IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Twinked weapons, What have people done with Arsenal?
JoelHalpern
post May 19 2008, 01:14 PM
Post #126


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 18-January 06
From: Leesburg, Virginia, USA
Member No.: 8,177



Could someone comment explicitly on PlatonicPimp's question. The same thing struck me reading the rules, although I could not find a reasonable resolution.

QUOTE ("BBB page 239")
Clearsight autosofts improve the Pilot's cognitive abilities, allowing it to better analyze and judge sensory input. A drone with this autosoft rolls Sensor + Clearsight for Sensor Tests (see p. 162)


But, as was observed, Clearsight is unlikely to be better than Pilot. If we simply substitute Sensor + Clearsight for Sensor + Pilot, the drone works no better, and possibly worses, than it did before.

Is PlatonicPimp's conclusion that one should substitute Sensor + Clearsight for Sensor in the test the right reading? It makes for odd English.

Thank you,
Joel Halpern
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dumori
post May 19 2008, 02:14 PM
Post #127


Dumorimasoddaa
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,687
Joined: 30-March 08
Member No.: 15,830



just mount a sensor on the blade then you don't have a problem also I think its hard to hide form a blade stuck in you if the blade knows its stuck in something.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WearzManySkins
post May 19 2008, 09:16 PM
Post #128


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,159
Joined: 12-April 07
From: Ork Underground
Member No.: 11,440



For a stock drone to hit a metahuman/critter will require a bit of luck. Most drones I have seen in game play have had a rigger type in full VR mode to hit metahuman/critter.

I would be simpler to just have the weapon fire when a certain point on the blade reached, you could incorporate a contact to arm the weapon.

WMS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Larme
post May 19 2008, 09:43 PM
Post #129


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,653
Joined: 22-January 08
Member No.: 15,430



QUOTE (JoelHalpern @ May 19 2008, 08:14 AM) *
Could someone comment explicitly on PlatonicPimp's question. The same thing struck me reading the rules, although I could not find a reasonable resolution.



But, as was observed, Clearsight is unlikely to be better than Pilot. If we simply substitute Sensor + Clearsight for Sensor + Pilot, the drone works no better, and possibly worses, than it did before.

Is PlatonicPimp's conclusion that one should substitute Sensor + Clearsight for Sensor in the test the right reading? It makes for odd English.

Thank you,
Joel Halpern


Pilots only go up to rating 4, while autosofts can go up to 6, n'est pas?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JoelHalpern
post May 20 2008, 02:54 AM
Post #130


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 18-January 06
From: Leesburg, Virginia, USA
Member No.: 8,177



QUOTE (Larme @ May 19 2008, 05:43 PM) *
Pilots only go up to rating 4, while autosofts can go up to 6, n'est pas?


A couple of questions:
So Clearsight is only useful if it is at a grade higher than the Pilot? Then why would the GM-Nissan Doberman which has Pilot 3 also come with a Clearsight 3 (and Target 3).
Also, presumably Clearsight (like all software) is limited by the Response / System of the drone. Which at least by the BBB would seem to be the same as the Pilot? Sure, you could upgrade the Response. But the Pilot IS the OS (System) for the Drone.

So it seems that the BBB thinks that Clearsight is useful even when it does not exceed Pilot,
And a reasonable reading is that the Pilot is the System, so the Autosofts should not be able to exceed it.

Yours,
Joel Halpern

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WearzManySkins
post May 20 2008, 03:20 AM
Post #131


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,159
Joined: 12-April 07
From: Ork Underground
Member No.: 11,440



QUOTE (Larme @ May 19 2008, 04:43 PM) *
Pilots only go up to rating 4, while autosofts can go up to 6, n'est pas?

RAW page 321
Pilots up to Rating 6
Autosofts (Rating 1-4)

WMS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PlatonicPimp
post May 20 2008, 03:37 AM
Post #132


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,219
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lofwyr's stomach.
Member No.: 1,320



Perhaps if this requires further discussion, we should move it to a different thread. In the mean time, I will simply state that the guns on my katars are as good or better at hitting their target than the standard security drone, and leave it at that. I still say that getting two additional point blank attacks on top of the melee attack is fun, fun, fun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sir_Psycho
post May 20 2008, 01:36 PM
Post #133


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,629
Joined: 14-December 06
Member No.: 10,361



I find a cheap Recoil comp system is a lanyard and a foregrip. Sure, there's better RC, but it's so CHEAP. And you could afford an internal smartlink mod (or hopefully it's already in the weapon).

The best example of this would be the Ingram Smartgun X. It's already got 2 (3) RC, so you throw on a cheap lanyard and a foregrip and you've got 4 (5) Recoil compensation, with a +2 DP Smartlink, and a silencer. Not elaborate, but cheap and effective.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 07:28 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.