![]() ![]() |
Jun 22 2008, 03:49 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
I do have a few questions about it. When Jin succeeded in her Perception test to see the Kitsune get shut down, does she automatically see the Hacker as well? In this case, no. In general, I believe, not necessarily. Each hit on the Matrix Perception Test gives one piece of information for which you're looking, and "is there an extra icon in this node" is a valid bit of information to seek, to me at least. Jin spots the hacker because he tries to shut down the Juhseung Saja; that was explicit at one point, but either I took it out or it was edited out (if it was me, sorry). QUOTE Since the hacker was running the Stealth program, how does that affect the threshold for Jin's Perception test? If Jin wanted information about the hacker, it would act as the opposition in an Opposed Test, per page 217 in your hymnal. QUOTE Would it be possible to see the Kitsune get shut down and not see the Hacker? When she turns on the Active Alert, does she specify the Hacker as the intruder? If she hadn't seen the Hacker, could she still trigger an Active Alert, without having seen a target? This was my intent in the example, to show that you don't need a specific target to activate an alert. That's why the node doesn't get a +4 bonus when opposing the attempt to unload the IC, the alert wasn't called specifically against the hacker's icon. This one was definitely my fault -- I should have made that more clear, sorry. QUOTE Also, could the Hacker, having admin privleges, have activated an Alert against Jin? Would the activated IC then attack Jin? Muhuhuhahahahahahaha! Er ... I mean yes, that's a clever tactic. Although, nothing says "somebody's in my node" like having it initiate an alert against you. On the other hand, IC could be programmed with a whitelist of icons not to attack. I suppose it's possible for a node to be also given a whitelist, but then an attacker could simply add himself to that list ... and so on. QUOTE thanks and great work by the way! Thanks! I hope it's useful. |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 03:56 PM
Post
#27
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,314 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado Member No.: 185 |
well, there was a option to tweak the decryption times. apply that and be happy i guess (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Unwired contains numerous advanced encryption options as well as guidelines for "dramatic encryption." The Andrews Algorhythm (aka the "Heinrich Maneuver") is meant to provide some context (for those that require it) for the rebalancing of the cryptography armsrace in favor of the decrypter. Note that there numerous other data protection methods available (from IC to access logs to other tricks) that complement encryption as a defense, and the introduction of the Heinrich Maneuver did not change any of that. And, no we have no intention of breaking out full-blown quantum encryption in SR quite yet. |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 04:01 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
CosaNostra Deliverator ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 346 Joined: 29-January 05 From: Philadelphia, PA Member No.: 7,034 |
Thanks! I hope it's useful. Thanks! Your answers were very helpful. I do have one more question about this example. The hacker was able deactivate the Kitsune without a roll. Why did he need to roll to try to unload the Juhseung Saja? Is it because the system is on alert, even though the alert wasn't directed against the hacker? |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 04:14 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 9-December 06 From: the Maaatlock-Expressway! Member No.: 10,326 |
re: Encryption: while I didn't find the encryption rules in the BBB "t3h borken" per se, they did generally tend to make it a rather minor challenge, forcing a GM to handwave plot relevant instances more than even I think he should need to.
That said, the new advanced encryption rules, while not completely overhauling the system, look gorgeous! I have no idea how they relate to any form of real en-/decryption technology, and I don't really care. They provide a set of very pretty options and frameworks for working encryption into a plot in a meaningful way and that is always a good thing! /fanboi (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 04:23 PM
Post
#30
|
|
|
CosaNostra Deliverator ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 346 Joined: 29-January 05 From: Philadelphia, PA Member No.: 7,034 |
I think I got this from Dumpshock but I have always just used increasing Intervals on my Encryption tests.
For example: Roll #1 - 1 combat turn Roll #2 - 1 minute Roll #3 - 1 hour Roll #4 - 1 day Roll #5 - 1 month Roll #6 - 1 year It keeps low grade encryrption easy to break but can make high grade stuff take a long time. |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 04:40 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
And, no we have no intention of breaking out full-blown quantum encryption in SR quite yet. Well, not to mention that it's not nearly as cool as people once thought it was. |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 04:45 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,148 Joined: 27-February 06 From: UCAS Member No.: 8,314 |
The hacker was able deactivate the Kitsune without a roll. Why did he need to roll to try to unload the Juhseung Saja? Is it because the system is on alert, even though the alert wasn't directed against the hacker? That was my intent. QUOTE Roll #1 - 1 combat turn Roll #2 - 1 minute Roll #3 - 1 hour Roll #4 - 1 day Roll #5 - 1 month Roll #6 - 1 year I like it. I wish I'd thought of it, although it probably wouldn't have made it into my work; there seems to be a deliberate aversion to exponents and logarithms in Shadowrun development, at least as I perceive it. |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 05:55 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
There now is quite a number of Programs of every kind out there in total - and to perform certain tests, you need them.
Unfortunately, they either degrade each (second for common use) month in the case of cracked/self written/free Programs (taking at least a week per program to patch them) - or lower the Data Search Threshold against you per Program in the case of legal Programs. Technically, if strictly enforced, it makes it suicidal to run legit software and futile to use self written software, leaving hackers with only the option to regularily buy cracked software or cracked patches. Oh, and of course, the Skillwire Expert System is basically useless - the DIMAP option does the same, in software. |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2008, 06:56 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Technomancer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
I know I personally based the structure of the Simsense chapter in Unwired after the structure I'd used for the Astral Space and the Metaplanes chapter of Street Magic. So you should see similarities there as far as how much fluff there is and how the ideas are presented with a mix of background and mechanics. You did a very good job. The similarity was obvious (in a good way). Also, props to whom ever decided that having a picture of a hacker getting analyzed on page 61 and that same hacker getting alerted to the analysis on page 67. That was a very cool moment. |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 01:09 AM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,336 Joined: 24-February 08 From: Albuquerque, New Mexico Member No.: 15,706 |
I'm more than willing to answer any questions about Programmable ASIST Biofeedback. It should actually be much simpler, mechanically, than its third edition incarnation. In 4E, the reprogramming test is a straight-up Extended Test with a table of Threshold modifiers. In 3E, this was the mechanic for reprogramming: I have gone over it again, and now only have one remaining question. To reprogram, you must make a Psychology + PAB Unit Rating extended test. Is Psychology a knowledge skill? Specialization of Medicine? A new active skill? A knowledge skill makes the most sense to me, but from what I have read, it is unclear. |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 01:55 AM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 263 Joined: 18-October 03 From: Cal Free State Member No.: 5,734 |
Is Psychology a knowledge skill? Specialization of Medicine? A new active skill? Psychology is a specialization of the skill Knowledge: Tom Cruise. Sorry, couldn't help myself. Psychology should probably be a knowledge skill, while Psychiatry would be a specialization of Medicine. |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 03:14 AM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,078 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 67 |
Psychology would be a Knowledge skill, yah.
|
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 05:43 AM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 2-June 08 Member No.: 16,028 |
There now is quite a number of Programs of every kind out there in total - and to perform certain tests, you need them. Unfortunately, they either degrade each (second for common use) month in the case of cracked/self written/free Programs (taking at least a week per program to patch them) - or lower the Data Search Threshold against you per Program in the case of legal Programs. Technically, if strictly enforced, it makes it suicidal to run legit software and futile to use self written software, leaving hackers with only the option to regularily buy cracked software or cracked patches. Don't forget that the "Registration" Program option means that the item of software doesn't degrade. I suspect most hackers will have Registered Common-Use programs and use patches on their illegal programs. Cheers CC |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 06:15 AM
Post
#39
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 |
Does anything stop someone from just buying an R4 agent and suddenly being a pretty good hacker yet?
|
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 08:18 AM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 |
Don't forget that the "Registration" Program option means that the item of software doesn't degrade. I suspect most hackers will have Registered Common-Use programs and use patches on their illegal programs. Actually, that would be the 'suicidal' part. Hackers can only safely work with non-registered software. |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 08:29 AM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,314 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado Member No.: 185 |
Does anything stop someone from just buying an R4 agent and suddenly being a pretty good hacker yet? Nope, there is no such restriction in Unwired, though the Agent Competency sidebar addresses the advantages and limitations of agent software compared to hackers and technomancers. |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 10:48 AM
Post
#42
|
|
|
Awakened Asset ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
A "pretty good hacker" has more than 8 dice and an edge of 0.
|
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 12:31 PM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,650 Joined: 21-July 07 Member No.: 12,328 |
Sure, that is why a R4 agent has a DP of 10 because of the R6 programs (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) That compares favorably with the characters in the main book if I remember correctly
|
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 12:52 PM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 80 Joined: 14-September 05 Member No.: 7,739 |
Just curious, any description or coverage of security rigging in the book?
With a sweep of his... Hat |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 01:13 PM
Post
#45
|
|
|
Technomancer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 01:20 PM
Post
#46
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 18-January 06 From: Leesburg, Virginia, USA Member No.: 8,177 |
Sure, that is why a R4 agent has a DP of 10 because of the R6 programs (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) That compares favorably with the characters in the main book if I remember correctly And presumably, after chargen you can upgrade your comlink to response 6, and buy an Agent 6. (Autosofts are limited to 4, but after repeatedly looking at the BBB I can not see anywhere that Agents or Pilots are limited to 4 other than availability.) At which point you up your 9 dice starting agent to 12? A 12 die pool is more than sufficient for a lot of tasks. Joel |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 01:27 PM
Post
#47
|
|
|
Technomancer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admins Posts: 4,638 Joined: 2-October 02 From: Champaign, IL Member No.: 3,374 |
I finally realized where the names of the characters in the intro to one of the chapters came from ... Aaron: I saw what you did there (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Also .... Poor Puck; he always gets himself in over his head. 'Course, he does always seem to come out of it again......... |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 01:29 PM
Post
#48
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,629 Joined: 14-December 06 Member No.: 10,361 |
A "pretty good hacker" has more than 8 dice and an edge of 0. How about 5 Agents all with 8 dice? Speaking of, does Unwired give hackastacking/mr. Smithing/ZERG RUSHing it's much needed nerfing, so that we have some reason to say no other than "i'm the GM and I don't like that". |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 01:31 PM
Post
#49
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,358 Joined: 2-December 07 From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Member No.: 14,465 |
You want a spoiler? Do you? DO YOU REALLY?
Jack. B. Nimble. |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2008, 02:58 PM
Post
#50
|
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 |
Speaking of, does Unwired give hackastacking/mr. Smithing/ZERG RUSHing it's much needed nerfing, so that we have some reason to say no other than "i'm the GM and I don't like that". not so much a nerfing as a set of rules to work it into the rules. from what i understand, each agent now have a accessid of its own, that cant be changed while its running. and multiple agents with the same accessid cant enter a node at the same time. the hacker can still sit down and craft a collection of agents with different accessids, but this will take time. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st August 2026 - 06:05 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.