IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Immunity to normal weapons, What counts and what doesn't?
Tarantula
post Apr 16 2008, 11:11 PM
Post #26


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



QUOTE (Larme @ Apr 16 2008, 04:17 PM) *
Fire spirits do not have any form of immunity to fire, so per RAW, yes, flamethrowers will burn the heck out of them. Spirits only have the powers that they are given. So while a fire spirit can burn through stuff with its elemental aura, that doesn't mean you can kill it with a fire extinguisher, or water, nor does it mean that it needs oxygen to live. It has none of the properties of fire, in other words.

Try to think of it like this: all spirits are made out of the same spirit stuff. Fire spirits are made out of the same stuff as air spirits, which are made out of the same stuff as water spirits. They just look like they're made out of an element.


Incorrect. Fire elementals have a severe allergy to water. Water elementals have a severe allergy to fire. You spray a fire elemental with a water based fire extinguisher... it'll get hurt (rate of 1 box per minute or +4DV of a water based weapon). Hit a water elemental with a flamethrower, and it'll eat +4DV from the attack.

Not to mention that since it bypasses their ItNW then its straight body for them to resist with. (And a -4 DP to everything while they are exposed to it.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WearzManySkins
post Apr 16 2008, 11:28 PM
Post #27


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,159
Joined: 12-April 07
From: Ork Underground
Member No.: 11,440



IIRC one of the Devs (Synner?) has stated that SnS/Taser rounds do not affect creature/beings with out an nervous system ie spirits was used as an example.

Besides electrical shock from SnS and Tasers is not additive in the method of projected round delivery.

WMS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Apr 16 2008, 11:28 PM
Post #28


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (Tarantula @ Apr 16 2008, 07:11 PM) *
Incorrect. Fire elementals have a severe allergy to water. Water elementals have a severe allergy to fire. You spray a fire elemental with a water based fire extinguisher... it'll get hurt (rate of 1 box per minute or +4DV of a water based weapon). Hit a water elemental with a flamethrower, and it'll eat +4DV from the attack.

i don't think there are water-based fire extinguishers, unless by fire extinguisher you simply mean anything which can be used to extinguish fires rather than an actual fire extinguisher (in which case a bucket full of water would qualify as a fire extinguisher, i suppose).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Apr 16 2008, 11:30 PM
Post #29


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



I believe class A fire extinguishers (not b or c, but only a) are in fact, water sprayers...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_classes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Apr 16 2008, 11:32 PM
Post #30


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (WearzManySkins @ Apr 16 2008, 07:28 PM) *
IIRC one of the Devs (Synner?) has stated that SnS/Taser rounds do not affect creature/beings with out an nervous system ie spirits was used as an example.

Besides electrical shock from SnS and Tasers is not additive in the method of projected round delivery.

WMS

don't believe that was ever said. i do recall someone saying it shouldn't realistically stun spirits, and possibly someone saying it wouldn't be a completely unreasonable houserule, but i don't remember anyone official actually saying they shouldn't do anything.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Apr 16 2008, 11:34 PM
Post #31


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



Mental Note: Never summon a Fire Elemental when outside in Seattle. With all the rain that happens. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cabral
post Apr 17 2008, 12:21 AM
Post #32


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 734
Joined: 30-August 05
Member No.: 7,646



What about DMSO + Insecticide against Bug Spirits?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Apr 17 2008, 12:23 AM
Post #33


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



If bug spirits have a severe allergy to insecticide (i think they do) then its 1P every minute they're exposed (and a -4DP modifier to all actions to boot).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Apr 17 2008, 12:25 AM
Post #34


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Tarantula @ Apr 16 2008, 07:23 PM) *
If bug spirits have a severe allergy to insecticide (i think they do) then its 1P every minute they're exposed (and a -4DP modifier to all actions to boot).

They do.

I even have an Advertisement for that!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElFenrir
post Apr 17 2008, 08:53 AM
Post #35


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,168
Joined: 15-April 05
From: Helsinki, Finland
Member No.: 7,337



This makes me wonder how i could work in those new 'Water Guns' that the firefighters have been testing
. I forget what they're called but they shoot the 'balls' of high-pressure water; it showed two firefighters extinguishing a car fire REALLY fast with it. They would aim, *whoomp*, and this high-pressure ball of water would land on the fire and smother some of it. Aim *whoomp*. And the cool thing was they really did look like guns hooked up to backpacks. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I think it had the disadvantage of really only being useful against class A fires, but i can't quite remember.

They could wreck some "#%ยค on a fire elemental by the look of it, though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Apr 17 2008, 09:03 AM
Post #36


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Jaid @ Apr 17 2008, 07:32 AM) *
don't believe that was ever said. i do recall someone saying it shouldn't realistically stun spirits, and possibly someone saying it wouldn't be a completely unreasonable houserule, but i don't remember anyone official actually saying they shouldn't do anything.

No, actually Synner really did post something to that effect. I am uncertain whether he meant no -1/2 AP, no elemental stun effect or simply no damage at all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Oracle
post Apr 17 2008, 09:24 AM
Post #37


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 934
Joined: 26-August 05
From: Earth - Europe - AGS - Norddeutscher Bund - Hannover
Member No.: 7,624



Interesting topic. I did not find anything from Synner concerning sns against spirits with the search function.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Apr 17 2008, 09:34 AM
Post #38


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Oracle @ Apr 17 2008, 05:24 PM) *
Interesting topic. I did not find anything from Synner concerning sns against spirits with the search function.

I had tried to find that post too, but I have not found it. But I am very certain he did make such a post, because it was the very few times I was not happy when a developer posted an "intention" clarification. I remember he was quite clear about it, I had hoped the writers would go for a more strategically ambiguous stand on the matter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tarantula
post Apr 17 2008, 03:30 PM
Post #39


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,664
Joined: 21-September 04
From: Arvada, CO
Member No.: 6,686



I remember seeing a post about it too. Possibly was Franktrollman and not Synner. I'll keep digging around for it as i can.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th November 2025 - 09:01 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.