IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Armor and Encumberance, A question about helmets
Emperor Tippy
post May 24 2008, 02:45 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 418
Joined: 20-September 07
Member No.: 13,346



1. Is the helmet factored in when calculating encumbrance?

If so does that mean that only a person with a body of 6 could wear Full Body Armor without being encumbered?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ranger
post May 24 2008, 03:02 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 256
Joined: 11-March 08
Member No.: 15,759



QUOTE (Emperor Tippy @ May 23 2008, 06:45 PM) *
1. Is the helmet factored in when calculating encumbrance?

If so does that mean that only a person with a body of 6 could wear Full Body Armor without being encumbered?


Yes to both questions.

"If a character is wearing multiple armor items, add their ratings together before comparing to Body" (SR4, 149).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Emperor Tippy
post May 24 2008, 03:16 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 418
Joined: 20-September 07
Member No.: 13,346



So another rule that makes no sense. I'm really tempted to change encumbrance to Body*3. Or just go with the first piece of armor isn't counted for encumbrance rule.

I mean when wearing regular security armor with a helmet requires you to be in Olympic level shape you have a problem. And you can't even get any ware to augment your body.

It's kinda sad that your better off with a Full Body suit of Form Fitting armor plus an Urban Explorer Jumpsuit with Helmet. It provides the same armor as Full Body Armor + Helmet and costs less than a third the price.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ranger
post May 24 2008, 03:22 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 256
Joined: 11-March 08
Member No.: 15,759



Yes, for sure there are several whacked out things in the rules, this being one of them. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

If that bothers you but you still want to stick to the rules, you can try the rule tweaks suggested in Arsenal:

• Ignore armor encumbrance entirely if a character is simply wearing a single armor item (even if that’s a full body armor suit). Only apply encumbrance when a character is stacking armor or using a
lot of armor accessories (helmet, shield, forearm guards, etc.).

• Allow characters to buy customized armor that is specially-tailored for their specific bodies (much like how military-grade armor is fit to each person). Custom-fit armor could either ignore encumbrance entirely, or increase the armor allowance to Body x 3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Emperor Tippy
post May 24 2008, 03:25 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 418
Joined: 20-September 07
Member No.: 13,346



QUOTE (Ranger @ May 23 2008, 11:22 PM) *
Yes, for sure there are several whacked out things in the rules, this being one of them. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

If that bothers you but you still want to stick to the rules, you can try the rule tweaks suggested in Arsenal:

• Ignore armor encumbrance entirely if a character is simply wearing a single armor item (even if that’s a full body armor suit). Only apply encumbrance when a character is stacking armor or using a
lot of armor accessories (helmet, shield, forearm guards, etc.).

• Allow characters to buy customized armor that is specially-tailored for their specific bodies (much like how military-grade armor is fit to each person). Custom-fit armor could either ignore encumbrance entirely, or increase the armor allowance to Body x 3.


Yeah, I will most likely go with you can just ignore the armor with the lowest encumbrance and helmets are counted as part of their armor piece.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th May 2026 - 12:32 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.