member No.: 15,853



QUOTE (WhiteWolf @ Apr 15 2008, 01:21 PM) *
Line of Sight (LoS) is having a straight view from you to your target meaning you are able to see your target with little to no obstructions.

That alone is false due to the Optical Devices allowing spellcasting, periscopes, endoscopes and Mage Goggles aren't "straight views from you to your target".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cabral
post Apr 15 2008, 11:19 PM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 734
Joined: 30-August 05
Member No.: 7,646



QUOTE (O'Donnell Heir @ Apr 15 2008, 01:32 PM) *
That alone is false due to the Optical Devices allowing spellcasting, periscopes, endoscopes and Mage Goggles aren't "straight views from you to your target".

They are straight views "as the photon flies" ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larme
post Apr 16 2008, 01:36 AM
Post #23


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,653
Joined: 22-January 08
Member No.: 15,430



QUOTE (Tarantula @ Apr 15 2008, 01:07 PM) *
The optical vs digital IS STILL THERE.

Also, to lend credit to that, SR4, 324, "These optical aids have many uses, one of which is enabling a magician to obtain optical (non-electronic) line of sight for spellcasting from cover. Spellcasting targeted through optics this way suffers a �€“3 dice pool modifier."


pwned (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)

Though I wonder what number ¿½â‚¬â€œ3 represents (IMG:style_emoticons/default/question.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Apr 16 2008, 02:09 AM
Post #24


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Larme @ Apr 16 2008, 11:36 AM) *
Though I wonder what number ���‚��€œ3 represents (IMG:style_emoticons/default/question.gif)


It's a -3. The new software sometimes screws up certain characters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 10:08 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.