IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Everything but the dumpshock..., "1st person" footage of UAV getting shot down.
Method
post Apr 23 2008, 12:58 AM
Post #1


Street Doc
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,508
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Neverwhere
Member No.: 6,114



Ever wonder what it would look like if you were jumped into a UAV when it got hit by an AAM missile fired from a fighter jet??

Me neither, but here is a very cool video showing just that!!

Sucks to be that rigger. At least dumpshock won't be invented for another decade or so... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cyber.gif)

[edit for clarity]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zen Shooter01
post Apr 23 2008, 02:39 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 932
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Orlando, Florida
Member No.: 1,042



Neat.

I think Putin's cheese is slipping off his cracker. What does Russia think it will gain by throwing its weight around this way? And, why start a shooting incident over one surveillance UAV?

(And incidentally, it's not necessary to write the word "missile" after "AAM". (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Method
post Apr 23 2008, 03:16 AM
Post #3


Street Doc
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,508
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Neverwhere
Member No.: 6,114



Good point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Heath Robinson
post Apr 23 2008, 03:25 AM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,263
Joined: 4-March 08
From: Blighty
Member No.: 15,736



Okay, so what appears to be, or is claimed to be, a MIG-29 shoots down a UAV near a separatist territory that is backed by Russia, and people believe Putin insane? Sure, it might be a waste of the missile, but to be honest that UAV was plausibly en route to a recon mission inside said territory as a precursor to a possible invasion and this was a case of pro-active defense which Georgia is making a big deal over as a diplomatic ploy.

I don't know enough of the political situation in the region to evaluate this properly, to be honest.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Earlydawn
post Apr 23 2008, 04:12 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 385
Joined: 20-August 07
Member No.: 12,766



QUOTE (Heath Robinson @ Apr 22 2008, 11:25 PM) *
Okay, so what appears to be, or is claimed to be, a MIG-29 shoots down a UAV near a separatist territory that is backed by Russia, and people believe Putin insane? Sure, it might be a waste of the missile, but to be honest that UAV was plausibly en route to a recon mission inside said territory as a precursor to a possible invasion and this was a case of pro-active defense which Georgia is making a big deal over as a diplomatic ploy.

I don't know enough of the political situation in the region to evaluate this properly, to be honest.
Invasion? By whom? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotfl.gif) There's nobody in Eastern Europe who can stand up to Russia.. who, coincidentally, is increasing their military spending again, and withdrew from a treaty governing their placement of troops along the European border a few months ago. Hello Second Cold War!

What is Russia's status in Shadowrun, anyway? I know Evo is up there, but what's up with the country itself?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Heath Robinson
post Apr 23 2008, 04:37 AM
Post #6


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,263
Joined: 4-March 08
From: Blighty
Member No.: 15,736



QUOTE (Earlydawn @ Apr 23 2008, 05:12 AM) *
Invasion? By whom? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotfl.gif) There's nobody in Eastern Europe who can stand up to Russia.. who, coincidentally, is increasing their military spending again, and withdrew from a treaty governing their placement of troops along the European border a few months ago. Hello Second Cold War!

What is Russia's status in Shadowrun, anyway? I know Evo is up there, but what's up with the country itself?

The separatist region is, I believe, self-governed. Russia might not actively intervene if it were invaded because, whilst Russia likes having friends, they aren't actually worth enough to Russia for her to commit troops. Blowing up a few UAVs, though, is cheap enough that Russia is willing to do it for the sake of a friendly governing power (certain pressure groups like small, ineffectual states for some reason and so having a few that owe you can be a good thing in the current international climate).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Earlydawn
post Apr 23 2008, 04:49 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 385
Joined: 20-August 07
Member No.: 12,766



Okay, my mistake. I thought you were trying to imply that the machine was gonna dart into Russian airspace to take a look-see. Nonetheless, I don't see what business Russia would have in that area, considering that at best, they could consider it a non-sovereign region, and at worst, part of Georgia.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Heath Robinson
post Apr 23 2008, 06:12 AM
Post #8


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,263
Joined: 4-March 08
From: Blighty
Member No.: 15,736



The separatists are Russian-backed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MYST1C
post Apr 23 2008, 07:33 AM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 858
Joined: 25-August 03
From: Braunschweig, North German League, Allied German States
Member No.: 5,537



QUOTE (Heath Robinson @ Apr 23 2008, 05:25 AM) *
Okay, so what appears to be, or is claimed to be, a MIG-29 shoots down a UAV near a separatist territory that is backed by Russia, and people believe Putin insane?

In some other forum I visit another user checked the coordinates displayed in that video and declared the UAVs position as well in Georgian territory.
Meaning, whatever the reason or circumstances, a Russian aircraft violated Georgia's airspace.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Naysayer
post Apr 23 2008, 07:56 AM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 325
Joined: 9-December 06
From: the Maaatlock-Expressway!
Member No.: 10,326



In Putin Russia, Georgian Airspace invades you!
...
I don't know what that is supposed to mean, either.
But I guess there are schools of thought in Russia that would argue that Georgian airspace effectively lies well within Russian airspace... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Apr 23 2008, 09:26 AM
Post #11


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



one step forward, two steps back...

the only thing the human race have become better at, is killing each other...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Heath Robinson
post Apr 23 2008, 11:19 AM
Post #12


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,263
Joined: 4-March 08
From: Blighty
Member No.: 15,736



QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Apr 23 2008, 10:26 AM) *
one step forward, two steps back...

the only thing the human race have become better at, is killing each other...

Given how resilient humans are, that's quite an impressive achievement. We also have nicer cars and houses these days.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Apr 23 2008, 11:43 AM
Post #13


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



yep, i just wonder how much of that achievement is related to technology developed for war uses...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Apr 23 2008, 12:12 PM
Post #14


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



For those who are not aware, Russia also recently dropped a bomb (that did not detonate - probably on purpose) in Georgia not long ago, withdrew their diplomats (not sure if they are back), cut off oil supply and crippled the governement by launching a cyber attack.

IMO they are using Georgia as a punching bag to intimidate the other nearby states.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Apr 23 2008, 01:28 PM
Post #15


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



I thought the cyber attack was against Estonia.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Apr 23 2008, 01:57 PM
Post #16


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



Was it? I thought it was Georgia... *googles* Yup, you are correct sir, Estonia. Just sort of a bitch-slap on their way to harass Georgia I guess.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serial_Peacemake...
post Apr 23 2008, 04:59 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 192
Joined: 29-December 06
Member No.: 10,483



Actually the interesting thing about killing a drone is that since you did not kill a person Georgia does not care. So it really is kind of a bloodless shooting war. Though I wonder if in a monetary sense that if the drones price is less than the missiles Georgia might attempt to just let Russia kill drones in order to drain them financially, and then try some kind of diplomatic maneuvering to have Russia pay them back for the drones that were shot down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Naysayer
post Apr 23 2008, 05:17 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 325
Joined: 9-December 06
From: the Maaatlock-Expressway!
Member No.: 10,326



That scheme would have a lot more going for it if Russia wasn't just dying for a good enough excuse to invade the smeg out of Georgia.

Only good thing about this is that my children can grow up in a cool Cold War world, with bitch-ass cold war Hollywood movies, just like their old man!
And then I can go all "Huh, son, back in our day, Rambo had a real hairpiece!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Apr 23 2008, 05:21 PM
Post #19


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



QUOTE (Serial_Peacemaker @ Apr 23 2008, 12:59 PM) *
Actually the interesting thing about killing a drone is that since you did not kill a person Georgia does not care. So it really is kind of a bloodless shooting war. Though I wonder if in a monetary sense that if the drones price is less than the missiles Georgia might attempt to just let Russia kill drones in order to drain them financially, and then try some kind of diplomatic maneuvering to have Russia pay them back for the drones that were shot down.


Summing down a conflict to money only is taking a very narrow view that does not reflect reality.
Meaning Georgia very much DOES care a Russian fighter jet just blew up one of their drones. It has a far greater impact that cost of missile vs cost of drone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post Apr 23 2008, 06:24 PM
Post #20


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



Do most UAVs even have radio receivers such that they could hear a warning to "leave or be shot down"?

For all we know the MiG pilot could have yelled a dozen radio warnings at the thing before opening up.


-karma
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Earlydawn
post Apr 23 2008, 06:33 PM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 385
Joined: 20-August 07
Member No.: 12,766



..Which is totally irrelevant, as it's not their sovereignty. They have no authority there. Internationally illegal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Backgammon
post Apr 23 2008, 06:45 PM
Post #22


Ain Soph Aur
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,477
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Montreal, Canada
Member No.: 600



Assuming the video wasn't doctored to show the drone as being in sovereign Georgian territory when it possibly wasn't. Just saying.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Apr 23 2008, 09:20 PM
Post #23


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



i would hazard a guess that any drone (unless specifically equipped to act as a decoy, ask the israelis) have a much smaller radar return then a full size aircraft...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Earlydawn
post Apr 23 2008, 10:04 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 385
Joined: 20-August 07
Member No.: 12,766



QUOTE (Backgammon @ Apr 23 2008, 02:45 PM) *
Assuming the video wasn't doctored to show the drone as being in sovereign Georgian territory when it possibly wasn't. Just saying.
I'm reasonably sure that there's a method to assertain the legitimacy of recorded radar data. We'll see if anybody trustworthy breaks it down and comes to a conclusion. That said, Georgia has very little to gain by falsely accusing Russia of illegal aggression, and if the drone was in Russian airspace, I'm sure they'd be the first to call foul.


QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Apr 23 2008, 05:20 PM) *
i would hazard a guess that any drone (unless specifically equipped to act as a decoy, ask the israelis) have a much smaller radar return then a full size aircraft...
I'm not in the Air Force (yet), but I believe that most current-generation drones are considered "low signature", with the exception of Wild Weasel-typed machines. Maybe WMS can throw some interesting facts our way.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zak
post Apr 23 2008, 10:11 PM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 17-November 06
From: 1984
Member No.: 9,891



QUOTE (Earlydawn @ Apr 23 2008, 04:04 PM) *
That said, Georgia has very little to gain by falsely accusing Russia of illegal aggression, and if the drone was in Russian airspace, I'm sure they'd be the first to call foul.


Sometimes international politics are just like schoolyard intimidation 'games'. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/spin.gif) Except its harder to grow up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 06:31 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.