Which version do you play? |
Which version do you play? |
Jun 18 2008, 05:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 983 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 326 |
Everyone has their own favorite version of Shadowrun, or at least a place along the "progression" from one version to another where they came to rest. For my group, it was SR3. [Specifically, I stopped purchasing products and following the metaplot after Renraku Arcology: Shutdown, I believe.] This thread is much less about the reasons people chose to stay with a given version, than it is about my curiosity as to which version people still play, but since I can't stop you, please, feel free to share your reasoning, as well.
|
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 05:12 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 584 Joined: 15-April 06 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 8,466 |
SR4. It is the first time I have run multiple campaigns in SR with brief interludes, vis a game or two followed by reading the books. In other words I used to like the crunch and dislike the system. Now I still enjoy the fluff, but the mechanics have become more consistent, simpler to use, quicker to implement, and above all easier for me to teach to new players. Of course I house rule some things like hard caps being a little higher, mostly so there is real room for improvement and a real difference between characters.
|
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 05:13 PM
Post
#3
|
|
King of the Hobos Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,117 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 127 |
3278 on dumpshock? Well that's a turn up for the books. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 05:19 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 983 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 326 |
3278 on dumpshock? Well that's a turn up for the books. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I actually tried first to log in as abortion_engine. Apparently, that got deprecated before 2002. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 05:43 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,162 Joined: 16-November 07 Member No.: 14,229 |
SR1 hooked me on the game. I don't think I could go back to that system, but it holds a special place in the memories of my "good ol' days."
I greatly enjoyed SR2. Given the chance to play it, I would do so as quickly as I could clear my schedule. I don't know anyone who'd GM it though, so that'll probably never happen. I recently ran a short SR3 game (about 6 sessions), the only time I've played or GM'd it. Unless someone I knew was really intent on GMing and want me, specifically, for the game, I'd definitely give it a pass. I'm just starting up an SR4 game and so far, I'm happy with the system. I'm planning to run SRM Denver for the next year or so, barring anything strange happening. -paws |
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 05:47 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
SR4, just starting in, and it seems to be the best that I've seen so far. I like that the Matrix Rules are very streamlined so that it isn't a separate game altogether and doesn't alienate the rest of the group.
|
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 05:52 PM
Post
#7
|
|
The ShadowComedian Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
thirded
i will stay with 3rd ed for as long as possible . . if i get to play AT ALL . . |
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 05:55 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,851 Joined: 15-February 08 From: Indianapolis Member No.: 15,686 |
SR4. I come from a D20 D&D background so it's easy to play and it's easy to teach. Combat in v.1-v.3 was a monster and I never got a solid grasp on it.
|
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 07:58 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 946 Joined: 16-September 05 From: London Member No.: 7,753 |
My SR is a mishmash..
I played a bit with SR1 when it came out [which zonked me with the possibilities], right about the time I was writing up my own Near Future sci-fi/fantasy system... ...Then moved onto SR2 - and added elements of CoC, CP2020, Kromosome, TORG, 2300, Cthulhupunk, Castle Falkenstein - and that was where most of my fun was had... ...Then I noticed Aeon Trinity, and the rules were so good I just swapped over to those [those are basically the same rules that SR4 now uses, but this was in '97]. The setting has moved on, but has much more of the SR2 ["Classic Cyberpunk"] feel than SR3 or SR4... ...But it's not any SR you'll get from the SR Devs. |
|
|
Jun 18 2008, 11:38 PM
Post
#10
|
|
King of the Hobos Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,117 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 127 |
I actually tried first to log in as abortion_engine. Apparently, that got deprecated before 2002. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Christ that brings back some memories. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) As for the original question I'm a Third Edition man myself. |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 01:43 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 602 Joined: 2-December 07 From: The corner of Detonation Boulevard and Fascination Street Member No.: 14,464 |
I've played tons of 1st ed. some 2nd ed, hardly any third, and have played and am Gm in 4th ed.
I really love SR4. As a gm, its easy to keep track of things and focus on the story and the characters. I get a little nostalgic when thinking of SR1. We had some great times playing that one. (sigh) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 01:58 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 503 Joined: 3-May 08 Member No.: 15,949 |
SR4. I was always fascinated by the setting and story of Shadowrun, but the mechanics were simply impenetrable to me. I read through the SR4 BBB once, and the entire system just clicked.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 02:06 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 |
4. The other editions (of which I've only played 2nd and read 3rd) are mechanically sucktastic by comparison, except for the matrix which is just universally sucktastic and poorly conceived. A trait it shares with CP2020.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 02:14 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 28-March 08 Member No.: 15,824 |
I play 4th, it is the superiour version.
All the world info and feel of the game is fairly consistant throughout and is subjective anyway, so I'm only considering the rules aspect of the game and 4th has many VAST improvements over all other previous editions. It's easy to learn, easy to play, easy to gm, more consistant, more easily adapted to group style and much more cohesive. It still suffers from terminalogy issues, different terms are used for extremly similar rules (from matris to vehiacle and meat body) which can sometimes be confusing but becuase the system is so well designed in 4th those things are easy to ignore. |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 05:23 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 78 Joined: 14-April 08 From: La Islas de Banana Member No.: 15,887 |
We played a lot of games with 1st Ed, 2nd Ed, and 3rd Ed. My group has just recently begun 4th Ed. They are all fun to me.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 06:29 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 609 Joined: 13-August 07 Member No.: 12,615 |
I began in 2nd, and was hooked. But now I only do 4th. I got rid of all my old product to make room on my bookshelves for old AD&D stuff. Kudos to the devs, whomever they were in those days. Outside of authors like Lovecraft, Tierney, et al, I've never seen such an intricate and convincing psuedo world populated with such interesting characters. The shadow chatter was also quite good, almost like a mini novel inside the sourcebooks.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 07:06 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Dragon Group: Members Posts: 4,328 Joined: 28-November 05 From: Zuerich Member No.: 8,014 |
I started with SR1, switched to SR2 and SR3 when they came out, delayed switching to SR4 for 2 years. Now playing with 4E rules, but stopped following the metaplot somewhere in the 50s/60s, with the exception of some stuff that was picked or retconned in (like the wireless matrix).
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 12:17 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,266 Joined: 3-June 06 From: UK Member No.: 8,638 |
I first played SR2, but the gaming group split up, so never got past the first half dozen sessions.
About 3 years ago I moved in with one of my old gaming group, and we began playing SR3 for a year or so. When I moved out I had to buy my own books (now thoroughly hooked on the background), rather than pinching my old flat mate's books. SR4 had just come out, so I naturally picked it up, and now I'm running a game and have dragged 2 or 3 new players into the SR fold. |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 01:09 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,066 Joined: 5-February 03 Member No.: 4,017 |
I prefer SR3 because of the dice system (and it refined away most of the really messy parts of 1 and 2). The SR4 dice system is too close to a cleanly predictable success rate for my taste.
This does make me wonder if I'd enjoy a system where dice count, dice sizes, TNs, and threshold are all variable. |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 01:17 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,453 Joined: 17-September 04 From: St. Paul Member No.: 6,675 |
I love the world, love/hate 3rd and 4th eds. Both are good for some things and hard to use for others. i am playing 4th, but 3rd holds a special place in my heart. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/love.gif)
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 03:12 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,706 Joined: 30-June 06 From: Fort Wayne, IN Member No.: 8,814 |
SR4 here. I played SR1 a ton, although we never liked the magic system, so we never used it. A friends got SR2, but my group of friends were playing DnD more, so never gave it a spin. I kinda lost any SR roots after high school and college and really just got back into it a couple years ago. At that time we had SR4, so I ran a campaign for close to 2 years.
Now that DnD4 is out, the group is shifting back to that. In my two favorite RPGs, I must say, I never played much of either's third edition...interesting. |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 04:58 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 210 Joined: 15-May 06 Member No.: 8,562 |
Started with 2nd edition, which is the version I really cut my Shadowrun teeth with. Still have all my books from 2nd ed.. Got into a little 3rd edition but not as much.. I like 4th edition.. I think it cleans things up quite a bit and streamlines things that were very difficult to play in older versions.. Shadowrun is still one of the best settings out there and that is really what keeps me coming back.. I would love to play SR4 right now but that doesn't look like it is gonna happen unless it is play by post.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 07:00 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 75 Joined: 20-April 02 Member No.: 2,622 |
Still reluctant to play SR4 seriously as we have a really workable houseruled sr3 system going even tho I keep buying the books like a good little consumer (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
|
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 07:11 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Genuine Artificial Intelligence Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 |
My favorite version is SR3. However my group's favorite is SR4, and thus I play SR4.
I do not mean this to bash SR4. I like SR4 very much. Personally, I like SR3 slightly more, but I like things that are very complicated. |
|
|
Jun 19 2008, 07:28 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 79 Joined: 19-June 08 From: St. Louie Member No.: 16,065 |
I play sr4 but I have most of the core books for sr1 and was playing it up into last year or so.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th January 2025 - 03:37 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.