Help me stat something up., Players from Greenhorns in Seattle stay out. |
Help me stat something up., Players from Greenhorns in Seattle stay out. |
May 20 2008, 06:51 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,532 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 769 |
Last chance Seraph, Joel, Mickle, Dusty and Nigel. Seriously don't click the spoiler tag, this has some metaplot stuff your characters don't have a clue about yet.
[ Spoiler ]
|
|
|
May 20 2008, 07:28 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,162 Joined: 16-November 07 Member No.: 14,229 |
[ Spoiler ]
|
|
|
May 21 2008, 07:18 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,532 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 769 |
hrm... Try a different tack here.
What's the TM build in the BBB like in play? If I upped the stats a bit to give her some better combat capabilities would she be a pretty decent TM? |
|
|
May 21 2008, 08:18 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 |
hrm... Try a different tack here. What's the TM build in the BBB like in play? If I upped the stats a bit to give her some better combat capabilities would she be a pretty decent TM? no, not really. honestly, if you want decent, give her a resonance of 4 (cap of 5 until she initiates) assume she has most of the CFs you always need (armor, attack, edit, browse, exploit, etc) and a decent set of skills with software. she won't be nearly as good as a chargen hacker, but you do want to allow some room for a chargen hacker to show up and not be totally schooled i assume (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) for cyber, i'd say give her an autoinjector with some combat drugs in it (poor man's initiative booster), maybe some skillwires, and give her decent combat skills (if she has a decent agility, she'll only need 3-4 in her combat skills). but really, if you want a technomancer who can handle all of those areas competently (or even near competently) she's gonna be way beyond chargen limitations... she just still won't be all that impressive. you really need to min/max to get anything out of TMs worth their cost. a better solution, imo, would be to just make her a regular hacker/rigger/razorgirl who at one point had AIPS, but is not actually a technomancer (even if she is suspected to be one). this means you can still run the team through the events in emergence, but leaves you with a much more plausible NPC in terms of what they can do... it is entirely believable for a hacker to be a rigger on the side and have some decent combat skills. a technomancer is pretty much just a technomancer, and may even be limited to just one aspect of being a technomancer... trying to also be a combat character is just really hard to believe, imo, since they have to be so focused on technomancering just to be good at what they do. but either way, it's your game... play it how you like. |
|
|
May 22 2008, 10:24 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,598 Joined: 15-March 03 From: Hong Kong Member No.: 4,253 |
[ Spoiler ]
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 10:39 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Nice! I might just steal that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
|
|
|
May 22 2008, 08:08 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,532 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Calgary, Canada Member No.: 769 |
Very cool idea.
Still, I'm leaning towards Jaid's idea ATM. I've played more than a few hackers so I'm a bit (a lot) more familiar with them. I actually have a combat hacker statted up for a previous campaign that I can modify without much trouble. Thanks for the suggestions though. |
|
|
May 22 2008, 08:18 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Grand Master of Run-Fu Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,840 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 178 |
No reason why you can't do both.
[ Spoiler ]
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 07:28 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.