IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ally with Materialization Power for Possession Traditions?, Is it allowed or not?
Triggerz
post Apr 21 2008, 10:39 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 23-August 05
Member No.: 7,590



I assume that possession-based traditions can only conjure Allies with Inhabitation or Possession (and not Materialization), but it's not entirely clear to me. The Street Magic errata does not seem to impose such a limitation, although page 34 of Street Magic seems to: "As such, all spirits conjured by magicians of a possession-based magical tradition replace the Materialization power in the spirits’ statistics with Possession." It could go either way based on which rule you give precedence to. What do you guys think?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Apr 21 2008, 11:32 PM
Post #2


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



Even if that isn't the case, you can achieve the same outcome by making a spirit inhabit like.. a regular rat, which will almost certainly explode and cause the spirits true form to manifest.. making it a materialization spirit.

However, from previous debates on the same topic I gather the intent was that ally spirits of possession mages could have/had materialization, but the actual rules are not quite written that way. not that it matters, thanks to the 'kill a kitten' escape from being possession.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Triggerz
post Apr 21 2008, 11:32 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 23-August 05
Member No.: 7,590



Oh! Please don't answer all at once! I can't possibly read that fast! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

EDIT: Ah! A first reply! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Triggerz
post Apr 21 2008, 11:35 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 23-August 05
Member No.: 7,590



QUOTE (Cthulhudreams @ Apr 21 2008, 07:32 PM) *
Even if that isn't the case, you can achieve the same outcome by making a spirit inhabit like.. a regular rat, which will almost certainly explode and cause the spirits true form to manifest.. making it a materialization spirit.

However, from previous debates on the same topic I gather the intent was that ally spirits of possession mages could have/had materialization, but the actual rules are not quite written that way. not that it matters, thanks to the 'kill a kitten' escape from being possession.


Awesome little loophole there! I guess it settles the question. Thanks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaid
post Apr 22 2008, 01:25 AM
Post #5


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,089
Joined: 4-October 05
Member No.: 7,813



QUOTE (Cthulhudreams @ Apr 21 2008, 06:32 PM) *
Even if that isn't the case, you can achieve the same outcome by making a spirit inhabit like.. a regular rat, which will almost certainly explode and cause the spirits true form to manifest.. making it a materialization spirit.

i disagree. having gained the materialisation power, it then replaces it with the possession power, per the rules for posession tradition spirits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Apr 22 2008, 01:32 AM
Post #6


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



i could counter argue that the 'conjurered' clause only applies at summoning time, rather than subsequently, but it;s pretty bleh. I just run with the authors intent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Triggerz
post Apr 22 2008, 03:13 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 23-August 05
Member No.: 7,590



QUOTE (Jaid @ Apr 21 2008, 09:25 PM) *
i disagree. having gained the materialisation power, it then replaces it with the possession power, per the rules for posession tradition spirits.


I guess even horses thought dead can be possessed and animated. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) Anyone else has an opinion on the matter? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/talker.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
weblife
post Apr 22 2008, 05:56 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 437
Joined: 11-April 05
Member No.: 7,318



QUOTE (Jaid @ Apr 21 2008, 09:25 PM) *
i disagree. having gained the materialisation power, it then replaces it with the possession power, per the rules for posession tradition spirits.



Nope, it does not. It explicitly described that an Inhabiting Ally can use other forms to manifest if it attains True Form. That would be moot if you were correct.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Triggerz
post Apr 22 2008, 10:48 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 23-August 05
Member No.: 7,590



I guess I'm a bit of a munch when it comes down to it, but I like optimizing and I like having options, and I like tricks that look cool...

I was thinking of using an Ally with Materialization as a sort of "shadow double" of myself when more firepower is needed. (Mystic Adept with a possession tradition.) The shadow double could materialize, kick a guard in the nuts, steal his gun and invite more people to the party after that. Since I can conjure Guardian Spirits, I'd give the Ally a few gun skills through the Skill power. (I'm a bit of a gun bunny, I guess, so my "clones" should be too.)

Ideally, I'd love to have a spirit with BOTH possession and materialization, but I guess I'll have to use two spirits for that.

EDIT: Yes, I'm aware that an Ally with Possession could just possess the guard and wreck havoc that way, but so can normal, non-Ally, spirits. As I said, I like having options. But I also like to play within the rules too, so I'm curious about the Materialization power as explained at the beginning of the thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 01:13 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.