IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Which version do you play?
Versioning
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 145
Guests cannot vote 
3278
post Jun 18 2008, 05:08 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 983
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 326



Everyone has their own favorite version of Shadowrun, or at least a place along the "progression" from one version to another where they came to rest. For my group, it was SR3. [Specifically, I stopped purchasing products and following the metaplot after Renraku Arcology: Shutdown, I believe.] This thread is much less about the reasons people chose to stay with a given version, than it is about my curiosity as to which version people still play, but since I can't stop you, please, feel free to share your reasoning, as well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Faelan
post Jun 18 2008, 05:12 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 584
Joined: 15-April 06
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 8,466



SR4. It is the first time I have run multiple campaigns in SR with brief interludes, vis a game or two followed by reading the books. In other words I used to like the crunch and dislike the system. Now I still enjoy the fluff, but the mechanics have become more consistent, simpler to use, quicker to implement, and above all easier for me to teach to new players. Of course I house rule some things like hard caps being a little higher, mostly so there is real room for improvement and a real difference between characters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post Jun 18 2008, 05:13 PM
Post #3


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



3278 on dumpshock? Well that's a turn up for the books. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3278
post Jun 18 2008, 05:19 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 983
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 326



QUOTE (FlakJacket @ Jun 18 2008, 06:13 PM) *
3278 on dumpshock? Well that's a turn up for the books. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I actually tried first to log in as abortion_engine. Apparently, that got deprecated before 2002. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paws2sky
post Jun 18 2008, 05:43 PM
Post #5


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,162
Joined: 16-November 07
Member No.: 14,229



SR1 hooked me on the game. I don't think I could go back to that system, but it holds a special place in the memories of my "good ol' days."

I greatly enjoyed SR2. Given the chance to play it, I would do so as quickly as I could clear my schedule. I don't know anyone who'd GM it though, so that'll probably never happen.

I recently ran a short SR3 game (about 6 sessions), the only time I've played or GM'd it. Unless someone I knew was really intent on GMing and want me, specifically, for the game, I'd definitely give it a pass.

I'm just starting up an SR4 game and so far, I'm happy with the system. I'm planning to run SRM Denver for the next year or so, barring anything strange happening.

-paws
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Jun 18 2008, 05:47 PM
Post #6


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



SR4, just starting in, and it seems to be the best that I've seen so far. I like that the Matrix Rules are very streamlined so that it isn't a separate game altogether and doesn't alienate the rest of the group.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Jun 18 2008, 05:52 PM
Post #7


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



thirded
i will stay with 3rd ed for as long as possible . . if i get to play AT ALL . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wesley Street
post Jun 18 2008, 05:55 PM
Post #8


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,851
Joined: 15-February 08
From: Indianapolis
Member No.: 15,686



SR4. I come from a D20 D&D background so it's easy to play and it's easy to teach. Combat in v.1-v.3 was a monster and I never got a solid grasp on it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner667
post Jun 18 2008, 07:58 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 946
Joined: 16-September 05
From: London
Member No.: 7,753



My SR is a mishmash..

I played a bit with SR1 when it came out [which zonked me with the possibilities], right about the time I was writing up my own Near Future sci-fi/fantasy system...
...Then moved onto SR2 - and added elements of CoC, CP2020, Kromosome, TORG, 2300, Cthulhupunk, Castle Falkenstein - and that was where most of my fun was had...
...Then I noticed Aeon Trinity, and the rules were so good I just swapped over to those [those are basically the same rules that SR4 now uses, but this was in '97].

The setting has moved on, but has much more of the SR2 ["Classic Cyberpunk"] feel than SR3 or SR4...
...But it's not any SR you'll get from the SR Devs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post Jun 18 2008, 11:38 PM
Post #10


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



QUOTE (3278 @ Jun 18 2008, 06:19 PM) *
I actually tried first to log in as abortion_engine. Apparently, that got deprecated before 2002. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Christ that brings back some memories. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

As for the original question I'm a Third Edition man myself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kanislatrans
post Jun 19 2008, 01:43 AM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 602
Joined: 2-December 07
From: The corner of Detonation Boulevard and Fascination Street
Member No.: 14,464



I've played tons of 1st ed. some 2nd ed, hardly any third, and have played and am Gm in 4th ed.

I really love SR4. As a gm, its easy to keep track of things and focus on the story and the characters.

I get a little nostalgic when thinking of SR1. We had some great times playing that one. (sigh) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zaranthan
post Jun 19 2008, 01:58 AM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 503
Joined: 3-May 08
Member No.: 15,949



SR4. I was always fascinated by the setting and story of Shadowrun, but the mechanics were simply impenetrable to me. I read through the SR4 BBB once, and the entire system just clicked.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Jun 19 2008, 02:06 AM
Post #13


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



4. The other editions (of which I've only played 2nd and read 3rd) are mechanically sucktastic by comparison, except for the matrix which is just universally sucktastic and poorly conceived. A trait it shares with CP2020.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DingoJones
post Jun 19 2008, 02:14 AM
Post #14


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 28-March 08
Member No.: 15,824



I play 4th, it is the superiour version.
All the world info and feel of the game is fairly consistant throughout and is subjective anyway, so I'm only considering the rules aspect of the game and 4th has many VAST improvements over all other previous editions. It's easy to learn, easy to play, easy to gm, more consistant, more easily adapted to group style and much more cohesive. It still suffers from terminalogy issues, different terms are used for extremly similar rules (from matris to vehiacle and meat body) which can sometimes be confusing but becuase the system is so well designed in 4th those things are easy to ignore.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
IQ Zero
post Jun 19 2008, 05:23 AM
Post #15


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 78
Joined: 14-April 08
From: La Islas de Banana
Member No.: 15,887



We played a lot of games with 1st Ed, 2nd Ed, and 3rd Ed. My group has just recently begun 4th Ed. They are all fun to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zhan Shi
post Jun 19 2008, 06:29 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 609
Joined: 13-August 07
Member No.: 12,615



I began in 2nd, and was hooked. But now I only do 4th. I got rid of all my old product to make room on my bookshelves for old AD&D stuff. Kudos to the devs, whomever they were in those days. Outside of authors like Lovecraft, Tierney, et al, I've never seen such an intricate and convincing psuedo world populated with such interesting characters. The shadow chatter was also quite good, almost like a mini novel inside the sourcebooks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fuchs
post Jun 19 2008, 07:06 AM
Post #17


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,328
Joined: 28-November 05
From: Zuerich
Member No.: 8,014



I started with SR1, switched to SR2 and SR3 when they came out, delayed switching to SR4 for 2 years. Now playing with 4E rules, but stopped following the metaplot somewhere in the 50s/60s, with the exception of some stuff that was picked or retconned in (like the wireless matrix).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ornot
post Jun 19 2008, 12:17 PM
Post #18


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,266
Joined: 3-June 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,638



I first played SR2, but the gaming group split up, so never got past the first half dozen sessions.

About 3 years ago I moved in with one of my old gaming group, and we began playing SR3 for a year or so. When I moved out I had to buy my own books (now thoroughly hooked on the background), rather than pinching my old flat mate's books. SR4 had just come out, so I naturally picked it up, and now I'm running a game and have dragged 2 or 3 new players into the SR fold.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post Jun 19 2008, 01:09 PM
Post #19


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



I prefer SR3 because of the dice system (and it refined away most of the really messy parts of 1 and 2). The SR4 dice system is too close to a cleanly predictable success rate for my taste.

This does make me wonder if I'd enjoy a system where dice count, dice sizes, TNs, and threshold are all variable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jrayjoker
post Jun 19 2008, 01:17 PM
Post #20


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,453
Joined: 17-September 04
From: St. Paul
Member No.: 6,675



I love the world, love/hate 3rd and 4th eds. Both are good for some things and hard to use for others. i am playing 4th, but 3rd holds a special place in my heart. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/love.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deek
post Jun 19 2008, 03:12 PM
Post #21


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 30-June 06
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Member No.: 8,814



SR4 here. I played SR1 a ton, although we never liked the magic system, so we never used it. A friends got SR2, but my group of friends were playing DnD more, so never gave it a spin. I kinda lost any SR roots after high school and college and really just got back into it a couple years ago. At that time we had SR4, so I ran a campaign for close to 2 years.

Now that DnD4 is out, the group is shifting back to that. In my two favorite RPGs, I must say, I never played much of either's third edition...interesting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darkeus
post Jun 19 2008, 04:58 PM
Post #22


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 210
Joined: 15-May 06
Member No.: 8,562



Started with 2nd edition, which is the version I really cut my Shadowrun teeth with. Still have all my books from 2nd ed.. Got into a little 3rd edition but not as much.. I like 4th edition.. I think it cleans things up quite a bit and streamlines things that were very difficult to play in older versions.. Shadowrun is still one of the best settings out there and that is really what keeps me coming back.. I would love to play SR4 right now but that doesn't look like it is gonna happen unless it is play by post.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Velocity219e
post Jun 19 2008, 07:00 PM
Post #23


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 75
Joined: 20-April 02
Member No.: 2,622



Still reluctant to play SR4 seriously as we have a really workable houseruled sr3 system going even tho I keep buying the books like a good little consumer (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Jun 19 2008, 07:11 PM
Post #24


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



My favorite version is SR3. However my group's favorite is SR4, and thus I play SR4.
I do not mean this to bash SR4. I like SR4 very much. Personally, I like SR3 slightly more, but I like things that are very complicated.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Jun 19 2008, 07:28 PM
Post #25


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Joined: 19-June 08
From: St. Louie
Member No.: 16,065



I play sr4 but I have most of the core books for sr1 and was playing it up into last year or so.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th January 2025 - 03:37 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.