![]() ![]() |
Dec 13 2003, 05:58 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
King of the Hobos ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,117 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 127 |
If you get someone that's really skilled with explosives, how concentrated a blast could you get using something like plastic explosives? I read in a newspaper about an assassination that used a remote control car-bomb that the police described as 'super professional'. It was placed under the car beaneath the drivers seat, and when activated basically mangled the guy and ripped the steering wheel off. The other passengers though escaped with only minor injuries. Is this kind of precision possible or were the newsies either mistaken or playing it up a bit for a better story? Thanks. :)
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 06:03 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Chrome to the Core ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
In terms of SR... If the Barrier Rating is high enough to protect the other people, it could happen. Just put the right strength of material in strategic points and the explosion will have nowhere else to go.
At least, that's how I read it. I'm not Explosives Expert, but that's about as close as I can see it. |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 07:47 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Perilously close to the Sioux Nation. Member No.: 5,818 |
Shaped charges work by focusing the blast by using the shape of the explosive and some fairly complex planning.
The effect is the opposite of the shape of the explosive. Most anti-tank rounds are basically inverted cones. When they hit the tank, the force of the expolsion blasts a cone into the tank, injecting super hot metal. The same thing would work for yoru car bomb- the charge was shaped in an inverse of the area the man was sitting on, so that the explosion was directed towards him and no one else. Any injuries were a reult of the secondary effects of the blast (fragmentation and whatnot). |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 12:42 PM
Post
#4
|
|||
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Slight exaggeration, but yeah, that's the principle. Like tanka said, you can get that effect by using Barriers. There really isn't any other canon way. Put heavy enough Barriers around the explosive so that it can escape in only one direction. As for is that kind of accuracy possible... I suppose. After all, if the explosive was directly under the guy's seat, you wouldn't need a very large charge to make sure he's killed. Everyone else is protected by the target and the benches and is about a meter or more away. I can't see the point, though. Just put 10kg of C-4 under the seat, and you won't be left guessing. :) |
||
|
|
|||
Dec 13 2003, 01:11 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 262 Joined: 26-February 02 From: A wreched hive of scum and villany. Member No.: 1,479 |
moosegod is right The shape of the charge does matter, i read an article on it once, about how not only the shape of the explosive matters but where the detonator is placed is also key. Watch a movie called "Blown Away" if you have a thing for explosives, some cool stuff. |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 01:23 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 108 Joined: 15-September 03 From: Worcester, MA Member No.: 5,621 |
To put it simply, demolitions and the use of shaped charges is definately a fine art, and a very precise science at the same time. It's entirely possible to use a shaped charge to do something like that.
A short and simple explanation: The "shaping" of a charge is merely placing a cavity within the explosive to cause a balancing of forces to achieve a desired effect. Many armor piercing charges use a cone-shaped cavity lined with metal. When it explodes, the force of the explosion will squeeze the metal into a semi-liquid stream to do the penetration for you. The same effect can be achieved, though not as powerfully, without using a projectile. The other part of shaping is called "tamping". Using materials around the explosive to channel force. The explosive force will tend to follow the path of least resistance. Water is one of the best tamping agents, due to it's incompressability, but earth is very good too. Just as a reference, fill a coffee can with C4, and remove enough to form a geometric right cone with a top angle of 45 degrees, and a base the same as a coffee can. With the proper standoff distance (distance of the explosive from the target), this can easily penetrate more than a foot of solid steel, with little damage to surroundings. |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 01:23 PM
Post
#7
|
|||
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
That is correct as well. The explosive charge will start exploding straight away from the detonator, and most of the force goes parallel to the direction the explosion is traveling. In most cases, the angle of the detonator is important as well (because even within the detonator, there is already a travel direction of the explosion forming). Unless I am horrible mistaken, in the case of a directed charge, you'll want to insert the detonator directly behind the explosive (or directly above the apex of the inverted cone), parallel to the direction you'll want the explosion to go to. Just because I know someone would say it soon enough: In HEAT warheads and some other applications, like Blade (a strip of explosive meant for cutting large holes through heavy metal plates), there is an inverted cone of copper in front of the inverted explosive cone, and the explosion turns it around into an "arrowhead" of molten copper and slams that into the target, hence the armor piercing effects. That's not really applicaple for what we're discussing here, though, unless you wish to assassinate a dragon or a full-body cyber-replacement guy who never leaves home without heavy rigid body armor. [Edit]Cykotek got there first. :)[/Edit] |
||
|
|
|||
Dec 13 2003, 03:42 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
I guess it's worth saying explicitly and clearly (before arm chair generals begin sharing too much wisdom about HEAT munitions and the Monroe effect)...
"Shaped Charges" and "HEAT" are often used synonomously (sp?) but HEAT munitions are just specialized sub-type of shaped charges. Shaped explosives covers a wide range of explosive applications. Some resemble HEAT (like the linear shaped charge), but others involve any re-direction of explosive effects. For example, the famous claymore mine, or getting a bomb in a car to wipe out the driver but no one else. "Blown Away," if that's the Stallone movie I'm thinking of, is an excellent demonstration of shaped charges. I like the one with the coffee cup and saucer. Unfortunately, I'm not sure how to pull this off with canon rules. What I would suggest attempting is an application of barrier rating rules: wrap an explosive in a high barrier material, leaving one or more sides open. While the explosives are wasted against the barrier in most directions, the explosion is free to travel and have normal effects in the open directions. I'd recommend some kind of ballistic plastic as the barrier - it will make poor shrapnel but a good barrier. Doubly unfortunately, you'd have to do some number crunching to determine the effect of reflected blasts bouncing of the container. That'll jack up the power of the blast inside the container and might require a very high barrier. (Or do you have to calculate that power increase for determining the chance of breaching a barrier?) |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 03:46 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,065 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Fayetteville, NC Member No.: 3,916 |
"Blown Away" has Tommy Lee Jones as the IRA terrorist out for revenge.
It took the whole "watching the fuse burn and detonate" schtick way, way too far. -Siege |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 04:43 PM
Post
#10
|
|||
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Yup. Sorry about being ambigous above. |
||
|
|
|||
Dec 13 2003, 05:19 PM
Post
#11
|
|||
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
Ah, I'm thinking of the Specialist, also starring Sharon Stone. And Austere, I wasn't talking about you, I was just hoping to prevent this thread from going OT onto "All About HEAT Warheads." It hadn't happened, it just looked like it might. So, rules question: When determining whether or not an explosive breaches a barrier, do you add up the reflected blast damage before determining the power of the attack? |
||
|
|
|||
Dec 13 2003, 05:29 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Chrome to the Core ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
If you leave an opening, I don't believe there's any reflected power accumulated. It all just gets directed one way.
Now, if you wanted to make it extra spicey, make it a full surrounding Barrier, but have one side weaker than the rest. It reflects for a while until it overcomes the weak barrier side, correct? Directional Chunky Salsa, anyone? |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 06:33 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 334 Joined: 17-November 03 From: Texas Member No.: 5,828 |
The Plastic Warriors supplemental has some rules for shaped charges. I'll try to dig up a link for you, we've used that supplemental a lot in my playing group.
Edit: Here we go, Plastic Warriors Downloads You want the "Running Gear" link on the left side, it's about 100 pages of .pdf. Shaped charges are on p. 27. |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 06:44 PM
Post
#14
|
|||
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Ruleswise, I'm sure it would rebound at least once even if the one side is completely open. It'll bounce of the wall opposite to the open. As for breaking the Barrier... Personally, I think I'd use something like half the Power of the first reflected shock wave, to represent that most of the pressure will just escape out through the open area. Stricly abiding the Blast Against Barriers rule, you'd end up having a pretty large Power against the side walls, as the explosion would just keep bouncing back and forth. So, for 2kg of C12 in a 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 meter heavy metal box with one side open (Barrier 12), using a few house rules (half-reflected vs Barriers, -3/m blast): 16D -3/m. Reflected distance for breaching the box walls: 0.5m = -1.5 Power. Total Power for breaching the box walls: 16 + (16 - 0.5 x 3)/2 = 23 Area of effect outside the box: 90 - 135 (or more, depending on a lot of things) degree cone extending from the center of the box Power of the explosion in the AoE: 16 + (16 - 0.5 x 3) = 30 30D -3/m in a 90+ degree cone. The metal box walls will be damaged (-1 Barrier Rating) but they'll hold. Don't try using the same box repeatedly, though... Strictly by the rules, the situation won't be that bad, since the reflection distance is 0.5 meters and the Blast is -12/m. Power against the box walls: 16 + (16 - 0.5 x 12) + (16 - 1 x 12) = 30 Ie don't try it without a Barrier Rating 16 box. The damage in the AoE is: 16 + (16 - 0.5 x 12) = 26D, -12/m However, the same thing with a 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 box would result in whacky numbers: Power against the box walls: 16 + 13 + 10 + 7 + 4 + 1 = 51, so anything less than a Barrier Rating 25 box will blow into bits.
That won't work too well, since the Power of the explosion will be reduced by the Barrier Rating. Lessee now... 0.25 x 0.25 x 0.25 box. Assuming C12 is as heavy as water (not likely, but let's go with that for the time being), you can fit 15.625kg of it into the box. That's 47D -12/m. The highest Power that can accumulate by bouncing back and forth is... 47 + 44 + 41 + 38 ... + 2 = 392. So we want a box with a Barrier Rating of 196 on 5 sides, 195 on one. The blast won't penetrate the 195 before the final rebound. 392 - 195 = 197D. So we'd have a 197D, -12/m explosion starting from the open edge of the box (not very directed, though, since the explosion would blow outwards from the whole width of the box's outer edge), for the paltry cost of 3,125 nuyen (6,250 on the streets). Plus of course the cost of getting a Barrier Rating 196/195 box... For reference, you'd need 269.5kg of C12 to do 197D without any reflection. This post has been edited by Austere Emancipator: Dec 13 2003, 06:57 PM |
||
|
|
|||
Dec 13 2003, 06:53 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 142 Joined: 27-May 02 Member No.: 2,776 |
no expert here, but I am pretty sure reactive armor (for tanks) works the same way as well - little inverted cones (or whatever hollow shape works best, i guess) on an inner layer of armor pop off at the place where the outer layer armor is hit and push back against the impact force and help keep the nasties out
-3Threes |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 06:57 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Manus Celer Dei ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,013 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
A box of heavy structural material?
~J |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 06:58 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
20cm/8" of hardened armor-grade steel should do the trick.
Don't ask me how the hell you'd manage a Barrier Rating of 196, though. Maybe a few dozen meters of hardened armor... |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 07:41 PM
Post
#18
|
|||
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 637 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,528 |
A bit more complicated. Explosive reactive armor (ERA) is a thin layer of explosives between two plates of metal. This box is fixed on the outer hull of a tank (don't use this on a car!). If the molten metal jet from a HEAT-charge strikes the outer plate the charge explodes and throws the plate "into" the jet, disrupting it and thereby reducing effectiveness. The system is quite worklable but disliked by infantry supporting the tanks since the shrappnel produced by the stuff is dangerous. ERA can be used on all faces of a tank, see the latest T80UM models with the heavy Kontakt-5 ERA even on the turret roof (the weakest part of the tank). The plates use a directional charge that is the explosive wave is diverted outward both by thickness of plates (The inner is thicker) and shape (IIRC the inner plate is slightly curved similar to a claymore mine) Smart armor (i.e Sowjet ARENA) is basically a "jumping ERA/ short range claymore" that detects incoming missiles and throws an ERA / shrappnel into their way, detonating them prematurely. Even more liked by the infantry ;-) Final note: Claymores have a danger area behind the weapon as well! Michael |
||
|
|
|||
Dec 13 2003, 11:14 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 262 Joined: 26-February 02 From: A wreched hive of scum and villany. Member No.: 1,479 |
remember one thing here guys, a car seat isnt exactly reinforced concrete or hardened steel, its some springs, some foam and maybe some leather.
if the cutting charge was angled slightly forward and slightly towards the drivers door, it would detonate, the primary blast would rip upwards tearing him a new asshole, the secondary blast would go outwards but meet the steel rails and support structure built into the chair, some power wuld be lost throught the lining but the majority would bounce back and go ou the now easiest path, where the springs, seat and driver used to be. of course all passengers would be very deaf and very unhappy. |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2003, 11:57 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 108 Joined: 15-September 03 From: Worcester, MA Member No.: 5,621 |
Another instance of the use of this sort of metallic penetrator explosives was used to assassinate someone in a passing car (i don't remember the exact circumstances). A satchel was filled with explosives and hung over the handlebars of a bicycle. A copper plate was affixed inside the satchel. The bike was chained to a street sign at a street corner, the plate facing the street. When the target's car passed the bike, the explosive was detonated. The projectile killed both men in the back seat of the car, blowing the remains out the opposite door. The men in the front seat were fine.
As for how to deal with it in-game, one of my players has years of experience IRL as a demolitions specialist in the Army Corps of Engineers. My system is to ask him what it would take him to achieve the desired result. I place that on one end of the scale, take what the SR rules say and put it on the other. ~4-5 successes gets what the expert says, 1 gets what the book says, and I fudge anything that falls between the two. I usually set the TN to between 4 and 6, modified for environment and such. I'm going to see if I can get the player in question to make a post with some suggestions for how to deal with it. As a side note, some good info on shaped charges, and some more here. And before I forget about it, another common use of shaping charges is used by police and government SWAT teams. It's a v-shaped channel on a frame, easily portable, about the size of a window or door. Hold it against the portal in question, push the button, and a nice knife-shaped shockwave cuts a hole into wherever you want to go. It's a one-shot deal, but good for dealing with boarded windows and such. |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 12:02 AM
Post
#21
|
|||||||
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Perhaps not a very good phrase, since the explosive charge in question hardly did any cutting in this case. Probably an unconscious mix-up of words, but though I might point it out.
Since we're probably talking about a very small explosive charge here, the energy loss in smashing the furnishings and the bench is likely to be very significant. You can "mangle" a human being quite easily with an extremely small explosive charge when it goes off directly beneath someone and is directed up. Also, the mangled body itself absorbs a large part of the energy of the charge. Being momentarily deaf, bleeding for several places, having bruises all over and perhaps even a few fractures is usually considered "minor injuries" in media terminology, which also explains quite a lot. Anyways, looking at the situation from a SR canon point of view, the explosive charge could've been 0.5kg of C-12 and the target would've been thoroughly screwed even without any reflection (8D which goes up to 8D+1 even without Demolition skill, which won't be easy to soak for Joe Average). Assuming a heavy plate beneath the charge, that'd be 16D (16D+2) for the guy in the drivers seat. In any case, no one else in the car would take any damage whatsoever from the explosion (8D, -12/m, and then there's the furnishings and the body).
Called "kylkimiina" ("flank mine") in the Finnish Defense Forces. I'm sure there are similar mines in many/most armies in the world. Tied to a tree on the side of a road, it ought to penetrate 15cm/6" of hardened steel armor at 15 meters, 8cm/3" at 50 meters. Stuff that your group's Army Engineer level 2 (or 3) contact ought to be able to get for you easily. (What, you're saying your group doesn't have a level 2 Army Engineer contact? Pfft. :D) This post has been edited by Austere Emancipator: Dec 14 2003, 12:15 AM |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Dec 14 2003, 01:44 AM
Post
#22
|
|||
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 51 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Reinbek, Germany Member No.: 72 |
The description of the bomb sounds very familiar from the assassination of Alfred Herrhausen (former CEO of the Deutsche Bank) by the RAF (a german anarchist terrorist group), but the effect was quite different back then: The car was heavily armored and so the bomb was constructed fro quite a serious blast, it actually ripped the whole car into very tiny pieces. The problem with penetrators is, that if the armor they have to get through is strong enough, the process of penetrating the armor will put enough energy into it to have it literally explode into a nasty cloud of shrapnels on the inside, turning everything inside into chunky salsa... |
||
|
|
|||
Dec 15 2003, 04:09 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775 |
Actually, it's not chunky salsa. It's referred to as the pinball effect, or something similar (I may be forgetting the actual name, at the moment). In simplest terms, anything in the car that is not nailed down (as well as a fair amount of whatever was) gets turned into shrapnel and bounces all over the place, effectively punching tons of holes through everything and everyone possible. The AT4 works like this, if I recall correctly.
|
|
|
|
Dec 15 2003, 04:38 AM
Post
#24
|
|||
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 8-November 03 Member No.: 5,803 |
It's called "Chunky Salsa" in SR3. Personally, I think it's far more descriptive than "the pinball effect". |
||
|
|
|||
Dec 15 2003, 05:30 AM
Post
#25
|
|||
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,685 Joined: 17-August 02 Member No.: 3,123 |
I looked up the density of C-4 once and found the number 1.63 g/cm^3. Since people pretty much consider C-4 and C-[everything else] to have roughly the same physical properties, I think it's safe to assume that you could fit that and more into your box. :) |
||
|
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th November 2025 - 08:42 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.