 The Last Samurai, True Bushido |
  |
 Dec 14 2003, 01:31 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill.  Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,545 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gloomy Boise Idaho Member No.: 2,006  |
If anyone was ever interested in playing a true Samurai in shadowrun, I mean a real one. They should go see The Last Samurai. The whole movie is about Bushido and definetly worth watching. After you watch the battle scenes, ask yourself...
Now if that katana was Dikoted.... I know this seems off topic, but I run a Bushido web for Shadowrun so ha! :nyah: |
 |
 
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 01:47 AM
Post
#2
|
|||
|
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
...which is overdue for updating. :D |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dec 14 2003, 02:33 AM
Post
#3
|
|||||
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,512 Joined: 16-August 03 From: Northampton Member No.: 5,499 |
hear that, good for what it's got though! |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Dec 14 2003, 02:33 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 30-May 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 4,652 |
I do have to agree with you. That movie did an exceptional job at showing and explaining Bushido. It was also did a great job of telling the story of 19th century Japan in a historical fiction kind of way.
I have to say I sat through that movie and until this post didn't connect it to Shadowrun in any way whatsoever. Which is pretty rare for me to do. It was kind of refreshing now that I think about it. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 02:37 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Chrome to the Core Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
It's good to hear that some people who actually know Japanese history are giving it compliments that aren't "OMG COOL" or something akin to that. I was very worried that it would shred apart history and everything contained in it. Now I may just have to go see it.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 02:43 AM
Post
#6
|
|||
|
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
Most definitely. :) From all the reviews I've seen (haven't seen the movie yet, damnit! :(), they are saying that it's an excellent movie, and Tom Cruise's best role to date. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dec 14 2003, 02:59 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill. Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,545 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gloomy Boise Idaho Member No.: 2,006 |
Well I do have a full time job, a wife, and a three month old baby...
Having said that, Christmas break is coming and I get 2 weeks off. I have a couple of projects and one of them is updating Shadowrun Bushido. So look for that around Christmas time. I have another webpage I am starting called the Shadowrun Webpository, guess what that's about. Back on topic, I am by no means an expert in Japanese culture or the Samurai. But I am an enthusiast, I read what I can and I watch the history channel as much as I can. And in my mind, that movie was pretty accurate. As historically accurate as a movie can be anyways. This post has been edited by Shadow: Dec 14 2003, 03:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 03:00 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Chrome to the Core Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
Exactly what I meant. I was expecting it to be so far off base that I'd simply leave halfway through the film. Thus far, however, I've only gotten good reviews.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 03:05 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 186 Joined: 30-January 03 From: Redlands, CA Member No.: 3,996 |
The way "The Last Samurai" portered the samurai class was very accurate as far as I can tell. My grandmother is a native from Japan and her father was of the samurai class, so I have been asking her this and that about the samurai class. And from what shes told me and what the movie showed, it was pretty damn accurate IMO.
[Edit] For a Hollywood movie it was some what accurate, history is a bit off, but accurate in the context of the daily life of a samurai. [/Edit] |
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 03:06 AM
Post
#10
|
|||
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
Actually, the reviews that I have read point out its historical inaccuracy. And it gets bashed from both sides of the spectrum. One side says that it glorifies people who were essentially similar to the Taliban in their outlook, while the revisionist historians who romanticize the good ol' days of warlords, rigid social castes, random beheadings, and subservient women are still upset about the ethnically insulting "white guy saves the day" stuff. I know I'm not going to see it. I have nothing but contempt for so-called "historical" movies that give a simple-minded and romanticized view of actual events, and take the wrong side to boot. But then again, this movie was made by the people who brought us "Thirtysomething". |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dec 14 2003, 03:07 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Chrome to the Core Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
The one thing I'll be watching is how the samurai treated samurai under a different master. They weren't too kind when they met somebody that had a different Shogun, or even Daimyo than their own.
Ronin were another story entirely. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 03:07 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 124 Joined: 21-November 03 Member No.: 5,837 |
From what I know, not having seen it. I have heard there is a historically inaccurate part near the ending. This was confirmed by a history major who concentrates in japanese history... I don't know what yet, neither will tell me, since I haven't seen it.
Anyone know what they might be talking about? POF, I hear the rest is almost spot on accuracte. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 03:10 AM
Post
#13
|
|||||
|
Chrome to the Core Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
This is also coming from people who look for something just to bash it. The "white guy" learns something, just as the other guys do too (If I'm understanding the plot correctly). Also; women are being portrayed as subservient back then because they were subservient back then. Anyway; I'll see it a.s.a.p. and probably write something about it somewhere. Nobody spoil it or I'll be forced to feed you to my rabid parrot. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Dec 14 2003, 03:13 AM
Post
#14
|
|||
|
Immoral Elf Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 |
There's a white guy in it. Oh yeah, and some Samurai. All that, and it's set in Japan. :D |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dec 14 2003, 03:15 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Chrome to the Core Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
That's it!
*grabs Fortune and grinds him into a fine paste, then pours Fortune-paste over his parrot's dinner* Told you. :evil: |
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 05:06 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,213 Joined: 10-March 02 From: Back from the abyss. Member No.: 2,316 |
I don't go the movies, I'll see it when it comes out on DVD. I'll see it just for the story and the action. If I want to see accurate history I'll pick up a book (like all history in books are accurate :) ). It is nice that it is accurate, but I am not going for a history lesson. Why are people so hooked on accuracy? I mean I don't want to see something completely outrageously wrong or just plain wrong, like I said I am not going for a history lesson, I have a few books on Japanesse history and Samuria for that.
|
|
|
|
 Dec 14 2003, 01:40 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 112 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Württemberg, AGS Member No.: 2,068 |
Since I study Japanese Sciences, and already had a seminar about Japanese history, I'm not so enthusiastic about the historical accuracy of this movie. But I'll go see it anyway as soon as it starts showing over here in Europe, and if it's just to make fun of it. ;)
The biggest mistake certainly is displaying the "White Guy" as "The Last Samurai", which definitely is bulldrek. There are a lots of false myths about Japan and especially Samurai, so I'm afraid this movie might even spread this misconceptions further. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 05:52 PM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 488 Joined: 4-August 03 From: Amidst the ruins of Silicon Valley. Member No.: 5,242 |
That wasn't at all the impression I took away from the movie. I took it more as the "last samurai" mentioned in the title to be a plural -- that is, that with the rebellion and the following cultural shift died the significant portion of Japanese society that adhered to that outlook.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 06:07 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Chrome to the Core Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,152 Joined: 14-October 03 From: ::1 Member No.: 5,715 |
Indeed. After all, the plural of Samurai is Samurai, not Samurais. That would be a huge inconsistency in the language, as every word ends in a vowel.
1 Samurai, 2 Samurai 1 Ninja, 2 Ninja So on and so forth. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 08:26 PM
Post
#20
|
|||
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
I know Hollywood couldn't string together an accurate docudrama to save its collective life, so I go to "historical" movies knowing full well that I'll be getting a romanticized, hyped-up of view of events. Therefore, I try not to get caught in the stuffy artsy critic attitude that pans modern Hollywood "historical" movies. I don't go to the movies to watch documentaries, I go for a thrill, and the Last Samurai delivers. But, gee, if I want reality, I'll watch the History channel (and I do just that - much more informative but dry than the Last Samurai). Last Samurai was a very fun movie. I've picked up a dash of 1800s Japanese history thanks to recent programs on the History channel and, y'know, I don't care about inaccuracies in the Last Samurai. (I didn't care about the bad history in Gladiator, either, and I look forward to Troy.) What mattered is that there was action, big unit combat, and more - character development, good acting, interesting plot, etc. It gave a good, Hollywood lowest-common-denominator description of Bushido and Tom Cruise and whatshisname the Head Samurai played their parts well. Funny thing is, I think bushido's goofy. I much prefer the modern military pragmatism of the Imperial troops to the Bushido of the rebel samurai, but I went with the flow and rooted for the underdog in the film, the samurai. Definitely a fun movie. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dec 14 2003, 08:44 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,213 Joined: 10-March 02 From: Back from the abyss. Member No.: 2,316 |
Is it about the 47 ronin rebeling the newly re-established imperial family? Just curious it is starting to sound like it.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2003, 09:06 PM
Post
#22
|
|||
|
Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill. Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,545 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Gloomy Boise Idaho Member No.: 2,006 |
That isn't it at all, go watch it, I think you will be pleasently suprised. Frago- It isn't a remake of 47 Samurai . |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Dec 15 2003, 01:28 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Canon Companion Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 |
Isn't the plural of samurai samurii?
And the plural of ninja ninji? |
|
|
|
|
Dec 15 2003, 01:31 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 123 Joined: 23-November 03 From: Chicago (post bug/pre nuke) Member No.: 5,839 |
just to clear it up , the white guy isnt the last samurai , but the white guy helps the last samurai in his rebellion. over all i thought it was ok historically, romanticized yes, but good for a movie. i expected it to be horrible based soley on the lack of real knowledge about samurai most people have. i figured they would dumb it down, it wasn't bad.
as far as going to the history channel for "real" history, for a channel that shows 75% WW2 history its not half bad. but going to it for a 60 min special on the samurai wont give you a whole lot of information. the samurai sword demos were interesting i suppose, aside from that it was annoying to hear the military historian call the samurai the bad guys for standing against the modernization of the country... the truth is they just wanted it to slow down, not stop altogether. although i will say this, the ending is all hollywood goo for about 15 mins, still a good movie :spin: |
|
|
|
|
Dec 15 2003, 03:04 AM
Post
#25
|
|||
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 227 Joined: 18-August 03 Member No.: 5,513 |
Well, the truth is always a point of contention. :P Let me get this straight, Tom Cruise's character decides to help the last of Japan's old priviledged feudal class resist the encroachment/reforms of Japan's new priviledged capitalist class because the former was in some way better than the latter? I'm sure the samurai would have allowed moderniztion to go forward had the perceived benefits been accorded to them rather than the upstarts leading the Meiji Restoration (whom incidentally were themselves Samurai, just not from any of the real major clans). They actually set the bulk of the movie about a year after a major/real samurai uprising in Satsuma BTW. [ Spoiler ] It did explain Bushido and the idealized motivations of the samurai quite well though and it was a great production in terms of cinematography. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd January 2025 - 03:25 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.